Network Working Group P. Nesser II
Request for Comments: 2626 Nesser & Nesser Consulting
Category: Informational June 1999
Network Working Group P. Nesser II
Request for Comments: 2626 Nesser & Nesser Consulting
Category: Informational June 1999
The Internet and the Millennium Problem (Year 2000)
互联网与千年问题（2000年）
Status of this Memo
本备忘录的状况
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
本备忘录为互联网社区提供信息。它没有规定任何类型的互联网标准。本备忘录的分发不受限制。
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
版权所有（C）互联网协会（1999年）。版权所有。
Abstract
摘要
The Year 2000 Working Group (WG) has conducted an investigation into the millennium problem as it regards Internet related protocols. This investigation only targeted the protocols as documented in the Request For Comments Series (RFCs). This investigation discovered little reason for concern with regards to the functionality of the protocols. A few minor cases of older implementations still using two digit years (ala RFC 850) were discovered, but almost all Internet protocols were given a clean bill of health. Several cases of "period" problems were discovered, where a time field would "roll over" as the size of field was reached. In particular, there are several protocols, which have 32 bit, signed integer representations of the number of seconds since January 1, 1970 which will turn negative at Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 GMT 2038. Areas whose protocols will be effected by such problems have been notified so that new revisions will remove this limitation.
2000年工作组就与互联网有关的协议方面的千年问题进行了调查。本次调查仅针对征求意见系列（RFCs）中记录的协议。这项调查发现，几乎没有理由担心协议的功能。发现了一些仍然使用两位数年份（ala RFC 850）的较旧实现的小案例，但几乎所有互联网协议都得到了干净的健康证明。发现了几个“周期”问题的案例，当达到场的大小时，时间场会“滚动”。特别是，有几种协议，它们具有自1970年1月1日起秒数的32位有符号整数表示，将在1月19日星期二03:14:07 GMT 2038变为负数。已通知其协议将受到此类问题影响的区域，以便新的修订版将消除此限制。
According to the trade press billions of dollars will be spend the upcoming years on the year 2000 problem, also called the millennium problem (though the third millennium will really start in 2001). This problem consists of the fact that many software packages and some protocols use a two-digit field for the year in a date field. Most of the problems seem to be in administrative and financial programs, or in the hardcoded microcomputers found in electronic equipment. A lot of organizations are now starting to make an inventory of which software and tools they use will suffer from the millennium problem.
据贸易媒体报道，未来几年将有数十亿美元用于2000年问题，也被称为千年问题（尽管第三个千年将于2001年开始）。这个问题由以下事实组成：许多软件包和一些协议在日期字段中使用两位数字段表示年份。大多数问题似乎都存在于行政和财务计划中，或者存在于电子设备中的硬编码微型计算机中。许多组织现在开始清点他们使用的软件和工具将受到千年问题的影响。
With the increasing popularity of the Internet, more and more organizations use the Internet as a serious business tool. This means that most organizations will want to analyze the millennium problems due to the use of Internet protocols and popular Internet software. In the trade press the first articles suggest that the Internet will collapse at midnight the 31st of December 1999.
随着互联网的日益普及，越来越多的组织将互联网作为一种重要的商业工具。这意味着大多数组织都希望分析由于使用互联网协议和流行的互联网软件而产生的千年问题。在商业报纸上，第一篇文章暗示互联网将在1999年12月31日午夜崩溃。
To counter these suggestions, and to avoid having countless companies redo the same investigation, this effort was undertaken by the IETF. The Year 2000 WG has made an inventory of all-important Internet protocols that have been documented in the Request for Comments (RFC) series. Only protocols directly related to the Internet will be considered.
为了反驳这些建议，避免无数公司重做同样的调查，IETF进行了这项工作。2000年工作组对所有重要的互联网协议进行了盘点，这些协议已记录在征求意见（RFC）系列中。只考虑与互联网直接相关的协议。
This document is divided into a number of sections. Section 1 is the Introduction which you are now reading. Section 2 is a disclaimer about the completeness of this effort. Section 3 describes areas in which millenium problems have been found, while Section 4 describes a few other "period" problems. Section 5 describes potential fixes to problems that have been identified. Section 6 describes the methodology used in the investigation. Sections 7 through 22 are devoted to the 15 different groupings of protocols and RFCs. Section 23 discusses security considerations, Section 24 is devoted to references, and Section 25 is the author contact information. Appendix A is the list of RFCs examined broken down by category. Appendix B is a PERL program used to make a first cut identification of problems, and Appendix C is the output of that PERL program.
本文件分为若干节。第一节是你现在正在阅读的导言。第2节是关于这项工作完整性的免责声明。第3节描述了发现千禧年问题的领域，而第4节描述了一些其他“时期”问题。第5节描述了已识别问题的潜在修复方法。第6节描述了调查中使用的方法。第7节至第22节专门讨论15种不同的协议和RFC分组。第23节讨论安全注意事项，第24节专门讨论参考资料，第25节是作者联系信息。附录A是按类别细分的RFC清单。附录B是一个PERL程序，用于对问题进行初步识别，附录C是该PERL程序的输出。
The editor of this document would like to acknowledge the critical contributions of the follow for direct performance of research and the provision of text: Alex Latzko, Robert Elz, Erik Huizer, Gillian Greenwood, Barbara Jennings, R.E. (Robert) Moore, David Mills, Lynn Kubinec, Michael Patton, Chris Newman, Erik-Jan Bos, Paul Hoffman, and Rick H. Wesson. The pace with which this group has operated has only been achievable by the intimate familiarity of the contributors with the protocols and ready access to the collective knowledge of the IETF.
本文件的编辑要感谢以下人员对直接执行研究和提供文本的重要贡献：Alex Latzko、Robert Elz、Erik Huizer、Gillian Greenwood、Barbara Jennings、R.E.（Robert）Moore、David Mills、Lynn Kubinec、Michael Patton、Chris Newman、Erik Jan Bos、Paul Hoffman、，还有里克·H·维森。该小组的运作速度只有在参与者对协议非常熟悉并随时了解IETF集体知识的情况下才能实现。
This RFC is not complete. It is an effort to analyze the Y2K impact on hundreds of protocols but is likely to have missed some protocols and misunderstood others. Organizations should not attempt to claim any legitimacy or approval for any particular protocol based on this document. The efforts have concentrated on the identification of potential problems, rather than solutions to any of the problems that have been identified. Any proposed solutions are only that: proposed. A formal engineering review should take place before any solution is
此RFC不完整。这是一项旨在分析Y2K对数百个协议的影响的工作，但可能遗漏了一些协议，并误解了其他协议。组织不应试图根据本文件要求任何特定协议的合法性或批准。这些努力集中于确定潜在问题，而不是解决已确定的任何问题。任何提议的解决方案都只是：提议的。在制定任何解决方案之前，应进行正式的工程审查
adopted.
采用
It should also be noted that the research was performd on RFCs 1 through 2128. At that time the IESG was charted with not allowing any new RFCs to be published that had any Year 2000 issues. Since that cutoff time there has been work to correct issues discovered by this Working Group. In particular, RWhois as documented by RFC 1714 has been updated to fix the problems found. RFC 2167 now documents a fixed version of the RWhois protocol. The work of this group was to look backwards, and hence new RFC's which supplant the old are expected to make the information in this RFC obsolete. The work of this group will truly be complete when this document is completely obsolete.
还应注意的是，该研究是在RFCs 1至2128上进行的。当时，IESG被规划为不允许出版任何有任何2000年问题的新RFC。自该截止时间以来，一直在努力纠正该工作组发现的问题。特别是，RFC 1714记录的RWhois已更新，以修复发现的问题。RFC2167现在记录了RWhois协议的固定版本。该小组的工作是回顾过去，因此，取代旧RFC的新RFC有望使RFC中的信息过时。当本文件完全过时时，该小组的工作将真正完成。
A number of people have suggested looking into other "special" dates. For example, the first leap year, the first "double digit" day (January 10, 2000), January 1, 2001, etc. There is not one place where days have been used in the protocols defined by the RFC series so there is little reason to believe that any of these special dates will have any impact.
许多人建议研究其他“特殊”日期。例如，第一个闰年、第一个“两位数”日（2000年1月10日）、2001年1月1日等。RFC系列定义的协议中没有一个地方使用了天数，因此几乎没有理由相信这些特殊日期会产生任何影响。
Here is a brief description of all the Millennium issues discovered in the course of this research. Note that many of the RFCs are unclear on the issue. They mandate the use of UTCTime but do not specify whether the two-digit or four-digit year representation should be used.
以下是在本研究过程中发现的所有千年问题的简要说明。请注意，许多RFC对此问题并不清楚。它们强制使用UTCTime，但没有规定应使用两位数还是四位数的年份表示法。
rfc1274.txt - References UTC date/time
rfc1276.txt - References UTC date/time for version control.
rfc1488.txt - References UTC Time as printable strings.
rfc1608.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1609.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1778.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1274.txt - References UTC date/time
rfc1276.txt - References UTC date/time for version control.
rfc1488.txt - References UTC Time as printable strings.
rfc1608.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1609.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1778.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
HTTP 1.1, as defined in RFC 2068, requires all newly generated date stamps to conform to RFC 1123 date formats which are Year 2000 compliant, but it also requires acceptance of the older non-compliant RFC850 formats. Some specific recommendations have been passed to the HTTP WG.
RFC 2068中定义的HTTP 1.1要求所有新生成的日期戳符合RFC 1123日期格式，该格式符合2000年标准，但也要求接受旧的不符合RFC850格式。一些具体建议已提交给HTTP工作组。
HTML 2.0, as defined in RFC 1866, could allow a very subtle Year 2000 problem, but once again this recommendation has been passed on the HTML WG.
RFC1866中定义的HTML2.0可能会导致一个非常微妙的2000年问题，但这一建议再次在HTMLWG上得到了传递。
RFC 1778 on String Representations of Standard Attribute Syntax's define UTC Time in Section 2.21 and uses that definition in Section 2.25 on User Certificates. Since UTC Time is being used, there is a potential millennium issue.
RFC 1778标准属性语法的字符串表示在第2.21节中定义UTC时间，并在用户证书的第2.25节中使用该定义。由于使用UTC时间，因此存在潜在的千年问题。
RFC 1440 on SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer defines an optional DATE command in Section 5 of the form mm/dd/yy which is subject to millennium issues.
SIFT/UFT上的RFC 1440:Sender Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer在mm/dd/yy表格的第5节中定义了一个可选的日期命令，该命令受millennium问题的约束。
After reviewing all mail-related RFCs, it was discovered that while some obsolete standards required two-digit years, all currently used standards require four-digit years and are thus not prone to typical Year 2000 problems.
在审查所有与邮件相关的RFC后，发现虽然一些过时的标准需要两位数的年份，但所有当前使用的标准都需要四位数的年份，因此不容易出现典型的2000年问题。
RFCs 821 and 822, the main basis for SMTP mail exchange and message format, originally required two-digit years. However, both of these RFCs were later modified by RFC 1123 in 1989, which strongly recommended 4-digit years.
RFCs 821和822是SMTP邮件交换和邮件格式的主要基础，最初需要两位数的年份。然而，1989年RFC1123对这两个RFC进行了修改，强烈建议采用4位数年份。
While not a protocol issue, there is a common habit of writing serial numbers for DNS zone files in the form YYXXXXXX. The only real requirement on the serial numbers is that they be increasing (see RFC 1982 for a complete description) and a change from 99XXXXXX to 00XXXXXX cause a failure. See the section on "Name Serving" for a complete description of the issues.
虽然不是协议问题，但有一种常见的习惯，即以YYXXXXXX的形式为DNS区域文件写入序列号。对序列号的唯一实际要求是增加序列号（完整说明见RFC 1982），并且从99XXXXXX更改为00XXXXXX会导致故障。有关这些问题的完整说明，请参见“姓名服务”一节。
Version 2 of SNMP's MIB definition language (SMIv2) specifies the use of UCTTimes for time stamping MIB modules. Even though these time stamps do not flow in any network protocols, there could be as issue with management applications, depending on implementations.
SNMP的MIB定义语言（SMIv2）的第2版规定了时间戳MIB模块的使用时间。即使这些时间戳不在任何网络协议中流动，管理应用程序也可能存在同样的问题，具体取决于实现。
There does exist a problem in both NNTP, RFC 977, and the Usenet News Message Format, RFC 10336. They both specify two-digit year format. A working group has been formed to update the network news protocols in general, and addressing this problem is on their list of work items.
NNTP、RFC 977和Usenet新闻消息格式RFC 10336都存在问题。它们都指定了两位数的年份格式。已经成立了一个工作组来更新网络新闻协议，解决这一问题已列入他们的工作项目清单。
A Year 2000 problem does occur in the Simple Network Paging Protocol, versions 2 & 3. Both define a HOLDuntil option which uses a YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT field. Version 3 also defines a MSTAtus command, which is required to store,dates and times as YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT.
简单网络分页协议版本2和版本3中确实存在2000年问题。两者都定义了使用YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT字段的HOLDINTIL选项。版本3还定义了一个MSTAtus命令，该命令用于将日期和时间存储为YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT。
There is a small Year 2000 issue in RFC 1786 on the Representation of IP Routing Policies in the ripe-81++ Routing Registry. In Appendices C the "changed" object parameter defines a format of <email-address> YYMMDD, and similarly in Appendix D "withdrawn" object identifier has he format of YYMMDD. Since these are only identifiers there should be little operational impact. Some application software may need to be modified.
RFC1786中有一个关于RIME-81++路由注册表中IP路由策略表示的2000年小问题。在附录C中，“更改”对象参数定义了<email address>YYMMDD的格式，同样在附录D中，“撤回”对象标识符的格式为YYMMDD。因为这些只是标识符，所以对操作的影响应该很小。某些应用软件可能需要修改。
RFC 1507 on Distributed Authentication Security Services (DASS) use UTCTime. Because of the imprecision of the UTC time definition there could be problems with this protocol.
分布式身份验证安全服务（DAS）上的RFC1507使用UTCTime。由于UTC时间定义的不精确性，此协议可能存在问题。
RFCs 1421-1424 specifies that PEM uses UTC time formats which could have a Millennium issue.
RFCs 1421-1424规定PEM使用UTC时间格式，该格式可能存在千年问题。
By far, the largest area of "period" problems occurs in the year 2038. Many protocols use a 32-bit field to record the number of seconds since January 1, 1970.
到目前为止，最大的“周期”问题发生在2038年。许多协议使用32位字段记录自1970年1月1日以来的秒数。
DNS Security uses 32-bit timestamps which will roll over in 2038. This issue has been refered to the appropriate Working Group so that the details of rollover can be established.
DNS安全性使用32位时间戳，该时间戳将在2038年滚动。该问题已提交给适当的工作组，以便确定展期的细节。
IDPR suffers from the classic Year 2038 problem, by having a timestamp counter which rolls over at that time.
IDPR遇到了典型的2038年问题，因为当时有一个时间戳计数器。
The real solution to the problem is to use 4 digit year fields for applications and hardware systems. For counters that key off of a certain time (January 1, 1970 for example) need to either: define a wrapping solution, or to define a larger number space (greater than 32-bits), or to make more efficient use of the 32-bit space. However,
该问题的真正解决方案是为应用程序和硬件系统使用4位年份字段。对于在特定时间（例如1970年1月1日）关闭的计数器，需要：定义包装解决方案，或定义更大的数字空间（大于32位），或更有效地使用32位空间。然而
it will be impossible to completely replace currently deployed systems, so solutions for handling problems are in order.
完全替换当前部署的系统是不可能的，因此处理问题的解决方案是有序的。
A number of organizations and groups have suggested a fixed solution to the problem of two digit years. Given a two-digit year YY, if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year shall be interpreted as 19YY; and where YY is less than 50, the year shall be intrepreted as 20YY.
一些组织和团体已经提出了两位数年份问题的固定解决方案。给定两位数的年份YY，如果YY大于或等于50，则该年份应解释为19YY；如果YY小于50，则年份应为20YY。
While a simple and straightforward solution, it only pushes the problem off 40 to 50 years, until the artificially generated Year 2050 problem needs to be addressed. However, it is easy to implement and deploy, so it might be the most commonly adopted solution.
虽然这是一个简单而直接的解决方案，但它只会将问题推迟40到50年，直到人为产生的2050年问题需要解决为止。但是，它易于实现和部署，因此它可能是最常用的解决方案。
Another solution is the "sliding window" approach. In this approach, some value N is selected, and any two digit year that is less than or equal to the current two digit year plus N is considered the future, while any other two digit year is considered in the past.
另一个解决方案是“滑动窗口”方法。在这种方法中，选择一些值N，小于或等于当前两位数年份加N的任何两位数年份被视为未来，而任何其他两位数年份被视为过去。
For example, choosing N equal to 10, If the current year is 2012, and I get a two digit year that is any of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22, assume it is 20YY (i.e. the future), otherwise consider it to be in the past(1923-1999, 2000-2011).
例如，选择n等于10，如果当前年是2012，而我得到的是12, 13, 14、15, 16, 17、18, 19, 20、21或22的两位数年，假设它是20yy（即未来），否则认为它是过去的（1923-1999，2000年-2011年）。
This solution has two advantages. First, no new fixed year problems are introduced. Second, different applications and protocols could choose different values of N. The drawback is that this solution is harder to implement, and to work well the value of N will need to be constant across different implementations.
这种解决方案有两个优点。首先，没有引入新的固定年份问题。第二，不同的应用程序和协议可能会选择不同的N值。缺点是此解决方案更难实现，要想正常工作，N值需要在不同的实现中保持不变。
The first task was dividing the types of RFC's into logical groups rather than the strict numeric publishing order. Sixteen specific areas were identified. They are: "Autoconfiguration" , "Directory Services", "Disk Sharing", "Games and Chat" ,"Information Services & File Transfer", "Network & Transport Layer", "Electronic Mail", "NTP", Name Serving", "Network Management", "News", "Real Time Services", "Routing", "Security", "Virtual Terminal", and "Other". In addition to these categories, many hundreds of RFC's were immediately eliminated based on content. That is not to say that all Informational RFC's were not considered, many did contain some technical content or overview whichdemanded scrutiny.
第一个任务是将RFC的类型划分为逻辑组，而不是严格的数字发布顺序。确定了16个具体领域。它们是：“自动配置”、“目录服务”、“磁盘共享”、“游戏和聊天”、“信息服务和文件传输”、“网络和传输层”、“电子邮件”、“NTP”、“名称服务”、“网络管理”、“新闻”、“实时服务”、“路由”、“安全”、“虚拟终端”和“其他”“。除这些类别外，基于内容的数百个RFC立即被淘汰。这并不是说所有的信息RFC都没有被考虑，许多RFC确实包含了一些需要仔细审查的技术内容或概述。
Each area was assigned to a team for investigation. Although each team used whatever additional investigation techniques which seemed appropriate (including completely reading each RFC, and in some cases the source code for the reference implementation) at minimum each team used an automatic scanning system to search for the following items (case insensitively) in each RFC:
每个区域都分配给一个小组进行调查。尽管每个团队使用了任何看起来合适的额外调查技术（包括完全阅读每个RFC，在某些情况下还包括参考实施的源代码），但至少每个团队使用了自动扫描系统来搜索每个RFC中的以下项目（不敏感的情况）：
- date - GMT - UTCTime - year - yy (that is not part of yyyy) - two-digit, 2-digit, 2digit - century - 1900 & 2000
- 日期-GMT-UTCTime-year-yy（这不是yyyy的一部分）-两位数、两位数、两位数-世纪-1900和2000
Note that all of these strings except "UTCTime" may occur in conjunction with a date format that accommodates the Year 2000 crossing, as well as with one that does not. So "hits" on these string do not necessarily indicate Year 2000 problems: they simply identify elements that need to be examined.
请注意，除“UTCTime”之外的所有这些字符串都可能与适应2000年交叉的日期格式一起出现，也可能与不适应2000年交叉的日期格式一起出现。因此，这些字符串上的“点击”并不一定表示2000年问题：它们只是确定需要检查的元素。
After the documents were scanned, therefore, each "hit" was examined individually. Those that cause no Year 2000 problems (e.g., those that encode the year as a two-byte integer, or as a four-character display string) are not discussed here. Those that do cause Year 2000 problems are identified in this document, and the nature and impact of the problems they cause are described.
因此，在扫描文件之后，每个“命中”都会被单独检查。这里不讨论不会导致2000年问题的问题（例如，将年份编码为两字节整数或四字符显示字符串的问题）。本文件确定了导致2000年问题的问题，并描述了这些问题的性质和影响。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were primarily the BOOT Protocol (BOOTP) and the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) for both IP version four and six.
分为这一组的RFC主要是IP版本4和6的引导协议（BOOTP）和动态主机配置协议（DHCP）。
Examination of the BOOTP protocols and most popular implementations show no year 2000 problems. All times are references as 32 bit integers in seconds of UTC time. An investigation of all DHCP and the IPv6 Autoconfiguration mechanisms produced no year 2000 problems. All references to time, in particular lease lengths, are 32 bit integers in seconds, allowing lease times of well over 100 years.
对BOOTP协议和最流行的实现的检查表明，2000年没有问题。所有时间都是以UTC时间秒为单位的32位整数的引用。对所有DHCP和IPv6自动配置机制的调查没有产生任何2000年问题。所有对时间的引用，特别是租约长度，都是以秒为单位的32位整数，允许租约时间超过100年。
The following RFCs were examined for possible millennium problems: 906, 951, 1048, 1084, 1395, 1497, 1531, 1532, 1533, 1534, 1541, 1542, 1970, & 1971. RFC 951's only reference to time or dates is a two-byte field in the packet, which is number of second since the hosts, was booted. RFC's 1048, 1084, 1395, 1497, 1531, & 1532 have either no references to dates and time, or they are the same as the RFCs, which obsoleted them, discussed in the next paragraph.
对以下RFC进行了可能的千年问题检查：906、951、1048、1084、1395、1497、1531、1532、1533、1534、1541、1542、1970和1971。RFC951对时间或日期的唯一引用是数据包中的一个两字节字段，这是自主机启动以来的秒数。RFC的1048、1084、1395、1497、1531和1532要么没有提及日期和时间，要么与下一段中讨论的淘汰它们的RFC相同。
RFC 1533 enumerates all the known DHCP field types and a number of these have to do with time. Section 3.4 defines a "Time Offset" field which specifies the offset of the clients subnet in seconds from UTC. This 4 byte field has no millennium issues. Section 9.2 defines the IP Address Lease Time field which is used by clients to request a specific lease time. This four byte field is an unsigned integer containing a number of seconds. Section 9.9 defines a Renewal Time Value field, Section 9.10 defines a Rebinding Time Value, both of which are similarly 32 bit fields, which have no millennium issues.
RFC1533列举了所有已知的DHCP字段类型，其中许多与时间有关。第3.4节定义了一个“时间偏移”字段，该字段以秒为单位指定客户端子网距UTC的偏移量。此4字节字段没有千年问题。第9.2节定义了IP地址租用时间字段，客户端使用该字段请求特定的租用时间。此四字节字段是包含秒数的无符号整数。第9.9节定义了更新时间值字段，第9.10节定义了重新绑定时间值，两者都是类似的32位字段，没有任何问题。
RFC 1534 has no references to times or dates.
RFC 1534未提及时间或日期。
RFC 1541 has two mentions of times/dates. The first is the "secs" field which, similarly to RFC 951, is a 16-bit field for the number of seconds since the host has booted. There is also a discussion in section 3.3 about "Interpretation and Representation of Time Values" which while clearly states that there is no millennium or period problems.
RFC 1541两次提到时间/日期。第一个是“secs”字段，与RFC 951类似，它是一个16位字段，表示主机启动后的秒数。第3.3节还讨论了“时间值的解释和表示”，其中明确指出不存在千年或周期问题。
RFC 1542 also references the "secs" field mentioned previously.
RFC 1542还引用了前面提到的“secs”字段。
RFC 1970 mentions a number of variables, which are time related. In section 4.2 "Router Advertisement Message Format" the following fields are defined: Router Lifetime, Reachable Time, & Retrans Timer. In section 4.6.2 "Prefix Information" the following are defined: Valid Lifetime, & Preferred Lifetime. In section 6.2.1 "Router Configuration Variables the following are defined: MaxRtrAdvInterval, MinRtrAdvInterval, AdvReachableTime, AdvRetransTimer, AdvDefaultLifetime, AdvValidLifetime, & AdvPreferredLifetime. All of these fields specify counters of some sort which have no millennium or periodicity problems.
RFC1970提到了许多与时间相关的变量。在第4.2节“路由器广告消息格式”中，定义了以下字段：路由器生存期、可达时间和重传计时器。在第4.6.2节“前缀信息”中定义了以下内容：有效寿命和首选寿命。在第6.2.1节“路由器配置变量”中，定义了以下变量：MaxRtrAdvInterval、MinRtrAdvInterval、AdvReachableTime、AdvRenstimer、AdvDefaultLifetime、AdvValidLifetime和AdvPreferredLifetime。所有这些字段都指定了某种计数器，这些计数器没有千年或周期性问题。
RFC 1971 has some discussion of preferred lifetimes, depreciated lifetimes and valid lifetimes of leases, but only discusses them in an expository way.
RFC 1971对租赁的优先使用年限、折旧使用年限和有效使用年限进行了一些讨论，但仅以解释性的方式进行了讨论。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were primarily X.500 related RFC's, Whois, Rwhois, Whois++, and the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
被归为这一组的RFC主要是X.500相关RFC、Whois、Rwhois、Whois++和轻量级目录访问协议（LDAP）。
Upon review of the Directory Services related RFC's, no serious year 2000 problems were discovered. Some minor issues were noted and explained below in the specific portion of this section.
在审查与目录服务相关的RFC后，未发现严重的2000年问题。以下在本节的具体部分对一些小问题进行了说明。
RFCs that mentioned UTC Time or made reference to uTCTimeSyntax could fail to be Y2K compliant. These should be updated to specify the four year version of uTCTimeSyntax rather than giving the option of using a two-year date representation. The following RFCs fall into this category:
提及UTC时间或提及uTCTimeSyntax的RFC可能不符合Y2K标准。应更新这些文件，以指定uTCTimeSyntax的四年版本，而不是提供使用两年日期表示的选项。以下RFC属于此类：
rfc1274.txt - References UTC date/time
rfc1276.txt - References UTC date/time for version control.
rfc1488.txt - References UTC Time as printable strings.
rfc1608.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1609.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1778.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1274.txt - References UTC date/time
rfc1276.txt - References UTC date/time for version control.
rfc1488.txt - References UTC Time as printable strings.
rfc1608.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1609.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
rfc1778.txt - Refers to uTCTimeSyntax
Two RFC's have unusual date specifications and specify their own date format. Both of these support Y2K compliant dates.
两个RFC具有不寻常的日期规格，并指定了自己的日期格式。这两个都支持Y2K兼容日期。
RFC1714 (RWhois) specifies date formats that are not Y2K compliant, but it also supports dates that are. Implementers of the RWhois protocol should only use the %MY4 format
RFC1714（RWhois）指定了不符合Y2K的日期格式，但它也支持符合Y2K的日期。RWhois协议的实现者应仅使用%MY4格式
RFC1834 (Whois++) requires the use of dates, but it didn't specify the format, syntax, or representation of the date string to be used.
RFC1834（Whois++）要求使用日期，但没有指定要使用的日期字符串的格式、语法或表示形式。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were those related to the Network File System (NFS). Other popular disk sharing protocols like SMB and AFS were referred to their respective trustee's for review.
归入此组的RFC是与网络文件系统（NFS）相关的RFC。其他流行的磁盘共享协议（如SMB和AFS）被提交给各自的受信任方进行审查。
After careful review, NFS has no year 2000 problems.
经过仔细审查，NFS没有2000年问题。
The references to time in this protocol are the times of file data modification, file access, and file metadata change (mtime, atime, and time, respectively). These times are kept as 32 bit unsigned quantities in seconds since 1970-01-01, and so the NFS protocol will not experience an Epoch event until the year 2106.
本协议中对时间的引用是文件数据修改、文件访问和文件元数据更改的时间（分别为mtime、atime和time）。自1970-01-01以来，这些时间保持为以秒为单位的32位无符号量，因此NFS协议在2106年之前不会经历历元事件。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were related to the Internet Relay Chat Protocol (IRC). No millennium problems exist in the IRC protocol.
属于这一组的RFC与Internet中继聊天协议（IRC）有关。IRC协议中不存在千年问题。
There is only a single instance of time or date related information in the IRC protocol as specified by RFC 1459. Section 4.3.4 defines a TIME message type which queries a server for its local time. No mention is made of the format of the reply or how it is parsed, the assumption being specific implementations will handle the reply and parse it appropriately.
按照RFC 1459的规定，IRC协议中只有一个时间或日期相关信息的实例。第4.3.4节定义了一种时间消息类型，用于查询服务器的本地时间。没有提到回复的格式或解析方式，假设特定的实现将处理回复并适当地解析它。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were divided among World Wide Web (WWW) protocols and File Transfer Protocols (FTP). WWW protocols include the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), a variety of Uniform Resource formats (URL, URAs, etc.) and the HyperText Markup Language(HTML). FTP protocols include the well known FTP protocol, the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) and a variety of extensions to these protocols. Other information services includes the Finger Protocol and the LPD protocol.
属于这一类的RFC分为万维网（WWW）协议和文件传输协议（FTP）。WWW协议包括超文本传输协议（HTTP）、各种统一资源格式（URL、URAs等）和超文本标记语言（HTML）。FTP协议包括众所周知的FTP协议、普通文件传输协议（TFTP）以及这些协议的各种扩展。其他信息服务包括Finger协议和LPD协议。
HTTP 1.1, as defined in RFC 2068, requires all newly generated date stamps to conform to RFC 1123 date formats which are Year 2000 compliant, but it also requires acceptance of the older non-compliant RFC850 formats. Some specific recommendations are listed below and have been passed to the HTTP WG.
RFC 2068中定义的HTTP 1.1要求所有新生成的日期戳符合RFC 1123日期格式，该格式符合2000年标准，但也要求接受旧的不符合RFC850格式。下面列出了一些具体建议，并已提交给HTTP工作组。
HTML 2.0, as defined in RFC 1866, could allow a very subtle Year 2000 problem, but once again this recommendation has been passed on the HTML WG.
RFC1866中定义的HTML2.0可能会导致一个非常微妙的2000年问题，但这一建议再次在HTMLWG上得到了传递。
RFC 1778 on String Representations of Standard Attribute Syntax's define UTC Time in Section 2.21 and uses that definition in Section 2.25 on User Certificates. Since UTC Time is being used, there is a potential millennium issue.
RFC 1778标准属性语法的字符串表示在第2.21节中定义UTC时间，并在用户证书的第2.25节中使用该定义。由于使用UTC时间，因此存在潜在的千年问题。
RFC 1440 on SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer defines an optional DATE command in Section 5 of the form mm/dd/yy which is subject to millennium issues.
SIFT/UFT上的RFC 1440:Sender Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer在mm/dd/yy表格的第5节中定义了一个可选的日期命令，该命令受millennium问题的约束。
The main IETF standards-track document on the HTTP protocol is RFC2068 on HTTP 1.1. It notes that historically three different date formats have been used, and that one of them uses a two-digit year field. In section 3.3.1 it requires HTTP 1.1 implementations to generate this RFC1123 format:
HTTP协议上的主要IETF标准跟踪文档是HTTP 1.1上的RFC2068。它指出，历史上使用过三种不同的日期格式，其中一种使用两位数的年份字段。在第3.3.1节中，需要HTTP 1.1实现来生成此RFC1123格式：
Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
instead of this RFC850 format:
代替此RFC850格式：
Sunday, 06-Nov-94 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 850, obsoleted by RFC 1036
Sunday, 06-Nov-94 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 850, obsoleted by RFC 1036
Unfortunately, many existing servers, serving on the order of one fifth of the current HTTP traffic, send dates in the ambiguous RFC850 format.
不幸的是，许多现有服务器，服务于当前HTTP流量的五分之一，以不明确的RFC850格式发送日期。
Section 19.3 of the RFC2068 says this:
RFC2068第19.3节规定：
o HTTP/1.1 clients and caches should assume that an RFC-850 date which appears to be more than 50 years in the future is in fact in the past (this helps solve the "year 2000" problem).
o HTTP/1.1客户端和缓存应假定RFC-850日期（看起来在未来超过50年）实际上已经过去（这有助于解决“2000年”问题）。
This avoids a "stale cache" problem, which would cause the user to see out-of-date data.
这避免了“过时缓存”问题，这将导致用户看到过期数据。
RFC 1986 documents experiments with a simple file transfer program over radio links using Enhanced Trivial FTP (ETFTP). There are a number of timers defined which are all in seconds and have no year 2000 issues.
RFC1986记录了使用增强的普通FTP（ETFTP）通过无线链路进行简单文件传输程序的实验。定义了许多计时器，它们都以秒为单位，没有2000年问题。
In RFC 1866, on HTML 2.0,the <META> tag allows the embedding of recommended values for some HTTP headers, including Expires. E.g.
在RFC1866中，在HTML2.0上，<META>标记允许嵌入一些HTTP头的建议值，包括Expires。例如。
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Expires"
CONTENT="Tue, 04 Dec 1993 21:29:02 GMT">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Expires"
CONTENT="Tue, 04 Dec 1993 21:29:02 GMT">
Servers should rewrite these dates into RFC1123 format if necessary.
如有必要，服务器应将这些日期改写为RFC1123格式。
RFC 1807 defines a format for bibliographic records and it specifies a DATE format, which requires 4 digit year fields.
RFC1807定义了书目记录的格式，并指定了日期格式，该格式需要4位年份字段。
RFC 1788 defines ICMP Domain Name messages. Section 3 defines a Domain Name Reply Packet, which contains a signed 32-bit integer. This timer is not Year 2000 reliant and is certainly large enough for it purposes.
RFC1788定义了ICMP域名消息。第3节定义了一个域名回复包，它包含一个有符号的32位整数。这个计时器不依赖于2000年，并且对于它的用途来说肯定足够大。
RFC 1784 on TFTP Timeout Intervals and Transfer Size Options uses a field for the number of seconds for the timeout. It is an ASCII value from 1 to 255 octets in length. There is no Y2K issue.
RFC 1784 on TFTP超时间隔和传输大小选项使用一个字段表示超时的秒数。它是长度为1到255个八位字节的ASCII值。没有Y2K问题。
RFC 1778 on String Representations of Standard Attribute Syntax's define UTC Time in Section 2.21 and uses that definition in Section 2.25 on User Certificates. Since UTC Time is being used, there is a potential millennium issue.
RFC 1778标准属性语法的字符串表示在第2.21节中定义UTC时间，并在用户证书的第2.25节中使用该定义。由于使用UTC时间，因此存在潜在的千年问题。
RFC 1777 on LDAP defines a timelimit in Section 4.3 which is expressed in seconds, but does not define any limits.
LDAP上的RFC 1777在第4.3节中定义了以秒为单位的时间限制，但没有定义任何限制。
RFC 1440 on SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer defines an optional DATE command in Section 5 of the form mm/dd/yy, which is subject to millennium issues.
SIFT/UFT上的RFC 1440:Sender Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer在mm/dd/yy格式的第5节中定义了一个可选的日期命令，该命令受millennium问题的约束。
RFC 1068 on the Background File Transfer Protocol (BFTP) defines two commands in Sections B.2.12 and B.2.13, the Submit and Time commands. >From the example usage's given in Appendix C it is clear that this protocol will function correctly though the year 9999.
背景文件传输协议（BFTP）上的RFC 1068在B.2.12和B.2.13节中定义了两个命令，提交和时间命令。>从附录C中给出的示例用法可以清楚地看出，该协议将在9999年正常运行。
RFC 1037 on NFILE (a file access protocol) discusses the a Date representation in Section 7.1 as the number of seconds since January 1, 1900, but does not limit the field size. There should be no Y2K issues.
NFILE（文件访问协议）上的RFC1037将第7.1节中的日期表示形式讨论为自1900年1月1日起的秒数，但不限制字段大小。应该没有Y2K问题。
RFC 998 on NETBLT defines a Death time in Section 8, which is the sender's death time in seconds.
NETBLT上的RFC 998在第8节中定义了死亡时间，即发送方的死亡时间（以秒为单位）。
RFC 978 on the Voice File Interchange Protocol defines the Total Time of a message to be a 32-bit number of deci-seconds. This limits the size of a message but has no millennium issues.
语音文件交换协议上的RFC 978将消息的总时间定义为32位的分秒数。这限制了信息的大小，但没有千年问题。
RFC 969 was obsoleted by RFC 998.
RFC 969被RFC 998淘汰。
RFC 916 defines the Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol (RATP). Three timers are discussed in an expository manner in Section 5.4 and its subsections. There are no relevant issues.
RFC 916定义了可靠异步传输协议（RATP）。第5.4节及其小节以解释性方式讨论了三个计时器。没有相关问题。
RFCs 2122, 2056, 2055, 2054, 2044, 2016, 1960, 1959, 1874, 1865, 1862, 1843, 1842, 1823, 1815, 1808, 1798, 1785, 1783, 1782, 1779, 1766, 1738, 1737, 1736, 1729, 1728, 1727, 1639, 1633, 1630, 1625, 1554, 1545, 1530, 1529, 1528, 1489, 1486, 1436, 1415, 1413, 1350, 1345, 1312, 1302, 1288, 1278, 1241, 1235, 1196, 1194, 1179, 1123, 1003, 971, 965, 959, 949, 913, 887, 866, 865, 864, 863, 862, 797, 795, 783, 775, 765, 751, 743, 742, 740, 737, 725, 722, 707, 691, 683, 662, 640, 624, 614, 607, 599, 412, 411, 410, 407, and 406 were found to have no references to dates or times, and hence no millennium issues.
RFCs 2122、2056、2055、2054、2044、2016、1960、1959、1874、1865、1862、1843、1842、1823、1815、1808、1798、1785、1783、1782、1779、1766、1738、1737、1736、1729、1728、1727、1633、1630、1625、1554、1545、1530、1529、1528、1489、1436、1436、1415、1413、1350、1345、1312、1302、1288、1278、1278、1241、1235、1195、1199、1199、1199、1199、979、，949、913、887、866、865、864、863、862、797、795、783、775、765、751、743、742、740、737、725、722、707、691、683、662、640、624、614、607、599、412、411、410、407和406被发现没有提及日期或时间，因此没有千年发行的问题。
RFCs 712, 697, 633, 630, 622, 610, 593, 592, 589, 573, 571, 570, 553, 551, 549, 543, 535, 532, 525, 520, 514, 506, 505, 504, 501, 499, 493, 490, 487, 486, 485, 480, 479, 478, 477, 472, 468, 467, 463, 454, 451, 448, 446, 438, 437, 436, 430, 429, 418, 414, and 409 were not available for review.
RFCs 7126976336306622610993939393939395715705535515553532552552514650645014994834904804784784747247246846746745144643638437414和409不可供审查。
RFCS below 400 were considered too obsolete to even consider.
RFCs低于400被认为过于陈旧甚至无法考虑。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were the Internet Protocol (IP) versions four and six, the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and its extensions, Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) and Remote Procedure Call (RPC) protocol. A variety of less known protocols were also examined.
被归为这一组的RFC是Internet协议（IP）版本4和版本6、传输控制协议（TCP）、用户数据报协议（UDP）、点对点协议（PPP）及其扩展、Internet控制消息协议（ICMP）、地址解析协议（ARP）和远程过程调用（RPC）协议还研究了各种鲜为人知的协议。
After careful review of the nearly 400 RFC's in this catagory, no millennium or year 2000 problems were found.
在仔细审查了这一分类中近400个RFC之后，并没有发现任何千年或2000年问题。
RFC 2125 on the PPP Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP) in section 5.3 discusses the use if mandatory timers, but gives no mention as to how they are implemented.
第5.3节中关于PPP带宽分配协议（BAP）的RFC 2125讨论了强制定时器的使用，但未提及如何实现。
RFC 2114 on a Data Link Switching Client Access Protocol defines a retry timer of five seconds in Section 3.4.1.
数据链路交换客户端访问协议上的RFC 2114在第3.4.1节中定义了5秒的重试计时器。
RFC 2097 on the PPP NetBIOS Frame Control Protocol discuesses several timer and timeouts in Section 2.1, none of which suffers from a year 2000 problem.
PPP NetBIOS帧控制协议上的RFC 2097在第2.1节中讨论了几个计时器和超时，其中没有一个会出现2000年问题。
RFC 2075 on the IP Echo Host Service discusses timestamps and has no millennium issues.
IP Echo主机服务上的RFC 2075讨论了时间戳，没有千年问题。
RFC 2005 on the Applicability for Mobile IP discusses using timestamps as a security measure to avoid replay attacks (Section 3.), but does not quantify them. There are no expected issues.
关于移动IP适用性的RFC 2005讨论了使用时间戳作为安全措施来避免重播攻击（第3节），但没有对其进行量化。没有预期的问题。
RFC 2002 on IP Mobility Support uses a 16-bit field for the lifetime of a connection and notes the 18.2 hour limitation that this imposes. Section 5.6.1 on replay protection requires the use of 64-bit time fields, of a similar format to NTP packets.
RFC 2002 on IP Mobility Support在连接的生命周期中使用了一个16位字段，并注意到这会造成18.2小时的限制。关于重播保护的第5.6.1节要求使用64位时间字段，其格式与NTP数据包类似。
RFC 1981 on Path MTU Discovery for IPv6 discusses timestamps and their potential use to purge stale information in section 5.3. There is no millennium issues in this use.
RFC 1981针对IPv6的路径MTU发现在第5.3节中讨论了时间戳及其清除过时信息的潜在用途。在这种使用中没有千年问题。
RFC 1963 on the PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol defines a flow expiration time in section 4.9 which has no year 2000 issues.
PPP串行数据传输协议上的RFC 1963在第4.9节中定义了一个没有2000年问题的流过期时间。
RFC 1833 on Binding Protocols for ONC RPC Version 2 defines a variable in Section 2.2.1 called RPCBPROC_GETTIME which returns the local time in seconds since 1/1/1970. Since this value is not fields width dependent, it may or may not wrap around the 32-bit value depending on the operating system parameters.
ONC RPC版本2的绑定协议RFC 1833在第2.2.1节中定义了一个名为RPCBPROC_GETTIME的变量，该变量以秒为单位返回自1970年1月1日以来的本地时间。由于该值与字段宽度无关，因此根据操作系统参数，它可能会或可能不会环绕32位值。
RFC 1762 on the PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol discusses a number of timers in Section 5 (General Considerations). None of these timers experience any millennium issues.
PPP DECnet第四阶段控制协议的RFC 1762在第5节（一般注意事项）中讨论了许多定时器。这些计时器都没有遇到任何千年问题。
RFC 1761 on Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format discusses two 32-bit timestamp values on Section 4 on Packet Record Formats. The first of these may wrap in the year 2038, but should not effect anything of any import.
Snoop版本2数据包捕获文件格式上的RFC 1761讨论了数据包记录格式第4节中的两个32位时间戳值。第一个可能在2038年结束，但不会影响任何进口。
RFC 1755 on ATM Signalling Support for IP Over ATM discusses timing issues in Section 3.4 on VC Teardown. These limited timers have no year 2000 issues.
关于ATM上IP的ATM信令支持的RFC 1755在关于VC拆卸的第3.4节中讨论了定时问题。这些有限的计时器没有2000年问题。
RFC 1692 on the Transport Multiplexing Protocol (TMux) defines a TTL in Section 2.3 and a timer in Section 3.3. Neither of these suffer from any millennium or year 2000 issues.
传输多路复用协议（TMux）上的RFC 1692在第2.3节中定义了TTL，在第3.3节中定义了计时器。这两者都没有任何千年或2000年问题。
RFC 1661 on PPP defines three timers in Section 4.6, none of which have any year 2000 issues.
PPP上的RFC 1661在第4.6节中定义了三个计时器，其中没有一个有任何2000年问题。
RFC 1644 on T/TCP (TCP Extensions for Transactions) mentions RFC 1323 and the extended timers recommended in it.
T/TCP上的RFC1644（事务的TCP扩展）提到了RFC1323和其中推荐的扩展计时器。
RFC 1575 defines an echo function for CNLP discusses in the narrative the use of the Lifetime Field in Section 5.3. There is nothing to suggest that there is any year 2000 issues.
RFC 1575定义了CNLP的回波函数，在第5.3节的叙述中讨论了寿命字段的使用。没有任何迹象表明存在任何2000年问题。
RFC 1329 on Dual MAC FDDI Networks discusses ARP cache administration in Section 9.3 and 9.4 and various timers to expire entries.
双MAC FDDI网络上的RFC 1329在第9.3节和第9.4节中讨论了ARP缓存管理以及使条目过期的各种计时器。
RFC 1256 on ICMP Router Discovery Messages talks about lifetime fields in Section 2 and defines three router configuration variables in Section 4.1. None of these have any millennium issues.
ICMP路由器发现消息上的RFC 1256在第2节中讨论了生存期字段，并在第4.1节中定义了三个路由器配置变量。这些都没有任何千年问题。
RFC 792 on ICMP discusses Timestamps and Timestamp Reply messages which define a 32-bit timestamp which contains the number of milliseconds since midnight UT.
ICMP上的RFC 792讨论了时间戳和时间戳回复消息，这些消息定义了32位时间戳，其中包含自UT午夜以来的毫秒数。
RFC 791 on the Internet Protocol defines a packet type 68 which is an Internet Timestamp, which defines a 32-bit field which contains the number of milliseconds since midnght UT.
Internet协议上的RFC 791定义了一个数据包类型68，它是一个Internet时间戳，它定义了一个32位字段，其中包含自midnght UT以来的毫秒数。
RFC 781 was defines the same option which is codified in RFC 791 as a packet type 68.
RFC 781定义了在RFC 791中编码为数据包类型68的相同选项。
RFC's 2126, 2118, 2113, 2107, 2106, 2105, 2098, 2067, 2043, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2009, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1994, 1993, 1990, 1989, 1979, 1978, 1977, 1976, 1975, 1974, 1973, 1972, 1967, 1962, 1954, 1946, 1937, 1936, 1934, 1933, 1932, 1931, 1926, 1924, 1919, 1918, 1917, 1916, 1915, 1897, 1888, 1887, 1885, 1884, 1883, 1881, 1878, 1877, 1868, 1860, 1859, 1853, 1841, 1832, 1831, 1809, 1795, 1791, 1770, 1764, 1763, 1756, 1754, 1752, 1744, 1735, 1726, 1719, 1717, 1710, 1707, 1705, 1698, 1693, 1688, 1687, 1686, 1683, 1682, 1681, 1680, 1679, 1678, 1677, 1676, 1674, 1673, 1672, 1671, 1670, 1669, 1667, 1663, 1662, 1638, 1634, 1631, 1629, 1624, 1622, 1621, 1620, 1619, 1618, 1613, 1605, 1604, 1598, 1590, 1577, 1570, 1561, 1560, 1553, 1552, 1551, 1549, 1548, 1547, 1538, 1526, 1518, 1498, 1490, 1483, 1475, 1466, 1454, 1435, 1434, 1433, 1393, 1390, 1385, 1379, 1378, 1377, 1376, 1375, 1374, 1365, 1363, 1362, 1356, 1347, 1337, 1335, 1334, 1333, 1332, 1331, 1326, 1323, 1314, 1307, 1306, 1294, 1293, 1277, 1263, 1240, 1237, 1236, 1234, 1226, 1223, 1220, 1219, 1210, 1209, 1201, 1191, 1188, 1185, 1172, 1171, 1166, 1162, 1151, 1146, 1145, 1144, 1141, 1139, 1134, 1132, 1122, 1110, 1106, 1103, 1088, 1086, 1085, 1078, 1072, 1071, 1070, 1069, 1063, 1062, 1057, 1055, 1051, 1050, 1046, 1045, 1044, 1042, 1030, 1029, 1027, 1025, 1016, 1008, 1007, 1006, 1002, 1001, 994, 986, 983, 982, 970, 964, 963, 962, 955, 948, 942, 941, 940, 936, 935, 932, 926, 925, 924, 922, 919, 917, 914, 905, 903, 896, 895, 894, 893, 892, 891, 889, 879, 877, 874, 872, 871, 848, 829, 826, 824, 815, 814, 813, 801, 793, 789, 787, 777, 768, 761, 760, 759, 730, 704, 696, 695, 692, 690, 689, 687, 685, 680, 675, 674, 660, 632, 626, 613, 611 were reviewed but were found to have no millennium references.
RFC的2126、2118、2113、2107、2106、2105、2098、2067、2043、2023、2019、2018、2009、2004、2003、2001、1994、1993、1990、1989、1979、1978、1977、1976、1975、1974、1973、1972、1967、1962、1954、1946、1937、1936、1932、1931、1926、1924、1919、1918、1917、1916、1915、1897、1888、1887、1887、1878、1877、1868、1869、， 1853, 1841, 1832, 1831, 1809, 1795, 1791, 1770, 1764, 1763, 1756, 1754, 1752, 1744, 1735, 1726, 1719, 1717, 1710, 1707, 1705, 1698, 1693, 1688, 1687, 1686, 1683, 1682, 1681, 1680, 1679, 1678, 1677, 1676, 1674, 1673, 1672, 1671, 1670, 1669, 1667, 1663, 1662, 1638, 1634, 1631, 1629, 1624, 1622, 1621, 1620, 1619, 1618, 1613, 1605, 1604, 1598, 1590, 1577, 1570, 1561, 1560, 1553, 1552, 1551, 1549, 1548, 1547, 1538, 1526, 1518, 1498, 1490, 1483, 1475, 1466, 1454, 1435, 1434, 1433, 1393, 1390, 1385, 1379, 1378, 1377, 1376, 1375, 1374, 1365, 1363, 1362, 1356, 1347, 1337, 1335, 1334, 1333, 1332, 1331, 1326, 1323, 1314, 1307, 1306, 1294, 1293, 1277, 1263, 1240, 1237, 1236, 1234, 1226, 1223, 1220, 1219, 1210, 1209, 1201, 1191, 1188, 1185, 1172, 1171, 1166, 1162, 1151, 1146, 1145, 1144, 1141, 1139, 1134, 1132, 1122, 1110, 1106, 1103, 1088, 1086, 1085, 1078, 1072, 1071, 1070, 1069, 1063, 1062, 1057, 1055, 1051, 1050, 1046, 1045, 1044, 1042, 1030, 1029, 1027, 1025, 1016, 1008, 1007, 1006, 1002, 1001, 994, 986, 983, 982, 970, 964, 963, 962, 955, 948, 942, 941, 940, 936, 935, 932, 926, 925, 924, 922, 919, 917, 914, 905, 903, 896, 895, 894, 893, 892, 891, 889, 879, 877, 874, 872, 871, 848, 829, 826, 824, 815, 814, 813, 801, 793, 789, 787, 777, 768, 761, 760, 759, 730, 704, 696, 695, 692, 690, 689, 687, 685, 680, 675, 674, 660, 632, 626, 613,对611份进行了审查，但发现没有千年参考文献。
RFC's 594, 591, 576, 550, 548, 528, 521, 489, 488, 473, 460, 459, 450, 449, 445, 442, 434, 426, 417, 398, 395, 394, 359, 357, 348, 347, 346, 343, 312, 301, 300, 271, 241, 210, 203, 202, 197, 190, 178, 176, 175, 166, 165, 161, 151, 150, 146, 145, 143, 142, 128, 127, 123, 122, 93, 91, 80, 79, 70, 67, 65, 62, 60, 59, 56, 55, 54, 53, 41, 38, 33, 23, 22, 20, 19, 17, 12 were deemed too old to be considered for millennium investigation.
RFC的594、591、576、550、548、528、521、489、488、473、460、459、450、449、445、442、434、426、417、398、395、394、359、357、348、347、343、312、301、300、271、241、210、203、202、197、190、178、176、175、166、165、161、151、150、146、145、143、142、128、127、123、122、122、93、91、80、241、210、203、203、202、197、175、175、165、165、161、55、55、55、53、，22岁、20岁、19岁、17岁、12岁被认为太老，不适合进行千年调查。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Internet Mail Access Protocol (IMAP), Post Office Protocol (POP), Multipurpose Internet Mail Exchange (MIME), and X.400 to SMTP interaction.
RFC分为简单邮件传输协议（SMTP）、Internet邮件访问协议（IMAP）、邮局协议（POP）、多用途Internet邮件交换（MIME）和X.400到SMTP交互。
After reviewing all mail-related RFCs, it was discovered that while some obsolete standards required two-digit years, all currently used standards require four-digit years and are thus not prone to typical Year 2000 problems.
在审查所有与邮件相关的RFC后，发现虽然一些过时的标准需要两位数的年份，但所有当前使用的标准都需要四位数的年份，因此不容易出现典型的2000年问题。
RFCs 821 and 822, the main basis for SMTP mail exchange and message format, originally required two-digit years. However, both of these RFCs were later modified by RFC 1123 in 1989, which strongly recommended 4-digit years. Although there might be a few very old SMTP systems using two-digit years, it is believed that almost all mail sent over the Internet today uses four-digit years. Mail that contains two-digit years in its SMTP headers will not "fail", but might be mis-sorted in message stores and mail user agents. This problem is avoided entirely by taking the RFC 1123 change as a requirement, rather than merely as a recommendation.
RFCs 821和822是SMTP邮件交换和邮件格式的主要基础，最初需要两位数的年份。然而，1989年RFC1123对这两个RFC进行了修改，强烈建议采用4位数年份。虽然可能有一些非常古老的SMTP系统使用两位数的年份，但人们相信，今天通过互联网发送的几乎所有邮件都使用四位数的年份。SMTP邮件头中包含两位数年份的邮件不会“失败”，但可能在邮件存储和邮件用户代理中排序错误。通过将RFC1123变更作为一项要求，而不仅仅是一项建议，可以完全避免这个问题。
IMAP versions 1, 2, and 3 used two-digit years, but IMAP version 4 (defined in RFCs 1730 and 1732 in 1994) requires four-digit years. There are still a few IMAP 2 servers and clients in use on the Internet today, but IMAP version 4 has already taken over almost all of the IMAP market. Mail stored on an IMAP server or client with two-digit years will not "fail", but could possibly be mis-sorted or prematurely expired.
IMAP版本1、2和3使用两位数的年份，但IMAP版本4（1994年在RFCs 1730和1732中定义）需要四位数的年份。如今，互联网上仍有一些IMAP 2服务器和客户端在使用，但IMAP版本4已经占领了几乎所有的IMAP市场。存储在IMAP服务器或客户端上的具有两位数年数的邮件不会“失败”，但可能会排序错误或提前过期。
RFC 1153 describes a format for digests of mailing lists, and uses two-digit dates. This format is not widely used. The use of two-digit dates could possibly cause missorting of stored messages.
RFC1153描述了邮件列表摘要的格式，并使用两位数的日期。这种格式没有被广泛使用。使用两位数的日期可能会导致存储消息的错误排序。
RFC 1327, which describes mapping between X.400 mail and SMTP mail, uses the UTCTime format.
RFC1327描述了X.400邮件和SMTP邮件之间的映射，它使用UTCTime格式。
RFC 1422 describes the structure of certificates that were used in PEM (and are expected to be used in many other mail and non-mail services). Those certificates use dates in UTCTime format. Poorly written software might prematurely expire or validate a certificate based on comparisons of the date with the current date, although no current software is known to do this.
RFC 1422描述了PEM中使用的证书的结构（预计将用于许多其他邮件和非邮件服务）。这些证书使用UTCTime格式的日期。写得不好的软件可能会根据日期和当前日期的比较提前过期或验证证书，尽管目前还没有已知的软件会这样做。
14. Network Time Protocols
14. 网络时间协议
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were the Network Time Protocol (NTP), and the Time Protocol.
属于这一组的RFC是网络时间协议（NTP）和时间协议。
NTP has been certified year 2000 compliant, while the Time Protocol will "roll over" at Thu Feb 07 00:54:54 2036 GMT. Since NTP is the current defacto standard for network time this does not seem to be an issue.
NTP已被证明符合2000年标准，而时间协议将在2月7日星期四00:54:54 2036 GMT“过渡”。由于NTP是当前网络时间的实际标准，因此这似乎不是问题。
There is no reference anywhere in the NTP specification or implementation to any reference epoch other than 1 January 1900. In short, NTP doesn't know anything about the millennium.
NTP规范或实施中没有提及1900年1月1日以外的任何参考历元。简言之，NTP对千禧年一无所知。
>From the Time Protocol RFC (868):
>从时间协议RFC（868）开始：
S: Send the time as a 32 bit binary number.
S：以32位二进制数的形式发送时间。
...
...
The time is the number of seconds since 00:00 (midnight) 1 January 1900 GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT; this base will serve until the year 2036.
时间是自1900年1月1日格林威治标准时间00:00（午夜）起的秒数，因此时间1是1900年1月1日格林威治标准时间上午12:00:01；该基地将服役至2036年。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were the Domain Name System (DNS), it's advanced add on features (Incremental Zone Transfer, etc.).
属于这一组的RFC是域名系统（DNS），它的高级附加功能（增量区域传输等）。
There have been no year 2000 relayed problems found with the DNS protocols, or common implementations of them.
DNS协议或其常见实现未发现2000年中继问题。
One is a common practice of writing serial numbers in zone files as if they represent a date, and using only two digits of the year. That practice cannot survive into the year 2000. This is not a protocol problem, the serial number is simply an integer, and any value is OK, provided it always increases (see rfc1982 for a definition of what that means). In any case, a change from 97abcd (or similar) to 00abcd would be a decrease and so is not permitted. Zone file maintainers have two choices, one easy (though irrational) one would be to continue from 99 to 100 and so on. The other, is simply to switch, at any time between now and when the serial number first needs updating after the year 2000, to use 4 digits to represent the year instead of 2. As long as there are no more than 6 digits in the "abcd" part, and this is done sometime before the year 2100, this is always an increase, and therefore always safe. Should any zone files be of the form yyabcdefg (with 7 digits after a 2- digit year) then the procedures of section 7 of rfc2182 should be adopted to convert the serial number to some other value.
一种是在区域文件中写入序列号的常见做法，就好像它们代表日期一样，并且只使用年份的两位数字。这种做法无法延续到2000年。这不是协议问题，序列号只是一个整数，任何值都可以，只要它总是增加（请参阅rfc1982了解其含义的定义）。在任何情况下，从97abcd（或类似）更改为00abcd都是一种减少，因此不允许。区域文件维护者有两个选择，一个简单（尽管不合理），一个是从99继续到100，以此类推。另一种方法是，在从现在到2000年后序列号首次需要更新的任何时候，简单地切换为使用4位数字来表示年份，而不是2位数字。只要“abcd”部分中的数字不超过6位，并且是在2100年之前的某个时候完成的，那么这始终是一个增加，因此始终是安全的。如果任何区域文件的格式为yyabcdefg（2位数年份后为7位数），则应采用rfc2182第7节的程序将序列号转换为其他值。
The other item of note is related to timestamps in DNS security. Those are represented as 32 bit counts of seconds, based in 1970, and hence have no year 2000 problems. however, they do obviously have a natural end of life, and sometime before that time is reached, the definitions of those fields need to be corrected, perhaps to allow them to represent the number of seconds elapsed since the base, modulo 2^32, which is likely to be adequate for the purposes of DNS security (signatures and keys are unlikely to need to be valid for more than 70 years). In any case, more work is needed in this area in the not too far distant future.
另一个注意事项与DNS安全中的时间戳有关。这些都表示为基于1970年的32位秒计数，因此没有2000年问题。然而，它们显然有一个自然的寿命终止，在达到该时间之前的某个时候，需要更正这些字段的定义，也许是为了允许它们表示自基模2^32以来经过的秒数，这可能足以满足DNS安全的目的（签名和钥匙的有效期不可能超过70年）。无论如何，在不久的将来，这方面还需要更多的工作。
16 Network Management
16网络管理
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), a large number of Management Information Bases (MIBs) and the Common Management Information Protocol over TCP/IP (CMOT).
被归为这一组的RFC是简单网络管理协议（SNMP）、大量管理信息库（MIB）和TCP/IP上的通用管理信息协议（CMOT）。
Although a few discrepancies have been found and outlined below, none of them should have an impact on interoperability.
尽管发现了一些差异，并概述如下，但它们都不应对互操作性产生影响。
16.2.1 Use of GeneralizedTime in CMOT as defined in RFCs 1095 and 1189.
16.2.1 按照RFCs 1095和1189中的定义，在CMOT中使用GeneratedTime。
The standards for CMOT specify an unusual use for the GeneralizedTime type. (GeneralizedTime has a four-digit representation of the year.)
CMOT的标准规定了GeneratedTime类型的一个不寻常的用法。（GeneralizedTime以四位数字表示年份。）
If the system generating the PDU does not have the current time, yet does have the time since last boot, then GeneralizedTime can be used to encode this information. The time since last boot will be added to the base time "0001 Jan 1 00:00:00.00" using the Gregorian calendar algorithm.
如果生成PDU的系统没有当前时间，但有自上次引导以来的时间，则可以使用GeneralizedTime对该信息进行编码。自上次引导以来的时间将使用公历算法添加到基准时间“0001 Jan 1 00:00:00.00”。
This is really a "Year 0" problem rather than a Year 2000 problem, and in any case, CMOT is not currently deployed.
这实际上是一个“0年”问题，而不是2000年问题，而且在任何情况下，CMOT目前都没有部署。
UTCTime is an ASN.1 type that includes a two-digit representation of the year. There are several options for UTCTime in ASN.1, that vary in precision and in local versus GMT, but these options all have two-digit years. The standards for SNMP definitions specify one particular format:
UTCTime是一种ASN.1类型，包括一个两位数的年份表示。ASN.1中有几个UTCTime选项，在精度和本地与GMT方面有所不同，但这些选项都有两位数的年份。SNMP定义标准规定了一种特定格式：
YYMMDDHHMMZ
YYMMDDHHMMZ
The first usage of UTCTime in the standards for SNMP definitions goes all the way back to RFC 1303. It has persisted unchanged up through the current specifications in RFC 1902. The role of UTCTime in SNMP definitions is to record the history of an SNMP MIB module in the module itself, via two ASN.1 macros:
SNMP定义标准中UTCTime的首次使用可以追溯到RFC1303。在RFC1902的当前规范中，它一直保持不变。UTCTime在SNMP定义中的作用是通过两个ASN.1宏在模块本身中记录SNMP MIB模块的历史记录：
o LAST-UPDATED o REVISION
o 最新修订
Management applications that store and use MIB modules need to be smart about interpreting these UTCTimes, by prepending a "19" or a "20" as appropriate.
存储和使用MIB模块的管理应用程序需要在解释这些UTCTIME时保持智能，根据需要预先加上“19”或“20”。
There are two objects in the Printer MIB that allow use of a date as an object value with no explicit guidance for formatting the value. The objects are prtInterpreterLangVersion and prtInterpreterVersion. Both are defined with a syntax of OCTET STRING. The descriptions for the objects allow the object value to contain a date, version code or other product specific information to identify the interpreter or language. The descriptions do not include an explicit statement recommending use of a four-digit year when a date is used as the object value.
打印机MIB中有两个对象允许将日期用作对象值，但没有明确的值格式化指导。对象是prtInterpreterLangVersion和prtInterpreterVersion。两者都是用八位字节字符串的语法定义的。对象的描述允许对象值包含日期、版本代码或其他特定于产品的信息，以识别解释器或语言。这些描述不包括明确的声明，建议在使用日期作为对象值时使用四位数年份。
The RFC specifies trace headers and footers with date fields that are character arrays of size 32. While 32 characters certainly provide enough room for a four-digit year, there's no explicit statement that these years must be represented with four digits.
RFC使用大小为32的字符数组的日期字段指定跟踪页眉和页脚。虽然32个字符肯定为四位数年份提供了足够的空间，但没有明确规定这些年份必须用四位数表示。
17 Network News
17网络新闻
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were related to the Network News Protocol (NNTP).
属于这一类的RFC与网络新闻协议（NNTP）有关。
There does exist a problem in both NNTP, RFC 977, and the Usenet News Message Format, RFC 10336. They both specify two-digit year format. A working group has been formed to update the network news protocols in general, and addressing this problem is on their list of work items.
NNTP、RFC 977和Usenet新闻消息格式RFC 10336都存在问题。它们都指定了两位数的年份格式。已经成立了一个工作组来更新网络新闻协议，解决这一问题已列入他们的工作项目清单。
The NNTP transfer protocols defined in RFC 977. Sections 3.7.1, the definition of the NEWGROUPS command, and 3.8.1, the NEWNEWS command, that dates must be specified in YYMMDD format.
RFC 977中定义的NNTP传输协议。第3.7.1节，NEWGROUPS命令的定义，以及第3.8.1节，NEWNEWS命令，其中日期必须以YYMMDD格式指定。
The format for USENET news messages is defined in RFC 1036. The Date line is defined in section 2.1.2 and it is specified in RFC-822 format. It specifically disallows the standard UNIX ctime(3) format, which would allow for four digit years. Section 2.2.4 on Expires also mandates the same two-digit year format.
USENET新闻消息的格式在RFC 1036中定义。日期行在第2.1.2节中定义，并以RFC-822格式指定。它特别禁止使用标准的UNIX ctime（3）格式，该格式允许使用四位数的年份。关于到期的第2.2.4节也要求采用相同的两位数年份格式。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were related to IP Multicast, RTP, and Internet Stream Protocol. A Year 2000 problem does occur in the Simple Network Paging Protocol, versions 2 & 3. Both define a HOLDuntil option which uses a YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT field. Version 3 also defines a MSTAtus command, which is required to store, dates and times as YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT.
属于这一类的RFC与IP多播、RTP和Internet流协议有关。简单网络分页协议版本2和版本3中确实存在2000年问题。两者都定义了使用YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT字段的HOLDINTIL选项。版本3还定义了一个MSTAtus命令，该命令用于将日期和时间存储为YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT。
RFC 2102 discusses Multicast support for NIMROD and has no mention of dates or time. RFC 2090 on TFTP Multicast options is also free from any date/time references.
RFC2102讨论了NIMROD的多播支持，没有提到日期或时间。TFTP多播选项上的RFC 2090也没有任何日期/时间参考。
RFC 2038 on RTP MPEG formats has three references to time: a Presentation Time Stamp (PTS), a Decoding Time Stamp (DTS), and a System Clock (SC) reference time. Each RTP packet contains a timestamp derived from the sender 90 kHz clock reference. Each of the header fields are defined in section 2.1, 3, and 3.3 are 32 bit fields. No mention is made of a "zero" start time, so it is presumed that this format will be valid until at least 2038.
RTP MPEG格式上的RFC 2038有三个时间参考：表示时间戳（PTS）、解码时间戳（DTS）和系统时钟（SC）参考时间。每个RTP数据包包含一个从发送方90 kHz时钟基准导出的时间戳。第2.1节、第3节和第3.3节中定义的每个标题字段都是32位字段。没有提到“零”开始时间，因此假定此格式至少在2038年之前有效。
Similarly RFC 2035 on the RTP JPEG format defines the same timestamp in section 3. RFC 2032 on RTP H.261 video streams uses a calculated time based on the original frame so once again there is no millennium issue. RFC 2029 on the RTP format for Sun's CellB video encoding mentions the RTP timestamp in section 2.1.
类似地，RTP JPEG格式上的RFC 2035在第3节中定义了相同的时间戳。RTP H.261视频流上的RFC 2032使用基于原始帧的计算时间，因此再次没有千年问题。Sun CellB视频编码RTP格式的RFC 2029在第2.1节中提到了RTP时间戳。
RFC 2022 defines support for multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM networks. Section 5. defines a timeout value for connections between one and twenty minutes. Section 5.1.1 discusses several timers that are bound between five and ten seconds, while 5.1.3 requires an inactivity timer, which should also run between one and twenty minutes. Sections 5.1.5, 5.1.5.1, 5.1.5.2, 5.2.2, 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.4.3, 6.1.3 and Appendix E all defines numerous timers, none of which have any millennium issues.
RFC 2022定义了对基于UNI 3.0/3.1的ATM网络上的多播的支持。第5节。为1到20分钟之间的连接定义超时值。第5.1.1节讨论了限制在5到10秒之间的几个计时器，而第5.1.3节要求使用非活动计时器，该计时器也应在1到20分钟之间运行。第5.1.5节、第5.1.5.1节、第5.1.5.2节、第5.2.2节、第5.4.2节、第5.4.3节、第6.1.3节和附录E都定义了许多计时器，其中没有任何计时器存在千年问题。
RFC 1890 on RTP profiles for audio and video conferences discusses a sampling frequency which has no issues. RFC 1889 on RTP discusses time formats in section 4, as the same 64 bit unsigned integer format that NTP uses. There is a "period" problem, which will occur in the year 2106. Section 5.1 is a more formalized discussion of the timestamp properties, while Section 6.3.1 discusses a variety of different timers all using the 64 bit field format, or a compressed 32-bit version of the inner octet of bytes. Section 8.2 discusses loop detection and how the various timers are used to determine if looping occurs.
音频和视频会议RTP配置文件上的RFC1890讨论了一个没有问题的采样频率。RTP上的RFC1889在第4节中讨论了时间格式，与NTP使用的64位无符号整数格式相同。有一个“时期”问题，将发生在2106年。第5.1节更正式地讨论了时间戳属性，而第6.3.1节讨论了各种不同的计时器，它们都使用64位字段格式，或内部字节八位组的压缩32位版本。第8.2节讨论循环检测以及如何使用各种定时器来确定是否发生循环。
RFC 1861 on Version 3 of the Simple Network Paging Protocol does have a Year 2000 problem. The protocol defines a HOLDuntil command in section 4.5.6 and a MSTAtus command in section 4.6.10, both of which require dates/times to be stored as YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT. Clearly this format will be invalid after the end of 1999.
简单网络分页协议版本3上的RFC1861确实存在2000年问题。协议在第4.5.6节中定义了HOLDTILL命令，在第4.6.10节中定义了MSTAtus命令，这两个命令都要求将日期/时间存储为YYMMDDHHMMSS+/-GMT。显然，该格式在1999年底后将无效。
RFC 1821 has no date/time references. RFC 1819 on Version 2 of the Internet Stream Protocol defines a HELLO message format in section 6.1.2, which does contain a timer which is updated every millisecond. No year 2000 problems exist with this protocol.
RFC 1821没有日期/时间参考。Internet流协议版本2上的RFC 1819在第6.1.2节中定义了HELLO消息格式，该格式包含一个每毫秒更新一次的计时器。本议定书不存在2000年问题。
RFC 1645 on Version 2 of the Simple Network Paging Protocol contains the same HOLDuntil field problem as version 3. The definition is contained section 4.4.6.
简单网络分页协议版本2上的RFC1645包含与版本3相同的HOLDuntil字段问题。定义见第4.4.6节。
RFC 1458 on the Requirements of Multicast Protocols discusses a retransmission timer in section 4.23. and a general discussion of timer expiration in section 5, neither of which have any millennium concerns. RFC 1301 on the Multicast Transport Protocol defines a heartbeat interval of time in section 2.1, as well as retention and windows. Formal definitions for each are contained in sections 2.2.7, 2.2.8 and 2.2.9. The heartbeat is a 32 bit unsigned field, while the Window and Retention are both 16 bit unsigned fields. Section 3.4.2 gives examples values for these fields, which indicate no millennium issues.
关于多播协议要求的RFC 1458在第4.23节中讨论了重传计时器。第5节对计时器过期进行了一般性讨论，这两个部分都没有任何千年问题。多播传输协议上的RFC 1301在第2.1节中定义了心跳时间间隔，以及保留和窗口。第2.2.7节、第2.2.8节和第2.2.9节中包含了每项的正式定义。heartbeat是一个32位无符号字段，而Window和Retention都是16位无符号字段。第3.4.2节给出了这些字段的示例值，表明没有千年问题。
RFC 1193 on Client Requirements for Real Time Services talks about time in section 4.4, but there are no Year 2000 issues. RFC 1190 have been obsoleted by RFC 1819, but the hello timer issues are similar.
关于实时服务的客户要求的RFC1193在第4.4节中讨论了时间，但没有2000年问题。RFC1190已被RFC1819淘汰，但hello定时器问题与此类似。
RFCs 1789, 1768, 1703, 1614, 1569, 1568, 1546, 1469, 1453, 1313, 1257, 1197, 1112, 1054, 988, 966, 947, 809, 804, 803, 798, 769, 741, 511, 508, 420, 408 and 251 contain no date or time references.
RFC 1789、1768、1703、1614、1569、1568、1546、1469、1453、1313、1257、1197、1112、1054、988、966、947、809、804、803、798、769、741、511、508、420、408和251不包含日期或时间参考。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were Routing Information Protocol (RIP), the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol, Classless InterDomain Routing (CIDR),the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), and the InterDomain Routing Protocol (IDRP).
被归为这一组的RFC是路由信息协议（RIP）、开放最短路径优先（OSPF）协议、无类别域间路由（CIDR）、边界网关协议（BGP）和域间路由协议（IDRP）。
After careful examination both BGP and RIP have been found Year 2000 compliant.
经过仔细检查，BGP和RIP均符合2000年标准。
There is a small Year 2000 issue in RFC 1786 on the Representation of IP Routing Policies in the ripe-81++ Routing Registry. In Appendices C the "changed" object parameter defines a format of <email-address> YYMMDD, and similarly in Appendix D "withdrawn" object identifier has he format of YYMMDD. Since these are only identifiers there should be little operational impact. Some application software may need to be modified.
RFC1786中有一个关于RIME-81++路由注册表中IP路由策略表示的2000年小问题。在附录C中，“更改”对象参数定义了<email address>YYMMDD的格式，同样在附录D中，“撤回”对象标识符的格式为YYMMDD。因为这些只是标识符，所以对操作的影响应该很小。某些应用软件可能需要修改。
IDPR suffers from the classic Year 2038 problem, by having a timestamp counter which rolls over at that time.
IDPR遇到了典型的2038年问题，因为当时有一个时间戳计数器。
RFC 2091 on Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits defines three required and one optional timers in section 6. The Database Timer (6.1), the Hold down Timer (6.2), the Retransmission Time (6.3)
RFC 2091关于RIP扩展以支持需求电路，在第6节中定义了三个必需和一个可选定时器。数据库计时器（6.1）、保持计时器（6.2）、重传时间（6.3）
and the Over-Subscription Timer (6.4) are all counters, which have no millennium, issues. RFC 2081 on the applicability of RIPng discusses deletion of routes for a variety of issues, one of which is the garbage- collection timer exceeds 120 seconds. There are no Year 2000 issues. RFC 2080 on RIPng for IPv6, discusses various times in section 2.6, none of which have any millennium problems.
超额订阅计时器（6.4）都是计数器，没有千年问题。关于RIPng适用性的RFC2081讨论了各种问题的路由删除，其中一个问题是垃圾收集计时器超过120秒。没有2000年问题。RIPng for IPv6上的RFC 2080，在第2.6节中讨论了不同的时间段，其中没有任何时间段存在任何千年问题。
RFC 1987 on Ipsilon's General Switch Management protocol there is a Duration field defined in section 4, which has no relevant problems. Section 8.2 defines the procedure for dealing with timers. RFC 1953 on Ipsilon's Flow Management Specification for IPv4 defines the same procedure in section 3.2, as well as a lifetime field in the Redirect Message (Section 4.1). There are no millennium issues in either case.
RFC 1987在Ipsilon的通用交换机管理协议中，第4节定义了一个持续时间字段，该字段没有相关问题。第8.2节规定了处理计时器的程序。Ipsilon的IPv4流量管理规范RFC 1953在第3.2节中定义了相同的过程，并在重定向消息（第4.1节）中定义了生存期字段。这两种情况都没有千年问题。
There is a small Year 2000 issue in RFC 1786 on the Representation of IP Routing Policies in the ripe-81++ Routing Registry. In Appendices C the "changed" object parameter defines a format of <email-address> YYMMDD, and similarly in Appendix D "withdrawn" object identifier has he format of YYMMDD. Since these are only identifiers there should be little operational impact. Some application software may need to be modified.
RFC1786中有一个关于RIME-81++路由注册表中IP路由策略表示的2000年小问题。在附录C中，“更改”对象参数定义了<email address>YYMMDD的格式，同样在附录D中，“撤回”对象标识符的格式为YYMMDD。因为这些只是标识符，所以对操作的影响应该很小。某些应用软件可能需要修改。
RFC 1771 defines the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). BGP does not have knowledge of absolute time, only relative time. There are five timers defined: Hold Timer, ConnectRetry Timer, KeepAlive Timer, MinRoueAdvertisementInterval and MinASOriginationInterval. There are no known issues regarding BGP and the millennium.
RFC1771定义了边界网关协议（BGP）。BGP不知道绝对时间，只知道相对时间。定义了五个计时器：保持计时器、连接重试计时器、保留计时器、MinRoueAdvertizementInterval和MinASOriginationInterval。关于BGP和千禧年，没有已知的问题。
In RFC 1584, which defines Multicast Extensions to OSPF, three timers are defined in section 8.2: IGMPPollingInterval, IGMPTimeout, and IGMP polling timer. Section 8.4 defines an age parameter for the local groups database and section 9.3 outlines how to implement that age parameter. It is not expected that any connections lifetime will be long enough to cause any issues with these timers.
在定义OSPF多播扩展的RFC1584中，第8.2节定义了三个计时器：IGMPPollingInterval、IGMPTimeout和IGMP轮询计时器。第8.4节定义了本地组数据库的年龄参数，第9.3节概述了如何实现该年龄参数。预计任何连接的生存期都不会长到足以导致这些计时器出现任何问题。
RFC 1583, OSPF, there are two types of timers defined in section 4.4, single-shot timers and interval timers. There are a number of timers defined in Section 9 including: HelloInterval, RouterDeadInterval, InfTransDelay, Hello Timer, Wait Timer and RxmtInterval. Section 10 also defines the Inactivity Timer. No millennium problem exists for any of these timers.
RFC 1583，OSPF，第4.4节中定义了两种定时器，单次定时器和间隔定时器。第9节中定义了许多计时器，包括：HelloInterval、RouterDeadInterval、InfTransDelay、Hello计时器、Wait计时器和RxmtInterval。第10节还定义了非活动计时器。这些计时器都不存在千年问题。
RFC 1582 is an earlier version of RFC 2091. Section 7 documents the same timers as noted above, with the same lack of a millennium issue.
RFC 1582是RFC 2091的早期版本。第7节记录了与上述相同的计时器，但同样没有千年问题。
RFC 1504 on Appletalk Update-Based Routing Protocol defines a 10- second period in Section 3, and hence has no relevant issues.
基于Appletalk更新的路由协议上的RFC1504在第3节中定义了10秒的周期，因此没有相关问题。
RFC 1479 which specifies IDPR Version 1, defines a timestamp field in section 1.5.1, which is a 32 bit unsigned integer number of seconds since January 1, 1970. The authors recognize the problem of timestamp exhaustion in 2038, but feel that the protocol will not be in use for that period. Sections 1.7, 2.1, and 4.3.1 also discuss the timestamp field. RFC 1478 on the IDPR Architecture, also discusses the same timestamp field in section 3.3.4. RFC 1477 again refers to the IDPR timestamp in section 4.2. Thus IDPR has no Year 2000 issue, but does have a period problem in the year 2038.
RFC 1479指定了IDPR版本1，在第1.5.1节中定义了一个时间戳字段，它是自1970年1月1日以来的32位无符号整数秒数。作者认识到2038年时间戳耗尽的问题，但认为该协议在这段时间内不会被使用。第1.7、2.1和4.3.1节也讨论了时间戳字段。关于IDPR体系结构的RFC 1478，也在第3.3.4节中讨论了相同的时间戳字段。RFC 1477再次参考第4.2节中的IDPR时间戳。因此，IDPR没有2000年问题，但在2038年确实存在周期问题。
RFC 1075 on Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol devotes section 7 to time values. None of the timers have any millennium issues. RFC 1074, on the NFSNET backbone SPF IGP defines several hardcoded timers values in section 5.
距离向量多播路由协议RFC1075第7节专门讨论时间值。没有一个计时器有任何千年问题。NFSNET主干上的RFC 1074 SPF IGP在第5节中定义了几个硬编码定时器值。
RFC 1058 on RIP discusses the 30-second timers in section 3.3. There is no millennium issues related to RIP.
RIP上的RFC 1058在第3.3节中讨论了30秒计时器。没有与RIP相关的千年问题。
RFC 995 on the Requirements for Internet Gateways has extensive discussions of timers in section 7.1 and throughout A.1 and A.2. None of these timers suffer from the millennium problem.
关于互联网网关要求的RFC 995在第7.1节以及整个A.1和A.2中对计时器进行了广泛讨论。这些计时器都没有千年问题。
RFC 911 on EGP on Berkeley Unix recommend timer values of 30 and 120 seconds.
Berkeley Unix上EGP上的RFC 911建议计时器值为30秒和120秒。
RFC 904 which defines the Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP). There are a number of timers discussed in sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.4. None of these timers suffer from any relevant problems.
RFC 904定义了外部网关协议（EGP）。第4.1.1节和第4.1.4节讨论了许多定时器。这些计时器都没有任何相关问题。
RFCs 2103, 2092, 2073, 2072, 2042, 2008, 1998, 1997, 1992, 1966, 1955, 1940, 1930, 1925, 1923, 1863, 1817, 1812, 1793, 1787, 1774, 1773, 1772, 1765, 1753, 1745, 1723, 1722, 1721, 1716, 1702, 1701, 1668, 1656, 1655, 1654, 1587, 1586, 1585, 1581, 1520, 1519, 1517, 1482, 1476, 1439, 1403, 1397, 1388, 1387, 1383, 1380, 1371, 1370, 1364, 1338, 1322, 1268, 1267, 1266, 1265, 1264, 1254, 1246, 1245, 1222, 1195, 1164, 1163, 1142, 1136, 1133, 1126, 1125, 1124,1104, 1102, 1092, 1009, 985, 981, 975, 950, 898, 890, 888, 875, and 823 contain no date or time references.
RFCs 2103、2092、2073、2072、2042、2008、1998、1997、1992、1966、1955、1940、1930、1925、1923、1863、1817、1812、1793、1787、1774、1773、1772、1765、1753、1745、1723、1722、1721、1716、1702、1701、1668、1656、1655、1654、1587、1585、1581、1520、1519、1517、1482、1476、1439、1403、1397、1388、1387、1387、1387、1387、13328、13328、13328、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327、13327，1268、1267、1266、1265、1264、1254、1246、1245、1222、1195、1164、1163、1142、1136、1133、1126、1125、11241104、1102、1092、1009、985、981、975、950、898、890、888、875和823不包含日期或时间参考。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were kerberos authentication protocol, Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS), One Time Password System (OTP), Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM), security extensions to a variety of protocols including (but not limited to) RIPv2, HTTP, MIME, PPP, IP, Telnet and FTP.
RFC分为以下几类：kerberos身份验证协议、远程身份验证拨入用户服务（RADIUS）、一次性密码系统（OTP）、隐私增强邮件（PEM）、各种协议的安全扩展，包括（但不限于）RIPv2、HTTP、MIME、PPP、IP、Telnet和FTP。
Encryption and authentication algorithms are also examined.
还研究了加密和认证算法。
RFC 1507 on Distributed Authentication Security Services (DASS) discusses time and secure time in an expository manner in Sections 1.2.2, 1.4.4 and 2.1. Section 3.6 defines absolute time as an UTC time with a precision of 1 second, and Section 4.1 discusses ANS.1 encoding of time values. Because of the imprecision of the UTC time definition there could be problems with this protocol.
关于分布式身份验证安全服务（DAS）的RFC 1507在第1.2.2、1.4.4和2.1节中以解释性的方式讨论了时间和安全时间。第3.6节将绝对时间定义为精度为1秒的UTC时间，第4.1节讨论ANS.1时间值编码。由于UTC时间定义的不精确性，此协议可能存在问题。
RFCs 1421-1424 specifies that PEM uses UTC time formats which could have a Millennium issue since the year specification only provides the last two digits of the year.
RFCs 1421-1424规定PEM使用UTC时间格式，该格式可能存在千年问题，因为年份规范仅提供年份的最后两位数字。
RFC 2082 on RIP-2 MD5 Authentication requires storage of security keys for a specified lifetime in sections 4.1 and 4.2. There are no millennium issues in this protocol.
RIP-2 MD5身份验证上的RFC 2082要求在第4.1节和第4.2节中指定的生命周期内存储安全密钥。本议定书中没有千年问题。
RFC 2078 on the GSSAPI Version 2 defines numerous calls that use timers for inputs and outputs. Sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.5 and 2.2.6 all use the lifetime_rec field, which is defined as an integer counter in seconds. There should be no relevant problems with this protocol.
GSSAPI版本2上的RFC 2078定义了许多使用定时器进行输入和输出的调用。第2.1.1节、第2.1.3节、第2.1.4节、第2.1.5节、第2.2.1节、第2.2.2节、第2.2.5节和第2.2.6节均使用lifetime_rec字段，该字段定义为以秒为单位的整数计数器。本协议不应存在相关问题。
RFC 2069 on Digest Authentication for HTTP, defines a 'date' and a 1123 formats which is not subject to millennium issues. Section 3.2 discusses dates and times in the context of thwarting replay attacks, but have no relevant issues.
关于HTTP摘要身份验证的RFC 2069定义了一个“日期”和一个不受千年问题约束的1123格式。第3.2节讨论了阻止重播攻击的日期和时间，但没有相关问题。
RFC 2065 on DNS Security extensions first discusses time in section 2.3.3. The SIG RDATA format is defined in Section 4.1 discusses "time signed" field and defines it to be a 32 bit unsigned integer number of seconds since January 1, 1970. There will be a period problem in 2038 because of rollover. Section 4.5 on the file representations of SIG RRs specifies the time field is expressed as YYYYMMDDHHMMSS which is clearly Year 2000 compliant.
DNS安全扩展上的RFC 2065在第2.3.3节中首次讨论了时间。SIG RDATA格式在第4.1节中定义，讨论了“时间有符号”字段，并将其定义为自1970年1月1日起的32位无符号整数秒数。2038年将出现一个周期问题，因为会发生滚动。关于SIG RRs文件表示的第4.5节规定，时间字段表示为YYYYMMDDHHMMSS，显然符合2000年标准。
RFC 2059 on RADIUS account formats defines a "time" attribute, which is optional which is a 32 bit unsigned integer number of seconds since January 1, 1970. Likewise RFC 2058 on RADIUS also defines this optional attribute in the same way. There will be a potential period problem that occurs on 2038.
RADIUS帐户格式上的RFC 2059定义了一个“时间”属性，该属性是可选的，是自1970年1月1日以来的32位无符号整数秒数。同样，RADIUS上的RFC 2058也以相同的方式定义此可选属性。2038年将出现潜在的周期问题。
RFC 2035 on the Simple Public Key GSSAPI Mechanism talks about secure timestamps in the background and overview sections only in an expository manner.
简单公钥GSSAPI机制上的RFC 2035仅以解释性的方式在后台和概述部分讨论安全时间戳。
RFC 1969 on the PPP DES Encryption Protocol uses time as an example in Section 4 when discussing how to encrypt the first packet of a stream. It is suggested that the first 32 bits be used for the number of seconds since January 1, 1970. There could thus be a potential operations problem in 2038.
PPP DES加密协议上的RFC 1969在第4节讨论如何加密流的第一个数据包时使用时间作为示例。建议将前32位用于自1970年1月1日起的秒数。因此，2038年可能存在潜在的运营问题。
RFC 1898 on the CyberCash Credit Card Protocol provides an example message in Section 2.7 which uses a date field of the form YYYYMMDDHHMM that is clearly Y2K compliant.
CyberCash信用卡协议上的RFC 1898在第2.7节中提供了一条示例消息，该消息使用格式为YYYYMMDDHHMM的日期字段，该字段显然符合Y2K。
RFC 1510, which defines Kerberos Version 5, makes extensive use of times in the security model. There are discussions in the Introduction, as well as Sections 1.2, and 3.1.3. Kerberos uses ASN.1 definitions to abstract values, and hence defines a base definition for KerberosTime which is a generalized time format in Section 5.2. >From the text: "Example: The only valid format for UTC time 6 minutes, 27 seconds after 9 p.m. on 6 November 1985 is 19851106210627Z." A side note is that the MIT reference implementation of the Kerberos, by default set the expiration of tickets to December 31, 1999. This is not protocol related but could have some operational impacts.
RFC1510定义了Kerberos版本5，在安全模型中大量使用了时间。导言以及第1.2节和第3.1.3节对此进行了讨论。Kerberos使用ASN.1定义来抽象值，因此定义了KerberosTime的基本定义，这是第5.2节中的通用时间格式。>文本中：“示例：1985年11月6日晚上9点后6分27秒UTC时间的唯一有效格式是19851106210627Z。”附带说明的是，Kerberos的MIT参考实现默认将票证过期时间设置为1999年12月31日。这与协议无关，但可能会产生一些操作影响。
RFC 1509 on GSSAPI C-bindings makes a single reference that all counters are in seconds and assigned as 32 bit unsigned integers. Hence GSSAPI mechanisms may have problems in 2038.
GSSAPI C-bindings上的RFC1509生成一个引用，所有计数器以秒为单位，并分配为32位无符号整数。因此，GSSAPI机制在2038年可能会出现问题。
RFC 1507 on Distributed Authentication Security Services (DASS) discusses time and secure time in an expository manner in Sections 1.2.2, 1.4.4 and 2.1. Section 3.6 defines absolute time as an UTC time with a precision of 1 second, and Section 4.1 discusses ANS.1 encoding of time values. Because of the imprecision of the UTC time definition there could be problems with this protocol.
关于分布式身份验证安全服务（DAS）的RFC 1507在第1.2.2、1.4.4和2.1节中以解释性的方式讨论了时间和安全时间。第3.6节将绝对时间定义为精度为1秒的UTC时间，第4.1节讨论ANS.1时间值编码。由于UTC时间定义的不精确性，此协议可能存在问题。
RFC 1424 on PEM Part IV defines a self-signed certificate request in Section 3.1. The validity period start and end times are both suggested to be January 1, 1970. RFC 1422 on PEM Part II defines the validity period for a certificate in Section 3.3.6. It is recommended that UTC Time formats are used, and notes the lack of a century so that comparisons between different centuries must be done with care. No suggestions on how to do this are included. Sections 3.5.2 also discusses validity period in PEM CRLs. RFC 1421 on PEM Part I discusses validity periods in an expository way. PEM as a whole could have problems after December 31, 1999 based on its use of UTC Time.
PEM第四部分中的RFC 1424在第3.1节中定义了自签名证书请求。有效期开始和结束时间均建议为1970年1月1日。PEM第二部分RFC 1422定义了第3.3.6节中证书的有效期。建议使用UTC时间格式，并注意到缺少世纪，因此必须小心地进行不同世纪之间的比较。没有关于如何做到这一点的建议。第3.5.2节还讨论了PEM CRLs的有效期。关于PEM第一部分的RFC 1421以解释性的方式讨论了有效期。由于使用UTC时间，PEM作为一个整体在1999年12月31日之后可能会出现问题。
RFCs 1113, 1114, and 1115 specify the original version of PEM and have been obsoleted bye 1421, 1422, 1423, & 1424.
RFC 1113、1114和1115规定了PEM的原始版本，并在1421、1422、1423和1424年被淘汰。
RFCs 2104, 2085, 2084, 2057, 2040, 2015, 1984, 1968, 1964, 1961, 1949, 1948, 1938, 1929, 1928, 1858, 1852, 1851, 1829, 1828, 1827, 1826, 1825, 1824, 1760, 1751, 1750, 1704, 1675, 1579, 1535, 1511, 1492, 1457, 1455, 1423, 1416, 1412, 1411, 1409, 1408, 1321, 1320, 1319, 1281, 1244, 1186, 1170, 1156, 1108, 1004, 972, 931, 927, 912, and 644 contain no date or time references.
RFCs 2104、2085、2084、2057、2040、2015、1984、1968、1964、1961、1949、1948、1938、1929、1928、1858、1851、1829、1828、1827、1826、1825、1824、1760、1751、1750、1704、1675、1579、1535、1511、1492、1457、1423、1412、1411、1409、1321、1320、1319、1281、1244、1186、1170、1156、1108、1004、972、912、，和644不包含日期或时间引用。
The RFC's which were categorized into this group were Telnet and its many extensions, as well as the Secure SHell (SSH) protocol. The X window system was not considered since it is not an IETF protocol. Official acknowledgement by the trustee's of the X window system was given that they will examine the protocol.
被归为这一组的RFC是Telnet及其许多扩展，以及Secure SHell（SSH）协议。未考虑X window系统，因为它不是IETF协议。X window系统的受托人正式确认他们将检查协议。
Unencrypted Telnet and TN3270 have both been found to be Year 2000 Compliant. The SSH protocols are also Year 2000 compliant.
未加密的Telnet和TN3270都被发现与2000年兼容。SSH协议也与2000年兼容。
21.2 Specifics
21.2 详情
RFC 1013 on the X Windows version 11 alpha protocol defines are 32 bit unsigned integer timestamp in Section 4.
X Windows版本11 alpha协议上的RFC 1013在第4节中定义为32位无符号整数时间戳。
RFCs 2066, 1647, 1576, 1572, 1571, 1372, 1282, 1258, 1221, 1205, 1184, 1143, 1116, 1097, 1096, 1091, 1080, 1079, 1073, 1053, 1043, 1041, 1005, 946, 933, 930, 929, 907, 885, 884, 878, 861, 860, 859, 858, 857, 856, 855, 854, 851, 818, 802, 782, 779, 764, 749, 748, 747, 746, 736, 735, 734, 732, 731, 729, 728, 727, 726, 721, 719, 718, 701, 698, 658, 657, 656, 655, 654, 653, 652, 651, 647, 636, 431, 399, 393, 386, 365, 352, 340, 339, 328, 311, 297, 231, and 215 contain no date or time references.
本公司或其他（1143、1116、1116、1097、1096 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 658，657、656、655、654、653、652、651、647、636、431、399、393、386、365、352、340、339、328、311、297、231和215不包含日期或时间引用。
RFCs 703, 702, 688, 679, 669, 659, 600, 596, 595, 587, 563, 562, 560, 559, 513, 495, 470, 466, 461, 447, 435, 377, 364, 318, 296, 216, 206, 205, 177, 158, 139, 137, 110, 97 were unavailable.
RFC 703、702、688、679、669、659、600、596、595、587、563、562、560、559、513、495、470、466、461、447、435、377、364、318、296、216、206、205、177、158、139、137、110、97不可用。
This grouping was a hodge-podge of informational RFCs, April Fool's Jokes, IANA lists, and experimental RFCs. None were found to have any millennium issues.
这是一个由信息RFC、愚人节笑话、IANA列表和实验RFC组成的大杂烩。没有发现任何千年问题。
RFCs 2123, 2036, 2014, 2000, 1999, 1958, 1935, 1900, 1879, 1855, 1822, 1814, 1810, 1799, 1776, 1718, 1715, 1700, 1699, 1640, 1627, 1610, 1607, 1601, 1600, 1599, 1594, 1580, 1578, 1574, 1550, 1540, 1539, 1527, 1499, 1463, 1462, 1438, 1410, 1402, 1401, 1391, 1367, 1366, 1360, 1359, 1358, 1349, 1340, 1336, 1325, 1324, 1300, 1291, 1287, 1261, 1250, 1249, 1206, 1200, 1199, 1177, 1175, 1174, 1152, 1149, 1140, 1135, 1127, 1118, 1111, 1100, 1099, 1077, 1060, 1039, 1020, 1019, 999, 997, 992, 990, 980, 960, 945, 944, 943, 939, 909, 902, 900, 899, 873, 869, 846, 845, 844, 843, 842, 840, 839, 838, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, 831, 820, 817, 800, 776, 774, 770, 766, 762, 758, 755, 750, 745, 717, 637, 603, 602, 590, 581, 578, 529, 527, 526, 523, 519, 518, 496, 491, 432, 404, 403, 401, 372, 363, 356, 345, 330, 329, 327, 317, 316, 313, 295, 282, 263, 242, 239, 234, 232, 225, 223, 213, 209, 204, 198, 195, 173, 170, 169, 167, 154, 149, 148, 147, 140, 138, 132, 131, 130, 129, 126, 121, 112, 109, 107, 100, 95, 90, 68, 64, 57, 52, 51, 46, 43, 37, 27, 25, 21, 15, 10, and 9 were examined and none were found to have any date or time references, let alone millennium or Year 2000 issues.
RFCs 21232036201420001999 195819581935195901879185518218141810179917761717151700169916401627161610160160161616161616161616161616161616161616161616161616161616169158015781578157515401539152714914914631462143143143143143814313671361360135913581358134913491340133613251291， 1249, 1206, 1200, 1199, 1177, 1175, 1174, 1152, 1149, 1140, 1135, 1127, 1118, 1111, 1100, 1099, 1077, 1060, 1039, 1020, 1019, 999, 997, 992, 990, 980, 960, 945, 944, 943, 939, 909, 902, 900, 899, 873, 869, 846, 845, 844, 843, 842, 840, 839, 838, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, 831, 820, 817, 800, 776, 774, 770, 766, 762, 758, 755, 750, 745, 717, 637, 603, 602, 590, 581, 578, 529, 527, 526, 523, 519, 518, 496, 491, 432, 404, 403, 401, 372, 363, 356, 345, 330, 329, 327, 317, 316, 313, 295, 282, 263, 242, 239, 234, 232, 225, 223, 213, 209, 204, 198, 195, 173, 170, 169, 167, 154, 149, 148, 147, 140, 138, 132, 131, 130, 129, 126, 121, 112, 109, 107, 100, 95, 90, 68, 64, 57, 52, 51, 46, 43, 37,对27、25、21、15、10和9进行了检查，没有发现任何日期或时间参考，更不用说千年或2000年问题了。
Although this document does consider the implications of various security protocols, there is no need for additional security considerations. The effect of a potential year 2000 problem may cause some security problems, but those problems are more of specific applications rather than protocol deficiencies introduced in this document.
尽管该文档确实考虑了各种安全协议的影响，但不需要额外的安全考虑。潜在的2000年问题的影响可能会导致一些安全问题，但这些问题更多地是特定应用程序的问题，而不是本文档中介绍的协议缺陷。
Because of the exhaustive nature of this investigation, the reader is referred to the list of published RFC's available from the IETF Secretariat or the RFC Editor, rather than republishing them here.
由于本次调查的详尽性，读者可参考IETF秘书处或RFC编辑处发布的RFC列表，而不是在此重新发布。
Philip J. Nesser II Nesser & Nesser Consulting 13501 100th Ave N.E. Suite 5202 Kirkland, WA 98052
Philip J.Nesser II Nesser&Nesser Consulting 13501北东大街100号5202室华盛顿州柯克兰，邮编98052
Phone: 425-481-4303 EMail: pjnesser@nesser.com pjnesser@martigny.ai.mit.edu
电话：425-481-4303电子邮件：pjnesser@nesser.com pjnesser@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Appendix A: List of RFC's for each Area
附录A：每个区域的RFC清单
The following list contains the RFC's grouped by area that were searched for year 2000 problems.
以下列表包含按区域分组的RFC，这些区域用于搜索2000年问题。
Each line contains three fields are separated by '::'. The first filed is the RFC number, the second field is the type of RFC (S = Standard, DS = Draft Standard, PS = Proposed Standard, E = Experimental, H = Historical, I = Informational, BC = Best Current Practice, '' = No Type), and the third field is the Title.
每行包含三个字段，用“：：”分隔。第一个字段是RFC编号，第二个字段是RFC类型（S=标准，DS=标准草案，PS=建议标准，E=实验性，H=历史性，I=信息性，BC=最佳当前实践，''=无类型），第三个字段是标题。
1971:: PS:: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
1970:: PS:: Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)
1542:: PS:: Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol
1541:: PS:: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
1534:: PS:: Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP
1533:: PS:: DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions
1532:: PS:: Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol
1531:: PS:: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
1497:: DS:: BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions
1395:: DS:: BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions
1084:: DS:: BOOTP vendor information extensions
1048:: DS:: BOOTP vendor information extensions
951:: DS:: Bootstrap Protocol
906:: :: Bootstrap loading using TFTP
1971:: PS:: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
1970:: PS:: Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)
1542:: PS:: Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol
1541:: PS:: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
1534:: PS:: Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP
1533:: PS:: DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions
1532:: PS:: Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol
1531:: PS:: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
1497:: DS:: BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions
1395:: DS:: BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions
1084:: DS:: BOOTP vendor information extensions
1048:: DS:: BOOTP vendor information extensions
951:: DS:: Bootstrap Protocol
906:: :: Bootstrap loading using TFTP
2120:: E :: Managing the X.500 Root Naming Context
2079:: PS:: Definition of X.500 Attribute Types and an Object Class
to Hold Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
1943:: I:: Building an X.500 Directory Service in the US
1914:: PS:: How to interact with a Whois++ mesh
1913:: PS:: Architecture of the Whois++ Index Service
1838:: E:: Use of the X.500 Directory to support mapping between
X.400 and RFC 822 Addresses
1837:: E:: Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 Directory
1836:: E:: Representing the O/R Address hierarchy in the X.500
Directory Information Tree
1835:: PS:: Architecture of the WHOIS++ service
1834:: I:: Whois and Network Information Lookup Service Whois++
1781:: PS:: Using the OSI Directory to Achieve User Friendly Naming
1714:: I:: Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois)
1684:: I:: Introduction to White Pages services based on X.500
1637:: E:: DNS NSAP Resource Records
1632:: I:: A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
2120:: E :: Managing the X.500 Root Naming Context
2079:: PS:: Definition of X.500 Attribute Types and an Object Class
to Hold Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
1943:: I:: Building an X.500 Directory Service in the US
1914:: PS:: How to interact with a Whois++ mesh
1913:: PS:: Architecture of the Whois++ Index Service
1838:: E:: Use of the X.500 Directory to support mapping between
X.400 and RFC 822 Addresses
1837:: E:: Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 Directory
1836:: E:: Representing the O/R Address hierarchy in the X.500
Directory Information Tree
1835:: PS:: Architecture of the WHOIS++ service
1834:: I:: Whois and Network Information Lookup Service Whois++
1781:: PS:: Using the OSI Directory to Achieve User Friendly Naming
1714:: I:: Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois)
1684:: I:: Introduction to White Pages services based on X.500
1637:: E:: DNS NSAP Resource Records
1632:: I:: A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
1617:: I:: Naming and Structuring Guidelines for X.500 Directory Pilots
1609:: E:: Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory
1608:: E:: Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory
1588:: I:: WHITE PAGES MEETING REPORT
1562:: I:: Naming Guidelines for the AARNet X.500 Directory Service
1491:: I:: A Survey of Advanced Usages of X.500
1488:: PS:: The X.500 String Representation of Standard Attribute
Syntaxes
1487:: PS:: X.500 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1485:: PS:: A String Representation of Distinguished Names
1484:: E:: Using the OSI Directory to achieve User Friendly Naming
1430:: I:: A Strategic Plan for Deploying an Internet X.500
Directory Service
1400:: I:: Transition and Modernization of the Internet Registration
Service
1384:: I:: Naming Guidelines for Directory Pilots
1355:: I:: Privacy and Accuracy Issues in Network Information
Center Databases
1330:: I:: Recommendations for the Phase I Deployment of OSI
Directory Services (X.500) and OSI Message Handling
Services (X.400) within the ESnet Community
1309:: I:: Technical Overview of Directory Services Using the
X.500 Protocol
1308:: I:: Executive Introduction to Directory Services Using the
X.500 Protocol
1292:: I:: A Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
1279:: :: X.500 and Domains
1276:: PS:: Replication and Distributed Operations extensions to
provide an Internet Directory using X.500
1275:: I:: Replication Requirements to provide an Internet Directory
using X.500
1274:: PS:: The COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema
1255:: I:: A Naming Scheme for c=US
1218:: :: A Naming Scheme for c=US
1202:: I:: Directory Assistance Service
1107:: :: Plan for Internet directory services
954:: DS:: NICNAME/WHOIS
953:: H:: Hostname Server
812:: :: NICNAME/WHOIS
756:: :: NIC name server - a datagram-based information utility
752:: :: Universal host table
============ ==========================================================
Disk Sharing
1813:: I:: NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification
1094:: H:: NFS: Network File System Protocol specification
============ ==========================================================
Games and Chat
1459:: E:: Internet Relay Chat Protocol
1617:: I:: Naming and Structuring Guidelines for X.500 Directory Pilots
1609:: E:: Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory
1608:: E:: Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory
1588:: I:: WHITE PAGES MEETING REPORT
1562:: I:: Naming Guidelines for the AARNet X.500 Directory Service
1491:: I:: A Survey of Advanced Usages of X.500
1488:: PS:: The X.500 String Representation of Standard Attribute
Syntaxes
1487:: PS:: X.500 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1485:: PS:: A String Representation of Distinguished Names
1484:: E:: Using the OSI Directory to achieve User Friendly Naming
1430:: I:: A Strategic Plan for Deploying an Internet X.500
Directory Service
1400:: I:: Transition and Modernization of the Internet Registration
Service
1384:: I:: Naming Guidelines for Directory Pilots
1355:: I:: Privacy and Accuracy Issues in Network Information
Center Databases
1330:: I:: Recommendations for the Phase I Deployment of OSI
Directory Services (X.500) and OSI Message Handling
Services (X.400) within the ESnet Community
1309:: I:: Technical Overview of Directory Services Using the
X.500 Protocol
1308:: I:: Executive Introduction to Directory Services Using the
X.500 Protocol
1292:: I:: A Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations
1279:: :: X.500 and Domains
1276:: PS:: Replication and Distributed Operations extensions to
provide an Internet Directory using X.500
1275:: I:: Replication Requirements to provide an Internet Directory
using X.500
1274:: PS:: The COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema
1255:: I:: A Naming Scheme for c=US
1218:: :: A Naming Scheme for c=US
1202:: I:: Directory Assistance Service
1107:: :: Plan for Internet directory services
954:: DS:: NICNAME/WHOIS
953:: H:: Hostname Server
812:: :: NICNAME/WHOIS
756:: :: NIC name server - a datagram-based information utility
752:: :: Universal host table
============ ==========================================================
Disk Sharing
1813:: I:: NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification
1094:: H:: NFS: Network File System Protocol specification
============ ==========================================================
Games and Chat
1459:: E:: Internet Relay Chat Protocol
======================================================================
Information Services & File Transfer
2122:: PS:: VEMMI URL Specification
2070:: PS:: Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup Language
2068:: PS:: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1
2056:: PS:: Uniform Resource Locators for Z39.50
2055:: I:: WebNFS Server Specification
2054:: I:: WebNFS Client Specification
2044:: I:: UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO 10646
2016:: E:: Uniform Resource Agents (URAs)
1986:: E:: Experiments with a Simple File Transfer Protocol for
Radio Links using Enhanced Trivial File Transfer
Protocol (ETFTP)
1980:: I:: A Proposed Extension to HTML: Client-Side Image Maps
1960:: PS:: A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
1959:: PS:: An LDAP URL Format
1945:: I:: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0
1942:: E:: HTML Tables
1874:: E:: SGML Media Types
1867:: E:: Form-based File Upload in HTML
1866:: PS:: Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0
1865:: I:: EDI Meets the Internet: Frequently Asked Questions
about Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) on the Internet
1862:: I:: Report of the IAB Workshop on Internet Information
Infrastructure, October 12-14, 1994
1843:: I:: HZ - A Data Format for Exchanging Files of Arbitrarily
Mixed Chinese and ASCII characters
1842:: I:: ASCII Printable Characters-Based Chinese Character
Encoding for Internet Messages
1823:: I:: The LDAP Application Program Interface
1815:: I:: Character Sets ISO-10646 and ISO-10646-J-1
1808:: PS:: Relative Uniform Resource Locators
1807:: I:: A Format for Bibliographic Records
1798:: PS:: Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1788:: E:: ICMP Domain Name Messages
1785:: I:: TFTP Option Negotiation Analysis
1784:: PS:: TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size Options
1783:: PS:: TFTP Blocksize Option
1782:: PS:: TFTP Option Extension
1779:: DS:: A String Representation of Distinguished Names
1778:: DS:: The String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes
1777:: DS:: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1766:: PS:: Tags for the Identification of Languages
1738:: PS:: Uniform Resource Locators (URL)
1737:: I:: Functional Requirements for Uniform Resource Names
1736:: I:: Functional Requirements for Internet Resource Locators
1729:: I:: Using the Z39.50 Information Retrieval Protocol in the
Internet Environment
======================================================================
Information Services & File Transfer
2122:: PS:: VEMMI URL Specification
2070:: PS:: Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup Language
2068:: PS:: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1
2056:: PS:: Uniform Resource Locators for Z39.50
2055:: I:: WebNFS Server Specification
2054:: I:: WebNFS Client Specification
2044:: I:: UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO 10646
2016:: E:: Uniform Resource Agents (URAs)
1986:: E:: Experiments with a Simple File Transfer Protocol for
Radio Links using Enhanced Trivial File Transfer
Protocol (ETFTP)
1980:: I:: A Proposed Extension to HTML: Client-Side Image Maps
1960:: PS:: A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
1959:: PS:: An LDAP URL Format
1945:: I:: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0
1942:: E:: HTML Tables
1874:: E:: SGML Media Types
1867:: E:: Form-based File Upload in HTML
1866:: PS:: Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0
1865:: I:: EDI Meets the Internet: Frequently Asked Questions
about Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) on the Internet
1862:: I:: Report of the IAB Workshop on Internet Information
Infrastructure, October 12-14, 1994
1843:: I:: HZ - A Data Format for Exchanging Files of Arbitrarily
Mixed Chinese and ASCII characters
1842:: I:: ASCII Printable Characters-Based Chinese Character
Encoding for Internet Messages
1823:: I:: The LDAP Application Program Interface
1815:: I:: Character Sets ISO-10646 and ISO-10646-J-1
1808:: PS:: Relative Uniform Resource Locators
1807:: I:: A Format for Bibliographic Records
1798:: PS:: Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1788:: E:: ICMP Domain Name Messages
1785:: I:: TFTP Option Negotiation Analysis
1784:: PS:: TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size Options
1783:: PS:: TFTP Blocksize Option
1782:: PS:: TFTP Option Extension
1779:: DS:: A String Representation of Distinguished Names
1778:: DS:: The String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes
1777:: DS:: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1766:: PS:: Tags for the Identification of Languages
1738:: PS:: Uniform Resource Locators (URL)
1737:: I:: Functional Requirements for Uniform Resource Names
1736:: I:: Functional Requirements for Internet Resource Locators
1729:: I:: Using the Z39.50 Information Retrieval Protocol in the
Internet Environment
1728:: I:: Resource Transponders
1727:: I:: A Vision of an Integrated Internet Information Service
1639:: E:: FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR)
1633:: I:: Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture
1630:: I:: Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW
1625:: I:: WAIS over Z39.50-1988
1558:: I:: A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
1554:: I:: ISO-2022-JP-2: Multilingual Extension of ISO-2022-JP
1545:: E:: FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR)
1530:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
General Principles and Policy
1529:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
Remote Printing -- Administrative Policies
1528:: E:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
Remote Printing -- Technical Procedures
1489:: I:: Registration of a Cyrillic Character Set
1486:: E:: An Experiment in Remote Printing
1440:: E:: SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer
1436:: I:: The Internet Gopher Protocol (a distributed document
search and retrieval protocol)
1415:: PS:: FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification
1413:: PS:: Identification Protocol
1350:: S:: THE TFTP PROTOCOL (REVISION 2)
1345:: I:: Character Mnemonics & Character Sets
1312:: E:: Message Send Protocol
1302:: I:: Building a Network Information Services Infrastructure
1288:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1278:: I:: A String Encoding of Presentation Address
1241:: E:: A Scheme for an Internet Encapsulation Protocol: Version 1
1235:: E:: The Coherent File Distribution Protocol
1196:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1194:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1179:: I:: Line Printer Daemon Protocol
1123:: S:: Requirements for Internet hosts - application and support
1068:: :: Background File Transfer Program BFTP
1037:: H:: NFILE - a file access protocol
1003:: :: Issues in defining an equations representation standard
998:: E:: NETBLT: A bulk data transfer protocol
978:: :: Voice File Interchange Protocol VFIP
971:: :: Survey of data representation standards
969:: :: NETBLT: A bulk data transfer protocol
965:: :: Format for a graphical communication protocol
959:: S:: File Transfer Protocol
949:: :: FTP unique-named store command
916:: H:: Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol RATP
913:: H:: Simple File Transfer Protocol
887:: E:: Resource Location Protocol
866:: S:: Active users
1728:: I:: Resource Transponders
1727:: I:: A Vision of an Integrated Internet Information Service
1639:: E:: FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR)
1633:: I:: Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture
1630:: I:: Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW
1625:: I:: WAIS over Z39.50-1988
1558:: I:: A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters
1554:: I:: ISO-2022-JP-2: Multilingual Extension of ISO-2022-JP
1545:: E:: FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR)
1530:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
General Principles and Policy
1529:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
Remote Printing -- Administrative Policies
1528:: E:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain:
Remote Printing -- Technical Procedures
1489:: I:: Registration of a Cyrillic Character Set
1486:: E:: An Experiment in Remote Printing
1440:: E:: SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer
1436:: I:: The Internet Gopher Protocol (a distributed document
search and retrieval protocol)
1415:: PS:: FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification
1413:: PS:: Identification Protocol
1350:: S:: THE TFTP PROTOCOL (REVISION 2)
1345:: I:: Character Mnemonics & Character Sets
1312:: E:: Message Send Protocol
1302:: I:: Building a Network Information Services Infrastructure
1288:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1278:: I:: A String Encoding of Presentation Address
1241:: E:: A Scheme for an Internet Encapsulation Protocol: Version 1
1235:: E:: The Coherent File Distribution Protocol
1196:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1194:: DS:: The Finger User Information Protocol
1179:: I:: Line Printer Daemon Protocol
1123:: S:: Requirements for Internet hosts - application and support
1068:: :: Background File Transfer Program BFTP
1037:: H:: NFILE - a file access protocol
1003:: :: Issues in defining an equations representation standard
998:: E:: NETBLT: A bulk data transfer protocol
978:: :: Voice File Interchange Protocol VFIP
971:: :: Survey of data representation standards
969:: :: NETBLT: A bulk data transfer protocol
965:: :: Format for a graphical communication protocol
959:: S:: File Transfer Protocol
949:: :: FTP unique-named store command
916:: H:: Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol RATP
913:: H:: Simple File Transfer Protocol
887:: E:: Resource Location Protocol
866:: S:: Active users
865:: S:: Quote of the Day Protocol
864:: S:: Character Generator Protocol
863:: S:: Discard Protocol
862:: S:: Echo Protocol
797:: :: Format for Bitmap files
795:: :: Service mappings
783:: DS:: TFTP Protocol revision 2
775:: :: Directory oriented FTP commands
765:: :: File Transfer Protocol specification
751:: :: Survey of FTP mail and MLFL
743:: :: FTP extension: XRSQ/XRCP
742:: PS:: NAME/FINGER Protocol
740:: H:: NETRJS Protocol
737:: :: FTP extension: XSEN
725:: :: RJE protocol for a resource sharing network
722:: :: Thoughts on interactions in distributed services
712:: :: Distributed Capability Computing System DCCS
707:: :: High-level framework for network-based resource sharing
697:: :: CWD command of FTP
691:: :: One more try on the FTP
683:: :: FTPSRV - Tenex extension for paged files
662:: :: Performance improvement in ARPANET file transfers
from Multics
640:: :: Revised FTP reply codes
633:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
630:: :: FTP error code usage for more reliable mail service
624:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
622:: :: Scheduling IMP/TIP down time
614:: :: Response to RFC 607: "Comments on the File Transfer
Protocol"
610:: :: Further datalanguage design concepts
607:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
599:: :: Update on NETRJS
593:: :: Telnet and FTP implementation schedule change
592:: :: Some thoughts on system design to facilitate resource
sharing
589:: :: CCN NETRJS server messages to remote user
573:: :: Data and file transfer: Some measurement results
571:: :: Tenex FTP problem
570:: :: Experimental input mapping between NVT ASCII and UCSB
On Line System
553:: :: Draft design for a text/graphics protocol
551:: :: [Letter from Feinroth re: NYU, ANL, and LBL entering
the net, and FTP protocol]
549:: :: Minutes of Network Graphics Group meeting, 15-17
July 1973
543:: :: Network journal submission and delivery
542:: :: File Transfer Protocol
865:: S:: Quote of the Day Protocol
864:: S:: Character Generator Protocol
863:: S:: Discard Protocol
862:: S:: Echo Protocol
797:: :: Format for Bitmap files
795:: :: Service mappings
783:: DS:: TFTP Protocol revision 2
775:: :: Directory oriented FTP commands
765:: :: File Transfer Protocol specification
751:: :: Survey of FTP mail and MLFL
743:: :: FTP extension: XRSQ/XRCP
742:: PS:: NAME/FINGER Protocol
740:: H:: NETRJS Protocol
737:: :: FTP extension: XSEN
725:: :: RJE protocol for a resource sharing network
722:: :: Thoughts on interactions in distributed services
712:: :: Distributed Capability Computing System DCCS
707:: :: High-level framework for network-based resource sharing
697:: :: CWD command of FTP
691:: :: One more try on the FTP
683:: :: FTPSRV - Tenex extension for paged files
662:: :: Performance improvement in ARPANET file transfers
from Multics
640:: :: Revised FTP reply codes
633:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
630:: :: FTP error code usage for more reliable mail service
624:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
622:: :: Scheduling IMP/TIP down time
614:: :: Response to RFC 607: "Comments on the File Transfer
Protocol"
610:: :: Further datalanguage design concepts
607:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
599:: :: Update on NETRJS
593:: :: Telnet and FTP implementation schedule change
592:: :: Some thoughts on system design to facilitate resource
sharing
589:: :: CCN NETRJS server messages to remote user
573:: :: Data and file transfer: Some measurement results
571:: :: Tenex FTP problem
570:: :: Experimental input mapping between NVT ASCII and UCSB
On Line System
553:: :: Draft design for a text/graphics protocol
551:: :: [Letter from Feinroth re: NYU, ANL, and LBL entering
the net, and FTP protocol]
549:: :: Minutes of Network Graphics Group meeting, 15-17
July 1973
543:: :: Network journal submission and delivery
542:: :: File Transfer Protocol
535:: :: Comments on File Access Protocol
532:: :: UCSD-CC Server-FTP facility
525:: :: MIT-MATHLAB meets UCSB-OLS -an example of resource sharing
520:: :: Memo to FTP group: Proposal for File Access Protocol
514:: :: Network make-work
506:: :: FTP command naming problem
505:: :: Two solutions to a file transfer access problem
504:: :: Distributed resources workshop announcement
501:: :: Un-muddling "free file transfer"
499:: :: Harvard's network RJE
493:: :: E.W., Jr Graphics Protocol
490:: :: Surrogate RJS for UCLA-CCN
487:: :: Free file transfer
486:: :: Data transfer revisited
485:: :: MIX and MIXAL at UCSB
480:: :: Host-dependent FTP parameters
479:: :: Use of FTP by the NIC Journal
478:: :: FTP server-server interaction - II
477:: :: Remote Job Service at UCSB
472:: :: Illinois' reply to Maxwell's request for graphics
information NIC 14925
468:: :: FTP data compression
467:: :: Proposed change to Host-Host Protocol:Resynchronization
of connection status
463:: :: FTP comments and response to RFC 430
454:: :: File Transfer Protocol - meeting announcement and a new
proposed document
451:: :: Tentative proposal for a Unified User Level Protocol
448:: :: Print files in FTP
446:: :: Proposal to consider a network program resource notebook
438:: :: FTP server-server interaction
437:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service at UCSB
436:: :: Announcement of RJS at UCSB
430:: :: Comments on File Transfer Protocol
429:: :: Character generator process
418:: :: Server file transfer under TSS/360 at NASA Ames
414:: :: File Transfer Protocol FTP status and further comments
412:: :: User FTP documentation
411:: :: New MULTICS network software features
410:: :: Removal of the 30-second delay when hosts come up
409:: :: Tenex interface to UCSB's Simple-Minded File System
407:: H:: Remote Job Entry Protocol
406:: :: Scheduled IMP software releases
396:: :: Network Graphics Working Group meeting - second iteration
387:: :: Some experiences in implementing Network Graphics
Protocol Level 0
385:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
382:: :: Mathematical software on the ARPA Network
535:: :: Comments on File Access Protocol
532:: :: UCSD-CC Server-FTP facility
525:: :: MIT-MATHLAB meets UCSB-OLS -an example of resource sharing
520:: :: Memo to FTP group: Proposal for File Access Protocol
514:: :: Network make-work
506:: :: FTP command naming problem
505:: :: Two solutions to a file transfer access problem
504:: :: Distributed resources workshop announcement
501:: :: Un-muddling "free file transfer"
499:: :: Harvard's network RJE
493:: :: E.W., Jr Graphics Protocol
490:: :: Surrogate RJS for UCLA-CCN
487:: :: Free file transfer
486:: :: Data transfer revisited
485:: :: MIX and MIXAL at UCSB
480:: :: Host-dependent FTP parameters
479:: :: Use of FTP by the NIC Journal
478:: :: FTP server-server interaction - II
477:: :: Remote Job Service at UCSB
472:: :: Illinois' reply to Maxwell's request for graphics
information NIC 14925
468:: :: FTP data compression
467:: :: Proposed change to Host-Host Protocol:Resynchronization
of connection status
463:: :: FTP comments and response to RFC 430
454:: :: File Transfer Protocol - meeting announcement and a new
proposed document
451:: :: Tentative proposal for a Unified User Level Protocol
448:: :: Print files in FTP
446:: :: Proposal to consider a network program resource notebook
438:: :: FTP server-server interaction
437:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service at UCSB
436:: :: Announcement of RJS at UCSB
430:: :: Comments on File Transfer Protocol
429:: :: Character generator process
418:: :: Server file transfer under TSS/360 at NASA Ames
414:: :: File Transfer Protocol FTP status and further comments
412:: :: User FTP documentation
411:: :: New MULTICS network software features
410:: :: Removal of the 30-second delay when hosts come up
409:: :: Tenex interface to UCSB's Simple-Minded File System
407:: H:: Remote Job Entry Protocol
406:: :: Scheduled IMP software releases
396:: :: Network Graphics Working Group meeting - second iteration
387:: :: Some experiences in implementing Network Graphics
Protocol Level 0
385:: :: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
382:: :: Mathematical software on the ARPA Network
374:: :: IMP system announcement
373:: :: Arbitrary character sets
368:: :: Comments on "Proposed Remote Job Entry Protocol"
367:: :: Network host status
366:: :: Network host status
361:: :: Deamon processes on host 106
360:: :: Proposed Remote Job Entry Protocol
354:: :: File Transfer Protocol
351:: :: Graphics information form for the ARPANET graphics
resources notebook
342:: :: Network host status
338:: :: EBCDIC/ASCII mapping for network RJE
336:: :: Level 0 Graphic Input Protocol
335:: :: New interface - IMP/360
332:: :: Network host status
325:: :: Network Remote Job Entry program - NETRJS
324:: :: RJE Protocol meeting
314:: :: Network Graphics Working Group meeting
310:: :: Another look at Data and File Transfer Protocols
309:: :: Data and File Transfer workshop announcement
307:: :: Using network Remote Job Entry
306:: :: Network host status
299:: :: Information management system
298:: :: Network host status
294:: :: On the use of "set data type" transaction in
File Transfer Protocol
293:: :: Network host status
292:: :: E.W., Jr Graphics Protocol: Level 0 only
288:: :: Network host status
287:: :: Status of network hosts
286:: :: Network library information system
285:: :: Network graphics
283:: :: NETRJT: Remote Job Service Protocol for TIPS
281:: :: Suggested addition to File Transfer Protocol
268:: :: Graphics facilities information
267:: :: Network host status
266:: :: Network host status
265:: :: File Transfer Protocol
264:: :: Data Transfer Protocol
255:: :: Status of network hosts
252:: :: Network host status
250:: :: Some thoughts on file transfer
238:: :: Comments on DTP and FTP proposals
217:: :: Specifications changes for OLS, RJE/RJOR, and SMFS
199:: :: Suggestions for a network data-tablet graphics protocol
192:: :: Some factors which a Network Graphics Protocol must
consider
191:: :: Graphics implementation and conceptualization at
374:: :: IMP system announcement
373:: :: Arbitrary character sets
368:: :: Comments on "Proposed Remote Job Entry Protocol"
367:: :: Network host status
366:: :: Network host status
361:: :: Deamon processes on host 106
360:: :: Proposed Remote Job Entry Protocol
354:: :: File Transfer Protocol
351:: :: Graphics information form for the ARPANET graphics
resources notebook
342:: :: Network host status
338:: :: EBCDIC/ASCII mapping for network RJE
336:: :: Level 0 Graphic Input Protocol
335:: :: New interface - IMP/360
332:: :: Network host status
325:: :: Network Remote Job Entry program - NETRJS
324:: :: RJE Protocol meeting
314:: :: Network Graphics Working Group meeting
310:: :: Another look at Data and File Transfer Protocols
309:: :: Data and File Transfer workshop announcement
307:: :: Using network Remote Job Entry
306:: :: Network host status
299:: :: Information management system
298:: :: Network host status
294:: :: On the use of "set data type" transaction in
File Transfer Protocol
293:: :: Network host status
292:: :: E.W., Jr Graphics Protocol: Level 0 only
288:: :: Network host status
287:: :: Status of network hosts
286:: :: Network library information system
285:: :: Network graphics
283:: :: NETRJT: Remote Job Service Protocol for TIPS
281:: :: Suggested addition to File Transfer Protocol
268:: :: Graphics facilities information
267:: :: Network host status
266:: :: Network host status
265:: :: File Transfer Protocol
264:: :: Data Transfer Protocol
255:: :: Status of network hosts
252:: :: Network host status
250:: :: Some thoughts on file transfer
238:: :: Comments on DTP and FTP proposals
217:: :: Specifications changes for OLS, RJE/RJOR, and SMFS
199:: :: Suggestions for a network data-tablet graphics protocol
192:: :: Some factors which a Network Graphics Protocol must
consider
191:: :: Graphics implementation and conceptualization at
Augmentation Research Center
189:: :: Interim NETRJS specifications
184:: :: Proposed graphic display modes
183:: :: EBCDIC codes and their mapping to ASCII
181:: :: Modifications to RFC 177
174:: :: UCLA - computer science graphics overview
172:: :: File Transfer Protocol
163:: :: Data transfer protocols
141:: :: Comments on RFC 114: A File Transfer Protocol
134:: :: Network Graphics meeting
133:: :: File transfer and recovery
125:: :: Response to RFC 86: Proposal for network standard format
for a graphics data stream
114:: :: File Transfer Protocol
105:: :: Network specifications for Remote Job Entry and Remote
Job Output Retrieval at UCSB
98:: :: Logger Protocol proposal
94:: :: Some thoughts on network graphics
88:: :: NETRJS: A third level protocol for Remote JobEntry
86:: :: Proposal for a network standard format for a data stream
to control graphics display
83:: :: Language-machine for data reconfiguration
========== ============================================================
Internet & Network Layer
2126:: PS:: ISO Transport Service on top of TCP (ITOT)
2125:: PS:: The PPP Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP) The PPP
Bandwidth Allocation Control Protocol (BACP)
2118:: I:: Microsoft Point-To-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol
2114:: I:: Data Link Switching Client Access Protocol
2113:: PS:: IP Router Alert Option
2107:: I:: Ascend Tunnel Management Protocol - ATMP
2106:: I:: Data Link Switching Remote Access Protocol
2105:: I:: Cisco Systems' Tag Switching Architecture Overview
2098:: I:: Toshiba's Router Architecture Extensions for ATM:Overview
2097:: PS:: The PPP NetBIOS Frames Control Protocol (NBFCP)
2075:: I:: IP Echo Host Service
2067:: DS:: IP over HIPPI
2043:: PS:: The PPP SNA Control Protocol (SNACP)
2023:: PS:: IP Version 6 over PPP
2019:: PS:: Transmission of IPv6 Packets Over FDDI
2018:: PS:: TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options
2009:: E:: GPS-Based Addressing and Routing
2005:: PS:: Applicability Statement for IP Mobility Support
2004:: PS:: Minimal Encapsulation within IP
2003:: PS:: IP Encapsulation within IP
2002:: PS:: IP Mobility Support
2001:: PS:: TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit,
and Fast Recovery Algorithms
Augmentation Research Center
189:: :: Interim NETRJS specifications
184:: :: Proposed graphic display modes
183:: :: EBCDIC codes and their mapping to ASCII
181:: :: Modifications to RFC 177
174:: :: UCLA - computer science graphics overview
172:: :: File Transfer Protocol
163:: :: Data transfer protocols
141:: :: Comments on RFC 114: A File Transfer Protocol
134:: :: Network Graphics meeting
133:: :: File transfer and recovery
125:: :: Response to RFC 86: Proposal for network standard format
for a graphics data stream
114:: :: File Transfer Protocol
105:: :: Network specifications for Remote Job Entry and Remote
Job Output Retrieval at UCSB
98:: :: Logger Protocol proposal
94:: :: Some thoughts on network graphics
88:: :: NETRJS: A third level protocol for Remote JobEntry
86:: :: Proposal for a network standard format for a data stream
to control graphics display
83:: :: Language-machine for data reconfiguration
========== ============================================================
Internet & Network Layer
2126:: PS:: ISO Transport Service on top of TCP (ITOT)
2125:: PS:: The PPP Bandwidth Allocation Protocol (BAP) The PPP
Bandwidth Allocation Control Protocol (BACP)
2118:: I:: Microsoft Point-To-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol
2114:: I:: Data Link Switching Client Access Protocol
2113:: PS:: IP Router Alert Option
2107:: I:: Ascend Tunnel Management Protocol - ATMP
2106:: I:: Data Link Switching Remote Access Protocol
2105:: I:: Cisco Systems' Tag Switching Architecture Overview
2098:: I:: Toshiba's Router Architecture Extensions for ATM:Overview
2097:: PS:: The PPP NetBIOS Frames Control Protocol (NBFCP)
2075:: I:: IP Echo Host Service
2067:: DS:: IP over HIPPI
2043:: PS:: The PPP SNA Control Protocol (SNACP)
2023:: PS:: IP Version 6 over PPP
2019:: PS:: Transmission of IPv6 Packets Over FDDI
2018:: PS:: TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options
2009:: E:: GPS-Based Addressing and Routing
2005:: PS:: Applicability Statement for IP Mobility Support
2004:: PS:: Minimal Encapsulation within IP
2003:: PS:: IP Encapsulation within IP
2002:: PS:: IP Mobility Support
2001:: PS:: TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit,
and Fast Recovery Algorithms
1994:: DS:: PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)
1993:: I:: PPP Gandalf FZA Compression Protocol
1990:: DS:: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
1989:: DS:: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
1981:: PS:: Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
1979:: I:: PPP Deflate Protocol
1978:: I:: PPP Predictor Compression Protocol
1977:: I:: PPP BSD Compression Protocol
1976:: I:: PPP for Data Compression in Data Circuit-Terminating
Equipment (DCE)
1975:: I:: PPP Magnalink Variable Resource Compression
1974:: I:: PPP Stac LZS Compression Protocol
1973:: PS:: PPP in Frame Relay
1972:: PS:: A Method for the Transmission of IPv6 Packets over
Ethernet Networks
1967:: I:: PPP LZS-DCP Compression Protocol (LZS-DCP)
1963:: I:: PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol (SDTP)
1962:: PS:: The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP)
1954:: I:: Transmission of Flow Labelled IPv4 on ATM Data Links
Ipsilon Version 1.0
1946:: I:: Native ATM Support for ST2+
1937:: I:: Local/Remote Forwarding Decision in Switched Data
Link Subnetworks
1936:: I:: Implementing the Internet Checksum in Hardware
1934:: I:: Ascend's Multilink Protocol Plus (MP+)
1933:: PS:: Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers
1932:: I:: IP over ATM: A Framework Document
1931:: I:: Dynamic RARP Extensions and Administrative Support for
Automatic Network Address Allocation
1926:: I:: An Experimental Encapsulation of IP Datagrams on
Top of ATM
1924:: I:: A Compact Representation of IPv6 Addresses
1919:: I:: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies
1918:: BC:: Address Allocation for Private Internets
1917:: BC:: An Appeal to the Internet Community to Return Unused
IP Networks (Prefixes) to the IANA
1916:: I:: Enterprise Renumbering
1915:: BC:: Variance for The PPP Connection Control Protocol and
The PPP Encryption Control Protocol
1897:: E:: IPv6 Testing Address Allocation
1888:: E:: OSI NSAPs and IPv6
1887:: I:: An Architecture for IPv6 Unicast Address Allocation
1885:: PS:: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
1884:: PS:: IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
1883:: PS:: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
1881:: I:: IPv6 Address Allocation Management
1878:: I:: Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4
1994:: DS:: PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)
1993:: I:: PPP Gandalf FZA Compression Protocol
1990:: DS:: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
1989:: DS:: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
1981:: PS:: Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
1979:: I:: PPP Deflate Protocol
1978:: I:: PPP Predictor Compression Protocol
1977:: I:: PPP BSD Compression Protocol
1976:: I:: PPP for Data Compression in Data Circuit-Terminating
Equipment (DCE)
1975:: I:: PPP Magnalink Variable Resource Compression
1974:: I:: PPP Stac LZS Compression Protocol
1973:: PS:: PPP in Frame Relay
1972:: PS:: A Method for the Transmission of IPv6 Packets over
Ethernet Networks
1967:: I:: PPP LZS-DCP Compression Protocol (LZS-DCP)
1963:: I:: PPP Serial Data Transport Protocol (SDTP)
1962:: PS:: The PPP Compression Control Protocol (CCP)
1954:: I:: Transmission of Flow Labelled IPv4 on ATM Data Links
Ipsilon Version 1.0
1946:: I:: Native ATM Support for ST2+
1937:: I:: Local/Remote Forwarding Decision in Switched Data
Link Subnetworks
1936:: I:: Implementing the Internet Checksum in Hardware
1934:: I:: Ascend's Multilink Protocol Plus (MP+)
1933:: PS:: Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers
1932:: I:: IP over ATM: A Framework Document
1931:: I:: Dynamic RARP Extensions and Administrative Support for
Automatic Network Address Allocation
1926:: I:: An Experimental Encapsulation of IP Datagrams on
Top of ATM
1924:: I:: A Compact Representation of IPv6 Addresses
1919:: I:: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies
1918:: BC:: Address Allocation for Private Internets
1917:: BC:: An Appeal to the Internet Community to Return Unused
IP Networks (Prefixes) to the IANA
1916:: I:: Enterprise Renumbering
1915:: BC:: Variance for The PPP Connection Control Protocol and
The PPP Encryption Control Protocol
1897:: E:: IPv6 Testing Address Allocation
1888:: E:: OSI NSAPs and IPv6
1887:: I:: An Architecture for IPv6 Unicast Address Allocation
1885:: PS:: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
1884:: PS:: IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
1883:: PS:: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification
1881:: I:: IPv6 Address Allocation Management
1878:: I:: Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4
1877:: I:: PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol Extensions for
Name Server Addresses
1868:: E:: ARP Extension - UNARP
1860:: I:: Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4
1859:: I:: ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control
over TCP RFC1006 extension
1853:: I:: IP in IP Tunneling
1841:: I:: PPP Network Control Protocol for LAN Extension
1833:: PS:: Binding Protocols for ONC RPC Version 2
1832:: PS:: XDR
1831:: PS:: RPC
1809:: I:: Using the Flow Label Field in IPv6
1795:: I:: Data Link Switching
1791:: E:: TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU
1770:: I:: IPv4 Option for Sender Directed Multi-Destination Delivery
1764:: PS:: The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP)
1763:: PS:: The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP)
1762:: DS:: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
1761:: I:: Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format
1756:: E:: REMOTE WRITE PROTOCOL - VERSION 1.0
1755:: PS:: ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATM
1754:: I:: IP over ATM Working Group's Recommendations for the
ATM Forum's Multiprotocol BOF Version 1
1752:: PS:: The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol
1744:: I:: Observations on the Management of the Internet Address
Space
1735:: E:: NBMA Address Resolution Protocol (NARP)
1726:: I:: Technical Criteria for Choosing IP
1719:: I:: A Direction for IPng
1717:: PS:: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
1710:: I:: Simple Internet Protocol Plus White Paper
1707:: I:: CATNIP
1705:: I:: Six Virtual Inches to the Left
1698:: I:: Octet Sequences for Upper-Layer OSI to Support Basic
Communications Applications
1693:: E:: An Extension to TCP
1692:: PS:: Transport Multiplexing Protocol (TMux)
1688:: I:: IPng Mobility Considerations
1687:: I:: A Large Corporate User's View of IPng
1686:: I:: IPng Requirements
1683:: I:: Multiprotocol Interoperability In IPng
1682:: I:: IPng BSD Host Implementation Analysis
1681:: I:: On Many Addresses per Host
1680:: I:: IPng Support for ATM Services
1679:: I:: HPN Working Group Input to the IPng Requirements
Solicitation
1678:: I:: IPng Requirements of Large Corporate Networks
1677:: I:: Tactical Radio Frequency Communication Requirements
1877:: I:: PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol Extensions for
Name Server Addresses
1868:: E:: ARP Extension - UNARP
1860:: I:: Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4
1859:: I:: ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control
over TCP RFC1006 extension
1853:: I:: IP in IP Tunneling
1841:: I:: PPP Network Control Protocol for LAN Extension
1833:: PS:: Binding Protocols for ONC RPC Version 2
1832:: PS:: XDR
1831:: PS:: RPC
1809:: I:: Using the Flow Label Field in IPv6
1795:: I:: Data Link Switching
1791:: E:: TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU
1770:: I:: IPv4 Option for Sender Directed Multi-Destination Delivery
1764:: PS:: The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP)
1763:: PS:: The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP)
1762:: DS:: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
1761:: I:: Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format
1756:: E:: REMOTE WRITE PROTOCOL - VERSION 1.0
1755:: PS:: ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATM
1754:: I:: IP over ATM Working Group's Recommendations for the
ATM Forum's Multiprotocol BOF Version 1
1752:: PS:: The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol
1744:: I:: Observations on the Management of the Internet Address
Space
1735:: E:: NBMA Address Resolution Protocol (NARP)
1726:: I:: Technical Criteria for Choosing IP
1719:: I:: A Direction for IPng
1717:: PS:: The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)
1710:: I:: Simple Internet Protocol Plus White Paper
1707:: I:: CATNIP
1705:: I:: Six Virtual Inches to the Left
1698:: I:: Octet Sequences for Upper-Layer OSI to Support Basic
Communications Applications
1693:: E:: An Extension to TCP
1692:: PS:: Transport Multiplexing Protocol (TMux)
1688:: I:: IPng Mobility Considerations
1687:: I:: A Large Corporate User's View of IPng
1686:: I:: IPng Requirements
1683:: I:: Multiprotocol Interoperability In IPng
1682:: I:: IPng BSD Host Implementation Analysis
1681:: I:: On Many Addresses per Host
1680:: I:: IPng Support for ATM Services
1679:: I:: HPN Working Group Input to the IPng Requirements
Solicitation
1678:: I:: IPng Requirements of Large Corporate Networks
1677:: I:: Tactical Radio Frequency Communication Requirements
for IPng
1676:: I:: INFN Requirements for an IPng
1674:: I:: A Cellular Industry View of IPng
1673:: I:: Electric Power Research Institute Comments on IPng
1672:: I:: Accounting Requirements for IPng
1671:: I:: IPng White Paper on Transition and Other Considerations
1670:: I:: Input to IPng Engineering Considerations
1669:: I:: Market Viability as a IPng Criteria
1667:: I:: Modeling and Simulation Requirements for IPng
1663:: PS:: PPP Reliable Transmission
1662:: S:: PPP in HDLC-like Framing
1661:: S:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
1644:: E:: T/TCP -- TCP Extensions for Transactions Functional
Specification
1638:: PS:: PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
1634:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1631:: I:: The IP Network Address Translator (Nat)
1629:: DS:: Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet
1626:: PS:: Default IP MTU for use over ATM AAL5
1624:: I:: Computation of the Internet Checksum via Incremental
Update
1622:: I:: Pip Header Processing
1621:: I:: Pip Near-term Architecture
1620:: I:: Internet Architecture Extensions for Shared Media
1619:: PS:: PPP over SONET/SDH
1618:: PS:: PPP over ISDN
1613:: I:: cisco Systems X.25 over TCP (XOT)
1605:: I:: SONET to Sonnet Translation
1604:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Service
1598:: PS:: PPP in X.25
1590:: I:: Media Type Registration Procedure
1577:: PS:: Classical IP and ARP over ATM
1575:: DS:: An Echo Function for CLNP (ISO 8473)
1570:: PS:: PPP LCP Extensions
1561:: E:: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments
1560:: I:: The MultiProtocol Internet
1553:: PS:: Compressing IPX Headers Over WAN Media (CIPX)
1552:: PS:: The PPP Internetwork Packet Exchange Control
Protocol (IPXCP)
1551:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1549:: DS:: PPP in HDLC Framing
1548:: DS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
1547:: I:: Requirements for an Internet Standard
Point-to-Point Protocol
1538:: I:: Advanced SNA/IP
1526:: I:: Assignment of System Identifiers for TUBA/CLNP Hosts
1518:: PS:: An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR
1498:: I:: On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations
for IPng
1676:: I:: INFN Requirements for an IPng
1674:: I:: A Cellular Industry View of IPng
1673:: I:: Electric Power Research Institute Comments on IPng
1672:: I:: Accounting Requirements for IPng
1671:: I:: IPng White Paper on Transition and Other Considerations
1670:: I:: Input to IPng Engineering Considerations
1669:: I:: Market Viability as a IPng Criteria
1667:: I:: Modeling and Simulation Requirements for IPng
1663:: PS:: PPP Reliable Transmission
1662:: S:: PPP in HDLC-like Framing
1661:: S:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
1644:: E:: T/TCP -- TCP Extensions for Transactions Functional
Specification
1638:: PS:: PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)
1634:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1631:: I:: The IP Network Address Translator (Nat)
1629:: DS:: Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet
1626:: PS:: Default IP MTU for use over ATM AAL5
1624:: I:: Computation of the Internet Checksum via Incremental
Update
1622:: I:: Pip Header Processing
1621:: I:: Pip Near-term Architecture
1620:: I:: Internet Architecture Extensions for Shared Media
1619:: PS:: PPP over SONET/SDH
1618:: PS:: PPP over ISDN
1613:: I:: cisco Systems X.25 over TCP (XOT)
1605:: I:: SONET to Sonnet Translation
1604:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Service
1598:: PS:: PPP in X.25
1590:: I:: Media Type Registration Procedure
1577:: PS:: Classical IP and ARP over ATM
1575:: DS:: An Echo Function for CLNP (ISO 8473)
1570:: PS:: PPP LCP Extensions
1561:: E:: Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments
1560:: I:: The MultiProtocol Internet
1553:: PS:: Compressing IPX Headers Over WAN Media (CIPX)
1552:: PS:: The PPP Internetwork Packet Exchange Control
Protocol (IPXCP)
1551:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1549:: DS:: PPP in HDLC Framing
1548:: DS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
1547:: I:: Requirements for an Internet Standard
Point-to-Point Protocol
1538:: I:: Advanced SNA/IP
1526:: I:: Assignment of System Identifiers for TUBA/CLNP Hosts
1518:: PS:: An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR
1498:: I:: On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations
1490:: DS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay
1483:: PS:: Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5
1475:: E:: TP/IX
1466:: I:: Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space
1454:: I:: Comparison of Proposals for Next Version of IP
1435:: I:: IESG Advice from Experience with Path MTU Discovery
1434:: I:: Data Link Switching
1433:: E:: Directed ARP
1393:: E:: Traceroute Using an IP Option
1390:: S:: Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI Networks
1385:: I:: EIP
1379:: I:: Extending TCP for Transactions -- Concepts
1378:: PS:: The PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol (ATCP)
1377:: PS:: The PPP OSI Network Layer Control Protocol (OSINLCP)
1376:: PS:: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
1375:: I:: Suggestion for New Classes of IP Addresses
1374:: PS:: IP and ARP on HIPPI
1365:: I:: An IP Address Extension Proposal
1363:: E:: A Proposed Flow Specification
1362:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1356:: PS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 and ISDN in the
Packet Mode
1347:: I:: TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple
Proposal for Internet Addressing and Routing
1337:: I:: TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP
1335:: :: A Two-Tier Address Structure for the Internet
1334:: PS:: PPP Authentication Protocols
1333:: PS:: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
1332:: PS:: The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)
1331:: PS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for the Transmission
of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links
1329:: I:: Thoughts on Address Resolution for Dual MAC FDDI Networks
1326:: I:: Mutual Encapsulation Considered Dangerous
1323:: PS:: TCP Extensions for High Performance
1314:: PS:: A File Format for the Exchange of Images in the Internet
1307:: E:: Dynamically Switched Link Control Protocol
1306:: I:: Experiences Supporting By-Request Circuit-Switched T3
Networks
1294:: PS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay
1293:: PS:: Inverse Address Resolution Protocol
1277:: PS:: Encoding Network Addresses to Support Operation Over
Non-OSI Lower Layers
1263:: I:: TCP Extensions Considered Harmful
1256:: PS:: ICMP Router Discovery Messages
1240:: PS:: OSI Connectionless Transport Services on top of UDP
1237:: PS:: Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet
1236:: :: IP to X.121 Address Mapping for DDN
1234:: PS:: Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Networks
1490:: DS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay
1483:: PS:: Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5
1475:: E:: TP/IX
1466:: I:: Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space
1454:: I:: Comparison of Proposals for Next Version of IP
1435:: I:: IESG Advice from Experience with Path MTU Discovery
1434:: I:: Data Link Switching
1433:: E:: Directed ARP
1393:: E:: Traceroute Using an IP Option
1390:: S:: Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI Networks
1385:: I:: EIP
1379:: I:: Extending TCP for Transactions -- Concepts
1378:: PS:: The PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol (ATCP)
1377:: PS:: The PPP OSI Network Layer Control Protocol (OSINLCP)
1376:: PS:: The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
1375:: I:: Suggestion for New Classes of IP Addresses
1374:: PS:: IP and ARP on HIPPI
1365:: I:: An IP Address Extension Proposal
1363:: E:: A Proposed Flow Specification
1362:: I:: Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)
1356:: PS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 and ISDN in the
Packet Mode
1347:: I:: TCP and UDP with Bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple
Proposal for Internet Addressing and Routing
1337:: I:: TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP
1335:: :: A Two-Tier Address Structure for the Internet
1334:: PS:: PPP Authentication Protocols
1333:: PS:: PPP Link Quality Monitoring
1332:: PS:: The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)
1331:: PS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for the Transmission
of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links
1329:: I:: Thoughts on Address Resolution for Dual MAC FDDI Networks
1326:: I:: Mutual Encapsulation Considered Dangerous
1323:: PS:: TCP Extensions for High Performance
1314:: PS:: A File Format for the Exchange of Images in the Internet
1307:: E:: Dynamically Switched Link Control Protocol
1306:: I:: Experiences Supporting By-Request Circuit-Switched T3
Networks
1294:: PS:: Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay
1293:: PS:: Inverse Address Resolution Protocol
1277:: PS:: Encoding Network Addresses to Support Operation Over
Non-OSI Lower Layers
1263:: I:: TCP Extensions Considered Harmful
1256:: PS:: ICMP Router Discovery Messages
1240:: PS:: OSI Connectionless Transport Services on top of UDP
1237:: PS:: Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet
1236:: :: IP to X.121 Address Mapping for DDN
1234:: PS:: Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Networks
1226:: E:: Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames
1223:: :: OSI CLNS and LLC1 Protocols on Network Systems HYPERchannel
1220:: PS:: Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging
1219:: :: On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers
1210:: :: Network and Infrastructure User Requirements for
Transatlantic Research Collaboration - Brussels,
July 16-18, and Washington July 24-25, 1990
1209:: DS:: The Transmission of IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service
1201:: H:: Transmitting IP Traffic over ARCNET Networks
1191:: DS:: Path MTU Discovery
1188:: DS:: A Proposed Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
over FDDI Networks
1185:: E:: TCP Extension for High-Speed Paths
1172:: PS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Initial Configuration
Options
1171:: DS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol for the Transmission of
Multi-Protocol Datagrams Over Point-to-Point Links
1166:: :: Internet Numbers
1162:: :: Connectionless Network Protocol (ISO 8473) and End
System to Intermediate System (ISO 9542) Management
Information Base
1151:: E:: Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP)
1146:: E:: TCP Alternate Checksum Options
1145:: E:: TCP Alternate Checksum Options
1144:: PS:: Compressing TCP/IP headers for low-speed serial links
1141:: :: Incremental Updating of the Internet Checksum
1139:: PS:: Echo function for ISO 8473
1134:: PS:: Point-to-Point Protocol
1132:: S:: Standard for the transmission of 802.2 packets over
IPX networks
1122:: S:: Requirements for Internet hosts - communication layers
1110:: :: Problem with the TCP big window option
1106:: :: TCP big window and NAK options
1103:: PS:: Proposed standard for the transmission of IP datagrams
over FDDI Networks
1088:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
NetBIOS networks
1086:: :: ISO-TP0 bridge between TCP and X.25
1085:: :: ISO presentation services on top of TCP/IP based internets
1078:: :: TCP port service Multiplexer TCPMUX
1072:: E:: TCP extensions for long-delay paths
1071:: :: Computing the Internet checksum
1070:: :: Use of the Internet as a subnetwork for experimentation
with the OSI network layer
1069:: :: Guidelines for the use of Internet-IP addressesin the
ISO Connectionless-Mode Network Protocol
1063:: :: IP MTU Discovery options
1062:: :: Internet numbers
1226:: E:: Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames
1223:: :: OSI CLNS and LLC1 Protocols on Network Systems HYPERchannel
1220:: PS:: Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging
1219:: :: On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers
1210:: :: Network and Infrastructure User Requirements for
Transatlantic Research Collaboration - Brussels,
July 16-18, and Washington July 24-25, 1990
1209:: DS:: The Transmission of IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service
1201:: H:: Transmitting IP Traffic over ARCNET Networks
1191:: DS:: Path MTU Discovery
1188:: DS:: A Proposed Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
over FDDI Networks
1185:: E:: TCP Extension for High-Speed Paths
1172:: PS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Initial Configuration
Options
1171:: DS:: The Point-to-Point Protocol for the Transmission of
Multi-Protocol Datagrams Over Point-to-Point Links
1166:: :: Internet Numbers
1162:: :: Connectionless Network Protocol (ISO 8473) and End
System to Intermediate System (ISO 9542) Management
Information Base
1151:: E:: Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP)
1146:: E:: TCP Alternate Checksum Options
1145:: E:: TCP Alternate Checksum Options
1144:: PS:: Compressing TCP/IP headers for low-speed serial links
1141:: :: Incremental Updating of the Internet Checksum
1139:: PS:: Echo function for ISO 8473
1134:: PS:: Point-to-Point Protocol
1132:: S:: Standard for the transmission of 802.2 packets over
IPX networks
1122:: S:: Requirements for Internet hosts - communication layers
1110:: :: Problem with the TCP big window option
1106:: :: TCP big window and NAK options
1103:: PS:: Proposed standard for the transmission of IP datagrams
over FDDI Networks
1088:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
NetBIOS networks
1086:: :: ISO-TP0 bridge between TCP and X.25
1085:: :: ISO presentation services on top of TCP/IP based internets
1078:: :: TCP port service Multiplexer TCPMUX
1072:: E:: TCP extensions for long-delay paths
1071:: :: Computing the Internet checksum
1070:: :: Use of the Internet as a subnetwork for experimentation
with the OSI network layer
1069:: :: Guidelines for the use of Internet-IP addressesin the
ISO Connectionless-Mode Network Protocol
1063:: :: IP MTU Discovery options
1062:: :: Internet numbers
1057:: I:: RPC
1055:: S:: Nonstandard for transmission of IP datagrams over serial
lines
1051:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams and ARP
packets over ARCNET networks
1050:: H:: RPC
1046:: :: Queuing algorithm to provide type-of-service for IP links
1045:: E:: VMTP
1044:: S:: Internet Protocol on Network System's HYPERchannel
1042:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
IEEE 802 networks
1030:: :: On testing the NETBLT Protocol over divers networks
1029:: :: More fault tolerant approach to address resolution for
a Multi-LAN system of Ethernets
1027:: :: Using ARP to implement transparent subnet gateways
1025:: :: TCP and IP bake off
1016:: :: Something a host could do with source quench
1008:: :: Implementation guide for the ISO Transport Protocol
1007:: :: Military supplement to the ISO Transport Protocol
1006:: S:: ISO transport services on top of the TCP
1002:: S:: Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP
transport
1001:: S:: Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP
transport
994:: :: Final text of DIS 8473,Protocol for Providing the
Connectionless-mode Network Service
986:: :: Guidelines for the use of Internet-IP addressesin the
ISO Connectionless-Mode Network Protocol [Working draft]
983:: :: ISO transport arrives on top of the TCP
982:: :: Guidelines for the specification of the structure of the
Domain Specific Part DSP of the ISO standard NSAP address
970:: :: On packet switches with infinite storage
964:: :: Some problems with the specification of the Military
Standard Transmission Control Protocol
963:: :: Some problems with the specification of the Military
Standard Internet Protocol
962:: :: TCP-4 prime
955:: :: Towards a transport service for transaction processing
applications
948:: :: Two methods for the transmission of IP datagrams over
IEEE 802.3 networks
942:: :: Transport protocols for Department of Defense data
networks
941:: :: Addendum to the networkservice definition covering
network layer addressing
940:: :: Toward an Internet standard scheme for subnetting
936:: :: Another Internet subnet addressing scheme
935:: :: Reliable link layer protocols
1057:: I:: RPC
1055:: S:: Nonstandard for transmission of IP datagrams over serial
lines
1051:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams and ARP
packets over ARCNET networks
1050:: H:: RPC
1046:: :: Queuing algorithm to provide type-of-service for IP links
1045:: E:: VMTP
1044:: S:: Internet Protocol on Network System's HYPERchannel
1042:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
IEEE 802 networks
1030:: :: On testing the NETBLT Protocol over divers networks
1029:: :: More fault tolerant approach to address resolution for
a Multi-LAN system of Ethernets
1027:: :: Using ARP to implement transparent subnet gateways
1025:: :: TCP and IP bake off
1016:: :: Something a host could do with source quench
1008:: :: Implementation guide for the ISO Transport Protocol
1007:: :: Military supplement to the ISO Transport Protocol
1006:: S:: ISO transport services on top of the TCP
1002:: S:: Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP
transport
1001:: S:: Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP
transport
994:: :: Final text of DIS 8473,Protocol for Providing the
Connectionless-mode Network Service
986:: :: Guidelines for the use of Internet-IP addressesin the
ISO Connectionless-Mode Network Protocol [Working draft]
983:: :: ISO transport arrives on top of the TCP
982:: :: Guidelines for the specification of the structure of the
Domain Specific Part DSP of the ISO standard NSAP address
970:: :: On packet switches with infinite storage
964:: :: Some problems with the specification of the Military
Standard Transmission Control Protocol
963:: :: Some problems with the specification of the Military
Standard Internet Protocol
962:: :: TCP-4 prime
955:: :: Towards a transport service for transaction processing
applications
948:: :: Two methods for the transmission of IP datagrams over
IEEE 802.3 networks
942:: :: Transport protocols for Department of Defense data
networks
941:: :: Addendum to the networkservice definition covering
network layer addressing
940:: :: Toward an Internet standard scheme for subnetting
936:: :: Another Internet subnet addressing scheme
935:: :: Reliable link layer protocols
932:: :: Subnetwork addressing scheme
926:: :: Protocol for providing the connectionless mode network
services
925:: :: Multi-LAN address resolution
924:: :: Official ARPA-Internet protocols for connecting
personal computers to the Internet
922:: S:: Broadcasting Internet datagrams in the presence of subnets
919:: S:: Broadcasting Internet datagrams
917:: :: Internet subnets
914:: H:: Thinwire protocol for connecting personal computers to
the Internet
905:: :: ISO Transport Protocol specification ISO DP 8073
903:: S:: Reverse Address Resolution Protocol
896:: :: Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks
895:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
experimental Ethernet networks
894:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
Ethernet networks
893:: :: Trailer encapsulations
892:: :: ISO Transport Protocol specification [Draft]
891:: S:: DCN local-network protocols
889:: :: Internet delay experiments
879:: :: TCP maximum segment size and related topics
877:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
public data networks
874:: :: Critique of X.25
872:: :: TCP-on-a-LAN
871:: :: Perspective on the ARPANET reference model
848:: :: Who provides the "little" TCP services?
829:: :: Packet satellite technology reference sources
826:: S:: Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol
824:: :: CRONUS Virtual Local Network
815:: :: IP datagram reassembly algorithms
814:: :: Name, addresses, ports, and routes
813:: :: Window and acknowlegement strategy in TCP
801:: :: NCP/TCP transition plan
793:: S:: Transmission Control Protocol
792:: S:: Internet Control Message Protocol
791:: S:: Internet Protocol
789:: :: Vulnerabilities of network control protocols
787:: :: Connectionless data transmission survey/tutorial
781:: :: Specification of the Internet Protocol IP timestamp option
777:: :: Internet Control Message Protocol
768:: S:: User Datagram Protocol
761:: :: DOD Standard Transmission Control Protocol
760:: :: DoD standard Internet Protocol
759:: H:: Internet Message Protocol
730:: :: Extensible field addressing
932:: :: Subnetwork addressing scheme
926:: :: Protocol for providing the connectionless mode network
services
925:: :: Multi-LAN address resolution
924:: :: Official ARPA-Internet protocols for connecting
personal computers to the Internet
922:: S:: Broadcasting Internet datagrams in the presence of subnets
919:: S:: Broadcasting Internet datagrams
917:: :: Internet subnets
914:: H:: Thinwire protocol for connecting personal computers to
the Internet
905:: :: ISO Transport Protocol specification ISO DP 8073
903:: S:: Reverse Address Resolution Protocol
896:: :: Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks
895:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
experimental Ethernet networks
894:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
Ethernet networks
893:: :: Trailer encapsulations
892:: :: ISO Transport Protocol specification [Draft]
891:: S:: DCN local-network protocols
889:: :: Internet delay experiments
879:: :: TCP maximum segment size and related topics
877:: S:: Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over
public data networks
874:: :: Critique of X.25
872:: :: TCP-on-a-LAN
871:: :: Perspective on the ARPANET reference model
848:: :: Who provides the "little" TCP services?
829:: :: Packet satellite technology reference sources
826:: S:: Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol
824:: :: CRONUS Virtual Local Network
815:: :: IP datagram reassembly algorithms
814:: :: Name, addresses, ports, and routes
813:: :: Window and acknowlegement strategy in TCP
801:: :: NCP/TCP transition plan
793:: S:: Transmission Control Protocol
792:: S:: Internet Control Message Protocol
791:: S:: Internet Protocol
789:: :: Vulnerabilities of network control protocols
787:: :: Connectionless data transmission survey/tutorial
781:: :: Specification of the Internet Protocol IP timestamp option
777:: :: Internet Control Message Protocol
768:: S:: User Datagram Protocol
761:: :: DOD Standard Transmission Control Protocol
760:: :: DoD standard Internet Protocol
759:: H:: Internet Message Protocol
730:: :: Extensible field addressing
704:: :: IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol change
696:: :: Comments on the IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol changes
695:: :: Official change in Host-Host Protocol
692:: :: Comments on IMP/Host Protocol changes RFCs 687 and 690
690:: :: Comments on the proposed Host/IMP Protocol changes
689:: :: Tenex NCP finite state machine for connections
687:: :: IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol changes
685:: :: Response time in cross network debugging
680:: :: Message Transmission Protocol
675:: :: Specification of Internet Transmission Control Program
674:: :: Procedure call documents - version 2
660:: :: Some changes to the IMP and the IMP/Host interface
632:: :: Throughput degradations for single packet messages
626:: :: On a possible lockup condition in IMP subnet due to
message sequencing
613:: :: Network connectivity
611:: :: Two changes to the IMP/Host Protocol to improve
user/network communications
594:: :: Speedup of Host-IMP interface
591:: :: Addition to the Very Distant Host specifications
576:: :: Proposal for modifying linking
550:: :: NIC NCP experiment
548:: :: Hosts using the IMP Going Down message
528:: :: Software checksumming in the IMP and network reliability
521:: :: Restricted use of IMP DDT
489:: :: Comment on resynchronization of connection status proposal
488:: :: NLS classes at network sites
476:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule rev. 2
473:: :: MIX and MIXAL?
460:: :: NCP survey
459:: :: Network questionnaires
450:: :: MULTICS sampling timeout change
449:: :: Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
445:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
442:: :: Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
434:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule
426:: :: Reconnection Protocol
417:: :: Link usage violation
398:: :: ICP sockets
395:: :: Switch settings on IMPs and TIPs
394:: :: Two proposed changes to the IMP-Host Protocol
359:: :: Status of the release of the new IMP System
357:: :: Echoing strategy for satellite links
348:: :: Discard process
347:: :: Echo process
346:: :: Satellite considerations
343:: :: IMP System change notification
312:: :: Proposed change in IMP-to-Host Protocol
704:: :: IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol change
696:: :: Comments on the IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol changes
695:: :: Official change in Host-Host Protocol
692:: :: Comments on IMP/Host Protocol changes RFCs 687 and 690
690:: :: Comments on the proposed Host/IMP Protocol changes
689:: :: Tenex NCP finite state machine for connections
687:: :: IMP/Host and Host/IMP Protocol changes
685:: :: Response time in cross network debugging
680:: :: Message Transmission Protocol
675:: :: Specification of Internet Transmission Control Program
674:: :: Procedure call documents - version 2
660:: :: Some changes to the IMP and the IMP/Host interface
632:: :: Throughput degradations for single packet messages
626:: :: On a possible lockup condition in IMP subnet due to
message sequencing
613:: :: Network connectivity
611:: :: Two changes to the IMP/Host Protocol to improve
user/network communications
594:: :: Speedup of Host-IMP interface
591:: :: Addition to the Very Distant Host specifications
576:: :: Proposal for modifying linking
550:: :: NIC NCP experiment
548:: :: Hosts using the IMP Going Down message
528:: :: Software checksumming in the IMP and network reliability
521:: :: Restricted use of IMP DDT
489:: :: Comment on resynchronization of connection status proposal
488:: :: NLS classes at network sites
476:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule rev. 2
473:: :: MIX and MIXAL?
460:: :: NCP survey
459:: :: Network questionnaires
450:: :: MULTICS sampling timeout change
449:: :: Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
445:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
442:: :: Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
434:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule
426:: :: Reconnection Protocol
417:: :: Link usage violation
398:: :: ICP sockets
395:: :: Switch settings on IMPs and TIPs
394:: :: Two proposed changes to the IMP-Host Protocol
359:: :: Status of the release of the new IMP System
357:: :: Echoing strategy for satellite links
348:: :: Discard process
347:: :: Echo process
346:: :: Satellite considerations
343:: :: IMP System change notification
312:: :: Proposed change in IMP-to-Host Protocol
301:: :: BBN IMP #5 and NCC schedule March 4, 1971
300:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
271:: :: IMP System change notifications
241:: :: Connecting computers to MLC ports
210:: :: Improvement of flow control
203:: :: Achieving reliable communication
202:: :: Possible deadlock in ICP
197:: :: Initial Connection Protocol - Reviewed
190:: :: DEC PDP-10-IMLAC communications system
178:: :: Network graphic attention handling
176:: :: Comments on "Byte size for connections"
175:: :: Comments on "Socket conventions reconsidered"
166:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service
165:: :: Proffered official Initial Connection Protocol
161:: :: Solution to the race condition in the ICP
151:: :: Comments on a proffered official ICP
150:: :: Use of IPC facilities
146:: :: Views on issues relevant to data sharing on computer
networks
145:: :: Initial Connection Protocol control commands
143:: :: Regarding proffered official ICP
142:: :: Time-out mechanism in the Host-Host Protocol
128:: :: Bytes
127:: :: Comments on RFC 123
123:: :: Proffered official ICP
122:: :: Network specifications for UCSB's Simple-Minded File
System
93:: :: Initial Connection Protocol
91:: :: Proposed User-User Protocol
80:: :: Protocols and data formats
79:: :: Logger Protocol error
70:: :: Note on padding
67:: :: Proposed change to Host/IMP spec to eliminate marking
65:: :: Comments on Host/Host Protocol document #1
62:: :: Systems for interprocess communication in a resource
sharing computer network
60:: :: Simplified NCP Protocol
59:: :: Flow control - fixed versus demand allocation
56:: :: Third level protocol
55:: :: Prototypical implementation of the NCP
54:: :: Official protocol proffering
53:: :: Official protocol mechanism
41:: :: IMP-IMP teletype communication
38:: :: Comments on network protocol from NWG/RFC #36
33:: :: New Host-Host Protocol
23:: :: Transmission of multiple control messages
22:: :: Host-host control message formats
20:: :: ASCII format for network interchange
301:: :: BBN IMP #5 and NCC schedule March 4, 1971
300:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
271:: :: IMP System change notifications
241:: :: Connecting computers to MLC ports
210:: :: Improvement of flow control
203:: :: Achieving reliable communication
202:: :: Possible deadlock in ICP
197:: :: Initial Connection Protocol - Reviewed
190:: :: DEC PDP-10-IMLAC communications system
178:: :: Network graphic attention handling
176:: :: Comments on "Byte size for connections"
175:: :: Comments on "Socket conventions reconsidered"
166:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service
165:: :: Proffered official Initial Connection Protocol
161:: :: Solution to the race condition in the ICP
151:: :: Comments on a proffered official ICP
150:: :: Use of IPC facilities
146:: :: Views on issues relevant to data sharing on computer
networks
145:: :: Initial Connection Protocol control commands
143:: :: Regarding proffered official ICP
142:: :: Time-out mechanism in the Host-Host Protocol
128:: :: Bytes
127:: :: Comments on RFC 123
123:: :: Proffered official ICP
122:: :: Network specifications for UCSB's Simple-Minded File
System
93:: :: Initial Connection Protocol
91:: :: Proposed User-User Protocol
80:: :: Protocols and data formats
79:: :: Logger Protocol error
70:: :: Note on padding
67:: :: Proposed change to Host/IMP spec to eliminate marking
65:: :: Comments on Host/Host Protocol document #1
62:: :: Systems for interprocess communication in a resource
sharing computer network
60:: :: Simplified NCP Protocol
59:: :: Flow control - fixed versus demand allocation
56:: :: Third level protocol
55:: :: Prototypical implementation of the NCP
54:: :: Official protocol proffering
53:: :: Official protocol mechanism
41:: :: IMP-IMP teletype communication
38:: :: Comments on network protocol from NWG/RFC #36
33:: :: New Host-Host Protocol
23:: :: Transmission of multiple control messages
22:: :: Host-host control message formats
20:: :: ASCII format for network interchange
19:: :: Two protocol suggestions to reduce congestion at
swap bound nodes
17:: :: Some questions re
12:: :: IMP-Host interface flow diagrams
=====================================================================
Mail
2112:: PS:: The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
2111:: PS:: Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators
2110:: PS:: MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such
as HTML (MHTML)
2109:: PS:: HTTP State Management Mechanism
2095:: PS:: IMAP/POP AUTHorize Extension for Simple Challenge/Response
2088:: PS:: IMAP4 non-synchroniziong literals
2087:: PS:: IMAP4 QUOTA extension
2086:: PS:: IMAP4 ACL extension
2077:: PS:: The Model Primary Content Type for Multipurpose
Internet Mail Extensions
2076:: I:: Common Internet Message Headers
2062:: I:: Internet Message Access Protocol - Obsolete Syntax
2061:: I:: IMAP4 COMPATIBILITY WITH IMAP2BIS
2060:: PS:: INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1
2049:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Five
2048:: BC:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four
2047:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three
2046:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two
2045:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One
2034:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Returning Enhanced Error Codes
2033:: I:: Local Mail Transfer Protocol
2017:: PS:: Definition of the URL MIME External-Body Access-Type
1991:: I:: PGP Message Exchange Formats
1985:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Remote Message Queue Starting
1957:: I:: Some Observations on Implementations of the Post Office
Protocol (POP3)
1947:: I:: Greek Character Encoding for Electronic Mail Messages
1939:: S:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1927:: I:: Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents
1922:: I:: Chinese Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1911:: E:: Voice Profile for Internet Mail
1896:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1895:: I:: The Application/CALS-1840 Content-type
1894:: PS:: An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status
Notifications
1893:: PS:: Enhanced Mail System Status Codes
1892:: PS:: The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting
of Mail System Administrative Messages
1891:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
1873:: E:: Message/External-Body Content-ID Access Type
1872:: E:: The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
19:: :: Two protocol suggestions to reduce congestion at
swap bound nodes
17:: :: Some questions re
12:: :: IMP-Host interface flow diagrams
=====================================================================
Mail
2112:: PS:: The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
2111:: PS:: Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators
2110:: PS:: MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such
as HTML (MHTML)
2109:: PS:: HTTP State Management Mechanism
2095:: PS:: IMAP/POP AUTHorize Extension for Simple Challenge/Response
2088:: PS:: IMAP4 non-synchroniziong literals
2087:: PS:: IMAP4 QUOTA extension
2086:: PS:: IMAP4 ACL extension
2077:: PS:: The Model Primary Content Type for Multipurpose
Internet Mail Extensions
2076:: I:: Common Internet Message Headers
2062:: I:: Internet Message Access Protocol - Obsolete Syntax
2061:: I:: IMAP4 COMPATIBILITY WITH IMAP2BIS
2060:: PS:: INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1
2049:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Five
2048:: BC:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four
2047:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three
2046:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two
2045:: DS:: Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One
2034:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Returning Enhanced Error Codes
2033:: I:: Local Mail Transfer Protocol
2017:: PS:: Definition of the URL MIME External-Body Access-Type
1991:: I:: PGP Message Exchange Formats
1985:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Remote Message Queue Starting
1957:: I:: Some Observations on Implementations of the Post Office
Protocol (POP3)
1947:: I:: Greek Character Encoding for Electronic Mail Messages
1939:: S:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1927:: I:: Suggested Additional MIME Types for Associating Documents
1922:: I:: Chinese Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1911:: E:: Voice Profile for Internet Mail
1896:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1895:: I:: The Application/CALS-1840 Content-type
1894:: PS:: An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status
Notifications
1893:: PS:: Enhanced Mail System Status Codes
1892:: PS:: The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting
of Mail System Administrative Messages
1891:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
1873:: E:: Message/External-Body Content-ID Access Type
1872:: E:: The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
1870:: S:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1869:: S:: SMTP Service Extensions
1864:: DS:: The Content-MD5 Header Field
1854:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining
1848:: PS:: MIME Object Security Services
1847:: PS:: Security Multiparts for MIME
1846:: E:: SMTP 521 reply code
1845:: E:: SMTP Service Extension for Checkpoint/Restart
1844:: I:: Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent checklist
1830:: E:: SMTP Service Extensions for Transmission of Large
and Binary MIME Messages
1820:: I:: Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent Checklist
1806:: E:: Communicating Presentation Information in Internet
Messages
1804:: E:: Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory
1803:: I:: Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory Service
1801:: E:: MHS use of the X.500 Directory to support MHS Routing
1767:: PS:: MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects
1741:: I:: MIME Content Type for BinHex Encoded Files
1740:: PS:: MIME Encapsulation of Macintosh files - MacMIME
1734:: PS:: POP3 AUTHentication command
1733:: I:: DISTRIBUTED ELECTRONIC MAIL MODELS IN IMAP4
1732:: I:: IMAP4 COMPATIBILITY WITH IMAP2 AND IMAP2BIS
1731:: PS:: IMAP4 Authentication mechanisms
1730:: PS:: INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4
1725:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1711:: I:: Classifications in E-mail Routing
1685:: I:: Writing X.400 O/R Names
1653:: DS:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1652:: DS:: SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport
1651:: DS:: SMTP Service Extensions
1649:: I:: Operational Requirements for X.400 Management Domains
in the GO-MHS Community
1648:: PS:: Postmaster Convention for X.400 Operations
1642:: E:: UTF-7 - A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode
1641:: E:: Using Unicode with MIME
1616:: I:: X.400(1988) for the Academic and Research Community
in Europe
1615:: I:: Migrating from X.400(84) to X.400(88)
1563:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1557:: I:: Korean Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1556:: I:: Handling of Bi-directional Texts in MIME
1555:: I:: Hebrew Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1544:: PS:: The Content-MD5 Header Field
1524:: I:: A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia
Mail Format Information
1523:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1522:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Two
1870:: S:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1869:: S:: SMTP Service Extensions
1864:: DS:: The Content-MD5 Header Field
1854:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining
1848:: PS:: MIME Object Security Services
1847:: PS:: Security Multiparts for MIME
1846:: E:: SMTP 521 reply code
1845:: E:: SMTP Service Extension for Checkpoint/Restart
1844:: I:: Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent checklist
1830:: E:: SMTP Service Extensions for Transmission of Large
and Binary MIME Messages
1820:: I:: Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent Checklist
1806:: E:: Communicating Presentation Information in Internet
Messages
1804:: E:: Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory
1803:: I:: Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory Service
1801:: E:: MHS use of the X.500 Directory to support MHS Routing
1767:: PS:: MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects
1741:: I:: MIME Content Type for BinHex Encoded Files
1740:: PS:: MIME Encapsulation of Macintosh files - MacMIME
1734:: PS:: POP3 AUTHentication command
1733:: I:: DISTRIBUTED ELECTRONIC MAIL MODELS IN IMAP4
1732:: I:: IMAP4 COMPATIBILITY WITH IMAP2 AND IMAP2BIS
1731:: PS:: IMAP4 Authentication mechanisms
1730:: PS:: INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4
1725:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1711:: I:: Classifications in E-mail Routing
1685:: I:: Writing X.400 O/R Names
1653:: DS:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1652:: DS:: SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport
1651:: DS:: SMTP Service Extensions
1649:: I:: Operational Requirements for X.400 Management Domains
in the GO-MHS Community
1648:: PS:: Postmaster Convention for X.400 Operations
1642:: E:: UTF-7 - A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode
1641:: E:: Using Unicode with MIME
1616:: I:: X.400(1988) for the Academic and Research Community
in Europe
1615:: I:: Migrating from X.400(84) to X.400(88)
1563:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1557:: I:: Korean Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1556:: I:: Handling of Bi-directional Texts in MIME
1555:: I:: Hebrew Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1544:: PS:: The Content-MD5 Header Field
1524:: I:: A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia
Mail Format Information
1523:: I:: The text/enriched MIME Content-type
1522:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Two
1521:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part One
1506:: I:: A tutorial on gatewaying between X.400 and Internet mail
1505:: E:: Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages
1502:: PS:: X.400 Use of Extended Character Sets
1496:: PS:: Rules for downgrading messages from X.400/88 to X.400/84
when MIME content-types are present in the messages
1495:: PS:: Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
1494:: PS:: Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
1468:: I:: Japanese Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1465:: E:: Routing coordination for X.400 MHS services within a
multi protocol / multi network environment Table Format
V3 for static routing
1460:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1456:: I:: Conventions for Encoding the Vietnamese Language VISCII
1437:: I:: The Extension of MIME Content-Types to a New Medium
1429:: I:: Listserv Distribute Protocol
1428:: I:: Transition of Internet Mail from Just-Send-8 to
8Bit-SMTP/MIME
1427:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1426:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport
1425:: PS:: SMTP Service Extensions
1405:: E:: Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)
1357:: I:: A Format for E-mailing Bibliographic Records
1344:: I:: Implications of MIME for Internet Mail Gateways
1343:: I:: A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia
Mail Format Information
1342:: PS:: Representation of Non-ASCII Text in Internet Message
Headers
1341:: PS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)
1339:: E:: Remote Mail Checking Protocol
1328:: PS:: X.400 1988 to 1984 downgrading
1327:: PS:: Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1225:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1211:: :: Problems with the Maintenance of Large Mailing Lists
1204:: E:: Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
1203:: H:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol - Version 3
1176:: E:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol - Version 2
1168:: :: Intermail and Commercial Mail Relay Services
1159:: E:: Message Send Protocol
1154:: E:: Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages
1153:: E:: Digest Message Format
1148:: E:: Mapping between X.400 (1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1138:: I:: Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1137:: E:: Mapping between full RFC 822 and RFC 822 with restricted
encoding
1090:: :: SMTP on X.25
1082:: H:: Post Office Protocol - version 3
1081:: PS:: Post Office Protocol - version 3
1521:: DS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part One
1506:: I:: A tutorial on gatewaying between X.400 and Internet mail
1505:: E:: Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages
1502:: PS:: X.400 Use of Extended Character Sets
1496:: PS:: Rules for downgrading messages from X.400/88 to X.400/84
when MIME content-types are present in the messages
1495:: PS:: Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
1494:: PS:: Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
1468:: I:: Japanese Character Encoding for Internet Messages
1465:: E:: Routing coordination for X.400 MHS services within a
multi protocol / multi network environment Table Format
V3 for static routing
1460:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1456:: I:: Conventions for Encoding the Vietnamese Language VISCII
1437:: I:: The Extension of MIME Content-Types to a New Medium
1429:: I:: Listserv Distribute Protocol
1428:: I:: Transition of Internet Mail from Just-Send-8 to
8Bit-SMTP/MIME
1427:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration
1426:: PS:: SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport
1425:: PS:: SMTP Service Extensions
1405:: E:: Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)
1357:: I:: A Format for E-mailing Bibliographic Records
1344:: I:: Implications of MIME for Internet Mail Gateways
1343:: I:: A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia
Mail Format Information
1342:: PS:: Representation of Non-ASCII Text in Internet Message
Headers
1341:: PS:: MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)
1339:: E:: Remote Mail Checking Protocol
1328:: PS:: X.400 1988 to 1984 downgrading
1327:: PS:: Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1225:: DS:: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
1211:: :: Problems with the Maintenance of Large Mailing Lists
1204:: E:: Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
1203:: H:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol - Version 3
1176:: E:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol - Version 2
1168:: :: Intermail and Commercial Mail Relay Services
1159:: E:: Message Send Protocol
1154:: E:: Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages
1153:: E:: Digest Message Format
1148:: E:: Mapping between X.400 (1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1138:: I:: Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822
1137:: E:: Mapping between full RFC 822 and RFC 822 with restricted
encoding
1090:: :: SMTP on X.25
1082:: H:: Post Office Protocol - version 3
1081:: PS:: Post Office Protocol - version 3
1064:: H:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol
1056:: I:: PCMAIL
1049:: S:: Content-type header field for Internet messages
1047:: :: Duplicate messages and SMTP
1026:: PS:: Addendum to RFC 987
993:: :: PCMAIL
987:: PS:: Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822
984:: :: PCMAIL
976:: :: UUCP mail interchange format standard
974:: S:: Mail routing and the domain system
937:: H:: Post Office Protocol - version 2
934:: :: Proposed standard for message encapsulation
918:: :: Post Office Protocol
915:: :: Network mail path service
910:: :: Multimedia mail meeting notes
886:: :: Proposed standard for message header munging
876:: :: Survey of SMTP implementations
841:: :: Specification for message format for Computer Based
Message Systems
822:: S:: Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages
821:: S:: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
808:: :: Summary of computer mail services meeting held at BBN
on 10 January 1979
807:: :: Multimedia mail meeting notes
805:: :: Computer mail meeting notes
788:: :: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
786:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
785:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
784:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
780:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
773:: :: Comments on NCP/TCP mail service transition strategy
772:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
771:: :: Mail transition plan
767:: :: Structured format for transmission of multi-media
documents
763:: :: Role mailboxes
757:: :: Suggested solution to the naming, addressing, and
delivery problem for ARPANET message systems
754:: :: Out-of-net host addresses for mail
753:: :: Internet Message Protocol
744:: :: MARS - a Message Archiving and Retrieval Service
733:: :: Standard for theformat of ARPA network text messages
724:: :: Proposed official standard for the format of ARPA
Network messages
720:: :: Address specification syntax for network mail
714:: :: Host-Host Protocol for an ARPANET-type network
713:: :: MSDTP-Message Services Data Transmission Protocol
706:: :: On the junk mail problem
1064:: H:: Interactive Mail Access Protocol
1056:: I:: PCMAIL
1049:: S:: Content-type header field for Internet messages
1047:: :: Duplicate messages and SMTP
1026:: PS:: Addendum to RFC 987
993:: :: PCMAIL
987:: PS:: Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822
984:: :: PCMAIL
976:: :: UUCP mail interchange format standard
974:: S:: Mail routing and the domain system
937:: H:: Post Office Protocol - version 2
934:: :: Proposed standard for message encapsulation
918:: :: Post Office Protocol
915:: :: Network mail path service
910:: :: Multimedia mail meeting notes
886:: :: Proposed standard for message header munging
876:: :: Survey of SMTP implementations
841:: :: Specification for message format for Computer Based
Message Systems
822:: S:: Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages
821:: S:: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
808:: :: Summary of computer mail services meeting held at BBN
on 10 January 1979
807:: :: Multimedia mail meeting notes
805:: :: Computer mail meeting notes
788:: :: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
786:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
785:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
784:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
780:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
773:: :: Comments on NCP/TCP mail service transition strategy
772:: :: Mail Transfer Protocol
771:: :: Mail transition plan
767:: :: Structured format for transmission of multi-media
documents
763:: :: Role mailboxes
757:: :: Suggested solution to the naming, addressing, and
delivery problem for ARPANET message systems
754:: :: Out-of-net host addresses for mail
753:: :: Internet Message Protocol
744:: :: MARS - a Message Archiving and Retrieval Service
733:: :: Standard for theformat of ARPA network text messages
724:: :: Proposed official standard for the format of ARPA
Network messages
720:: :: Address specification syntax for network mail
714:: :: Host-Host Protocol for an ARPANET-type network
713:: :: MSDTP-Message Services Data Transmission Protocol
706:: :: On the junk mail problem
577:: :: Mail priority
574:: :: Announcement of a mail facility at UCSB
561:: :: Standardizingnetwork mail headers
555:: :: Responses to critiques of the proposed mail protocol
539:: :: Thoughts on the mail protocol proposed in RFC524
534:: :: Lost message detection
533:: :: Message-ID numbers
524:: :: Proposed Mail Protocol
516:: :: Lost message detection
512:: :: More on lost message detection
510:: :: Request for network mailbox addresses
498:: :: On mail service to CCN
475:: :: FTP and network mail system
469:: :: Network mail meeting summary
458:: :: Mail retrieval via FTP
453:: :: Meeting announcement to discuss a network mail system
333:: :: Proposed experiment with a Message Switching Protocol
278:: :: Revision of theMail Box Protocol
224:: :: Comments on Mailbox Protocol
221:: :: Mail Box Protocol
196:: :: Mail Box Protocol
58:: :: Logical message synchronization
42:: :: Message data types
=====================================================================
NTP
2030:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4,
IPv6 and OSI
1769:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
1708:: I:: NTP PICS PROFORMA For the Network Time Protocol Version 3
1589:: I:: A Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping
1361:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
1305:: PS:: Network Time Protocol (v3)
1165:: E:: Network Time Protocol (NTP) over the OSI Remote Operations
Service
1129:: :: Internet time synchronization
1128:: :: Measured performance of the Network Time Protocol in the
Internet system
1119:: S:: Network Time Protocol version 2 specification and
implementation
1059:: :: Network Time Protocol version 1 specification and
implementation
958:: :: Network Time Protocol NTP
957:: :: Experiments in network clock synchronization
956:: :: Algorithms for synchronizing network clocks
868:: S:: Time Protocol
867:: S:: Daytime Protocol
778:: H:: DCNET Internet Clock Service
738:: :: Time server
577:: :: Mail priority
574:: :: Announcement of a mail facility at UCSB
561:: :: Standardizingnetwork mail headers
555:: :: Responses to critiques of the proposed mail protocol
539:: :: Thoughts on the mail protocol proposed in RFC524
534:: :: Lost message detection
533:: :: Message-ID numbers
524:: :: Proposed Mail Protocol
516:: :: Lost message detection
512:: :: More on lost message detection
510:: :: Request for network mailbox addresses
498:: :: On mail service to CCN
475:: :: FTP and network mail system
469:: :: Network mail meeting summary
458:: :: Mail retrieval via FTP
453:: :: Meeting announcement to discuss a network mail system
333:: :: Proposed experiment with a Message Switching Protocol
278:: :: Revision of theMail Box Protocol
224:: :: Comments on Mailbox Protocol
221:: :: Mail Box Protocol
196:: :: Mail Box Protocol
58:: :: Logical message synchronization
42:: :: Message data types
=====================================================================
NTP
2030:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4,
IPv6 and OSI
1769:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
1708:: I:: NTP PICS PROFORMA For the Network Time Protocol Version 3
1589:: I:: A Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping
1361:: I:: Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
1305:: PS:: Network Time Protocol (v3)
1165:: E:: Network Time Protocol (NTP) over the OSI Remote Operations
Service
1129:: :: Internet time synchronization
1128:: :: Measured performance of the Network Time Protocol in the
Internet system
1119:: S:: Network Time Protocol version 2 specification and
implementation
1059:: :: Network Time Protocol version 1 specification and
implementation
958:: :: Network Time Protocol NTP
957:: :: Experiments in network clock synchronization
956:: :: Algorithms for synchronizing network clocks
868:: S:: Time Protocol
867:: S:: Daytime Protocol
778:: H:: DCNET Internet Clock Service
738:: :: Time server
29:: :: Response to RFC 28
28:: :: Time standards
=====================================================================
Name Serving
2053:: I:: The AM (Armenia) Domain
2052:: E:: A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)
2010:: I:: Operational Criteria for Root Name Servers
1996:: PS:: A Mechanism for Prompt Notification of Zone Changes
(DNS NOTIFY)
1995:: PS:: Incremental Zone Transfer in DNS
1982:: PS:: Serial Number Arithmetic
1956:: I:: Registration in the MIL Domain
1912:: I:: Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors
1886:: PS:: DNS Extensions to support IP version 6
1876:: E:: A Means for Expressing Location Information in the
Domain Name System
1794:: I:: DNS Support for Load Balancing
1713:: I:: Tools for DNS debugging
1712:: E:: DNS Encoding of Geographical Location
1706:: I:: DNS NSAP Resource Records
1664:: E:: Using the Internet DNS to Distribute RFC1327 Mail
Address Mapping Tables
1591:: I:: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation
1537:: I:: Common DNS Data File Configuration Error
1536:: I:: Common DNS Implementation Errors and Suggested Fixes.
1480:: I:: The US Domain
1464:: E:: Using the Domain Name System To Store Arbitrary
String Attributes
1394:: I:: Relationship of Telex Answerback Codes to Internet Domains
1386:: I:: The US Domain
1348:: E:: DNS NSAP RRs
1183:: E:: New DNS RR Definitions
1101:: :: DNS encoding of network names and other types
1035:: S:: Domain names - implementation and specification
1034:: S:: Domain names - concepts and facilities
1033:: :: Domain administrators operations guide
1032:: :: Domain administrators guide
1031:: :: MILNET name domain transition
973:: :: Domain system changes and observations
952:: :: DoD Internet host table specification
921:: :: Domain name system implementation schedule - revised
920:: :: Domain requirements
897:: :: Domain name system implementation schedule
883:: :: Domain names
882:: :: Domain names
881:: :: Domain names plan and schedule
849:: :: Suggestions for improved host table distribution
830:: :: Distributed system for Internet name service
29:: :: Response to RFC 28
28:: :: Time standards
=====================================================================
Name Serving
2053:: I:: The AM (Armenia) Domain
2052:: E:: A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)
2010:: I:: Operational Criteria for Root Name Servers
1996:: PS:: A Mechanism for Prompt Notification of Zone Changes
(DNS NOTIFY)
1995:: PS:: Incremental Zone Transfer in DNS
1982:: PS:: Serial Number Arithmetic
1956:: I:: Registration in the MIL Domain
1912:: I:: Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors
1886:: PS:: DNS Extensions to support IP version 6
1876:: E:: A Means for Expressing Location Information in the
Domain Name System
1794:: I:: DNS Support for Load Balancing
1713:: I:: Tools for DNS debugging
1712:: E:: DNS Encoding of Geographical Location
1706:: I:: DNS NSAP Resource Records
1664:: E:: Using the Internet DNS to Distribute RFC1327 Mail
Address Mapping Tables
1591:: I:: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation
1537:: I:: Common DNS Data File Configuration Error
1536:: I:: Common DNS Implementation Errors and Suggested Fixes.
1480:: I:: The US Domain
1464:: E:: Using the Domain Name System To Store Arbitrary
String Attributes
1394:: I:: Relationship of Telex Answerback Codes to Internet Domains
1386:: I:: The US Domain
1348:: E:: DNS NSAP RRs
1183:: E:: New DNS RR Definitions
1101:: :: DNS encoding of network names and other types
1035:: S:: Domain names - implementation and specification
1034:: S:: Domain names - concepts and facilities
1033:: :: Domain administrators operations guide
1032:: :: Domain administrators guide
1031:: :: MILNET name domain transition
973:: :: Domain system changes and observations
952:: :: DoD Internet host table specification
921:: :: Domain name system implementation schedule - revised
920:: :: Domain requirements
897:: :: Domain name system implementation schedule
883:: :: Domain names
882:: :: Domain names
881:: :: Domain names plan and schedule
849:: :: Suggestions for improved host table distribution
830:: :: Distributed system for Internet name service
819:: :: Domain naming convention for Internet user applications
811:: :: Hostnames Server
810:: :: DoD Internet host table specification
799:: :: Internet name domains
796:: :: Address mappings
627:: :: ASCII text file of hostnames
625:: :: On-line hostnames service
623:: :: Comments on on-line host name service
620:: :: Request for monitor host table updates
608:: :: Host names on-line
606:: :: Host names on-line
289:: :: What we hope is an official list of host names
280:: :: Draft of host names
273:: :: More on standard host names
247:: :: Proffered set of standard host names
237:: :: NIC view of standard host names
236:: :: Standard host names
233:: :: Standardization of host call letters
229:: :: Standard host names
226:: :: Standardization of host mnemonics
=====================================================================
Network Management
2128:: PS:: Dial Control Management Information Base using SMIv2
2127:: PS:: ISDN Management Information Base
2124:: I:: Light-weight Flow Admission Protocol Specification
Version 1.0
2108:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater
Devices using SMIv2
2096:: PS:: IP Forwarding Table MIB
2089:: I:: V2ToV1 Mapping SNMPv2 onto SNMPv1 within a bi-lingual
SNMP agent
2074:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring MIB Protocol Identifiers
2064:: E:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2063:: E:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2051:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for APPC
2041:: I:: Mobile Network Tracing
2039:: I:: Applicability of Standards Track MIBs to Management
of World Wide Web Servers
2037:: PS:: Entity MIB
2024:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Data Link Switching
using SNMPv2
2021:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information
Base Version 2 using SMIv2
2020:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.12 Interfaces
2013:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the User
Datagram Protocol using SMIv2
2012:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the
Transmission Control Protocol
819:: :: Domain naming convention for Internet user applications
811:: :: Hostnames Server
810:: :: DoD Internet host table specification
799:: :: Internet name domains
796:: :: Address mappings
627:: :: ASCII text file of hostnames
625:: :: On-line hostnames service
623:: :: Comments on on-line host name service
620:: :: Request for monitor host table updates
608:: :: Host names on-line
606:: :: Host names on-line
289:: :: What we hope is an official list of host names
280:: :: Draft of host names
273:: :: More on standard host names
247:: :: Proffered set of standard host names
237:: :: NIC view of standard host names
236:: :: Standard host names
233:: :: Standardization of host call letters
229:: :: Standard host names
226:: :: Standardization of host mnemonics
=====================================================================
Network Management
2128:: PS:: Dial Control Management Information Base using SMIv2
2127:: PS:: ISDN Management Information Base
2124:: I:: Light-weight Flow Admission Protocol Specification
Version 1.0
2108:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater
Devices using SMIv2
2096:: PS:: IP Forwarding Table MIB
2089:: I:: V2ToV1 Mapping SNMPv2 onto SNMPv1 within a bi-lingual
SNMP agent
2074:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring MIB Protocol Identifiers
2064:: E:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2063:: E:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2051:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for APPC
2041:: I:: Mobile Network Tracing
2039:: I:: Applicability of Standards Track MIBs to Management
of World Wide Web Servers
2037:: PS:: Entity MIB
2024:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Data Link Switching
using SNMPv2
2021:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information
Base Version 2 using SMIv2
2020:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.12 Interfaces
2013:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the User
Datagram Protocol using SMIv2
2012:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the
Transmission Control Protocol
2011:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the Internet
Protocol using SMIv2
2006:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for IP Mobility
Support using SMIv2
1944:: I:: Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices
1910:: E:: User-based Security Model for SNMPv2
1909:: E:: An Administrative Infrastructure for SNMPv2
1908:: DS:: Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the
Internet-standard Network Management Framework
1907:: DS:: Management Information Base for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1906:: DS:: Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1905:: DS:: Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1904:: DS:: Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1903:: DS:: Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1902:: DS:: Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1901:: E:: Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2
1857:: I:: A Model for Common Operational Statistics
1856:: I:: The Opstat Client-Server Model for Statistics Retrieval
1850:: DS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1792:: E:: TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification
1759:: PS:: Printer MIB
1757:: DS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base
1749:: PS:: IEEE 802.5 Station Source Routing MIB using SMIv2
1748:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 MIB using SMIv2
1747:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA Data Link Control
1743:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 MIB using SMIv2
1742:: PS:: AppleTalk Management Information Base II
1724:: DS:: RIP Version 2 MIB Extension
1697:: PS:: Relational Database Management System (RDBMS)
Management Information Base (MIB) using SMIv2
1696:: PS:: Modem Management Information Base (MIB) using SMIv2
1695:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for ATM Management
Version 8.0 using SMIv2
1694:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SMDS Interfaces
using SMIv2
1666:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2
1665:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2
1660:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Parallel-printer-like
Hardware Devices using SMIv2
1659:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for RS-232-like
Hardware Devices using SMIv2
1658:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Character Stream
2011:: PS:: SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the Internet
Protocol using SMIv2
2006:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for IP Mobility
Support using SMIv2
1944:: I:: Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices
1910:: E:: User-based Security Model for SNMPv2
1909:: E:: An Administrative Infrastructure for SNMPv2
1908:: DS:: Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the
Internet-standard Network Management Framework
1907:: DS:: Management Information Base for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1906:: DS:: Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1905:: DS:: Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1904:: DS:: Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1903:: DS:: Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1902:: DS:: Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1901:: E:: Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2
1857:: I:: A Model for Common Operational Statistics
1856:: I:: The Opstat Client-Server Model for Statistics Retrieval
1850:: DS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1792:: E:: TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification
1759:: PS:: Printer MIB
1757:: DS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base
1749:: PS:: IEEE 802.5 Station Source Routing MIB using SMIv2
1748:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 MIB using SMIv2
1747:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA Data Link Control
1743:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 MIB using SMIv2
1742:: PS:: AppleTalk Management Information Base II
1724:: DS:: RIP Version 2 MIB Extension
1697:: PS:: Relational Database Management System (RDBMS)
Management Information Base (MIB) using SMIv2
1696:: PS:: Modem Management Information Base (MIB) using SMIv2
1695:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for ATM Management
Version 8.0 using SMIv2
1694:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SMDS Interfaces
using SMIv2
1666:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2
1665:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA NAUs using SMIv2
1660:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Parallel-printer-like
Hardware Devices using SMIv2
1659:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for RS-232-like
Hardware Devices using SMIv2
1658:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Character Stream
Devices using SMIv2
1657:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fourth Version
of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) using SMIv2
1650:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types using SMIv2
1643:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1628:: PS:: UPS Management Information Base
1623:: S:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1612:: PS:: DNS Resolver MIB Extensions
1611:: PS:: DNS Server MIB Extensions
1596:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Service
1595:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the SONET/SDH
Interface Type
1593:: I:: SNA APPN Node MIB
1592:: E:: Simple Network Management Protocol Distributed Protocol
Interface Version 2.0
1573:: PS:: Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II
1567:: PS:: X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB
1566:: PS:: Mail Monitoring MIB
1565:: PS:: Network Services Monitoring MIB
1564:: I:: DSA Metrics (OSI-DS 34 (v3))
1559:: DS:: DECnet Phase IV MIB Extensions
1525:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges
1516:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3
Repeater Devices
1515:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3
Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)
1514:: PS:: Host Resources MIB
1513:: PS:: Token Ring Extensions to the Remote Network Monitoring MIB
1512:: PS:: FDDI Management Information Base
1503:: I:: Algorithms for Automating Administration in SNMPv2
Managers
1493:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges
1474:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Bridge
Network Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1473:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the IP Network
Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1472:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Security
Protocols of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1471:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Link Control
Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1470:: I:: FYI on a Network Management Tool Catalog
1461:: PS:: SNMP MIB extension for MultiProtocol Interconnect over
X.25
1452:: PS:: Coexistence between version 1 and version 2 of the
Internet-standard Network Management Framework
Devices using SMIv2
1657:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fourth Version
of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) using SMIv2
1650:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types using SMIv2
1643:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1628:: PS:: UPS Management Information Base
1623:: S:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1612:: PS:: DNS Resolver MIB Extensions
1611:: PS:: DNS Server MIB Extensions
1596:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Service
1595:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the SONET/SDH
Interface Type
1593:: I:: SNA APPN Node MIB
1592:: E:: Simple Network Management Protocol Distributed Protocol
Interface Version 2.0
1573:: PS:: Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II
1567:: PS:: X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB
1566:: PS:: Mail Monitoring MIB
1565:: PS:: Network Services Monitoring MIB
1564:: I:: DSA Metrics (OSI-DS 34 (v3))
1559:: DS:: DECnet Phase IV MIB Extensions
1525:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges
1516:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3
Repeater Devices
1515:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3
Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)
1514:: PS:: Host Resources MIB
1513:: PS:: Token Ring Extensions to the Remote Network Monitoring MIB
1512:: PS:: FDDI Management Information Base
1503:: I:: Algorithms for Automating Administration in SNMPv2
Managers
1493:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges
1474:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Bridge
Network Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1473:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the IP Network
Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1472:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Security
Protocols of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1471:: PS:: The Definitions of Managed Objects for the Link Control
Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol
1470:: I:: FYI on a Network Management Tool Catalog
1461:: PS:: SNMP MIB extension for MultiProtocol Interconnect over
X.25
1452:: PS:: Coexistence between version 1 and version 2 of the
Internet-standard Network Management Framework
1451:: PS:: Manager to Manager Management Information Base
1450:: PS:: Management Information Base for version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1449:: PS:: Transport Mappings for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1448:: PS:: Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1447:: PS:: Party MIB for version 2 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv2)
1446:: PS:: Security Protocols for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1445:: PS:: Administrative Model for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1444:: PS:: Conformance Statements for version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1443:: PS:: Textual Conventions for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1442:: PS:: Structure of Management Information for version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1441:: PS:: Introduction to version 2 of the Internet-standard
Network Management Framework
1431:: I:: DUA Metrics
1420:: PS:: SNMP over IPX
1419:: PS:: SNMP over AppleTalk
1418:: PS:: SNMP over OSI
1414:: PS:: Ident MIB
1407:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3/E3 Interface
Type
1406:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 and E1
Interface Types
1404:: I:: A Model for Common Operational Statistics
1398:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1389:: PS:: RIP Version 2 MIB Extension
1382:: PS:: SNMP MIB Extension for the X.25 Packet Layer
1381:: PS:: SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB
1369:: I:: Implementation Notes and Experience for The Internet
Ethernet MIB
1368:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater
Devices
1354:: PS:: IP Forwarding Table MIB
1353:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Administration of
SNMP Parties
1352:: H:: SNMP Security Protocols
1351:: H:: SNMP Administrative Model
1346:: I:: Resource Allocation, Control, and Accounting for the
Use of Network Resources
1318:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Parallel-printer-like
1451:: PS:: Manager to Manager Management Information Base
1450:: PS:: Management Information Base for version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1449:: PS:: Transport Mappings for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1448:: PS:: Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1447:: PS:: Party MIB for version 2 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv2)
1446:: PS:: Security Protocols for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1445:: PS:: Administrative Model for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1444:: PS:: Conformance Statements for version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1443:: PS:: Textual Conventions for version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1442:: PS:: Structure of Management Information for version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
1441:: PS:: Introduction to version 2 of the Internet-standard
Network Management Framework
1431:: I:: DUA Metrics
1420:: PS:: SNMP over IPX
1419:: PS:: SNMP over AppleTalk
1418:: PS:: SNMP over OSI
1414:: PS:: Ident MIB
1407:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3/E3 Interface
Type
1406:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 and E1
Interface Types
1404:: I:: A Model for Common Operational Statistics
1398:: DS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1389:: PS:: RIP Version 2 MIB Extension
1382:: PS:: SNMP MIB Extension for the X.25 Packet Layer
1381:: PS:: SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB
1369:: I:: Implementation Notes and Experience for The Internet
Ethernet MIB
1368:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater
Devices
1354:: PS:: IP Forwarding Table MIB
1353:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Administration of
SNMP Parties
1352:: H:: SNMP Security Protocols
1351:: H:: SNMP Administrative Model
1346:: I:: Resource Allocation, Control, and Accounting for the
Use of Network Resources
1318:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Parallel-printer-like
Hardware Devices
1317:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for RS-232-like
Hardware Devices
1316:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Character Stream
Devices
1315:: PS:: Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs
1304:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the SIP Interface Type
1303:: I:: A Convention for Describing SNMP-based Agents
1298:: I:: SNMP over IPX
1289:: PS:: DECnet Phase IV MIB Extensions
1286:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges
1285:: PS:: FDDI Management Information Base
1284:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1283:: E:: SNMP over OSI
1273:: I:: A Measurement Study of Changes in Service-Level
Reachability in the Global TCP/IP Internet
1272:: I:: Internet Accounting
1271:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base
1270:: I:: SNMP Communications Services
1269:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Border Gateway
Protocol (Version 3)
1262:: :: Guidelines for Internet Measurement Activities
1253:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1252:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1248:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1247:: DS:: OSPF Version 2
1243:: PS:: AppleTalk Management Information Base
1242:: I:: Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnection
Devices
1239:: PS:: Reassignment of Experimental MIBs to Standard MIBs
1238:: E:: CLNS MIB - for use with Connectionless Network
Protocol (ISO 8473) and End System to Intermediate
System (ISO 9542)
1233:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3 Interface Type
1232:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 Interface Type
1231:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 Token Ring MIB
1230:: H:: IEEE 802.4 Token Bus MIB
1229:: DS:: Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB
1228:: E:: SNMP-DPI - Simple Network Management Protocol
Distributed Program Interface
1227:: E:: SNMP MUX Protocol and MIB
1224:: E:: Techniques for Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts
1215:: I:: A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP
1214:: H:: OSI Internet Management
1213:: S:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1212:: S:: Concise MIB Definitions
Hardware Devices
1317:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for RS-232-like
Hardware Devices
1316:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Character Stream
Devices
1315:: PS:: Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs
1304:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the SIP Interface Type
1303:: I:: A Convention for Describing SNMP-based Agents
1298:: I:: SNMP over IPX
1289:: PS:: DECnet Phase IV MIB Extensions
1286:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges
1285:: PS:: FDDI Management Information Base
1284:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like
Interface Types
1283:: E:: SNMP over OSI
1273:: I:: A Measurement Study of Changes in Service-Level
Reachability in the Global TCP/IP Internet
1272:: I:: Internet Accounting
1271:: PS:: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base
1270:: I:: SNMP Communications Services
1269:: PS:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Border Gateway
Protocol (Version 3)
1262:: :: Guidelines for Internet Measurement Activities
1253:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1252:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1248:: PS:: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
1247:: DS:: OSPF Version 2
1243:: PS:: AppleTalk Management Information Base
1242:: I:: Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnection
Devices
1239:: PS:: Reassignment of Experimental MIBs to Standard MIBs
1238:: E:: CLNS MIB - for use with Connectionless Network
Protocol (ISO 8473) and End System to Intermediate
System (ISO 9542)
1233:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3 Interface Type
1232:: H:: Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 Interface Type
1231:: DS:: IEEE 802.5 Token Ring MIB
1230:: H:: IEEE 802.4 Token Bus MIB
1229:: DS:: Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB
1228:: E:: SNMP-DPI - Simple Network Management Protocol
Distributed Program Interface
1227:: E:: SNMP MUX Protocol and MIB
1224:: E:: Techniques for Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts
1215:: I:: A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP
1214:: H:: OSI Internet Management
1213:: S:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1212:: S:: Concise MIB Definitions
1189:: H:: The Common Management Information Services and Protocols
for the Internet
1187:: E:: Bulk Table Retrieval with the SNMP
1161:: E:: SNMP over OSI
1158:: PS:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1157:: S:: A Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
1155:: S:: Structure and Identification of Management Information
for TCP/IP-based Internets
1109:: :: Report of the second Ad Hoc Network Management Review
Group
1098:: :: Simple Network Management Protocol SNMP
1095:: DS:: Common Management Information Services and Protocol
over TCP/IP CMOT
1089:: :: SNMP over Ethernet
1067:: :: Simple Network Management Protocol
1066:: H:: Management Information Base for network management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1065:: H:: Structure and identification of management information
for TCP/IP-based internets
1052:: :: IAB recommendations for the development of Internet
network management standards
1028:: H:: Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol
1024:: :: HEMS variable definitions
1023:: :: HEMS monitoring and control language
1022:: :: High-level Entity Management Protocol HEMP
1021:: H:: High-level Entity Management System HEMS
1012:: :: Bibliography of Request For Comments 1 through 999
1011:: S:: Official Internet protocols
1010:: S:: Assigned numbers
996:: H:: Statistics server
619:: :: Mean round-trip times in the ARPANET
618:: :: Few observations on NCP statistics
616:: :: Latest network maps
615:: :: Proposed Network Standard Data Pathname Syntax
612:: :: Traffic statistics December 1973
601:: :: Traffic statistics November 1973
586:: :: Traffic statistics October 1973
579:: :: Traffic statistics September 1973
568:: :: Response to RFC 567 - cross country network bandwidth
567:: :: Cross country network bandwidth
566:: :: Traffic statistics August 1973
565:: :: Storing network survey data at the datacomputer
557:: :: Revelations in network host measurements
546:: :: Tenex load averages for July 1973
545:: :: Of what quality be the UCSB resources evaluators?
538:: :: Traffic statistics June 1973
531:: :: Feast or famine? A response to two recent RFC's about
1189:: H:: The Common Management Information Services and Protocols
for the Internet
1187:: E:: Bulk Table Retrieval with the SNMP
1161:: E:: SNMP over OSI
1158:: PS:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1157:: S:: A Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
1155:: S:: Structure and Identification of Management Information
for TCP/IP-based Internets
1109:: :: Report of the second Ad Hoc Network Management Review
Group
1098:: :: Simple Network Management Protocol SNMP
1095:: DS:: Common Management Information Services and Protocol
over TCP/IP CMOT
1089:: :: SNMP over Ethernet
1067:: :: Simple Network Management Protocol
1066:: H:: Management Information Base for network management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1065:: H:: Structure and identification of management information
for TCP/IP-based internets
1052:: :: IAB recommendations for the development of Internet
network management standards
1028:: H:: Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol
1024:: :: HEMS variable definitions
1023:: :: HEMS monitoring and control language
1022:: :: High-level Entity Management Protocol HEMP
1021:: H:: High-level Entity Management System HEMS
1012:: :: Bibliography of Request For Comments 1 through 999
1011:: S:: Official Internet protocols
1010:: S:: Assigned numbers
996:: H:: Statistics server
619:: :: Mean round-trip times in the ARPANET
618:: :: Few observations on NCP statistics
616:: :: Latest network maps
615:: :: Proposed Network Standard Data Pathname Syntax
612:: :: Traffic statistics December 1973
601:: :: Traffic statistics November 1973
586:: :: Traffic statistics October 1973
579:: :: Traffic statistics September 1973
568:: :: Response to RFC 567 - cross country network bandwidth
567:: :: Cross country network bandwidth
566:: :: Traffic statistics August 1973
565:: :: Storing network survey data at the datacomputer
557:: :: Revelations in network host measurements
546:: :: Tenex load averages for July 1973
545:: :: Of what quality be the UCSB resources evaluators?
538:: :: Traffic statistics June 1973
531:: :: Feast or famine? A response to two recent RFC's about
network information
522:: :: Traffic statistics May 1973
509:: :: Traffic statistics April 1973
500:: :: Integration of data management systems on a computer
network
482:: :: Traffic statistics February 1973
455:: :: Traffic statistics January 1973
443:: :: Traffic statistics December 1972
423:: :: UCLA Campus Computing Network liaison staff for ARPANET
422:: :: Traffic statistics November 1972
421:: :: Software consulting service for network users
416:: :: ARC system will be unavailable for use during
Thanksgivingweek
415:: :: Tenex bandwidth
413:: :: Traffic statistics October 1972
400:: :: Traffic statistics September 1972
392:: :: Measurement of host costs for transmitting network data
391:: :: Traffic statistics August 1972
389:: :: UCLA Campus Computing Network liaison staff for ARPA
Network
388:: :: NCP statistics
384:: :: Official site idents for organizations in the ARPA
Network
381:: :: Three aids to improved network operation
378:: :: Traffic statistics July 1972
369:: :: Evaluation of ARPANET services January-March, 1972
362:: :: Network host status
353:: :: Network host status
344:: :: Network host status
326:: :: Network host status
323:: :: Formation of Network Measurement Group NMG
308:: :: ARPANET host availability data
304:: :: Data management system proposal for the ARPA network
302:: :: Exercising the ARPANET
274:: :: Establishing a local guide for network usage
227:: :: Data transfer rates Rand/UCLA
212:: :: NWG meeting on network usage
193:: :: Network checkout
188:: :: Data management meeting announcement
156:: :: Status of the Illinois site
153:: :: SRI ARC-NIC status
96:: :: Interactive network experiment to study modes of
access tothe Network Information Center
32:: :: Connecting M.I.T. computers to the
ARPA Computer-to-computer communication network
18:: :: [Link assignments]
======================================================================
network information
522:: :: Traffic statistics May 1973
509:: :: Traffic statistics April 1973
500:: :: Integration of data management systems on a computer
network
482:: :: Traffic statistics February 1973
455:: :: Traffic statistics January 1973
443:: :: Traffic statistics December 1972
423:: :: UCLA Campus Computing Network liaison staff for ARPANET
422:: :: Traffic statistics November 1972
421:: :: Software consulting service for network users
416:: :: ARC system will be unavailable for use during
Thanksgivingweek
415:: :: Tenex bandwidth
413:: :: Traffic statistics October 1972
400:: :: Traffic statistics September 1972
392:: :: Measurement of host costs for transmitting network data
391:: :: Traffic statistics August 1972
389:: :: UCLA Campus Computing Network liaison staff for ARPA
Network
388:: :: NCP statistics
384:: :: Official site idents for organizations in the ARPA
Network
381:: :: Three aids to improved network operation
378:: :: Traffic statistics July 1972
369:: :: Evaluation of ARPANET services January-March, 1972
362:: :: Network host status
353:: :: Network host status
344:: :: Network host status
326:: :: Network host status
323:: :: Formation of Network Measurement Group NMG
308:: :: ARPANET host availability data
304:: :: Data management system proposal for the ARPA network
302:: :: Exercising the ARPANET
274:: :: Establishing a local guide for network usage
227:: :: Data transfer rates Rand/UCLA
212:: :: NWG meeting on network usage
193:: :: Network checkout
188:: :: Data management meeting announcement
156:: :: Status of the Illinois site
153:: :: SRI ARC-NIC status
96:: :: Interactive network experiment to study modes of
access tothe Network Information Center
32:: :: Connecting M.I.T. computers to the
ARPA Computer-to-computer communication network
18:: :: [Link assignments]
======================================================================
Network News
1036:: :: Standard for interchange of USENET messages
977:: PS:: Network News Transfer Protocol
850:: :: Standard for interchange of USENET messages
===================================================================
Real Time Services
:: ::
2102:: I:: Multicast Support for Nimrod
2090:: E:: TFTP Multicast Option
2038:: PS:: RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video
2035:: PS:: RTP Payload Format for JPEG-compressed Video
2032:: PS:: RTP payload format for H.261 video streams
2029:: PS:: RTP Payload Format of Sun's CellB Video Encoding
2022:: PS:: Support for Multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM
Networks
1890:: PS:: RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal
Control
1889:: PS:: RTP
1861:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 - Two-Way
Enhanced
1821:: I:: Integration of Real-time Services in an IP-ATM Network
Architecture
1819:: E:: Internet Stream Protocol Version 2 (ST2) Protocol
Specification - Version ST2+
1789:: I:: INETPhone
1768:: E:: Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting
1703:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain
1645:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 2
1614:: I:: Network Access to Multimedia Information
1569:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain
1568:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 1(b)
1546:: I:: Host Anycasting Service
1469:: PS:: IP Multicast over Token-Ring Local Area Networks
1458:: I:: Requirements for Multicast Protocols
1453:: I:: A Comment on Packet Video Remote Conferencing and the
Transport/Network Layers
1313:: I:: Today's Programming for KRFC AM 1313 Internet Talk Radio
1301:: I:: Multicast Transport Protocol
1257:: I:: Isochronous Applications Do Not Require
Jitter-Controlled Networks
1197:: I:: Using ODA for Translating Multimedia Information
1193:: :: Client Requirements for Real-Time Communication Services
1190:: E:: Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)
1112:: S:: Host extensions for IP multicasting
1054:: :: Host extensions for IP multicasting
988:: :: Host extensions for IP multicasting
966:: :: Host groups
947:: :: Multi-network broadcasting within the Internet
Network News
1036:: :: Standard for interchange of USENET messages
977:: PS:: Network News Transfer Protocol
850:: :: Standard for interchange of USENET messages
===================================================================
Real Time Services
:: ::
2102:: I:: Multicast Support for Nimrod
2090:: E:: TFTP Multicast Option
2038:: PS:: RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video
2035:: PS:: RTP Payload Format for JPEG-compressed Video
2032:: PS:: RTP payload format for H.261 video streams
2029:: PS:: RTP Payload Format of Sun's CellB Video Encoding
2022:: PS:: Support for Multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM
Networks
1890:: PS:: RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal
Control
1889:: PS:: RTP
1861:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 - Two-Way
Enhanced
1821:: I:: Integration of Real-time Services in an IP-ATM Network
Architecture
1819:: E:: Internet Stream Protocol Version 2 (ST2) Protocol
Specification - Version ST2+
1789:: I:: INETPhone
1768:: E:: Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting
1703:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain
1645:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 2
1614:: I:: Network Access to Multimedia Information
1569:: I:: Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain
1568:: I:: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 1(b)
1546:: I:: Host Anycasting Service
1469:: PS:: IP Multicast over Token-Ring Local Area Networks
1458:: I:: Requirements for Multicast Protocols
1453:: I:: A Comment on Packet Video Remote Conferencing and the
Transport/Network Layers
1313:: I:: Today's Programming for KRFC AM 1313 Internet Talk Radio
1301:: I:: Multicast Transport Protocol
1257:: I:: Isochronous Applications Do Not Require
Jitter-Controlled Networks
1197:: I:: Using ODA for Translating Multimedia Information
1193:: :: Client Requirements for Real-Time Communication Services
1190:: E:: Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)
1112:: S:: Host extensions for IP multicasting
1054:: :: Host extensions for IP multicasting
988:: :: Host extensions for IP multicasting
966:: :: Host groups
947:: :: Multi-network broadcasting within the Internet
809:: :: UCL facsimile system
804:: :: CCITT draft recommendation T.4 [Standardization of
Group 3 facsimile apparatus for document transmission]
803:: :: Dacom 450/500 facsimile data transcoding
798:: :: Decoding facsimile data from the Rapicom 450
769:: :: Rapicom 450 facsimile file format
741:: :: Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol NVP
511:: :: Enterprise phone service to NIC from ARPANET sites
508:: :: Real-time data transmission on the ARPANET
420:: :: CCA ICCC weather demo
408:: :: NETBANK
251:: :: Weather data
=====================================================================
Routing
2103:: I:: Mobility Support for Nimrod
2092:: I:: Protocol Analysis for Triggered RIP
2091:: PS:: Triggered Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
2081:: I:: RIPng Protocol Applicability Statement
2080:: PS:: RIPng for IPv6
2073:: PS:: An IPv6 Provider-Based Unicast Address Format
2072:: I:: Router Renumbering Guide
2042:: I:: Registering New BGP Attribute Types
2008:: BC:: Implications of Various Address Allocation Policies for
Internet Routing
1998:: I:: An Application of the BGP Community Attribute in
Multi-home Routing
1997:: PS:: BGP Communities Attribute
1992:: I:: The Nimrod Routing Architecture
1987:: I:: Ipsilon's General Switch Management Protocol
Specification Version 1.1
1966:: E:: BGP Route Reflection An alternative to full mesh IBGP
1965:: E:: Autonomous System Confederations for BGP
1955:: I:: New Scheme for Internet Routing and Addressing (ENCAPS)
for IPN
1953:: I:: Ipsilon Flow Management Protocol Specification for
IPv4 Version 1.0
1940:: I:: Source Demand Routing
1930:: BC:: Guidelines for creation, selection, and registration
of an Autonomous System (AS)
1925:: I:: The Twelve Networking Truths
1923:: I:: RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic Status
1863:: E:: A BGP/IDRP Route Server alternative to a full mesh routing
1817:: I:: CIDR and Classful Routing
1812:: PS:: Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers
1793:: PS:: Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits
1787:: I:: Routing in a Multi-provider Internet
1786:: I:: Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing
Registry (ripe-81++)
809:: :: UCL facsimile system
804:: :: CCITT draft recommendation T.4 [Standardization of
Group 3 facsimile apparatus for document transmission]
803:: :: Dacom 450/500 facsimile data transcoding
798:: :: Decoding facsimile data from the Rapicom 450
769:: :: Rapicom 450 facsimile file format
741:: :: Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol NVP
511:: :: Enterprise phone service to NIC from ARPANET sites
508:: :: Real-time data transmission on the ARPANET
420:: :: CCA ICCC weather demo
408:: :: NETBANK
251:: :: Weather data
=====================================================================
Routing
2103:: I:: Mobility Support for Nimrod
2092:: I:: Protocol Analysis for Triggered RIP
2091:: PS:: Triggered Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
2081:: I:: RIPng Protocol Applicability Statement
2080:: PS:: RIPng for IPv6
2073:: PS:: An IPv6 Provider-Based Unicast Address Format
2072:: I:: Router Renumbering Guide
2042:: I:: Registering New BGP Attribute Types
2008:: BC:: Implications of Various Address Allocation Policies for
Internet Routing
1998:: I:: An Application of the BGP Community Attribute in
Multi-home Routing
1997:: PS:: BGP Communities Attribute
1992:: I:: The Nimrod Routing Architecture
1987:: I:: Ipsilon's General Switch Management Protocol
Specification Version 1.1
1966:: E:: BGP Route Reflection An alternative to full mesh IBGP
1965:: E:: Autonomous System Confederations for BGP
1955:: I:: New Scheme for Internet Routing and Addressing (ENCAPS)
for IPN
1953:: I:: Ipsilon Flow Management Protocol Specification for
IPv4 Version 1.0
1940:: I:: Source Demand Routing
1930:: BC:: Guidelines for creation, selection, and registration
of an Autonomous System (AS)
1925:: I:: The Twelve Networking Truths
1923:: I:: RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic Status
1863:: E:: A BGP/IDRP Route Server alternative to a full mesh routing
1817:: I:: CIDR and Classful Routing
1812:: PS:: Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers
1793:: PS:: Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits
1787:: I:: Routing in a Multi-provider Internet
1786:: I:: Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing
Registry (ripe-81++)
1774:: I:: BGP-4 Protocol Analysis
1773:: I:: Experience with the BGP-4 protocol
1772:: DS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1771:: DS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
1765:: E:: OSPF Database Overflow
1753:: I:: IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and
Addressing Architecture
1745:: PS:: BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF Interaction
1723:: DS:: RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information
1722:: DS:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Applicability Statement
1721:: I:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Analysis
1716:: I:: Towards Requirements for IP Routers
1702:: I:: Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 networks
1701:: I:: Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
1668:: I:: Unified Routing Requirements for IPng
1656:: I:: BGP-4 Protocol Document Roadmap and Implementation
Experience
1655:: PS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the
Internet
1654:: PS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
1587:: PS:: The OSPF NSSA Option
1586:: I:: Guidelines for Running OSPF Over Frame Relay Networks
1585:: I:: MOSPF
1584:: PS:: Multicast Extensions to OSPF
1583:: DS:: OSPF Version 2
1582:: PS:: Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
1581:: I:: Protocol Analysis for Extensions to RIP to Support
Demand Circuits
1520:: I:: Exchanging Routing Information Across Provider Boundaries
in the CIDR Environment
1519:: PS:: Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
1517:: PS:: Applicability Statement for the Implementation of
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
1504:: I:: Appletalk Update-Based Routing Protocol
1482:: I:: Aggregation Support in the NSFNET Policy Routing Database
1479:: PS:: Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Specification
1478:: PS:: An Architecture for Inter-Domain Policy Routing
1477:: I:: IDPR as a Proposed Standard
1476:: E:: RAP
1439:: I:: The Uniqueness of Unique Identifiers
1403:: PS:: BGP OSPF Interaction
1397:: PS:: Default Route Advertisement In BGP2 And BGP3 Versions Of
The Border Gateway Protocol
1388:: PS:: RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information
1387:: I:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Analysis
1383:: I:: An Experiment in DNS Based IP Routing
1380:: I:: IESG Deliberations on Routing and Addressing
1371:: I:: Choosing a "Common IGP" for the IP Internet (The
1774:: I:: BGP-4 Protocol Analysis
1773:: I:: Experience with the BGP-4 protocol
1772:: DS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1771:: DS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
1765:: E:: OSPF Database Overflow
1753:: I:: IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and
Addressing Architecture
1745:: PS:: BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF Interaction
1723:: DS:: RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information
1722:: DS:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Applicability Statement
1721:: I:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Analysis
1716:: I:: Towards Requirements for IP Routers
1702:: I:: Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 networks
1701:: I:: Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
1668:: I:: Unified Routing Requirements for IPng
1656:: I:: BGP-4 Protocol Document Roadmap and Implementation
Experience
1655:: PS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the
Internet
1654:: PS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
1587:: PS:: The OSPF NSSA Option
1586:: I:: Guidelines for Running OSPF Over Frame Relay Networks
1585:: I:: MOSPF
1584:: PS:: Multicast Extensions to OSPF
1583:: DS:: OSPF Version 2
1582:: PS:: Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Circuits
1581:: I:: Protocol Analysis for Extensions to RIP to Support
Demand Circuits
1520:: I:: Exchanging Routing Information Across Provider Boundaries
in the CIDR Environment
1519:: PS:: Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
1517:: PS:: Applicability Statement for the Implementation of
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
1504:: I:: Appletalk Update-Based Routing Protocol
1482:: I:: Aggregation Support in the NSFNET Policy Routing Database
1479:: PS:: Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Specification
1478:: PS:: An Architecture for Inter-Domain Policy Routing
1477:: I:: IDPR as a Proposed Standard
1476:: E:: RAP
1439:: I:: The Uniqueness of Unique Identifiers
1403:: PS:: BGP OSPF Interaction
1397:: PS:: Default Route Advertisement In BGP2 And BGP3 Versions Of
The Border Gateway Protocol
1388:: PS:: RIP Version 2 Carrying Additional Information
1387:: I:: RIP Version 2 Protocol Analysis
1383:: I:: An Experiment in DNS Based IP Routing
1380:: I:: IESG Deliberations on Routing and Addressing
1371:: I:: Choosing a "Common IGP" for the IP Internet (The
IESG's Recommendation to the IAB)
1370:: PS:: Applicability Statement for OSPF
1364:: PS:: BGP OSPF Interaction
1338:: I:: Supernetting
1322:: I:: A Unified Approach to Inter-Domain Routing
1268:: DS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1267:: DS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3)
1266:: I:: Experience with the BGP Protocol
1265:: I:: BGP Protocol Analysis
1264:: I:: Internet Routing Protocol Standardization Criteria
1254:: I:: Gateway Congestion Control Survey
1246:: I:: Experience with the OSPF Protocol
1245:: I:: OSPF Protocol Analysis
1222:: :: Advancing the NSFNET Routing Architecture
1195:: PS:: Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual
Environments
1164:: PS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1163:: PS:: A Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
1142:: I:: OSI IS-IS Intra-domain Routing Protocol
1136:: :: Administrative Domains and Routing Domains
1133:: :: Routing between the NSFNET and the DDN
1131:: PS:: OSPF specification
1126:: :: Goals and functional requirements for inter-autonomous
system routing
1125:: :: Policy requirements for inter Administrative Domain
routing
1124:: :: Policy issues in interconnecting networks
1105:: E:: Border Gateway Protocol BGP
1104:: :: Models of policy based routing
1102:: :: Policy routing in Internet protocols
1092:: :: EGP and policy based routing in the new NSFNET backbone
1075:: E:: Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol
1074:: :: NSFNET backbone SPF based Interior Gateway Protocol
1058:: S:: Routing Information Protocol
1009:: H:: Requirements for Internet gateways
995:: :: End System to Intermediate System Routing Exchange
Protocol for use in conjunction with ISO 8473
985:: :: Requirements for Internet gateways - draft
981:: :: Experimental multiple-path routing algorithm
975:: :: Autonomous confederations
950:: S:: Internet standard subnetting procedure
911:: :: EGP Gateway under Berkeley UNIX 4.2
904:: H:: Exterior Gateway Protocol formal specification
898:: :: Gateway special interest group meeting notes
890:: :: Exterior Gateway Protocol implementation schedule
888:: :: STUB Exterior Gateway Protocol
875:: :: Gateways, architectures, and heffalumps
827:: :: Exterior Gateway Protocol EGP
IESG's Recommendation to the IAB)
1370:: PS:: Applicability Statement for OSPF
1364:: PS:: BGP OSPF Interaction
1338:: I:: Supernetting
1322:: I:: A Unified Approach to Inter-Domain Routing
1268:: DS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1267:: DS:: A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3)
1266:: I:: Experience with the BGP Protocol
1265:: I:: BGP Protocol Analysis
1264:: I:: Internet Routing Protocol Standardization Criteria
1254:: I:: Gateway Congestion Control Survey
1246:: I:: Experience with the OSPF Protocol
1245:: I:: OSPF Protocol Analysis
1222:: :: Advancing the NSFNET Routing Architecture
1195:: PS:: Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual
Environments
1164:: PS:: Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1163:: PS:: A Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
1142:: I:: OSI IS-IS Intra-domain Routing Protocol
1136:: :: Administrative Domains and Routing Domains
1133:: :: Routing between the NSFNET and the DDN
1131:: PS:: OSPF specification
1126:: :: Goals and functional requirements for inter-autonomous
system routing
1125:: :: Policy requirements for inter Administrative Domain
routing
1124:: :: Policy issues in interconnecting networks
1105:: E:: Border Gateway Protocol BGP
1104:: :: Models of policy based routing
1102:: :: Policy routing in Internet protocols
1092:: :: EGP and policy based routing in the new NSFNET backbone
1075:: E:: Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol
1074:: :: NSFNET backbone SPF based Interior Gateway Protocol
1058:: S:: Routing Information Protocol
1009:: H:: Requirements for Internet gateways
995:: :: End System to Intermediate System Routing Exchange
Protocol for use in conjunction with ISO 8473
985:: :: Requirements for Internet gateways - draft
981:: :: Experimental multiple-path routing algorithm
975:: :: Autonomous confederations
950:: S:: Internet standard subnetting procedure
911:: :: EGP Gateway under Berkeley UNIX 4.2
904:: H:: Exterior Gateway Protocol formal specification
898:: :: Gateway special interest group meeting notes
890:: :: Exterior Gateway Protocol implementation schedule
888:: :: STUB Exterior Gateway Protocol
875:: :: Gateways, architectures, and heffalumps
827:: :: Exterior Gateway Protocol EGP
823:: H:: DARPA Internet gateway
=====================================================================
Security
2104:: I:: HMAC
2085:: PS:: HMAC-MD5 IP Authentication with Replay Prevention
2084:: I:: Considerations for Web Transaction Security
2082:: PS:: RIP-2 MD5 Authentication
2078:: PS:: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface,
Version 2
2069:: PS:: An Extension to HTTP
2065:: PS:: Domain Name System Security Extensions
2059:: I:: RADIUS Accounting
2058:: PS:: Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)
2057:: I:: Source directed access control on the Internet.
2040:: I:: The RC5, RC5-CBC, RC5-CBC-Pad, and RC5-CTS Algorithms
2025:: PS:: The Simple Public-Key GSS-API Mechanism (SPKM)
2015:: :: MIME Security with Pretty Good Privacy (PGP)
1984:: I:: IAB and IESG Statement on Cryptographic Technology and
the Internet
1969:: I:: The PPP DES Encryption Protocol (DESE)
1968:: PS:: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)
1964:: PS:: The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism
1961:: PS:: GSS-API Authentication Method for SOCKS Version 5
1949:: E:: Scalable Multicast Key Distribution
1948:: I:: Defending Against Sequence Number Attacks
1938:: PS:: A One-Time Password System
1929:: PS:: Username/Password Authentication for SOCKS V5
1928:: PS:: SOCKS Protocol Version 5
1898:: I:: CyberCash Credit Card Protocol Version 0.8
1858:: I:: Security Considerations for IP Fragment Filtering
1852:: E:: IP Authentication using Keyed SHA
1851:: E:: The ESP Triple DES-CBC Transform
1829:: PS:: The ESP DES-CBC Transform
1828:: PS:: IP Authentication using Keyed MD5
1827:: PS:: IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
1826:: PS:: IP Authentication Header
1825:: PS:: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
1824:: I:: The Exponential Security System TESS
1760:: I:: The S/KEY One-Time Password System
1751:: I:: A Convention for Human-Readable 128-bit Keys
1750:: I:: Randomness Recommendations for Security
1704:: I:: On Internet Authentication
1675:: I:: Security Concerns for IPng
1579:: I:: Firewall-Friendly FTP
1535:: I:: A Security Problem and Proposed Correction With Widely
Deployed DNS Software
1511:: I:: Common Authentication Technology Overview
1510:: PS:: The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)
823:: H:: DARPA Internet gateway
=====================================================================
Security
2104:: I:: HMAC
2085:: PS:: HMAC-MD5 IP Authentication with Replay Prevention
2084:: I:: Considerations for Web Transaction Security
2082:: PS:: RIP-2 MD5 Authentication
2078:: PS:: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface,
Version 2
2069:: PS:: An Extension to HTTP
2065:: PS:: Domain Name System Security Extensions
2059:: I:: RADIUS Accounting
2058:: PS:: Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)
2057:: I:: Source directed access control on the Internet.
2040:: I:: The RC5, RC5-CBC, RC5-CBC-Pad, and RC5-CTS Algorithms
2025:: PS:: The Simple Public-Key GSS-API Mechanism (SPKM)
2015:: :: MIME Security with Pretty Good Privacy (PGP)
1984:: I:: IAB and IESG Statement on Cryptographic Technology and
the Internet
1969:: I:: The PPP DES Encryption Protocol (DESE)
1968:: PS:: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)
1964:: PS:: The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism
1961:: PS:: GSS-API Authentication Method for SOCKS Version 5
1949:: E:: Scalable Multicast Key Distribution
1948:: I:: Defending Against Sequence Number Attacks
1938:: PS:: A One-Time Password System
1929:: PS:: Username/Password Authentication for SOCKS V5
1928:: PS:: SOCKS Protocol Version 5
1898:: I:: CyberCash Credit Card Protocol Version 0.8
1858:: I:: Security Considerations for IP Fragment Filtering
1852:: E:: IP Authentication using Keyed SHA
1851:: E:: The ESP Triple DES-CBC Transform
1829:: PS:: The ESP DES-CBC Transform
1828:: PS:: IP Authentication using Keyed MD5
1827:: PS:: IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
1826:: PS:: IP Authentication Header
1825:: PS:: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
1824:: I:: The Exponential Security System TESS
1760:: I:: The S/KEY One-Time Password System
1751:: I:: A Convention for Human-Readable 128-bit Keys
1750:: I:: Randomness Recommendations for Security
1704:: I:: On Internet Authentication
1675:: I:: Security Concerns for IPng
1579:: I:: Firewall-Friendly FTP
1535:: I:: A Security Problem and Proposed Correction With Widely
Deployed DNS Software
1511:: I:: Common Authentication Technology Overview
1510:: PS:: The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)
1509:: PS:: Generic Security Service API
1508:: PS:: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface
1507:: E:: DASS - Distributed Authentication Security Service
1492:: I:: An Access Control Protocol, Sometimes Called TACACS
1457:: I:: Security Label Framework for the Internet
1455:: E:: Physical Link Security Type of Service
1424:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1423:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1422:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1421:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1416:: E:: Telnet Authentication Option
1412:: E:: Telnet Authentication
1411:: E:: Telnet Authentication
1409:: E:: Telnet Authentication Option
1408:: H:: Telnet Environment Option
1321:: I:: The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm
1320:: I:: The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm
1319:: I:: The MD2 Message-Digest Algorithm
1281:: I:: Guidelines for the Secure Operation of the Internet
1244:: I:: Site Security Handbook
1186:: I:: The MD4 Message Digest Algorithm
1170:: I:: Public Key Standards and Licenses
1156:: S:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1115:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1114:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1113:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1108:: PS:: U.S. Department of Defense Security Options for the
Internet Protocol
1040:: :: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1038:: :: Draft revised IP security option
1004:: E:: Distributed-protocol authentication scheme
989:: :: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
972:: :: Password Generator Protocol
931:: E:: Authentication server
927:: :: TACACS user identification Telnet option
912:: :: Authentication service
644:: :: On the problem of signature authentication for
network mail
=====================================================================
Virtual Terminal
2066:: E:: TELNET CHARSET Option
1647:: PS:: TN3270 Enhancements
1646:: I:: TN3270 Extensions for LUname and Printer Selection
1576:: I:: TN3270 Current Practices
1572:: PS:: Telnet Environment Option
1571:: I:: Telnet Environment Option Interoperability Issues
1372:: PS:: Telnet Remote Flow Control Option
1509:: PS:: Generic Security Service API
1508:: PS:: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface
1507:: E:: DASS - Distributed Authentication Security Service
1492:: I:: An Access Control Protocol, Sometimes Called TACACS
1457:: I:: Security Label Framework for the Internet
1455:: E:: Physical Link Security Type of Service
1424:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1423:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1422:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1421:: PS:: Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail
1416:: E:: Telnet Authentication Option
1412:: E:: Telnet Authentication
1411:: E:: Telnet Authentication
1409:: E:: Telnet Authentication Option
1408:: H:: Telnet Environment Option
1321:: I:: The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm
1320:: I:: The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm
1319:: I:: The MD2 Message-Digest Algorithm
1281:: I:: Guidelines for the Secure Operation of the Internet
1244:: I:: Site Security Handbook
1186:: I:: The MD4 Message Digest Algorithm
1170:: I:: Public Key Standards and Licenses
1156:: S:: Management Information Base for Network Management of
TCP/IP-based internets
1115:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1114:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1113:: H:: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1108:: PS:: U.S. Department of Defense Security Options for the
Internet Protocol
1040:: :: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
1038:: :: Draft revised IP security option
1004:: E:: Distributed-protocol authentication scheme
989:: :: Privacy enhancement for Internet electronic mail
972:: :: Password Generator Protocol
931:: E:: Authentication server
927:: :: TACACS user identification Telnet option
912:: :: Authentication service
644:: :: On the problem of signature authentication for
network mail
=====================================================================
Virtual Terminal
2066:: E:: TELNET CHARSET Option
1647:: PS:: TN3270 Enhancements
1646:: I:: TN3270 Extensions for LUname and Printer Selection
1576:: I:: TN3270 Current Practices
1572:: PS:: Telnet Environment Option
1571:: I:: Telnet Environment Option Interoperability Issues
1372:: PS:: Telnet Remote Flow Control Option
1282:: I:: BSD Rlogin
1258:: I:: BSD Rlogin
1221:: :: Host Access Protocol (HAP) Specification - Version 2
1205:: :: 5250 Telnet Interface
1184:: DS:: Telnet Linemode Option
1143:: :: The Q Method of Implementing TELNET Option Negotiation
1116:: PS:: Telnet Linemode option
1097:: :: Telnet subliminal-message option
1096:: :: Telnet X display location option
1091:: :: Telnet terminal-type option
1080:: :: Telnet remote flow control option
1079:: :: Telnet terminal speed option
1073:: :: Telnet window size option
1053:: :: Telnet X.3 PAD option
1043:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
1041:: :: Telnet 3270 regime option
1013:: :: X Window System Protocol, version 11
1005:: :: ARPANET AHIP-E Host Access Protocol enhanced AHIP
946:: :: Telnet terminal location number option
933:: :: Output marking Telnet option
930:: :: Telnet terminal type option
929:: :: Proposed Host-Front End Protocol
907:: S:: Host Access Protocol specification
885:: :: Telnet end of record option
884:: :: Telnet terminal type option
878:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
861:: :: Telnet extended options
860:: S:: Telnet timing mark option
859:: S:: Telnet status option
858:: S:: Telnet Suppress Go Ahead option
857:: S:: Telnet echo option
856:: S:: Telnet binary transmission
855:: S:: Telnet option specifications
854:: S:: Telnet Protocol specification
851:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
818:: H:: Remote User Telnet service
802:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
782:: :: Virtual Terminal management model
779:: :: Telnet send-location option
764:: :: Telnet Protocol specification
749:: :: Telnet SUPDUP-Output option
748:: :: Telnet randomly-lose option
747:: :: Recent extensions to the SUPDUP Protocol
746:: :: SUPDUP graphics extension
736:: :: Telnet SUPDUP option
735:: :: Revised Telnet byte macro option
734:: H:: SUPDUP Protocol
732:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
1282:: I:: BSD Rlogin
1258:: I:: BSD Rlogin
1221:: :: Host Access Protocol (HAP) Specification - Version 2
1205:: :: 5250 Telnet Interface
1184:: DS:: Telnet Linemode Option
1143:: :: The Q Method of Implementing TELNET Option Negotiation
1116:: PS:: Telnet Linemode option
1097:: :: Telnet subliminal-message option
1096:: :: Telnet X display location option
1091:: :: Telnet terminal-type option
1080:: :: Telnet remote flow control option
1079:: :: Telnet terminal speed option
1073:: :: Telnet window size option
1053:: :: Telnet X.3 PAD option
1043:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
1041:: :: Telnet 3270 regime option
1013:: :: X Window System Protocol, version 11
1005:: :: ARPANET AHIP-E Host Access Protocol enhanced AHIP
946:: :: Telnet terminal location number option
933:: :: Output marking Telnet option
930:: :: Telnet terminal type option
929:: :: Proposed Host-Front End Protocol
907:: S:: Host Access Protocol specification
885:: :: Telnet end of record option
884:: :: Telnet terminal type option
878:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
861:: :: Telnet extended options
860:: S:: Telnet timing mark option
859:: S:: Telnet status option
858:: S:: Telnet Suppress Go Ahead option
857:: S:: Telnet echo option
856:: S:: Telnet binary transmission
855:: S:: Telnet option specifications
854:: S:: Telnet Protocol specification
851:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
818:: H:: Remote User Telnet service
802:: :: ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol
782:: :: Virtual Terminal management model
779:: :: Telnet send-location option
764:: :: Telnet Protocol specification
749:: :: Telnet SUPDUP-Output option
748:: :: Telnet randomly-lose option
747:: :: Recent extensions to the SUPDUP Protocol
746:: :: SUPDUP graphics extension
736:: :: Telnet SUPDUP option
735:: :: Revised Telnet byte macro option
734:: H:: SUPDUP Protocol
732:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
731:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
729:: :: Telnet byte macro option
728:: :: Minor pitfall in the Telnet Protocol
727:: :: Telnet logout option
726:: :: Remote Controlled Transmission and Echoing Telnet option
721:: :: Out-of-band control signals in a Host-to-Host Protocol
719:: :: Discussion on RCTE
718:: :: Comments on RCTE from the Tenex implementation experience
703:: :: July, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers
702:: :: September, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
701:: :: August, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
698:: :: Telnet extended ASCII option
688:: :: Tentative schedule for the new Telnet implementation for
the TIP
679:: :: February, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
669:: :: November, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
659:: :: Announcing additional Telnet options
658:: :: Telnet output linefeed disposition
657:: :: Telnet output vertical tab disposition option
656:: :: Telnet output vertical tabstops option
655:: :: Telnet output formfeed disposition option
654:: :: Telnet output horizontal tab disposition option
653:: :: Telnet output horizontal tabstops option
652:: :: Telnet output carriage-return disposition option
651:: :: Revised Telnet status option
647:: :: Proposed protocol for connecting host computers to
ARPA-like networks via front end processors
636:: :: TIP/Tenex reliability improvements
600:: :: Interfacing an Illinois plasma terminal to the ARPANET
596:: :: Second thoughts on Telnet Go-Ahead
595:: :: Second thoughts in defense of the Telnet Go-Ahead
587:: :: Announcing new Telnet options
563:: :: Comments on the RCTE Telnet option
562:: :: Modifications to the Telnet specification
560:: :: Remote Controlled Transmission and Echoing Telnet option
559:: :: Comments on the new Telnet Protocol and its implementation
513:: :: Comments on the new Telnet specifications
495:: :: Telnet Protocol specifications
470:: :: Change in socket for TIP news facility
466:: :: Telnet logger/server for host LL-67
461:: :: Telnet Protocol meeting announcement
447:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule
435:: :: Telnet issues
431:: :: Update on SMFS login and logout
399:: :: SMFS login and logout
393:: :: Comments on Telnet Protocol changes
386:: :: Letter to TIP users-2
377:: :: Using TSO via ARPA Network Virtual Terminal
731:: :: Telnet Data Entry Terminal option
729:: :: Telnet byte macro option
728:: :: Minor pitfall in the Telnet Protocol
727:: :: Telnet logout option
726:: :: Remote Controlled Transmission and Echoing Telnet option
721:: :: Out-of-band control signals in a Host-to-Host Protocol
719:: :: Discussion on RCTE
718:: :: Comments on RCTE from the Tenex implementation experience
703:: :: July, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers
702:: :: September, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
701:: :: August, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
698:: :: Telnet extended ASCII option
688:: :: Tentative schedule for the new Telnet implementation for
the TIP
679:: :: February, 1975, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
669:: :: November, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
659:: :: Announcing additional Telnet options
658:: :: Telnet output linefeed disposition
657:: :: Telnet output vertical tab disposition option
656:: :: Telnet output vertical tabstops option
655:: :: Telnet output formfeed disposition option
654:: :: Telnet output horizontal tab disposition option
653:: :: Telnet output horizontal tabstops option
652:: :: Telnet output carriage-return disposition option
651:: :: Revised Telnet status option
647:: :: Proposed protocol for connecting host computers to
ARPA-like networks via front end processors
636:: :: TIP/Tenex reliability improvements
600:: :: Interfacing an Illinois plasma terminal to the ARPANET
596:: :: Second thoughts on Telnet Go-Ahead
595:: :: Second thoughts in defense of the Telnet Go-Ahead
587:: :: Announcing new Telnet options
563:: :: Comments on the RCTE Telnet option
562:: :: Modifications to the Telnet specification
560:: :: Remote Controlled Transmission and Echoing Telnet option
559:: :: Comments on the new Telnet Protocol and its implementation
513:: :: Comments on the new Telnet specifications
495:: :: Telnet Protocol specifications
470:: :: Change in socket for TIP news facility
466:: :: Telnet logger/server for host LL-67
461:: :: Telnet Protocol meeting announcement
447:: :: IMP/TIP memory retrofit schedule
435:: :: Telnet issues
431:: :: Update on SMFS login and logout
399:: :: SMFS login and logout
393:: :: Comments on Telnet Protocol changes
386:: :: Letter to TIP users-2
377:: :: Using TSO via ARPA Network Virtual Terminal
365:: :: Letter to all TIP users
364:: :: Serving remote users on the ARPANET
352:: :: TIP site information form
340:: :: Proposed Telnet changes
339:: :: MLTNET
328:: :: Suggested Telnet Protocol changes
318:: :: [Ad hoc Telnet Protocol]
311:: :: New console attachments to the USCB host
297:: :: TIP message buffers
296:: :: DS-1 display system
231:: :: Service center standards for remote usage
230:: :: Toward reliable operation of minicomputer-based
terminals on a TIP
216:: :: Telnet access to UCSB's On-Line System
215:: :: NCP, ICP, and Telnet
206:: :: User Telnet - description of an initial implementation
205:: :: NETCRT - a character display protocol
177:: :: Device independent graphical display description
158:: :: Telnet Protocol
139:: :: Discussion of Telnet Protocol
137:: :: Telnet Protocol - a proposed document
110:: :: Conventions for using an IBM 2741 terminal as a
user console for access to network server hosts
97:: :: First cut at a proposed Telnet Protocol
=====================================================================
Other
2123:: I:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2121:: I:: Issues affecting MARS Cluster Size
2119:: BC:: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
2101:: I:: IPv4 Address Behaviour Today
2100:: I:: The Naming of Hosts
2099:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 2000-2099
2083:: I:: PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification Version 1.0
2071:: I:: Network Renumbering Overview
2050:: BC:: INTERNET REGISTRY IP ALLOCATION GUIDELINES
2036:: I:: Observations on the use of Components of the Class
A Address Space within the Internet
2031:: I:: IETF-ISOC relationship
2028:: BC:: The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process
2027:: BC:: IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process
2026:: BC:: The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3
2014:: BC:: IRTF Research Group Guidelines and Procedures
2007:: I:: Catalogue of Network Training Materials
2000:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1999:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1900-1999
1988:: I:: Conditional Grant of Rights to Specific Hewlett-Packard
Patents In Conjunction With the Internet Engineering
Task Force's Internet-Standard Network Management
365:: :: Letter to all TIP users
364:: :: Serving remote users on the ARPANET
352:: :: TIP site information form
340:: :: Proposed Telnet changes
339:: :: MLTNET
328:: :: Suggested Telnet Protocol changes
318:: :: [Ad hoc Telnet Protocol]
311:: :: New console attachments to the USCB host
297:: :: TIP message buffers
296:: :: DS-1 display system
231:: :: Service center standards for remote usage
230:: :: Toward reliable operation of minicomputer-based
terminals on a TIP
216:: :: Telnet access to UCSB's On-Line System
215:: :: NCP, ICP, and Telnet
206:: :: User Telnet - description of an initial implementation
205:: :: NETCRT - a character display protocol
177:: :: Device independent graphical display description
158:: :: Telnet Protocol
139:: :: Discussion of Telnet Protocol
137:: :: Telnet Protocol - a proposed document
110:: :: Conventions for using an IBM 2741 terminal as a
user console for access to network server hosts
97:: :: First cut at a proposed Telnet Protocol
=====================================================================
Other
2123:: I:: Traffic Flow Measurement
2121:: I:: Issues affecting MARS Cluster Size
2119:: BC:: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
2101:: I:: IPv4 Address Behaviour Today
2100:: I:: The Naming of Hosts
2099:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 2000-2099
2083:: I:: PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification Version 1.0
2071:: I:: Network Renumbering Overview
2050:: BC:: INTERNET REGISTRY IP ALLOCATION GUIDELINES
2036:: I:: Observations on the use of Components of the Class
A Address Space within the Internet
2031:: I:: IETF-ISOC relationship
2028:: BC:: The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process
2027:: BC:: IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process
2026:: BC:: The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3
2014:: BC:: IRTF Research Group Guidelines and Procedures
2007:: I:: Catalogue of Network Training Materials
2000:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1999:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1900-1999
1988:: I:: Conditional Grant of Rights to Specific Hewlett-Packard
Patents In Conjunction With the Internet Engineering
Task Force's Internet-Standard Network Management
Framework
1983:: I:: Internet Users' Glossary
1958:: I:: Architectural Principles of the Internet
1952:: I:: GZIP file format specification version 4.3
1951:: I:: DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3
1950:: I:: ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3
1941:: I:: Frequently Asked Questions for Schools
1935:: I:: What is the Internet, Anyway?
1920:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1900:: I:: Renumbering Needs Work
1899:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1800-1899
1882:: I:: The 12-Days of Technology Before Christmas
1880:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1879:: I:: Class A Subnet Experiment Results and Recommendations
1875:: I:: UNINETT PCA Policy Statements
1871:: BC:: Addendum to RFC 1602 -- Variance Procedure
1855:: I:: Netiquette Guidelines
1822:: I:: A Grant of Rights to Use a Specific IBM patent with
Photuris
1818:: S:: Best Current Practices
1816:: I:: U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
1814:: I:: Unique Addresses are Good
1811:: I:: U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
1810:: I:: Report on MD5 Performance
1805:: I:: Location-Independent Data/Software Integrity Protocol
1802:: I:: Introducing Project Long Bud
1800:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1799:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1700-1799
1797:: E:: Class A Subnet Experiment
1796:: I:: Not All RFCs are Standards
1790:: I:: An Agreement between the Internet Society and Sun
Microsystems, Inc. in the Matter of ONC RPC and
XDR Protocols
1780:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1776:: I:: The Address is the Message
1775:: I:: To Be "On" the Internet
1758:: I:: NADF Standing Documents
1746:: I:: Ways to Define User Expectations
1739:: I:: A Primer On Internet and TCP/IP Tools
1720:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1718:: I:: The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of the
Internet Engineering Task Force
1715:: I:: The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency
1709:: I:: K-12 Internetworking Guidelines
1700:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1699:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1600-1699
1691:: I:: The Document Architecture for the Cornell Digital Library
1690:: I:: Introducing the Internet Engineering and Planning
Framework
1983:: I:: Internet Users' Glossary
1958:: I:: Architectural Principles of the Internet
1952:: I:: GZIP file format specification version 4.3
1951:: I:: DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3
1950:: I:: ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3
1941:: I:: Frequently Asked Questions for Schools
1935:: I:: What is the Internet, Anyway?
1920:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1900:: I:: Renumbering Needs Work
1899:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1800-1899
1882:: I:: The 12-Days of Technology Before Christmas
1880:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1879:: I:: Class A Subnet Experiment Results and Recommendations
1875:: I:: UNINETT PCA Policy Statements
1871:: BC:: Addendum to RFC 1602 -- Variance Procedure
1855:: I:: Netiquette Guidelines
1822:: I:: A Grant of Rights to Use a Specific IBM patent with
Photuris
1818:: S:: Best Current Practices
1816:: I:: U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
1814:: I:: Unique Addresses are Good
1811:: I:: U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
1810:: I:: Report on MD5 Performance
1805:: I:: Location-Independent Data/Software Integrity Protocol
1802:: I:: Introducing Project Long Bud
1800:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1799:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1700-1799
1797:: E:: Class A Subnet Experiment
1796:: I:: Not All RFCs are Standards
1790:: I:: An Agreement between the Internet Society and Sun
Microsystems, Inc. in the Matter of ONC RPC and
XDR Protocols
1780:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1776:: I:: The Address is the Message
1775:: I:: To Be "On" the Internet
1758:: I:: NADF Standing Documents
1746:: I:: Ways to Define User Expectations
1739:: I:: A Primer On Internet and TCP/IP Tools
1720:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1718:: I:: The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of the
Internet Engineering Task Force
1715:: I:: The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency
1709:: I:: K-12 Internetworking Guidelines
1700:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1699:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1600-1699
1691:: I:: The Document Architecture for the Cornell Digital Library
1690:: I:: Introducing the Internet Engineering and Planning
Group (IEPG)
1689:: I:: A Status Report on Networked Information Retrieval
1640:: I:: The Process for Organization of Internet Standards
Working Group (POISED)
1636:: I:: Report of IAB Workshop on Security in the Internet
Architecture - February 8-10, 1994
1635:: I:: How to Use Anonymous FTP
1627:: I:: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices
Shouldn't be Codified)
1610:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1607:: I:: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY
1606:: I:: A Historical Perspective On The Usage Of IP Version 9
1603:: I:: IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures
y1602:: I:: The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 2
1601:: I:: Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
1600:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1599:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1500 - 1599
1597:: I:: Address Allocation for Private Internets
1594:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answer Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1580:: I:: Guide to Network Resource Tools
1578:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answers
1574:: I:: Essential Tools for the OSI Internet
1550:: I:: IP
1543:: I:: Instructions to RFC Authors
1540:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1539:: I:: The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of the
Internet Engineering Task Force
1527:: I:: What Should We Plan Given the Dilemma of the Network?
1501:: I:: OS/2 User Group
1500:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1499:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1400-1499
1481:: I:: IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to
Address the Issue of Scaling
1467:: I:: Status of CIDR Deployment in the Internet
1463:: I:: FYI on Introducing the Internet--A Short Bibliography
of Introductory Internetworking Readings for the
Network Novice
1462:: I:: FYI on "What is the Internet?"
1438:: I:: Internet Engineering Task Force Statements Of
Boredom (SOBs)
1432:: I:: Recent Internet Books
1417:: I:: NADF Standing Documents
1410:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1402:: I:: There's Gold in them thar Networks! Searching for
Treasure in all the Wrong Places
1401:: I:: Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use
of DNS throughout the Internet
Group (IEPG)
1689:: I:: A Status Report on Networked Information Retrieval
1640:: I:: The Process for Organization of Internet Standards
Working Group (POISED)
1636:: I:: Report of IAB Workshop on Security in the Internet
Architecture - February 8-10, 1994
1635:: I:: How to Use Anonymous FTP
1627:: I:: Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices
Shouldn't be Codified)
1610:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1607:: I:: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY
1606:: I:: A Historical Perspective On The Usage Of IP Version 9
1603:: I:: IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures
y1602:: I:: The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 2
1601:: I:: Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
1600:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1599:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1500 - 1599
1597:: I:: Address Allocation for Private Internets
1594:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answer Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1580:: I:: Guide to Network Resource Tools
1578:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answers
1574:: I:: Essential Tools for the OSI Internet
1550:: I:: IP
1543:: I:: Instructions to RFC Authors
1540:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1539:: I:: The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of the
Internet Engineering Task Force
1527:: I:: What Should We Plan Given the Dilemma of the Network?
1501:: I:: OS/2 User Group
1500:: S:: INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1499:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1400-1499
1481:: I:: IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to
Address the Issue of Scaling
1467:: I:: Status of CIDR Deployment in the Internet
1463:: I:: FYI on Introducing the Internet--A Short Bibliography
of Introductory Internetworking Readings for the
Network Novice
1462:: I:: FYI on "What is the Internet?"
1438:: I:: Internet Engineering Task Force Statements Of
Boredom (SOBs)
1432:: I:: Recent Internet Books
1417:: I:: NADF Standing Documents
1410:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1402:: I:: There's Gold in them thar Networks! Searching for
Treasure in all the Wrong Places
1401:: I:: Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use
of DNS throughout the Internet
1399:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1300-1399
1396:: I:: The Process for Organization of Internet Standards
Working Group (POISED)
1392:: I:: Internet Users' Glossary
1391:: I:: The Tao of IETF
1367:: I:: Schedule for IP Address Space Management Guidelines
1366:: I:: Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space
1360:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1359:: I:: Connecting to the Internet What Connecting
Institutions Should Anticipate
1358:: I:: Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
1349:: PS:: Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite
1340:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1336:: I:: Who's Who in the Internet Biographies of IAB,
IESG and IRSG Members
1325:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answers Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1324:: I:: A Discussion on Computer Network Conferencing
1311:: I:: Introduction to the STD Notes
1310:: I:: The Internet Standards Process
1300:: I:: Remembrances of Things Past
1299:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1200-1299
1297:: I:: NOC Internal Integrated Trouble Ticket System
Functional Specification Wishlist
("NOC TT REQUIREMENTS")
1296:: I:: Internet Growth (1981-1991)
1295:: I:: User Bill of Rights for entries and listings in the
Public Directory
1291:: I:: Mid-Level Networks
1290:: I:: There's Gold in them thar Networks! or Searching for
Treasure in all the Wrong Places
1287:: I:: Towards the Future Internet Architecture
1280:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1261:: I:: Transition of NIC Services
1259:: I:: Building The Open Road
1251:: :: Who's Who in the Internet
1250:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1249:: I:: DIXIE Protocol Specification
1217:: :: Memo from the Consortium for Slow Commotion Research (CSCR)
1216:: :: Gigabit Network Economics and Paradigm Shifts
1208:: :: A Glossary of Networking Terms
1207:: :: Answers to Commonly asked "Experienced Internet User"
Questions
1206:: :: FYI on Questions and Answers - Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1200:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1199:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1100-1199
1198:: I:: FYI on the X Window System
1399:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1300-1399
1396:: I:: The Process for Organization of Internet Standards
Working Group (POISED)
1392:: I:: Internet Users' Glossary
1391:: I:: The Tao of IETF
1367:: I:: Schedule for IP Address Space Management Guidelines
1366:: I:: Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space
1360:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1359:: I:: Connecting to the Internet What Connecting
Institutions Should Anticipate
1358:: I:: Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
1349:: PS:: Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite
1340:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1336:: I:: Who's Who in the Internet Biographies of IAB,
IESG and IRSG Members
1325:: I:: FYI on Questions and Answers Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1324:: I:: A Discussion on Computer Network Conferencing
1311:: I:: Introduction to the STD Notes
1310:: I:: The Internet Standards Process
1300:: I:: Remembrances of Things Past
1299:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1200-1299
1297:: I:: NOC Internal Integrated Trouble Ticket System
Functional Specification Wishlist
("NOC TT REQUIREMENTS")
1296:: I:: Internet Growth (1981-1991)
1295:: I:: User Bill of Rights for entries and listings in the
Public Directory
1291:: I:: Mid-Level Networks
1290:: I:: There's Gold in them thar Networks! or Searching for
Treasure in all the Wrong Places
1287:: I:: Towards the Future Internet Architecture
1280:: S:: IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
1261:: I:: Transition of NIC Services
1259:: I:: Building The Open Road
1251:: :: Who's Who in the Internet
1250:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1249:: I:: DIXIE Protocol Specification
1217:: :: Memo from the Consortium for Slow Commotion Research (CSCR)
1216:: :: Gigabit Network Economics and Paradigm Shifts
1208:: :: A Glossary of Networking Terms
1207:: :: Answers to Commonly asked "Experienced Internet User"
Questions
1206:: :: FYI on Questions and Answers - Answers to Commonly
asked "New Internet User" Questions
1200:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1199:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1100-1199
1198:: I:: FYI on the X Window System
1192:: :: Commercialization of the Internet Summary Report
1181:: :: RIPE Terms of Reference
1180:: :: A TCP/IP Tutorial
1178:: :: Choosing a Name for Your Computer
1177:: :: FYI on Questions and Answers - Answers to Commonly
Asked "New Internet User" Questions
1175:: :: FYI on Where to Start - A Bibliography of
Internetworking Information
1174:: I:: IAB Recommended Policy on Distributing Internet
Identifier Assignment and IAB Recommended Policy Change
to Internet "Connected" Status
1173:: :: Responsibilities of Host and Network Managers
Summary of the "Oral Tradition" of the Internet
1169:: :: Explaining the Role of GOSIP
1167:: :: Thoughts on the National Research and Education Network
1160:: :: The Internet Activities Board
1152:: :: Workshop Report
1150:: I:: F.Y.I. on F.Y.I.
1149:: :: A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
on Avian Carriers
1147:: I:: FYI on a Network Management Tool Catalog
1140:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1135:: :: Helminthiasis of the Internet
1130:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1127:: :: Perspective on the Host Requirements RFCs
1121:: :: Act one - the poems
1120:: :: Internet Activities Board
1118:: :: Hitchhikers guide to the Internet
1117:: :: Internet numbers
1111:: :: Request for comments on Request for Comments
1100:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1099:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1000-1099
1093:: :: NSFNET routing architecture
1087:: :: Ethics and the Internet
1083:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1077:: :: Critical issues in high bandwidth networking
1076:: :: HEMS monitoring and control language
1060:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1039:: :: DoD statement on Open Systems Interconnection protocols
1020:: :: Internet numbers
1019:: :: Report of the Workshop on Environments for
Computational Mathematics
1018:: :: Some comments on SQuID
1017:: :: Network requirements for scientific research
1015:: :: Implementation plan for interagency research Internet
1014:: :: XDR
1000:: :: Request For Comments reference guide
999:: :: Requests For Comments summary notes
1192:: :: Commercialization of the Internet Summary Report
1181:: :: RIPE Terms of Reference
1180:: :: A TCP/IP Tutorial
1178:: :: Choosing a Name for Your Computer
1177:: :: FYI on Questions and Answers - Answers to Commonly
Asked "New Internet User" Questions
1175:: :: FYI on Where to Start - A Bibliography of
Internetworking Information
1174:: I:: IAB Recommended Policy on Distributing Internet
Identifier Assignment and IAB Recommended Policy Change
to Internet "Connected" Status
1173:: :: Responsibilities of Host and Network Managers
Summary of the "Oral Tradition" of the Internet
1169:: :: Explaining the Role of GOSIP
1167:: :: Thoughts on the National Research and Education Network
1160:: :: The Internet Activities Board
1152:: :: Workshop Report
1150:: I:: F.Y.I. on F.Y.I.
1149:: :: A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
on Avian Carriers
1147:: I:: FYI on a Network Management Tool Catalog
1140:: S:: IAB Official Protocol Standards
1135:: :: Helminthiasis of the Internet
1130:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1127:: :: Perspective on the Host Requirements RFCs
1121:: :: Act one - the poems
1120:: :: Internet Activities Board
1118:: :: Hitchhikers guide to the Internet
1117:: :: Internet numbers
1111:: :: Request for comments on Request for Comments
1100:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1099:: I:: Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1000-1099
1093:: :: NSFNET routing architecture
1087:: :: Ethics and the Internet
1083:: S:: IAB official protocol standards
1077:: :: Critical issues in high bandwidth networking
1076:: :: HEMS monitoring and control language
1060:: S:: ASSIGNED NUMBERS
1039:: :: DoD statement on Open Systems Interconnection protocols
1020:: :: Internet numbers
1019:: :: Report of the Workshop on Environments for
Computational Mathematics
1018:: :: Some comments on SQuID
1017:: :: Network requirements for scientific research
1015:: :: Implementation plan for interagency research Internet
1014:: :: XDR
1000:: :: Request For Comments reference guide
999:: :: Requests For Comments summary notes
997:: :: Internet numbers
992:: :: On communication support for fault tolerant process groups
991:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
990:: :: Assigned numbers
980:: :: Protocol document order information
979:: :: PSN End-to-End functional specification
968:: :: Twas the night before start-up
967:: :: All victims together
961:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
960:: :: Assigned numbers
945:: :: DoD statement on the NRC report
944:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
943:: :: Assigned numbers
939:: :: Executive summary of the NRC report on transport
protocols for Department of Defense data networks
938:: E:: Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol functional
and interface specification
928:: :: Introduction to proposed DoD standard H-FP
923:: :: Assigned numbers
909:: E:: Loader Debugger Protocol
908:: E:: Reliable Data Protocol
902:: :: ARPA Internet Protocol policy
901:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
900:: :: Assigned Numbers
899:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
880:: S:: Official protocols
873:: :: Illusion of vendor support
870:: :: Assigned numbers
869:: H:: Host Monitoring Protocol
852:: :: ARPANET short blocking feature
847:: :: Summary of Smallberg surveys
846:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 22 February 1983
845:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 15 February 1983
844:: :: Who talks ICMP, too? - Survey of 18 February 1983
843:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 8 February 83
842:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 1 February 83
840:: S:: Official protocols
839:: :: Who talks TCP?
838:: :: Who talks TCP?
837:: :: Who talks TCP?
836:: :: Who talks TCP?
835:: :: Who talks TCP?
834:: :: Who talks TCP?
833:: :: Who talks TCP?
832:: :: Who talks TCP?
831:: :: Backup access to the European side of SATNET
828:: :: Data communications
825:: :: Request for comments on Requests For Comments
997:: :: Internet numbers
992:: :: On communication support for fault tolerant process groups
991:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
990:: :: Assigned numbers
980:: :: Protocol document order information
979:: :: PSN End-to-End functional specification
968:: :: Twas the night before start-up
967:: :: All victims together
961:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
960:: :: Assigned numbers
945:: :: DoD statement on the NRC report
944:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
943:: :: Assigned numbers
939:: :: Executive summary of the NRC report on transport
protocols for Department of Defense data networks
938:: E:: Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol functional
and interface specification
928:: :: Introduction to proposed DoD standard H-FP
923:: :: Assigned numbers
909:: E:: Loader Debugger Protocol
908:: E:: Reliable Data Protocol
902:: :: ARPA Internet Protocol policy
901:: S:: Official ARPA-Internet protocols
900:: :: Assigned Numbers
899:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
880:: S:: Official protocols
873:: :: Illusion of vendor support
870:: :: Assigned numbers
869:: H:: Host Monitoring Protocol
852:: :: ARPANET short blocking feature
847:: :: Summary of Smallberg surveys
846:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 22 February 1983
845:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 15 February 1983
844:: :: Who talks ICMP, too? - Survey of 18 February 1983
843:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 8 February 83
842:: :: Who talks TCP? - survey of 1 February 83
840:: S:: Official protocols
839:: :: Who talks TCP?
838:: :: Who talks TCP?
837:: :: Who talks TCP?
836:: :: Who talks TCP?
835:: :: Who talks TCP?
834:: :: Who talks TCP?
833:: :: Who talks TCP?
832:: :: Who talks TCP?
831:: :: Backup access to the European side of SATNET
828:: :: Data communications
825:: :: Request for comments on Requests For Comments
820:: :: Assigned numbers
817:: :: Modularity and efficiency in protocol implementation
816:: :: Fault isolation and recovery
806:: :: Proposed Federal Information Processing Standard
800:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
794:: :: Pre-emption
790:: :: Assigned numbers
776:: :: Assigned numbers
774:: :: Internet Protocol Handbook
770:: :: Assigned numbers
766:: :: Internet Protocol Handbook
762:: :: Assigned numbers
758:: :: Assigned numbers
755:: :: Assigned numbers
750:: :: Assigned numbers
745:: :: JANUS interface specifications
739:: :: Assigned numbers
717:: :: Assigned network numbers
716:: :: Interim revision to Appendix F of BBN 1822
708:: :: Elements of a distributed programming system
705:: :: Front-end Protocol B6700 version
700:: :: Protocol experiment
699:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
694:: :: Protocol information
686:: :: Leaving well enough alone
684:: :: Commentary on procedure calling as a network protocol
681:: :: Network UNIX
678:: :: Standard file formats
677:: :: Maintenance of duplicate databases
672:: :: Multi-site data collection facility
671:: :: Note on Reconnection Protocol
667:: :: BBN host ports
666:: :: Specification of the Unified User-Level Protocol
663:: :: Lost message detection and recovery protocol
661:: :: Protocol information
645:: :: Network Standard Data Specification syntax
643:: :: Network Debugging Protocol
642:: :: Ready line philosophy and implementation
638:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
637:: :: Change of network address for SU-DSL
635:: :: Assessment of ARPANET protocols
634:: :: Change in network address for Haskins Lab
631:: :: International meeting on minicomputers and data
communication
629:: :: Scenario for using the Network Journal
628:: :: Status of RFC numbers and a note on pre-assigned
journal numbers
621:: :: NIC user directories at SRI ARC
820:: :: Assigned numbers
817:: :: Modularity and efficiency in protocol implementation
816:: :: Fault isolation and recovery
806:: :: Proposed Federal Information Processing Standard
800:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
794:: :: Pre-emption
790:: :: Assigned numbers
776:: :: Assigned numbers
774:: :: Internet Protocol Handbook
770:: :: Assigned numbers
766:: :: Internet Protocol Handbook
762:: :: Assigned numbers
758:: :: Assigned numbers
755:: :: Assigned numbers
750:: :: Assigned numbers
745:: :: JANUS interface specifications
739:: :: Assigned numbers
717:: :: Assigned network numbers
716:: :: Interim revision to Appendix F of BBN 1822
708:: :: Elements of a distributed programming system
705:: :: Front-end Protocol B6700 version
700:: :: Protocol experiment
699:: :: Request For Comments summary notes
694:: :: Protocol information
686:: :: Leaving well enough alone
684:: :: Commentary on procedure calling as a network protocol
681:: :: Network UNIX
678:: :: Standard file formats
677:: :: Maintenance of duplicate databases
672:: :: Multi-site data collection facility
671:: :: Note on Reconnection Protocol
667:: :: BBN host ports
666:: :: Specification of the Unified User-Level Protocol
663:: :: Lost message detection and recovery protocol
661:: :: Protocol information
645:: :: Network Standard Data Specification syntax
643:: :: Network Debugging Protocol
642:: :: Ready line philosophy and implementation
638:: :: IMP/TIP preventive maintenance schedule
637:: :: Change of network address for SU-DSL
635:: :: Assessment of ARPANET protocols
634:: :: Change in network address for Haskins Lab
631:: :: International meeting on minicomputers and data
communication
629:: :: Scenario for using the Network Journal
628:: :: Status of RFC numbers and a note on pre-assigned
journal numbers
621:: :: NIC user directories at SRI ARC
617:: :: Note on socket number assignment
609:: :: Statement of upcoming move of NIC/NLS service
604:: :: Assigned link numbers
603:: :: Response to RFC 597
602:: :: The stockings were hung by the chimney with care
598:: :: RFC index - December 5, 1973
597:: :: Host status
590:: :: MULTICS address change
588:: :: London node is now up
585:: :: ARPANET users interest working group meeting
584:: :: Charter for ARPANET Users Interest Working Group
582:: :: Comments on RFC 580
581:: :: Corrections to RFC 560
580:: :: Note to protocol designers and implementers
578:: :: Using MIT-Mathlab MACSYMA from MIT-DMS Muddle
569:: H:: NETED
552:: :: Single access to standard protocols
547:: :: Change to the Very Distant Host specification
544:: :: Locating on-line documentation at SRI-ARC
537:: :: Announcement of NGG meeting July 16-17
530:: :: Report on the Survey project
529:: :: Note on protocol synch sequences
527:: :: ARPAWOCKY
526:: :: Technical meeting
523:: :: SURVEY is in operation again
519:: :: Resource evaluation
518:: :: ARPANET accounts
515:: :: Specifications for datalanguage
503:: :: Socket number list
496:: :: TNLS quick reference card is available
494:: :: Availability of MIX and MIXAL in the Network
492:: :: Response to RFC 467
491:: :: What is "Free"?
483:: :: Cancellation of the resource notebook framework meeting
474:: :: Announcement of NGWG meeting
464:: :: Resource notebook framework
462:: :: Responding to user needs
457:: :: TIPUG
456:: :: Memorandum
441:: :: Inter-Entity Communication - an experiment
440:: :: Scheduled network software maintenance
439:: :: PARRY encounters the DOCTOR
433:: :: Socket number list
432:: :: Network logical map
425:: :: But my NCP costs $500 a day
419:: :: To
405:: :: Correction to RFC 404
404:: :: Host address changes involving Rand and ISI
617:: :: Note on socket number assignment
609:: :: Statement of upcoming move of NIC/NLS service
604:: :: Assigned link numbers
603:: :: Response to RFC 597
602:: :: The stockings were hung by the chimney with care
598:: :: RFC index - December 5, 1973
597:: :: Host status
590:: :: MULTICS address change
588:: :: London node is now up
585:: :: ARPANET users interest working group meeting
584:: :: Charter for ARPANET Users Interest Working Group
582:: :: Comments on RFC 580
581:: :: Corrections to RFC 560
580:: :: Note to protocol designers and implementers
578:: :: Using MIT-Mathlab MACSYMA from MIT-DMS Muddle
569:: H:: NETED
552:: :: Single access to standard protocols
547:: :: Change to the Very Distant Host specification
544:: :: Locating on-line documentation at SRI-ARC
537:: :: Announcement of NGG meeting July 16-17
530:: :: Report on the Survey project
529:: :: Note on protocol synch sequences
527:: :: ARPAWOCKY
526:: :: Technical meeting
523:: :: SURVEY is in operation again
519:: :: Resource evaluation
518:: :: ARPANET accounts
515:: :: Specifications for datalanguage
503:: :: Socket number list
496:: :: TNLS quick reference card is available
494:: :: Availability of MIX and MIXAL in the Network
492:: :: Response to RFC 467
491:: :: What is "Free"?
483:: :: Cancellation of the resource notebook framework meeting
474:: :: Announcement of NGWG meeting
464:: :: Resource notebook framework
462:: :: Responding to user needs
457:: :: TIPUG
456:: :: Memorandum
441:: :: Inter-Entity Communication - an experiment
440:: :: Scheduled network software maintenance
439:: :: PARRY encounters the DOCTOR
433:: :: Socket number list
432:: :: Network logical map
425:: :: But my NCP costs $500 a day
419:: :: To
405:: :: Correction to RFC 404
404:: :: Host address changes involving Rand and ISI
403:: :: Desirability of a network 1108 service
402:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
401:: :: Conversion of NGP-0 coordinates to device specific
coordinates
390:: :: TSO scenario
379:: :: Using TSO at CCN
376:: :: Network host status
372:: :: Notes on a conversation with Bob Kahn on the ICCC
371:: :: Demonstration at International Computer Communications
Conference
370:: :: Network host status
363:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
356:: :: ARPA Network Control Center
355:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 346
350:: :: User accounts for UCSB On-Line System
349:: :: Proposed standard socket numbers
345:: :: Interest in mixed integer programming MPSX on NIC
360/91 at CCN
334:: :: Network use on May 8
331:: :: IMP System change notification
330:: :: Network host status
329:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
327:: :: Data and File Transfer workshop notes
322:: :: Well known socket numbers
321:: :: CBI networking activity at MITRE
320:: :: Workshop on hard copy line printers
319:: :: Network host status
317:: :: Official Host-Host Protocol modification
316:: :: ARPA Network Data Management Working Group
315:: :: Network host status
313:: :: Computer based instruction
305:: :: Unknown host numbers
303:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
295:: :: Report of the Protocol Workshop, 12 October 1971
291:: :: Data management meeting announcement
290:: :: Computer networks and data sharing
282:: :: Graphics meeting report
276:: :: NIC course
270:: :: Correction to BBN Report No. 1822 NIC NO 7958
269:: :: Some experience with file transfer
263:: :: Very Distant Host interface
256:: :: IMPSYS change notification
254:: :: Scenarios for using ARPANET computers
253:: :: Second Network Graphics meeting details
249:: :: Coordination of equipment and supplies purchase
246:: :: Network Graphics meeting
245:: :: Reservations for Network Group meeting
243:: :: Network and data sharing bibliography
403:: :: Desirability of a network 1108 service
402:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
401:: :: Conversion of NGP-0 coordinates to device specific
coordinates
390:: :: TSO scenario
379:: :: Using TSO at CCN
376:: :: Network host status
372:: :: Notes on a conversation with Bob Kahn on the ICCC
371:: :: Demonstration at International Computer Communications
Conference
370:: :: Network host status
363:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
356:: :: ARPA Network Control Center
355:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 346
350:: :: User accounts for UCSB On-Line System
349:: :: Proposed standard socket numbers
345:: :: Interest in mixed integer programming MPSX on NIC
360/91 at CCN
334:: :: Network use on May 8
331:: :: IMP System change notification
330:: :: Network host status
329:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
327:: :: Data and File Transfer workshop notes
322:: :: Well known socket numbers
321:: :: CBI networking activity at MITRE
320:: :: Workshop on hard copy line printers
319:: :: Network host status
317:: :: Official Host-Host Protocol modification
316:: :: ARPA Network Data Management Working Group
315:: :: Network host status
313:: :: Computer based instruction
305:: :: Unknown host numbers
303:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
295:: :: Report of the Protocol Workshop, 12 October 1971
291:: :: Data management meeting announcement
290:: :: Computer networks and data sharing
282:: :: Graphics meeting report
276:: :: NIC course
270:: :: Correction to BBN Report No. 1822 NIC NO 7958
269:: :: Some experience with file transfer
263:: :: Very Distant Host interface
256:: :: IMPSYS change notification
254:: :: Scenarios for using ARPANET computers
253:: :: Second Network Graphics meeting details
249:: :: Coordination of equipment and supplies purchase
246:: :: Network Graphics meeting
245:: :: Reservations for Network Group meeting
243:: :: Network and data sharing bibliography
242:: :: Data descriptive language for shared data
240:: :: Site status
239:: :: Host mnemonics proposed in RFC 226 NIC 7625
235:: :: Site status
234:: :: Network Working Group meeting schedule
232:: :: Postponement of network graphics meeting
228:: :: Clarification
225:: :: Rand/UCSB network graphics experiment
223:: :: Network Information Center schedule for network users
219:: :: User's view of the datacomputer
218:: :: Changing the IMP status reporting facility
214:: :: Network checkpoint
213:: :: IMP System change notification
211:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
209:: :: Host/IMP interface documentation
208:: :: Address tables
207:: :: September Network Working Group meeting
204:: :: Sockets in use
200:: :: RFC list by number
198:: :: Site certification - Lincoln Labs 360/67
195:: :: Data computers-data descriptions and access language
194:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service - compiler/interpreter
implementation notes
187:: :: Network/440 protocol concept
186:: :: Network graphics loader
185:: :: NIC distribution of manuals and handbooks
182:: :: Compilation of list of relevant site reports
180:: :: File system questionnaire
179:: :: Link number assignments
173:: :: Network data management committee meeting announcement
171:: :: Data Transfer Protocol
170:: :: RFC list by number
169:: :: Computer networks
168:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
167:: :: Socket conventions reconsidered
164:: :: Minutes of Network Working Group meeting, 5/16
through 5/19/71
162:: :: NETBUGGER3
160:: :: RFC brief list
157:: :: Invitation to the Second Symposium on Problems in the
Optimization of Data Communications Systems
155:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
154:: :: Exposition style
149:: :: Best laid plans
148:: :: Comments on RFC 123
147:: :: Definition of a socket
140:: :: Agenda for the May NWG meeting
138:: :: Status report on proposed Data Reconfiguration Service
242:: :: Data descriptive language for shared data
240:: :: Site status
239:: :: Host mnemonics proposed in RFC 226 NIC 7625
235:: :: Site status
234:: :: Network Working Group meeting schedule
232:: :: Postponement of network graphics meeting
228:: :: Clarification
225:: :: Rand/UCSB network graphics experiment
223:: :: Network Information Center schedule for network users
219:: :: User's view of the datacomputer
218:: :: Changing the IMP status reporting facility
214:: :: Network checkpoint
213:: :: IMP System change notification
211:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
209:: :: Host/IMP interface documentation
208:: :: Address tables
207:: :: September Network Working Group meeting
204:: :: Sockets in use
200:: :: RFC list by number
198:: :: Site certification - Lincoln Labs 360/67
195:: :: Data computers-data descriptions and access language
194:: :: Data Reconfiguration Service - compiler/interpreter
implementation notes
187:: :: Network/440 protocol concept
186:: :: Network graphics loader
185:: :: NIC distribution of manuals and handbooks
182:: :: Compilation of list of relevant site reports
180:: :: File system questionnaire
179:: :: Link number assignments
173:: :: Network data management committee meeting announcement
171:: :: Data Transfer Protocol
170:: :: RFC list by number
169:: :: Computer networks
168:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
167:: :: Socket conventions reconsidered
164:: :: Minutes of Network Working Group meeting, 5/16
through 5/19/71
162:: :: NETBUGGER3
160:: :: RFC brief list
157:: :: Invitation to the Second Symposium on Problems in the
Optimization of Data Communications Systems
155:: :: ARPA Network mailing lists
154:: :: Exposition style
149:: :: Best laid plans
148:: :: Comments on RFC 123
147:: :: Definition of a socket
140:: :: Agenda for the May NWG meeting
138:: :: Status report on proposed Data Reconfiguration Service
136:: :: Host accounting and administrative procedures
135:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 110
132:: :: Typographical error in RFC 107
131:: :: Response to RFC 116
130:: :: Response to RFC 111
129:: :: Request for comments on socket name structure
126:: :: Graphics facilities at Ames Research Center
124:: :: Typographical error in RFC 107
121:: :: Network on-line operators
120:: :: Network PL1 subprograms
119:: :: Network Fortran subprograms
118:: :: Recommendations for facility documentation
117:: :: Some comments on the official protocol
116:: :: Structure of the May NWG meeting
115:: :: Some Network Information Center policies on handling
documents
113:: :: Network activity report
112:: :: User/Server Site Protocol
111:: :: Pressure from the chairman
109:: :: Level III Server Protocol for the Lincoln Laboratory
NIC 360/67 Host
108:: :: Attendance list at the Urbana NWG meeting, February
17-19,1971
107:: :: Output of the Host-Host Protocol glitch cleaning committee
106:: :: User/Server Site Protocol network host questionnaire
104:: :: Link 191
103:: :: Implementation of interrupt keys
102:: :: Output of the Host-Host Protocol glitch cleaning committee
101:: :: Notes on the Network Working Group meeting,
Urbana, Illinois, February 17, 1971
100:: :: Categorization and guide to NWG/RFCs
99:: :: Network meeting
95:: :: Distribution of NWG/RFC's through the NIC
90:: :: CCN as a network service center
89:: :: Some historic moments in networking
87:: :: Topic for discussion at the next Network Working Group
meeting
85:: :: Network Working Group meeting
84:: :: List of NWG/RFC's 1-80
82:: :: Network meeting notes
81:: :: Request for reference information
78:: :: NCP status report
77:: :: Network meeting report
76:: :: Connection by name
75:: :: Network meeting
74:: :: Specifications for network use of the UCSB On-Line System
73:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 67
72:: :: Proposed moratorium on changes to network protocol
136:: :: Host accounting and administrative procedures
135:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 110
132:: :: Typographical error in RFC 107
131:: :: Response to RFC 116
130:: :: Response to RFC 111
129:: :: Request for comments on socket name structure
126:: :: Graphics facilities at Ames Research Center
124:: :: Typographical error in RFC 107
121:: :: Network on-line operators
120:: :: Network PL1 subprograms
119:: :: Network Fortran subprograms
118:: :: Recommendations for facility documentation
117:: :: Some comments on the official protocol
116:: :: Structure of the May NWG meeting
115:: :: Some Network Information Center policies on handling
documents
113:: :: Network activity report
112:: :: User/Server Site Protocol
111:: :: Pressure from the chairman
109:: :: Level III Server Protocol for the Lincoln Laboratory
NIC 360/67 Host
108:: :: Attendance list at the Urbana NWG meeting, February
17-19,1971
107:: :: Output of the Host-Host Protocol glitch cleaning committee
106:: :: User/Server Site Protocol network host questionnaire
104:: :: Link 191
103:: :: Implementation of interrupt keys
102:: :: Output of the Host-Host Protocol glitch cleaning committee
101:: :: Notes on the Network Working Group meeting,
Urbana, Illinois, February 17, 1971
100:: :: Categorization and guide to NWG/RFCs
99:: :: Network meeting
95:: :: Distribution of NWG/RFC's through the NIC
90:: :: CCN as a network service center
89:: :: Some historic moments in networking
87:: :: Topic for discussion at the next Network Working Group
meeting
85:: :: Network Working Group meeting
84:: :: List of NWG/RFC's 1-80
82:: :: Network meeting notes
81:: :: Request for reference information
78:: :: NCP status report
77:: :: Network meeting report
76:: :: Connection by name
75:: :: Network meeting
74:: :: Specifications for network use of the UCSB On-Line System
73:: :: Response to NWG/RFC 67
72:: :: Proposed moratorium on changes to network protocol
71:: :: Reallocation in case of input error
69:: :: Distribution list change for MIT
68:: :: Comments on memory allocation control commands
66:: :: NIC - third level ideas and other noise
64:: :: Getting rid of marking
63:: :: Belated network meeting report
61:: :: Note on interprocess communication in a resource
sharing computer network
57:: :: Thoughts and reflections on NWG/RFC 54
52:: :: Updated distribution list
51:: :: Proposal for a Network Interchange Language
50:: :: Comments on the Meyer proposal
49:: :: Conversations with S. Crocker UCLA
48:: :: Possible protocol plateau
47:: :: BBN's comments on NWG/RFC #33
46:: :: ARPA Network protocol notes
45:: :: New protocol is coming
44:: :: Comments on NWG/RFC 33 and 36
43:: :: Proposed meeting [LIL]
40:: :: More comments on the forthcoming protocol
39:: :: Comments on protocol re
37:: :: Network meeting epilogue, etc
36:: :: Protocol notes
35:: :: Network meeting
34:: :: Some brief preliminary notes on the Augmentation
Research Center clock
31:: :: Binary message forms in computer
30:: :: Documentation conventions
27:: :: Documentation conventions
25:: :: No high link numbers
24:: :: Documentation conventions
21:: :: Network meeting
16:: :: M.I.T
15:: :: Network subsystem for time sharing hosts
13:: :: [Referring to NWG/RFC 11]
11:: :: Implementation of the Host-Host software procedures
in GORDO
10:: :: Documentation conventions
9:: :: Host software
8:: :: Functional specifications for the ARPA Network
7:: :: Host-IMP interface
6:: :: Conversation with Bob Kahn
5:: :: Decode Encode Language
4:: :: Network timetable
3:: :: Documentation conventions
2:: :: Host software
1:: :: Host software
71:: :: Reallocation in case of input error
69:: :: Distribution list change for MIT
68:: :: Comments on memory allocation control commands
66:: :: NIC - third level ideas and other noise
64:: :: Getting rid of marking
63:: :: Belated network meeting report
61:: :: Note on interprocess communication in a resource
sharing computer network
57:: :: Thoughts and reflections on NWG/RFC 54
52:: :: Updated distribution list
51:: :: Proposal for a Network Interchange Language
50:: :: Comments on the Meyer proposal
49:: :: Conversations with S. Crocker UCLA
48:: :: Possible protocol plateau
47:: :: BBN's comments on NWG/RFC #33
46:: :: ARPA Network protocol notes
45:: :: New protocol is coming
44:: :: Comments on NWG/RFC 33 and 36
43:: :: Proposed meeting [LIL]
40:: :: More comments on the forthcoming protocol
39:: :: Comments on protocol re
37:: :: Network meeting epilogue, etc
36:: :: Protocol notes
35:: :: Network meeting
34:: :: Some brief preliminary notes on the Augmentation
Research Center clock
31:: :: Binary message forms in computer
30:: :: Documentation conventions
27:: :: Documentation conventions
25:: :: No high link numbers
24:: :: Documentation conventions
21:: :: Network meeting
16:: :: M.I.T
15:: :: Network subsystem for time sharing hosts
13:: :: [Referring to NWG/RFC 11]
11:: :: Implementation of the Host-Host software procedures
in GORDO
10:: :: Documentation conventions
9:: :: Host software
8:: :: Functional specifications for the ARPA Network
7:: :: Host-IMP interface
6:: :: Conversation with Bob Kahn
5:: :: Decode Encode Language
4:: :: Network timetable
3:: :: Documentation conventions
2:: :: Host software
1:: :: Host software
Appendix B: Automatic Script to Implement Methodology
附录B：实现方法的自动脚本
#!/usr/bin/perl
#!/usr/bin/perl
# Program to read text files (such as RFCs and Internet Drafts) and # output items that might relate to year 2000 issues, particularly # 2-digit years.
#程序读取文本文件（如RFC和互联网草稿）并输出可能与2000年问题有关的项目，特别是两位数年份。
# Version 1.1a. Slight modification by Philip J. Nesser # (phil@nesser.com) to split lines from old RFC's that are # too wide to conform with current RFC standards.
#版本1.1a。Philip J.Nesser的轻微修改(phil@nesser.com)从旧的RFC中分割线，这些线太宽，不符合当前的RFC标准。
# Version 1.1. By Paul Hoffman (phoffman@imc.org). This is a # quick-and-dirty hack and could be written more elegantly and # more efficiently. There may be bugs in this software. For # example, there was an off-by-one-line bug in version 1.0. # Use this code at your own risk. This code may be freely # redistributed.
#版本1.1。保罗·霍夫曼(phoffman@imc.org). 这是一个快速而肮脏的黑客行为，可以写得更优雅、更高效。此软件中可能存在错误。例如，在1.0版中有一个离线错误使用此代码的风险自负。此代码可以自由重新分发。
# Some people like using disk files, others like STDIN and STDOUT.
# This program accomodates both types by setting the $UsageType
# variable. 'file' means input comes from the first argument on
# the command line, output goes to that filename with a ".out"
# extension; 'std' means STDIN and STDOUT.
$UsageType = 'file'; # Should be 'file' or 'std'
# Some people like using disk files, others like STDIN and STDOUT.
# This program accomodates both types by setting the $UsageType
# variable. 'file' means input comes from the first argument on
# the command line, output goes to that filename with a ".out"
# extension; 'std' means STDIN and STDOUT.
$UsageType = 'file'; # Should be 'file' or 'std'
# @CheckWords is a list of words to look for. This list is used in # addition to the automatic checking for "yy" on a line without "YYYY". # You might want to add "year yyyy" to this list, but then a large # proportion of the RFCs and drafts get selected
#@CheckWords是要查找的单词列表。除了在没有“YYYY”的行上自动检查“yy”之外，还使用此列表您可能希望将“yyyy年”添加到此列表中，但随后会选择大部分RFC和草稿
@CheckWords = qw(UTCTime two-digit 2-digit 2digit century 1900 2000);
@CheckWords = qw(UTCTime two-digit 2-digit 2digit century 1900 2000);
if($UsageType eq 'file') {
if($ARGV[0] eq '')
{ die "You must specify the name of the file to open.\n" }
$InName = $ARGV[0];
unless(-r $InName) { die "Could not read $InName.\n" }
open(IN, $InName) or die "Could not open $InName.\n";
$OutName = "$InName.out";
open(OUT, ">$OutName") or die "Could not write to $OutName.\n";
$OutStuff = ''; # Holder for what we're going to print out
} else { # Do STDIN and STDOUT
open(IN, "-"); open(OUT, ">-");
}
if($UsageType eq 'file') {
if($ARGV[0] eq '')
{ die "You must specify the name of the file to open.\n" }
$InName = $ARGV[0];
unless(-r $InName) { die "Could not read $InName.\n" }
open(IN, $InName) or die "Could not open $InName.\n";
$OutName = "$InName.out";
open(OUT, ">$OutName") or die "Could not write to $OutName.\n";
$OutStuff = ''; # Holder for what we're going to print out
} else { # Do STDIN and STDOUT
open(IN, "-"); open(OUT, ">-");
}
# Read the whole file into an array. This is a tad wasteful of memory # but makes the output easier.
#将整个文件读入数组。这有点浪费内存，但会使输出更容易。
@All = ();
while(<IN>) { push(@All, $_) }
$LastLine = $#All;
@All = ();
while(<IN>) { push(@All, $_) }
$LastLine = $#All;
# Process the instance of "yy" not followed by "yy"
for($i = 0; $i <= $LastLine; $i += 1 ) {
next unless(grep(/yy/i, $All[$i]));
next if(grep(/yyyy/i, $All[$i]));
&PrintFive($i, "'yy' on a line without 'yyyy'");
}
# Process the instance of "yy" not followed by "yy"
for($i = 0; $i <= $LastLine; $i += 1 ) {
next unless(grep(/yy/i, $All[$i]));
next if(grep(/yyyy/i, $All[$i]));
&PrintFive($i, "'yy' on a line without 'yyyy'");
}
# Next do the words that should cause extra concern
foreach $Word (@CheckWords) {
for($i = 0; $i <= $LastLine; $i += 1 ) {
next unless(grep(/$Word/i, $All[$i]));
&PrintFive($i, "$Word");
}
}
# Next do the words that should cause extra concern
foreach $Word (@CheckWords) {
for($i = 0; $i <= $LastLine; $i += 1 ) {
next unless(grep(/$Word/i, $All[$i]));
&PrintFive($i, "$Word");
}
}
# All done. If writing to a file, and nothing got written, delete the
# file so that you can quickly scan for the ".out" files.
# (A better-written program would have waited to do the opens
# until here so the unlink wouldn't be necessary. Oh, well.)
if($UsageType eq 'file') {
if(length($OutStuff) > 0) {
$OutStuff = "+=+=+=+=+= File $InName +=+=+=+=+= \n$OutStuff\n
print OUT $OutStuff; close(OUT);
} else { # Nothing to put in the .out
close(OUT);
unlink($OutName) or die "Couldn't unlink $OutName\n";
}
}
exit;
# All done. If writing to a file, and nothing got written, delete the
# file so that you can quickly scan for the ".out" files.
# (A better-written program would have waited to do the opens
# until here so the unlink wouldn't be necessary. Oh, well.)
if($UsageType eq 'file') {
if(length($OutStuff) > 0) {
$OutStuff = "+=+=+=+=+= File $InName +=+=+=+=+= \n$OutStuff\n
print OUT $OutStuff; close(OUT);
} else { # Nothing to put in the .out
close(OUT);
unlink($OutName) or die "Couldn't unlink $OutName\n";
}
}
exit;
# Print the five lines around the word found
sub PrintFive {
my $Where = shift(@_); my $Msg = shift(@_);
my ($WhereRealLine, $Start, $End, $j);
# Print the five lines around the word found
sub PrintFive {
my $Where = shift(@_); my $Msg = shift(@_);
my ($WhereRealLine, $Start, $End, $j);
$WhereRealLine = $Where + 1;
$OutStuff .= "$Msg found at line $WhereRealLine:\n";
$Start = $WhereRealLine - 2; $End = $WhereRealLine + 2;
if($Where < 2) { $Start = 0 }
if($Where > $LastLine - 2) { $End = $LastLine }
for($j = $Start; $j <= $End; $j += 1) {
if (length($All[$j-1]) > 64) {
$FirstHalf = substr($All[$j-1], 0, 64) . "\n";
$LastHalf = "$j(continued):\t\t" . substr($All[$j-1], 64);
$WhereRealLine = $Where + 1;
$OutStuff .= "$Msg found at line $WhereRealLine:\n";
$Start = $WhereRealLine - 2; $End = $WhereRealLine + 2;
if($Where < 2) { $Start = 0 }
if($Where > $LastLine - 2) { $End = $LastLine }
for($j = $Start; $j <= $End; $j += 1) {
if (length($All[$j-1]) > 64) {
$FirstHalf = substr($All[$j-1], 0, 64) . "\n";
$LastHalf = "$j(continued):\t\t" . substr($All[$j-1], 64);
$OutStuff .= "$j: " . $FirstHalf . $LastHalf;
}
else {
$OutStuff .= "$j: " . $All[$j-1]
}
}
$OutStuff .= "\n";
}
$OutStuff .= "$j: " . $FirstHalf . $LastHalf;
}
else {
$OutStuff .= "$j: " . $All[$j-1]
}
}
$OutStuff .= "\n";
}
Appendix C: Output of the script in Appendix B on all RFC's from 1 through 2479
附录C：附录B中的脚本在1到2479的所有RFC上的输出
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0052.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 141:
139:
140: Chuck Rose Case University
141: Jennings Computing Center (216) 368-2000
142: Case Western Reserve University x2808
143: 10900 Euclid Avenue
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0052.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 141:
139:
140: Chuck Rose Case University
141: Jennings Computing Center (216) 368-2000
142: Case Western Reserve University x2808
143: 10900 Euclid Avenue
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0090.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 71:
69: consoles);
70:
71: j) Six data communication ports (3 dial @
71(continued): 2000 baud,
72: 1 dedicated @ 4800 baud, and 2 dedicate
72(continued): d @ 50,000
73: baud) for remote batch entry terminals;
73(continued):
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0090.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 71:
69: consoles);
70:
71: j) Six data communication ports (3 dial @
71(continued): 2000 baud,
72: 1 dedicated @ 4800 baud, and 2 dedicate
72(continued): d @ 50,000
73: baud) for remote batch entry terminals;
73(continued):
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0230.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 92: 90: as for conventional synchronous block communication, since start 90(continued): and 91: stop bits for each character would need to be transmitted. This 91(continued): loss 92: is not substantial and does occur now for 2000 bps TIP-terminal 93: communication. 94:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第92行找到的文件rfc0230.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:90：对于传统的同步块通信，因为每个字符的起始90（续）和91：停止位都需要传输。这91（续）：损失92：不是很大，现在确实发生在2000 bps TIP终端93：通信中。94:
2000 found at line 134:
132: 92 transmitting sites in the U.S. and Canada were used with stan
132(continued): dard
133: Bell System Dataphone datasets used at both ends. At both 1200
133(continued): and
134: 2000 bps, approximately 82% of the calls had error rates of 1 er
134(continued): ror in
2000 found at line 134:
132: 92 transmitting sites in the U.S. and Canada were used with stan
132(continued): dard
133: Bell System Dataphone datasets used at both ends. At both 1200
133(continued): and
134: 2000 bps, approximately 82% of the calls had error rates of 1 er
134(continued): ror in
135: 10^5 bits or better, assuming an equal number of short, medium, 135(continued): and 136: long hauls.
135:10^5位或更高，假设短、中、135（续）和136：长运输的数量相等。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0241.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 32:
30: justifiable on the basis that the IMP and Host computers were
30(continued):
31: expected to be either in the same room (up to 30 feet of cabl
31(continued): e) or,
32: via the Distant Host option, within 2000 feet on well- contro
32(continued): lled,
33: shielded cables. A connection through common carrier facilit
33(continued): ies is
34: not comparably free of errors. Usage of common- carrier line
34(continued): s for
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0241.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 32:
30: justifiable on the basis that the IMP and Host computers were
30(continued):
31: expected to be either in the same room (up to 30 feet of cabl
31(continued): e) or,
32: via the Distant Host option, within 2000 feet on well- contro
32(continued): lled,
33: shielded cables. A connection through common carrier facilit
33(continued): ies is
34: not comparably free of errors. Usage of common- carrier line
34(continued): s for
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0263.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 22:
20: of the occasional desire to interface a Host to some IMP via a
21: long-distance connection (where long-distance, in this context,
22: is any cable run longer than 2000 feet but may typically be tens
22(continued):
23: of miles) via either a hard-wire or telephone circuit. We belie
23(continued): ve
24: that any good solution to the general problem of interfacing Hos
24(continued): ts
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0263.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 22:
20: of the occasional desire to interface a Host to some IMP via a
21: long-distance connection (where long-distance, in this context,
22: is any cable run longer than 2000 feet but may typically be tens
22(continued):
23: of miles) via either a hard-wire or telephone circuit. We belie
23(continued): ve
24: that any good solution to the general problem of interfacing Hos
24(continued): ts
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0662.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 143: 141: by a rather short cable (approximately 100 feet long.) The CISL 141(continued): Multics is 142: connected to the IMP number 6 (port 0) by an approximately l5OO 142(continued): feet long cable. 143: 8oth IMPs are in close physical proximity (approximately 2000 fe 143(continued): et,) and are 144: connected to each other by a 5O kilobits per second line. The re 144(continued): sults given 145: above show considerable improvement in the performance with the 145(continued): new IMP DIM.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0662.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000位于第143行：141：通过一根相当短的电缆（约100英尺长）找到。CISL 141（续）：Multics 142：通过一根约l5OO 142（续）：英尺长的电缆连接到IMP编号6（端口0）。143:8其他IMP物理上非常接近（约2000 fe 143（续）：et），并且144：通过每秒5千位的线路相互连接。RE144（续）：上文给出的145：结果表明，使用145（续）：新IMP DIM时，性能有了相当大的改善。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0713.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 830: 828: succeeding bytes in the stream used to encode the object. 829: 830: A data object requiring 20000 (47040 octal) bytes would 831: appear in the stream as follows.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0713.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第830行找到：828：用于编码对象的流中的后续字节。829:830:需要20000（47040八进制）字节的数据对象将831:显示在流中，如下所示。
832:
832:
2000 found at line 837: 835: 10000010 -- specifying that the next 2 bytes 836: contain the stream length 837: 01001110 -- first byte of number 20000 838: 00100000 -- second byte 839: .
2000位于第837:835:1000010行--指定接下来的2个字节836:包含流长度837:01001110--数字20000的第一个字节838:00100000--第二个字节839:。
2000 found at line 845: 843: . 844: 845: Interpretation of the contents of the 20000 bytes in 846: the stream can be performed by a module which knows the 847: specific format of the non-atomic type specified by DEFGH in
2000在第845行找到：843:。844:845:解释846中20000字节的内容：流可以由一个模块执行，该模块知道中DEFGH指定的非原子类型的847:特定格式
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0724.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2-digit found at line 1046:
1044: <4-digit-year>
1045: <slash-date> ::= <numeric-month> "/" <date-of-mo
1045(continued): nth>
1046: "/" <2-digit-ye
1046(continued): ar>
1047: <numeric-month> ::= <one or two decimal digits>
1048: <day-of-month> ::= <one or two decimal digits>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0724.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2-digit found at line 1046:
1044: <4-digit-year>
1045: <slash-date> ::= <numeric-month> "/" <date-of-mo
1045(continued): nth>
1046: "/" <2-digit-ye
1046(continued): ar>
1047: <numeric-month> ::= <one or two decimal digits>
1048: <day-of-month> ::= <one or two decimal digits>
2-digit found at line 1062:
1060: | "December" | "Dec"
1061: <4-digit-year> ::= <four decimal digits>
1062: <2-digit-year> ::= <two decimal digits>
1063: <time> ::= <24-hour-time> "-" <time-zone>
1064: <24-hour-time> ::= <hour> <minute>
2-digit found at line 1062:
1060: | "December" | "Dec"
1061: <4-digit-year> ::= <four decimal digits>
1062: <2-digit-year> ::= <two decimal digits>
1063: <time> ::= <24-hour-time> "-" <time-zone>
1064: <24-hour-time> ::= <hour> <minute>
2-digit found at line 1675:
1673: A. ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF SYNTAX RULES
1674:
1675: <2-digit-year> ::= <two decimal digits>
1676: <4-digit-year> ::= <four decimal digits>
1677: <24-hour-time> ::= <hour> <minute>
2-digit found at line 1675:
1673: A. ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF SYNTAX RULES
1674:
1675: <2-digit-year> ::= <two decimal digits>
1676: <4-digit-year> ::= <four decimal digits>
1677: <24-hour-time> ::= <hour> <minute>
2-digit found at line 1829:
1827:
1828: <slash-date> ::= <numeric-month> "/" <date-of-month>
1828(continued):
1829: "/" <2-digit-year>
1830: <space> ::= <TELNET ASCII space (decimal 32)>
1831:
2-digit found at line 1829:
1827:
1828: <slash-date> ::= <numeric-month> "/" <date-of-month>
1828(continued):
1829: "/" <2-digit-year>
1830: <space> ::= <TELNET ASCII space (decimal 32)>
1831:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0731.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1571: 1569: RFC 728, 1977. 1570: 1571: 9. Hazeltine 2000 Desk Top Display Operating Instructions. 1571(continued): 1572: Hazeltine IB-1866A, 1870. 1573:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0731.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第1571:1569:RFC 7281977行找到。1570: 1571: 9. Hazeltine 2000桌面显示器操作说明。1571（续）：1572:Hazeltine IB-1866A，1870。1573:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0732.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1681: 1679: 1977. 1680: 1681: 9. Hazeltine 2000 Desk Top Display Operating Instructions. H 1681(continued): azeltine 1682: IB-1866A, 1870. 1683:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0732.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第1681:1679:1977行找到。1680: 1681: 9. Hazeltine 2000桌面显示器操作说明。H 1681（续）：氮杂锡1682:IB-1866A，1870。1683:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0733.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2-digit found at line 333: 331: 332: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is 332(continued): , 333: exactly <n> occurrences of (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digi 333(continued): t 334: number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic characters. 335:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0733.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第333:331:332行找到的2位数字：“<n>（元素）”相当于“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是332（续）：，333：正好是（元素）的出现次数。因此，2DIGIT是一个2位333（续）：t334：数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母组成的字符串。335:
2digit found at line 333: 331: 332: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is 332(continued): , 333: exactly <n> occurrences of (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digi 333(continued): t 334: number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic characters. 335:
2在第333:331:332行找到的数字：“<n>（元素）”相当于“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是332（续）：，333：正好是（元素）的出现次数。因此，2DIGIT是一个2位333（续）：t334：数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母组成的字符串。335:
2digit found at line 947: 945: / "Sunday" / "Sun" 946: 947: date = 1*2DIGIT ["-"] month ; day month year 948: ["-"] (2DIGIT /4DIGIT) ; e.g. 20 Aug [19]7 948(continued): 7 949:
2在第947:945:/“星期日”/“太阳”946:947:date=1*2数字[“-”]月处找到数字；日-月-年948:[“-”]（2位数/4位数）；e、 g.8月20日[19]7948（续）：7949：
2digit found at line 948:
946:
947: date = 1*2DIGIT ["-"] month ; day month year
2digit found at line 948:
946:
947: date = 1*2DIGIT ["-"] month ; day month year
948: ["-"] (2DIGIT /4DIGIT) ; e.g. 20 Aug [19]7
948(continued): 7
949:
950: month = "January" / "Jan" / "February" / "Feb"
948: ["-"] (2DIGIT /4DIGIT) ; e.g. 20 Aug [19]7
948(continued): 7
949:
950: month = "January" / "Jan" / "February" / "Feb"
2digit found at line 967: 965: ; (seconds optional 965(continued): ) 966: 967: hour = 2DIGIT [":"] 2DIGIT [ [":"] 2DIGIT ] 968: ; 0000[00] - 2359[59 968(continued): ] 969:
2第967行：965:处的数字；（秒可选965（续）：966:967:hour=2DIGIT[“：”]2DIGIT[“：”]2DIGIT]968:；0000[00]-2359[59 968（续）：]969：
2digit found at line 1718:
1716: CTL = <any TELNET ASCII control character and DEL>
1717:
1718: date = 1*2DIGIT ["-"] month ["-"] (2DIGIT /4DIGIT)
1719: date-field = "Date" ":" date-time
1720: date-time = [ day-of-week "," ] date time
2digit found at line 1718:
1716: CTL = <any TELNET ASCII control character and DEL>
1717:
1718: date = 1*2DIGIT ["-"] month ["-"] (2DIGIT /4DIGIT)
1719: date-field = "Date" ":" date-time
1720: date-time = [ day-of-week "," ] date time
2digit found at line 1754:
1752: host-indicator = 1*( ("at" / "@") node )
1753: host-phrase = phrase host-indicator
1754: hour = 2DIGIT [":"] 2DIGIT [ [":"] 2DIGIT ]
1755: HTAB = <TELNET ASCII horizontal-tab>
1756:
2digit found at line 1754:
1752: host-indicator = 1*( ("at" / "@") node )
1753: host-phrase = phrase host-indicator
1754: hour = 2DIGIT [":"] 2DIGIT [ [":"] 2DIGIT ]
1755: HTAB = <TELNET ASCII horizontal-tab>
1756:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0734.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 184: 182: Bit name Value Meaning 183: 184: %TOALT 200000,,0 characters 175 and 176 are 184(continued): converted to 185: altmode (033) on input. 186:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第184行找到的文件rfc0734.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:182：位名称值意味着183:184:%TOALT 200000，，0个字符175和176为184（续）：在输入时转换为185:altmode（033）。186:
2000 found at line 264:
262: NORMALLY OFF.
263:
264: %TOSA1 2000,,0 characters 001-037 should
264(continued): be displayed
265: using the Stanford/ITS extended
265(continued): ASCII
266: graphics character set instead of
266(continued): uparrow
2000 found at line 264:
262: NORMALLY OFF.
263:
264: %TOSA1 2000,,0 characters 001-037 should
264(continued): be displayed
265: using the Stanford/ITS extended
265(continued): ASCII
266: graphics character set instead of
266(continued): uparrow
2000 found at line 354:
2000在第354行找到：
352: %TXTOP 4000 This character has the [TOP] key depressed. 353: 354: %TXSFL 2000 Reserved, must be zero. 355: 356: %TXSFT 1000 Reserved, must be zero.
352:%TXTOP 4000此字符已按下[TOP]键。353:354:%TXSFL 2000保留，必须为零。355:356:%TXSFT 1000保留，必须为零。
2000 found at line 634:
632: Value Key
633:
634: 2000 Reserved
635: 1000 Reserved
636: 0400 <META>
2000 found at line 634:
632: Value Key
633:
634: 2000 Reserved
635: 1000 Reserved
636: 0400 <META>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0738.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 41:
39: without sending anything.
40:
41: The time is the number of seconds since 0000 (midnight) 1 Januar
41(continued): y 1900
42: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT;
42(continued): this
43: base will serve until the year 2036. As a further example, the
43(continued): most
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0738.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 41:
39: without sending anything.
40:
41: The time is the number of seconds since 0000 (midnight) 1 Januar
41(continued): y 1900
42: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT;
42(continued): this
43: base will serve until the year 2036. As a further example, the
43(continued): most
1900 found at line 42:
40:
41: The time is the number of seconds since 0000 (midnight) 1 Januar
41(continued): y 1900
42: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT;
42(continued): this
43: base will serve until the year 2036. As a further example, the
43(continued): most
44: recent leap year as of this writing began from the time 2,398,29
44(continued): 1,200
1900 found at line 42:
40:
41: The time is the number of seconds since 0000 (midnight) 1 Januar
41(continued): y 1900
42: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT;
42(continued): this
43: base will serve until the year 2036. As a further example, the
43(continued): most
44: recent leap year as of this writing began from the time 2,398,29
44(continued): 1,200
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0745.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 562: 560: Circuits, EIA standard RS-422," April 1975; Engineering Dept., 561: Electronic Industries Assn., 2001 Eye St., N.W., Washington, D.C 561(continued): ., 562: 20006. 563: 564: REA bulletin 345-67, Rural Electrification Admin., U.S. Dept. of 564(continued):
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0745.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000，见第562行：560：电路，EIA标准RS-422，“1975年4月；工程部，561：电子工业协会，2001年华盛顿特区西北眼街561（续）：，562:20006.563:564:REA公告345-67，美国564部农村电气化管理局（续）：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0746.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 341: 339: %TDGRF ;Enter graphics.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc0746.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第341行没有找到'yyyy'：339:%TDGRF；输入图形。
340: %GOCLR ;Clear the screen.
341: %GOMVA xx yy ;Set cursor.
342: %GODLA xx yy ;Draw line from there.
343: << repeat last two commands for each line >>
340: %GOCLR ;Clear the screen.
341: %GOMVA xx yy ;Set cursor.
342: %GODLA xx yy ;Draw line from there.
343: << repeat last two commands for each line >>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 342: 340: %GOCLR ;Clear the screen. 341: %GOMVA xx yy ;Set cursor. 342: %GODLA xx yy ;Draw line from there. 343: << repeat last two commands for each line >> 344: %TDNOP ;Exit graphics.
第342行未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：340:%GOCLR；清除屏幕。341:%GOMVA xx yy；设置光标。342:%GODLA xx yy；从那里画线。343:<<对每行重复最后两个命令>>344:%TDNOP；退出图形。
2000 found at line 859: 857: %TRGIN 0,,400000 terminal can provide graphics input. 858: 859: %TRGHC 0,,200000 terminal has a hard-copy device to which outp 859(continued): ut can 860: be diverted. 861:
在第859行找到2000:857:%TRGIN 0，400000终端可以提供图形输入。858:859:%TRGHC 0，200000终端有一个硬拷贝设备，输出859（续）：ut可以转移到该设备860:。861:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0752.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 218: 216: word 4 The name of the site in SIXBIT. 217: word 5 The user name who compiled the file, usually in 217(continued): SIXBIT. 218: word 6 Date of compilation as SIXBIT YYMMDD. 219: word 7 Time of compilation as SIXBIT HHMMSS. 220: word 8 Address in file of NAME table.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc0752.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第218行中未找到'yyyy'：216:word 4以六位为单位的站点名称。217:word 5编译文件的用户名，通常为217（续）：6位。218:word 6编译日期为六位YYMMDD。219:word 7编译时间为六位HHMMS。220：名称表文件中的字8地址。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0754.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 76:
74:
75: Messages are transmitted as a character string to an address whi
75(continued): ch is
76: specified "outside" the message. The destination host ("YYY") i
76(continued): s
77: specified to the sending (or user) FTP as the argument of the "o
77(continued): pen
78: connection" command, and the destination user ("XXX") is specifi
78(continued): ed to
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0754.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 76:
74:
75: Messages are transmitted as a character string to an address whi
75(continued): ch is
76: specified "outside" the message. The destination host ("YYY") i
76(continued): s
77: specified to the sending (or user) FTP as the argument of the "o
77(continued): pen
78: connection" command, and the destination user ("XXX") is specifi
78(continued): ed to
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 81:
79: the receiving (or server) FTP as the argument of the "MAIL" (or
79(continued): "MLFL")
80: command. In Tenex, when mail is queued this outside information
80(continued): is
81: saved in the file name ("[---].XXX@YYY").
82:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 81:
79: the receiving (or server) FTP as the argument of the "MAIL" (or
79(continued): "MLFL")
80: command. In Tenex, when mail is queued this outside information
80(continued): is
81: saved in the file name ("[---].XXX@YYY").
82:
83: The proposed solutions are briefly characterized.
83：简要描述了提议的解决方案。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 239:
237:
238:
239: "[---].XXX@YYY", not anything from the header. Only the stri
239(continued): ng "XXX"
240: is passed to the FTP server.
241:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 239:
237:
238:
239: "[---].XXX@YYY", not anything from the header. Only the stri
239(continued): ng "XXX"
240: is passed to the FTP server.
241:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0759.txt +=+=+=+=+=
two-digit found at line 1414:
1412: yyyy-mm-dd-hh:mm:ss,fff+hh:mm
1413:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0759.txt +=+=+=+=+=
two-digit found at line 1414:
1412: yyyy-mm-dd-hh:mm:ss,fff+hh:mm
1413:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
two-digit found at line 1415:
1413:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
1417: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
1417(continued): is
two-digit found at line 1415:
1413:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
1417: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
1417(continued): is
two-digit found at line 1416:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
1417: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
1417(continued): is
1418: appended the offset from Greenwich as plus or minus hh hours
1418(continued): and mm
two-digit found at line 1416:
1414: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
1414(continued): , dd is
1415: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
1415(continued): mm is
1416: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
1416(continued): the
1417: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
1417(continued): is
1418: appended the offset from Greenwich as plus or minus hh hours
1418(continued): and mm
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0767.txt +=+=+=+=+= two-digit found at line 710: 708: yyyy-mm-dd-hh:mm:ss,fff+hh:mm 709:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0767.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第710行找到的两位数字：708:yyyy-mm-dd-hh:mm:ss，fff+hh:mm 709:
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
two-digit found at line 711:
709:
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
713: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
713(continued): is
two-digit found at line 711:
709:
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
713: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
713(continued): is
two-digit found at line 712:
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
713: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
713(continued): is
714: appended the offset from Greenwich as plus or minus hh hours
714(continued): and mm
two-digit found at line 712:
710: Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month
710(continued): , dd is
711: the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time,
711(continued): mm is
712: the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is
712(continued): the
713: decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time
713(continued): is
714: appended the offset from Greenwich as plus or minus hh hours
714(continued): and mm
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0786.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 71:
69:
70: The date-time will be in the default TOPS20 ODTIM forma
70(continued): t
71: "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss" (24 hour time).
72:
73: The files will named "arbitrary.NIMAIL.-1", where "arbitra
73(continued): ry" will
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0786.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 71:
69:
70: The date-time will be in the default TOPS20 ODTIM forma
70(continued): t
71: "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss" (24 hour time).
72:
73: The files will named "arbitrary.NIMAIL.-1", where "arbitra
73(continued): ry" will
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0788.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1592:
1590: <daytime> ::= "at" <SP> <date> <SP> <time>
1591:
1592: <date> ::= <dd> "-" <mon> "-" <yy>
1593:
1594: <time> ::= <hh> ":" <mm> ":" <ss> "-" <zone>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0788.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1592:
1590: <daytime> ::= "at" <SP> <date> <SP> <time>
1591:
1592: <date> ::= <dd> "-" <mon> "-" <yy>
1593:
1594: <time> ::= <hh> ":" <mm> ":" <ss> "-" <zone>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1602:
1600: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1600(continued): EC"
1601:
1602: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1602(continued): in the
1603: range 01 to 99.
1604:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1602:
1600: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1600(continued): EC"
1601:
1602: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1602(continued): in the
1603: range 01 to 99.
1604:
century found at line 1602:
1600: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1600(continued): EC"
1601:
1602: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1602(continued): in the
1603: range 01 to 99.
1604:
century found at line 1602:
1600: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1600(continued): EC"
1601:
1602: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1602(continued): in the
1603: range 01 to 99.
1604:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0809.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 3349:
3347:
3348: #define WID 0000000 /* Write Image Data */
3349: #define WGD 0020000 /* Write Graphic Data */
3350: #define WAC 0022000 /* Write AlphanumCh */
3351:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0809.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 3349:
3347:
3348: #define WID 0000000 /* Write Image Data */
3349: #define WGD 0020000 /* Write Graphic Data */
3350: #define WAC 0022000 /* Write AlphanumCh */
3351:
2000 found at line 3350:
3348: #define WID 0000000 /* Write Image Data */
3349: #define WGD 0020000 /* Write Graphic Data */
3350: #define WAC 0022000 /* Write AlphanumCh */
3351:
3352: #define LWM 0024000 /* Load Write Mode */
2000 found at line 3350:
3348: #define WID 0000000 /* Write Image Data */
3349: #define WGD 0020000 /* Write Graphic Data */
3350: #define WAC 0022000 /* Write AlphanumCh */
3351:
3352: #define LWM 0024000 /* Load Write Mode */
2000 found at line 3379:
3377:
3378: #define ERS 0030000 /* Erase */
3379: #define ERL 0032000 /* Erase Line */
3380: #define SLU 0034000 /* Special Location Update */
3381: #define SCRL_ZAP 0100 /* unlimited scroll speed */
2000 found at line 3379:
3377:
3378: #define ERS 0030000 /* Erase */
3379: #define ERL 0032000 /* Erase Line */
3380: #define SLU 0034000 /* Special Location Update */
3381: #define SCRL_ZAP 0100 /* unlimited scroll speed */
2000 found at line 3392:
3390: #define LLB 0070000 /* Load Lb */
3391: #define LLC 0074000 /* Load Lc */
3392: #define LGW 02000 /* perform write */
3393:
3394: #define NOP 0110000 /* No-Operation */
2000 found at line 3392:
3390: #define LLB 0070000 /* Load Lb */
3391: #define LLC 0074000 /* Load Lc */
3392: #define LGW 02000 /* perform write */
3393:
3394: #define NOP 0110000 /* No-Operation */
2000 found at line 3396:
2000在第3396行找到：
3394: #define NOP 0110000 /* No-Operation */
3395:
3396: #define SPD 0120000 /* Select Special Device */
3397: #define LPA 0130000 /* Load Peripheral Address */
3398: #define LPR 0140000 /* Load Peripheral Register */
3394: #define NOP 0110000 /* No-Operation */
3395:
3396: #define SPD 0120000 /* Select Special Device */
3397: #define LPA 0130000 /* Load Peripheral Address */
3398: #define LPR 0140000 /* Load Peripheral Register */
2000 found at line 3405:
3403: #define ALPHA 06000 /* LPR - Alphanumeric data */
3404: #define GRAPH 04000 /* LPR - Graphic data */
3405: #define IMAGE 02000 /* LPR - Image data */
3406: #define LTHENH 01000 /* take lo byte then hi byte */
3407: #define DROPBYTE 0400 /* drop last byte */
2000 found at line 3405:
3403: #define ALPHA 06000 /* LPR - Alphanumeric data */
3404: #define GRAPH 04000 /* LPR - Graphic data */
3405: #define IMAGE 02000 /* LPR - Image data */
3406: #define LTHENH 01000 /* take lo byte then hi byte */
3407: #define DROPBYTE 0400 /* drop last byte */
2000 found at line 3408:
3406: #define LTHENH 01000 /* take lo byte then hi byte */
3407: #define DROPBYTE 0400 /* drop last byte */
3408: #define INTERR 02000 /* SPD - Interrupt Enable */
3409: #define TEST 04000 /* SPD - Diagnostic Test */
3410:
2000 found at line 3408:
3406: #define LTHENH 01000 /* take lo byte then hi byte */
3407: #define DROPBYTE 0400 /* drop last byte */
3408: #define INTERR 02000 /* SPD - Interrupt Enable */
3409: #define TEST 04000 /* SPD - Diagnostic Test */
3410:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0810.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 146: 144: , (comma) is used as a data element delimiter 145: 146: XXX/YYY indicates protocol information of the type 146(continued): 147: TRANSPORT/SERVICE. 148:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0810.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第146行没有找到'yyyy'。（逗号）用作数据元素分隔符145:146:XXX/YYY表示146类型的协议信息（续）：147：传输/服务。148:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0820.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 674:
672: 014.000.000.001 311031700035 00 PURDUE-TN
672(continued): [CXK]
673: 014.000.000.002 311060800027 00 UWISC-TN
673(continued): [CXK]
674: 014.000.000.003 311030200024 00 UDEL-TN
674(continued): [CXK]
675: 014.000.000.004 234219200149 23 UCL-VTEST
675(continued): [PK]
676: 014.000.000.005 234219200300 23 UCL-TG
676(continued): [PK]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0820.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 674:
672: 014.000.000.001 311031700035 00 PURDUE-TN
672(continued): [CXK]
673: 014.000.000.002 311060800027 00 UWISC-TN
673(continued): [CXK]
674: 014.000.000.003 311030200024 00 UDEL-TN
674(continued): [CXK]
675: 014.000.000.004 234219200149 23 UCL-VTEST
675(continued): [PK]
676: 014.000.000.005 234219200300 23 UCL-TG
676(continued): [PK]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0821.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1944:
1942: <daytime> ::= <SP> <date> <SP> <time>
1943:
1944: <date> ::= <dd> <SP> <mon> <SP> <yy>
1945:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0821.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1944:
1942: <daytime> ::= <SP> <date> <SP> <time>
1943:
1944: <date> ::= <dd> <SP> <mon> <SP> <yy>
1945:
1946: <time> ::= <hh> ":" <mm> ":" <ss> <SP> <zone>
1946: <time> ::= <hh> ":" <mm> ":" <ss> <SP> <zone>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1954:
1952: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1952(continued): EC"
1953:
1954: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1954(continued): in the
1955: range 00 to 99.
1956:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1954:
1952: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1952(continued): EC"
1953:
1954: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1954(continued): in the
1955: range 00 to 99.
1956:
century found at line 1954:
1952: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1952(continued): EC"
1953:
1954: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1954(continued): in the
1955: range 00 to 99.
1956:
century found at line 1954:
1952: "JUL" | "AUG" | "SEP" | "OCT" | "NOV" | "D
1952(continued): EC"
1953:
1954: <yy> ::= the two decimal integer year of the century
1954(continued): in the
1955: range 00 to 99.
1956:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0822.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1635:
1633: 5.1. SYNTAX
1634:
1635: date-time = [ day "," ] date time ; dd mm yy
1636: ; hh:mm:ss zzz
1636(continued):
1637:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0822.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1635:
1633: 5.1. SYNTAX
1634:
1635: date-time = [ day "," ] date time ; dd mm yy
1636: ; hh:mm:ss zzz
1636(continued):
1637:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2701:
2699: dates = orig-date ; Original
2700: [ resent-date ] ; Forwarded
2701: date-time = [ day "," ] date time ; dd mm yy
2702: ; hh:mm:ss zzz
2702(continued):
2703: day = "Mon" / "Tue" / "Wed" / "Thu"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2701:
2699: dates = orig-date ; Original
2700: [ resent-date ] ; Forwarded
2701: date-time = [ day "," ] date time ; dd mm yy
2702: ; hh:mm:ss zzz
2702(continued):
2703: day = "Mon" / "Tue" / "Wed" / "Thu"
2-digit found at line 344: 342: 343: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to "<n>*<n>(element)"; th 343(continued): at is, 344: exactly <n> occurrences of (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2 344(continued): -digit 345: number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic characte 345(continued): rs. 346:
第344:342:343行的两位数字：“<n>（元素）”相当于“<n>*<n>（元素）”；th 343（续）：在is，344：精确地<n>出现（元素）。因此，2DIGIT是一个2344（续）：数字345：数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母组成的字符串345（续）：rs。346：
2digit found at line 344:
2在第344行找到的数字：
342: 343: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to "<n>*<n>(element)"; th 343(continued): at is, 344: exactly <n> occurrences of (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2 344(continued): -digit 345: number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic characte 345(continued): rs. 346:
342:343:“<n>（元素）”相当于“<n>*<n>（元素）”；th 343（续）：在is，344：精确地<n>出现（元素）。因此，2DIGIT是一个2344（续）：数字345：数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母组成的字符串345（续）：rs。346：
2digit found at line 1641: 1639: / "Fri" / "Sat" / "Sun" 1640: 1641: date = 1*2DIGIT month 2DIGIT ; day month yea 1641(continued): r 1642: ; e.g. 20 Jun 1642(continued): 82 1643:
2在第1641:1639行找到数字：/“周五”/“周六”/“太阳”1640:1641:date=1*2数字月2数字；年月日1641（续）：r 1642:；e、 g.1642年6月20日（续）：82 1643：
2digit found at line 1650: 1648: time = hour zone ; ANSI and Mili 1648(continued): tary 1649: 1650: hour = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT [":" 2DIGIT] 1651: ; 00:00:00 - 23 1651(continued): :59:59 1652:
2在第1650行找到的数字：1648：时间=小时区；ANSI和Mili 1648（续）：时间1649:1650:hour=2DIGIT:“2DIGIT[”：“2DIGIT]1651:；00:00:00-23 1651（续）：59:59 1652：
2digit found at line 2697:
2695: CTL = <any ASCII control ; ( 0- 37, 0.
2695(continued): - 31.)
2696: character and DEL> ; ( 177,
2696(continued): 127.)
2697: date = 1*2DIGIT month 2DIGIT ; day month yea
2697(continued): r
2698: ; e.g. 20 Jun
2698(continued): 82
2699: dates = orig-date ; Original
2digit found at line 2697:
2695: CTL = <any ASCII control ; ( 0- 37, 0.
2695(continued): - 31.)
2696: character and DEL> ; ( 177,
2696(continued): 127.)
2697: date = 1*2DIGIT month 2DIGIT ; day month yea
2697(continued): r
2698: ; e.g. 20 Jun
2698(continued): 82
2699: dates = orig-date ; Original
2digit found at line 2747:
2745: field-name = 1*<any CHAR, excluding CTLs, SPACE, and ":">
2745(continued):
2746: group = phrase ":" [#mailbox] ";"
2747: hour = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT [":" 2DIGIT]
2748: ; 00:00:00 - 23
2748(continued): :59:59
2749: HTAB = <ASCII HT, horizontal-tab> ; ( 11,
2749(continued): 9.)
2digit found at line 2747:
2745: field-name = 1*<any CHAR, excluding CTLs, SPACE, and ":">
2745(continued):
2746: group = phrase ":" [#mailbox] ";"
2747: hour = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT [":" 2DIGIT]
2748: ; 00:00:00 - 23
2748(continued): :59:59
2749: HTAB = <ASCII HT, horizontal-tab> ; ( 11,
2749(continued): 9.)
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0850.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 227:
225: network. One format that is acceptable to both is
226:
227: Weekday, DD-Mon-YY HH:MM:SS TIMEZONE
228:
229: Several examples of valid dates appear in the sample
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0850.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 227:
225: network. One format that is acceptable to both is
226:
227: Weekday, DD-Mon-YY HH:MM:SS TIMEZONE
228:
229: Several examples of valid dates appear in the sample
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0867.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 67: 65: Another popular syntax is that used in SMTP: 66: 67: dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz 68: 69: Example:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc0867.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第67:65行未找到'yyyy'。另一种常用语法是SMTP:66:67:dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz 68:69中使用的语法：示例：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0868.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 19:
17: This protocol provides a site-independent, machine readable date
17(continued): and
18: time. The Time service sends back to the originating source the
18(continued): time in
19: seconds since midnight on January first 1900.
20:
21: One motivation arises from the fact that not all systems have a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0868.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 19:
17: This protocol provides a site-independent, machine readable date
17(continued): and
18: time. The Time service sends back to the originating source the
18(continued): time in
19: seconds since midnight on January first 1900.
20:
21: One motivation arises from the fact that not all systems have a
1900 found at line 83: 81: The Time 82: 83: The time is the number of seconds since 00:00 (midnight) 1 Janua 83(continued): ry 1900 84: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT; 84(continued): this 85: base will serve until the year 2036.
1900位于第83:81行：时间82:83：时间是自1 Janua 83（续）：ry 1900 84:GMT起的秒数，因此时间1是1900 GMT 1月1日上午12:00:01；84（续）：该基地将服役至2036年。
1900 found at line 84: 82: 83: The time is the number of seconds since 00:00 (midnight) 1 Janua 83(continued): ry 1900 84: GMT, such that the time 1 is 12:00:01 am on 1 January 1900 GMT; 84(continued): this 85: base will serve until the year 2036. 86:
1900位于第84行：82:83:time是指自1 Janua 83年1月1日00:00（午夜）以来的秒数（续）：ry 1900 84:GMT，因此时间1是1900年1月1日GMT的12:00:01 am；84（续）：该基地将服役至2036年。86:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0869.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1639:
1637: 400 HDH
1638: 1000 Cassette Writer
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0869.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1639:
1637: 400 HDH
1638: 1000 Cassette Writer
1639: 2000 Propagation Delay Measurement 1640: 4000 X25 1641: 10000 Profile Measurements
1639:2000传播延迟测量1640:4000 X25 1641:10000剖面测量
2000 found at line 1642: 1640: 4000 X25 1641: 10000 Profile Measurements 1642: 20000 Self Authenticating Password 1643: 40000 Host traffic Matrix 1644: 100000 Experimental/Special
2000在第1642行找到：1640:4000 X25 1641:10000配置文件测量1642:20000自验证密码1643:40000主机流量矩阵1644:100000实验/特殊
2000 found at line 1669: 1667: 200 Trace ON 1668: 1000 Statistics ON 1669: 2000 Message Generator ON 1670: 4000 Packet Trace ON 1671: 10000 Host Data Checksum is BAD
在1668:1000的第1669:1667:200行找到了2000。在1671:10000主机数据校验和中，1669:2000消息生成器在1670:4000数据包跟踪上的统计信息不正确
2000 found at line 1672: 1670: 4000 Packet Trace ON 1671: 10000 Host Data Checksum is BAD 1672: 20000 Reload Location SET 1673: 1674:
在1671:10000主机数据校验和的第1672:1670:4000行中找到的2000数据包跟踪是错误的1672:20000重新加载位置集1673:1674:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0884.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 236:
234: GENERAL-TERMINAL-100A
235: HAZELTINE-1500
236: HAZELTINE-2000
237: HP-2621
238: HP-2640A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0884.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 236:
234: GENERAL-TERMINAL-100A
235: HAZELTINE-1500
236: HAZELTINE-2000
237: HP-2621
238: HP-2640A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0899.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 337:
335: provides a site-independent, machine readable date and time.
335(continued): The
336: Time service sends back to the originating source the time in
336(continued): seconds
337: since midnight on January first 1900.
338:
339: 867 Postel May 83 Daytime Protocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0899.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 337:
335: provides a site-independent, machine readable date and time.
335(continued): The
336: Time service sends back to the originating source the time in
336(continued): seconds
337: since midnight on January first 1900.
338:
339: 867 Postel May 83 Daytime Protocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0900.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1595:
1593: HAZELTINE-1510
1594: HAZELTINE-1520
1595: HAZELTINE-2000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0900.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1595:
1593: HAZELTINE-1510
1594: HAZELTINE-1520
1595: HAZELTINE-2000
1596: HP-2621 1597: HP-2621A
1596:HP-2621 1597:HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0909.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 859:
857: responses from the target. A session begins when a host op
857(continued): ens a
858: transport connection to a target listening on a well known
858(continued): port.
859: LDP uses RDP port number zzz or TCP port number yyy. Whe
859(continued): n the
860: connection has been established, the host sends a HELLO co
860(continued): mmand,
861: and the target replies with a HELLO_REPLY. The HELLO
861(continued): _REPLY
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0909.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 859:
857: responses from the target. A session begins when a host op
857(continued): ens a
858: transport connection to a target listening on a well known
858(continued): port.
859: LDP uses RDP port number zzz or TCP port number yyy. Whe
859(continued): n the
860: connection has been established, the host sends a HELLO co
860(continued): mmand,
861: and the target replies with a HELLO_REPLY. The HELLO
861(continued): _REPLY
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0923.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1769:
1767: HAZELTINE-1510
1768: HAZELTINE-1520
1769: HAZELTINE-2000
1770: HP-2621
1771: HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0923.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1769:
1767: HAZELTINE-1510
1768: HAZELTINE-1520
1769: HAZELTINE-2000
1770: HP-2621
1771: HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0937.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 327:
325: FOLD mailbox - Error
326: READ [n] #xxx
327: RETR =yyy
328: ACKS
329: ACKD
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0937.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 327:
325: FOLD mailbox - Error
326: READ [n] #xxx
327: RETR =yyy
328: ACKS
329: ACKD
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0943.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1829:
1827: HAZELTINE-1510
1828: HAZELTINE-1520
1829: HAZELTINE-2000
1830: HP-2621
1831: HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0943.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1829:
1827: HAZELTINE-1510
1828: HAZELTINE-1520
1829: HAZELTINE-2000
1830: HP-2621
1831: HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0952.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 159: 157: ,(comma) is used as a data element delimiter 158: 159: XXX/YYY indicates protocol information of the type 160: TRANSPORT/SERVICE. 161:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc0952.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第159:157:.行中未找到'yyyy'，（逗号）用作数据元素分隔符158:159:XXX/YYY表示160:TRANSPORT/SERVICE类型的协议信息。161:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0956.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 748: 746: 747: 3. The data format should be based on the UDP Time format 747(continued): , which 748: specifies 32-bit time in seconds since 1 January 1900, 748(continued): but 749: extended additional bits for the fractional part of a 749(continued): second. 750:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第748:746:747:3行找到文件rfc0956.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900。数据格式应基于UDP时间格式747（续）：748：指定1900年1月1日以来的32位时间（以秒为单位），748（续）：但749：749的小数部分的扩展附加位（续）：秒。750:
1900 found at line 826: 824: experiment the results indicated by UDP and ICMP are compared 824(continued): . In 825: the UDP Time protocol time is indicated as a 32-bit field in 825(continued): seconds 826: past 0000 UT on 1 January 1900, while in the ICMP Timestamp m 826(continued): essage 827: time is indicated as a 32-bit field in milliseconds past 0000 827(continued): UT of 828: each day.
1900在第826行发现：824：实验将UDP和ICMP显示的结果进行比较824（续）：。在825中：UDP时间协议时间在825中表示为32位字段（续）：秒826：1900年1月1日超过0000 UT，而在ICMP时间戳m 826中（续）：消息827：时间表示为超过0000 827的32位字段（续）：828 UT：每天。
2000 found at line 1392:
1390: CU-ARPA.CS.CORNELL.EDU -1 -514
1391: UCI-ICSE.ARPA -1 -1896
1392: UCI-ICSC.ARPA 1 2000
1393: DCN9.ARPA -7 -6610
1394: TRANTOR.ARPA 10 10232
2000 found at line 1392:
1390: CU-ARPA.CS.CORNELL.EDU -1 -514
1391: UCI-ICSE.ARPA -1 -1896
1392: UCI-ICSC.ARPA 1 2000
1393: DCN9.ARPA -7 -6610
1394: TRANTOR.ARPA 10 10232
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0958.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 41:
39: NTP provides the protocol mechanisms to synchronize time in p
39(continued): rinciple
40: to precisions in the order of nanoseconds while preserving a
41: non-ambiguous date, at least for this century. The protocol
41(continued): includes
42: provisions to specify the precision and estimated error of th
42(continued): e local
43: clock and the characteristics of the reference clock to which
43(continued): it may
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0958.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 41:
39: NTP provides the protocol mechanisms to synchronize time in p
39(continued): rinciple
40: to precisions in the order of nanoseconds while preserving a
41: non-ambiguous date, at least for this century. The protocol
41(continued): includes
42: provisions to specify the precision and estimated error of th
42(continued): e local
43: clock and the characteristics of the reference clock to which
43(continued): it may
1900 found at line 143:
141:
142: NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit fixed-point number
142(continued): , in
143: seconds relative to 0000 UT on 1 January 1900. The integer p
143(continued): art is
144: in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the last 32 bit
1900 found at line 143:
141:
142: NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit fixed-point number
142(continued): , in
143: seconds relative to 0000 UT on 1 January 1900. The integer p
143(continued): art is
144: in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the last 32 bit
144(continued): s, as 145: shown in the following diagram.
144（续）：s，as 145：如下图所示。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0960.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1659:
1657: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
1657(continued): [HDC1]
1658: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
1658(continued): [JFW]
1659: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
1659(continued): [AXH]
1660: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
1660(continued): [JR17]
1661: 014.000.000.022-014.255.255.254 Unassigned
1661(continued): [JBP]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0960.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1659:
1657: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
1657(continued): [HDC1]
1658: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
1658(continued): [JFW]
1659: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
1659(continued): [AXH]
1660: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
1660(continued): [JR17]
1661: 014.000.000.022-014.255.255.254 Unassigned
1661(continued): [JBP]
2000 found at line 1984: 1982: AEGIS 1983: APOLLO 1984: BS-2000 1985: CEDAR 1986: CGW
2000年发现于1984年：1982年：宙斯盾1983年：阿波罗1984年：BS-2000 1985年：雪松1986年：CGW
2000 found at line 2350: 2348: HAZELTINE-1510 2349: HAZELTINE-1520 2350: HAZELTINE-2000 2351: HP-2621 2352: HP-2621A
2000发现于第2350行：2348:HAZELTINE-1510 2349:HAZELTINE-1520 2350:HAZELTINE-2000 2351:HP-2621 2352:HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0973.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 377:
375: We might add the following to the parent zone:
376:
377: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0973.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 377:
375: We might add the following to the parent zone:
376:
377: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
2000 found at line 378:
376:
377: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
380: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.>
2000 found at line 378:
376:
377: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
380: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.>
2000 found at line 379: 377: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU. 378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
2000可在第379:377:99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA行找到。2000纳秒Q.ISI.EDU。378:2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU。
379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.> 380: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.> 381:
379:Q.ISI.EDU。2000年A<Q.ISI.EDU的地址>380:XX.MIT.EDU。2000年A<XX.MIT.EDU.地址>381:
2000 found at line 380: 378: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU. 379: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.> 380: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.> 381: 382: and the following to the child zone:
2000可在第380:378:2000行NS XX.MIT.EDU找到。379:Q.ISI.EDU。2000年A<Q.ISI.EDU的地址>380:XX.MIT.EDU。2000 A<地址XX.MIT.EDU.>381:382:并将以下内容发送到子区域：
2000 found at line 384:
382: and the following to the child zone:
383:
384: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
385: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
2000 found at line 384:
382: and the following to the child zone:
383:
384: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
385: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
2000 found at line 385:
383:
384: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
385: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
387: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
2000 found at line 385:
383:
384: 99.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 2000 NS Q.ISI.EDU.
385: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU.
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
387: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
2000 found at line 387: 385: 2000 NS XX.MIT.EDU. 386: 5000 SOA <SOA information> 387: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.> 388: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.> 389:
2000可在第387:385:2000行NS XX.MIT.EDU中找到。386:5000 SOA<SOA信息>387:Q.ISI.EDU。2000年A<Q.ISI.EDU的地址>388:XX.MIT.EDU。2000年A<XX.MIT.EDU.地址>389:
2000 found at line 388:
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
387: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
388: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.>
389:
390: SOA serials
2000 found at line 388:
386: 5000 SOA <SOA information>
387: Q.ISI.EDU. 2000 A <address of Q.ISI.EDU.>
388: XX.MIT.EDU. 2000 A <address of XX.MIT.EDU.>
389:
390: SOA serials
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0977.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 814:
812: the same format as the LIST command.
813:
814: The date is sent as 6 digits in the format YYMMDD, where YY i
814(continued): s the
815: last two digits of the year, MM is the two digits of the mont
815(continued): h (with
816: leading zero, if appropriate), and DD is the day of the month
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0977.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 814:
812: the same format as the LIST command.
813:
814: The date is sent as 6 digits in the format YYMMDD, where YY i
814(continued): s the
815: last two digits of the year, MM is the two digits of the mont
815(continued): h (with
816: leading zero, if appropriate), and DD is the day of the month
816(continued): (with
816（续）：（附
century found at line 817: 815: last two digits of the year, MM is the two digits of the mont 815(continued): h (with 816: leading zero, if appropriate), and DD is the day of the month 816(continued): (with 817: leading zero, if appropriate). The closest century is assume 817(continued): d as 818: part of the year (i.e., 86 specifies 1986, 30 specifies 2030, 818(continued): 99 is 819: 1999, 00 is 2000).
第817行中的世纪：815：年份的最后两位数字，MM是815月的两位数字（续）：h（816：前导零，如果合适），DD是816月的一天（续）：（817：前导零，如果合适）。最接近的世纪是假设817（续）：d为818：一年中的一部分（即86表示1986年，30表示2030年，818（续）：99表示819:1999，00表示2000年）。
2000 found at line 819:
817: leading zero, if appropriate). The closest century is assume
817(continued): d as
818: part of the year (i.e., 86 specifies 1986, 30 specifies 2030,
818(continued): 99 is
819: 1999, 00 is 2000).
820:
821: Time must also be specified. It must be as 6 digits HHMMSS w
821(continued): ith HH
2000 found at line 819:
817: leading zero, if appropriate). The closest century is assume
817(continued): d as
818: part of the year (i.e., 86 specifies 1986, 30 specifies 2030,
818(continued): 99 is
819: 1999, 00 is 2000).
820:
821: Time must also be specified. It must be as 6 digits HHMMSS w
821(continued): ith HH
2000 found at line 1190:
1188:
1189: (client asks for new newsgroups since April 3, 1985)
1190: C: NEWGROUPS 850403 020000
1191:
1192: S: 231 New newsgroups since 03/04/85 02:00:00 follow
2000 found at line 1190:
1188:
1189: (client asks for new newsgroups since April 3, 1985)
1190: C: NEWGROUPS 850403 020000
1191:
1192: S: 231 New newsgroups since 03/04/85 02:00:00 follow
2000 found at line 1275:
1273:
1274: (client asks for new newsgroups since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1275: C: NEWGROUPS 850515 020000
1276: S: 235 New newsgroups since 850515 follow
1277: S: net.fluff
2000 found at line 1275:
1273:
1274: (client asks for new newsgroups since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1275: C: NEWGROUPS 850515 020000
1276: S: 235 New newsgroups since 850515 follow
1277: S: net.fluff
2000 found at line 1282:
1280:
1281: (client asks for new news articles since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1282: C: NEWNEWS * 850515 020000
1283: S: 230 New news since 850515 020000 follows
1284: S: <1772@foo.UUCP>
2000 found at line 1282:
1280:
1281: (client asks for new news articles since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1282: C: NEWNEWS * 850515 020000
1283: S: 230 New news since 850515 020000 follows
1284: S: <1772@foo.UUCP>
2000 found at line 1283:
1281: (client asks for new news articles since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1282: C: NEWNEWS * 850515 020000
1283: S: 230 New news since 850515 020000 follows
2000 found at line 1283:
1281: (client asks for new news articles since 2 am, May 15, 1985)
1282: C: NEWNEWS * 850515 020000
1283: S: 230 New news since 850515 020000 follows
1284: S: <1772@foo.UUCP>
1285: S: <87623@baz.UUCP>
1284: S: <1772@foo.UUCP>
1285: S: <87623@baz.UUCP>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0985.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 505:
503: Very Distant Host (VDH) methods are not recommended for ne
503(continued): w
504: implementations. The Distant Host (DH) method is used whe
504(continued): n the
505: host and IMP are separated by not more than about 2000 fee
505(continued): t of
506: cable, while the HDLC Distant Host is used for greater dis
506(continued): tances
507: where a modem is required. Retransmission, resequencing a
507(continued): nd flow
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0985.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 505:
503: Very Distant Host (VDH) methods are not recommended for ne
503(continued): w
504: implementations. The Distant Host (DH) method is used whe
504(continued): n the
505: host and IMP are separated by not more than about 2000 fee
505(continued): t of
506: cable, while the HDLC Distant Host is used for greater dis
506(continued): tances
507: where a modem is required. Retransmission, resequencing a
507(continued): nd flow
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0987.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1100:
1098: X.408 (sections 4.2.2 and 5.2.2).
1099:
1100: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1101:
1102: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax conta
1102(continued): in: Year
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0987.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1100:
1098: X.408 (sections 4.2.2 and 5.2.2).
1099:
1100: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1101:
1102: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax conta
1102(continued): in: Year
UTCTime found at line 1102:
1100: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1101:
1102: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax conta
1102(continued): in: Year
1103: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute,
1103(continued): second
1104: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains
1104(continued): an
UTCTime found at line 1102:
1100: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1101:
1102: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax conta
1102(continued): in: Year
1103: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute,
1103(continued): second
1104: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains
1104(continued): an
UTCTime found at line 1107: 1105: optional day of the week, but this is redundant. There 1105(continued): fore a 1106: symmetrical mapping can be made between these construct 1106(continued): s <5>. 1107: The UTCTime format which specifies the timezone offset 1107(continued): should 1108: be used, in line with CEN/CENELEC recommendations. 1109:
UTCTime位于第1107行：1105：可选的一周中的某一天，但这是多余的。1105（续）：因此，可以在这些构造1106（续）：s<5>之间进行1106：对称映射。1107：UTCTime格式，指定时区偏移1107（续）：应根据CEN/CENELEC建议使用1108。1109:
UTCTime found at line 3395: 3393:
UTCTime位于第3395行：3393:
3394: The extended syntax of zone defined in the JNT Mail Protoc
3394(continued): ol
3395: should be used in the mapping of UTCTime defined in chapte
3395(continued): r 3.
3396:
3397: 5. Lack of separate 822-P1 originator specification
3394: The extended syntax of zone defined in the JNT Mail Protoc
3394(continued): ol
3395: should be used in the mapping of UTCTime defined in chapte
3395(continued): r 3.
3396:
3397: 5. Lack of separate 822-P1 originator specification
UTCTime found at line 3910: 3908: <5> In practice, a gateway will need to parse various illega 3908(continued): l 3909: variants on 822.date-time. In cases where 822.date-time 3909(continued): cannot 3910: be parsed, it is recommended that the derived UTCTime is 3910(continued): set to 3911: the value at the time of translation. 3912:
UTCTime位于第3910:3908:<5>行。实际上，网关需要解析各种illega 3908（续）：l 3909:822.date-time上的变体。在822.date-time 3909（续）：无法解析3910:的情况下，建议将派生的UTCTime设置为3910（续）：设置为3911:转换时的值。3912:
2digit found at line 2785:
2783: last-trace ";"
2784: "ext" 1*DIGIT
2785: "flags" 2DIGIT
2786: [ "intended" mailbox ] ";"
2787: [ "info" printablestring ]
2digit found at line 2785:
2783: last-trace ";"
2784: "ext" 1*DIGIT
2785: "flags" 2DIGIT
2786: [ "intended" mailbox ] ";"
2787: [ "info" printablestring ]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0990.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2265:
2263: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
2263(continued): [GB7]
2264: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
2264(continued): [JFW]
2265: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
2265(continued): [AXH]
2266: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
2266(continued): [JR17]
2267: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80902 77 DFVLRVAX-X25
2267(continued): [GB7]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0990.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2265:
2263: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
2263(continued): [GB7]
2264: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
2264(continued): [JFW]
2265: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
2265(continued): [AXH]
2266: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
2266(continued): [JR17]
2267: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80902 77 DFVLRVAX-X25
2267(continued): [GB7]
2000 found at line 2584: 2582: AEGIS 2583: APOLLO 2584: BS-2000 2585: CEDAR 2586: CGW
2000发现于第2584:2582行：宙斯盾2583:APOLLO 2584:BS-2000 2585:CEDAR 2586:CGW
2000 found at line 2945: 2943: HAZELTINE-1510 2944: HAZELTINE-1520 2945: HAZELTINE-2000
2000发现于第2945行：2943:HAZELTINE-1510 2944:HAZELTINE-1520 2945:HAZELTINE-2000
2946: HP-2621 2947: HP-2621A
2946:HP-2621 2947:HP-2621A
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0996.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 76:
74:
75: Process type: 000027 options: 040000
76: Subnet: DMV status: 376 hello: 15 timeout: 2000
77: Foreign address: [192.5.39.87] max size: 576
78: Input packets 3645 Output packets 3690
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc0996.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 76:
74:
75: Process type: 000027 options: 040000
76: Subnet: DMV status: 376 hello: 15 timeout: 2000
77: Foreign address: [192.5.39.87] max size: 576
78: Input packets 3645 Output packets 3690
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1000.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 3105:
3103: protocol provides a site-independent, machine readable dat
3103(continued): e and
3104: time. The Time service sends back to the originating sour
3104(continued): ce the
3105: time in seconds since midnight on January first 1900.
3106:
3107: 867 Postel May 83 Daytime Protocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1000.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 3105:
3103: protocol provides a site-independent, machine readable dat
3103(continued): e and
3104: time. The Time service sends back to the originating sour
3104(continued): ce the
3105: time in seconds since midnight on January first 1900.
3106:
3107: 867 Postel May 83 Daytime Protocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1009.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1412:
1410: method is used when the host and IMP (the Defense Communic
1410(continued): ation
1411: Agency calls it a Packet Switch Node or PSN) are separated
1411(continued): by not
1412: more than about 2000 feet of cable, while the HDLC Distant
1412(continued): Host
1413: (HDH) is used for greater distances where a modem is requi
1413(continued): red.
1414: Under HDH, retransmission, resequencing and flow control a
1414(continued): re
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1009.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1412:
1410: method is used when the host and IMP (the Defense Communic
1410(continued): ation
1411: Agency calls it a Packet Switch Node or PSN) are separated
1411(continued): by not
1412: more than about 2000 feet of cable, while the HDLC Distant
1412(continued): Host
1413: (HDH) is used for greater distances where a modem is requi
1413(continued): red.
1414: Under HDH, retransmission, resequencing and flow control a
1414(continued): re
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1010.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 969:
967: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
967(continued): [GB7]
968: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
968(continued): [JFW]
969: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
969(continued): [AXH]
970: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
970(continued): [JR17]
971: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80902 77 DFVLRVAX-X25
971(continued): [GB7]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1010.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 969:
967: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 DFVLR5-X25
967(continued): [GB7]
968: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
968(continued): [JFW]
969: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
969(continued): [AXH]
970: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
970(continued): [JR17]
971: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80902 77 DFVLRVAX-X25
971(continued): [GB7]
2000 found at line 1353:
2000在第1353行找到：
1351: AEGIS 1352: APOLLO 1353: BS-2000 1354: CEDAR 1355: CGW
1351:宙斯盾1352:阿波罗1353:BS-2000 1354:雪松1355:CGW
2000 found at line 1719: 1717: HAZELTINE-1510 1718: HAZELTINE-1520 1719: HAZELTINE-2000 1720: HP-2621 1721: HP-2621A
2000发现于第1719:1717:HAZELTINE-1510 1718:HAZELTINE-1520 1719:HAZELTINE-2000 1720:HP-2621 1721:HP-2621A行
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1024.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 535: 533: 534: The local system clock, measured in milliseconds since 00:00 534(continued): 1 535: January 1900 UTC. Assumed to be only a local estimate of the 535(continued): time. 536: The value 0 is reserved for an uninitialized clock (For examp 536(continued): le, an 537: uninitialized time-of-day chip.)
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1024.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第535行找到：533:534：本地系统时钟，从00:00开始测量534（续）：1 535:1900 UTC一月。假设仅为535的局部估计值（续）：时间。536:值0保留给未初始化的时钟（对于examp 536（续）：le，537:未初始化的时间芯片）
1900 found at line 546: 544: A network synchronized clock, which is assumed to be synchron 544(continued): ized 545: across some part of a network. The clock value is measured i 545(continued): n 546: milliseconds since 00:00 1 January 1900 UTC. Specific inform 546(continued): ation 547: about the synchronization protocol is found in the system var 547(continued): iable 548: dictionary. The value 0 is used to indicate an uninitialized 548(continued): clock.
1900在第546行找到：544：一个网络同步时钟，假设它是同步的544（续）：545：跨越网络的某个部分。时钟值的测量值为i 545（续）：n 546:UTC 1900年1月1日00:00后的毫秒。关于同步协议的特定通知546（续）：在系统var 547（续）：可启用548：字典中找到。值0用于指示未初始化的548（续）：时钟。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1036.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 196: 194: both is: 195: 196: Wdy, DD Mon YY HH:MM:SS TIMEZONE 197: 198: Several examples of valid dates appear in the sample message 198(continued): above.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1036.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第196:194行中未找到'yyyy'。两者都是：195:196:Wdy，DD Mon yy HH:MM:SS时区197:198：上面的示例消息198中显示了几个有效日期的示例（续）：上面的示例消息。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1037.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 541:
539: Date A numeric data token. The date is expre
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1037.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 541:
539: Date A numeric data token. The date is expre
539(continued): ssed in 540: Universal Time format, which measures a 540(continued): time as 541: the number of seconds since January 1, 1 541(continued): 900, at 542: midnight GMT. 543:
539（续）：540：世界时格式，测量540（续）：时间为541：1月1日以来的秒数，1541（续）：900，格林威治标准时间542:午夜。543:
1900 found at line 2544:
2542: The creation date of the file. The date is expressed in Univ
2542(continued): ersal
2543: Time format, which measures a time as the number of seconds s
2543(continued): ince
2544: January 1, 1900, at midnight GMT. Creation date does not nec
2544(continued): essarily
2545: mean the time the file system created the directory entry or
2545(continued): records
2546: of the file. For systems that support modification or append
2546(continued): ing to
1900 found at line 2544:
2542: The creation date of the file. The date is expressed in Univ
2542(continued): ersal
2543: Time format, which measures a time as the number of seconds s
2543(continued): ince
2544: January 1, 1900, at midnight GMT. Creation date does not nec
2544(continued): essarily
2545: mean the time the file system created the directory entry or
2545(continued): records
2546: of the file. For systems that support modification or append
2546(continued): ing to
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1038.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 317: 315: 316: The values of this field are assigned by DCA Code R130, Washi 316(continued): ngton, 317: D.C. 20305-2000. Each value corresponds to a requestor who, 317(continued): once 318: assigned, becomes the authority for the remainder of the opti 318(continued): on 319: definition for that value.
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第317行找到的文件rfc1038.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:315:316：该字段的值由DCA代码R130，Washi 316（续）：ngton，317:D.C.20305-2000分配。每个值对应一个请求者，其317（续）：一旦318：分配，就成为该值的319：定义的opti 318（续）：剩余部分的权限。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1050.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 323: 321: 7.3 Program Number Assignment 322: 323: Program numbers are given out in groups of hexadecimal 200000 323(continued): 00 324: (decimal 536870912) according to the following chart: 325:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第323:321:7.3行找到的文件rfc1050.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000程序编号分配322:323：程序编号按十六进制200000 323（续）：00 324：（十进制536870912）分组给出，如下图表所示：325：
2000 found at line 327:
325:
326: 0 - 1fffffff defined by Sun
327: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
328: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
329: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
2000 found at line 327:
325:
326: 0 - 1fffffff defined by Sun
327: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
328: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
329: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1057.txt +=+=+=+=+=
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1057.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 339: 337: 7.3 Program Number Assignment 338: 339: Program numbers are given out in groups of hexadecimal 200000 339(continued): 00 340: (decimal 536870912) according to the following chart: 341:
2000在第339:337:7.3行找到程序编号分配338:339：程序编号按十六进制200000 339（续）：00 340：（十进制536870912）分组给出，如下表所示：341：
2000 found at line 343:
341:
342: 0 - 1fffffff defined by Sun
343: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
344: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
345: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
2000 found at line 343:
341:
342: 0 - 1fffffff defined by Sun
343: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
344: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
345: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1059.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 142:
140: mechanisms to synchronize time in principle to precisions in
140(continued): the
141: order of nanoseconds while preserving a non-ambiguous date we
141(continued): ll into
142: the next century. The protocol includes provisions to specif
142(continued): y the
143: characteristics and estimate the error of the local clock and
143(continued): the
144: time server to which it may be synchronized. It also include
144(continued): s
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1059.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 142:
140: mechanisms to synchronize time in principle to precisions in
140(continued): the
141: order of nanoseconds while preserving a non-ambiguous date we
141(continued): ll into
142: the next century. The protocol includes provisions to specif
142(continued): y the
143: characteristics and estimate the error of the local clock and
143(continued): the
144: time server to which it may be synchronized. It also include
144(continued): s
1900 found at line 574: 572: frequency to the TA time scale. At 0000 hours on 1 January 1 572(continued): 972 the 573: NTP time scale was set to 2,272,060,800, representing the num 573(continued): ber of 574: TA seconds since 0000 hours on 1 January 1900. The insertion 574(continued): of leap 575: seconds in UTC does not affect the oscillator itself, only th 575(continued): e 576: translation between TA and UTC, or conventional civil time. 576(continued): However,
1900位于第574行：572：TA时间刻度的频率。572（续）：972年1月1日0000时，573:NTP时标设置为2272060800，表示自1900年1月1日0000时起573（续）：误码率为574:TA秒。插入574（续）：UTC中的闰575：秒不影响振荡器本身，仅影响th 575（续）：e 576：TA和UTC之间的转换，或传统民用时间。576（续）：然而，
1900 found at line 649:
647: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
647(continued): been
648: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsi
648(continued): gned
649: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0000 UT on 1 Janua
649(continued): ry 1900.
650: The integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction par
1900 found at line 649:
647: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
647(continued): been
648: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsi
648(continued): gned
649: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0000 UT on 1 Janua
649(continued): ry 1900.
650: The integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction par
650(continued): t in the 651: last 32 bits, as shown in the following diagram.
650（续）：651：最后32位中的t，如下图所示。
1900 found at line 690:
688: the Integer Part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will
688(continued):
689: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP be in use in 2036, so
689(continued): me
690: external means will be necessary to qualify time relative to
690(continued): 1900 and
691: time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 years).
692: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
692(continued): ious
1900 found at line 690:
688: the Integer Part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will
688(continued):
689: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP be in use in 2036, so
689(continued): me
690: external means will be necessary to qualify time relative to
690(continued): 1900 and
691: time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 years).
692: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
692(continued): ious
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1060.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2324:
2322: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport
2322(continued): (LAT) - old
2323: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private
2323(continued): use
2324: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster gr
2324(continued): oups
2325: System Communication Architec
2325(continued): ture (SCA)
2326: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test
2326(continued): protocol (Loopback)
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1060.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2324:
2322: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport
2322(continued): (LAT) - old
2323: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private
2323(continued): use
2324: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster gr
2324(continued): oups
2325: System Communication Architec
2325(continued): ture (SCA)
2326: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test
2326(continued): protocol (Loopback)
2000 found at line 2729:
2727: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25
2727(continued): [GB7]
2728: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
2728(continued): [JFW]
2729: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
2729(continued): [AXH]
2730: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
2730(continued): [VXT]
2731: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25
2731(continued): [GB7]
2000 found at line 2729:
2727: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25
2727(continued): [GB7]
2728: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
2728(continued): [JFW]
2729: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
2729(continued): [AXH]
2730: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
2730(continued): [VXT]
2731: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25
2731(continued): [GB7]
2000 found at line 3155: 3153: AEGIS MACOS TP3010 3154: APOLLO MINOS TRSDOS 3155: BS-2000 MOS ULTRIX 3156: CEDAR MPE5 UNIX 3157: CGW MSDOS UNIX-BSD
2000第3155行：3153:AEGIS MACOS TP3010 3154:APOLLO MINOS TRSDOS 3155:BS-2000 MOS ULTRIX 3156:CEDAR MPE5 UNIX 3157:CGW MSDOS UNIX-BSD
2000 found at line 3508: 3506: HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-5-E
2000位于第3508行：3506:HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-5-E
3507: HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3279-2-E 3508: HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3279-3-E 3509: HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IMLAC 3510: HP-2392 INFOTON-100
3507:HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3279-2-E 3508:HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3279-3-E 3509:HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IMLAC 3510:HP-2392 INFOTON-100
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1064.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1321:
1319: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
1320:
1321: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
1322:
1323: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from S
1323(continued): P
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1064.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1321:
1319: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
1320:
1321: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
1322:
1323: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from S
1323(continued): P
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1085.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1501:
1499:
1500: commonReference
1501: UTCTime,
1502:
1503: additionalReferenceInformation[0]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1085.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1501:
1499:
1500: commonReference
1501: UTCTime,
1502:
1503: additionalReferenceInformation[0]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1094.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 878:
876:
877: 0040000 This is a directory; "type" field should be NFDIR.
877(continued):
878: 0020000 This is a character special file; "type" field sho
878(continued): uld
879: be NFCHR.
880: 0060000 This is a block special file; "type" field should
880(continued): be
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1094.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 878:
876:
877: 0040000 This is a directory; "type" field should be NFDIR.
877(continued):
878: 0020000 This is a character special file; "type" field sho
878(continued): uld
879: be NFCHR.
880: 0060000 This is a block special file; "type" field should
880(continued): be
2000 found at line 883: 881: NFBLK. 882: 0100000 This is a regular file; "type" field should be NFR 882(continued): EG. 883: 0120000 This is a symbolic link file; "type" field should 883(continued): be 884: NFLNK. 885: 0140000 This is a named socket; "type" field should be NFN 885(continued): ON.
2000可在第883:881:NFBLK行找到。882:0100000这是一个常规文件；“类型”字段应为NFR 882（续）：例如883:0120000这是一个符号链接文件；“类型”字段应为883（续）：为884:NFLNK。885:014000这是一个命名套接字；“类型”字段应为NFN 885（续）：ON。
2000 found at line 887: 885: 0140000 This is a named socket; "type" field should be NFN 885(continued): ON. 886: 0004000 Set user id on execution.
2000在第887:885:014000行找到，这是一个命名套接字；“类型”字段应为NFN 885（续）：ON。886:0004000在执行时设置用户id。
887: 0002000 Set group id on execution. 888: 0001000 Save swapped text even after use. 889: 0000400 Read permission for owner.
887:0002000在执行时设置组id。888:0001000即使在使用后也保存交换的文本。889:0000400所有者的读取权限。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1108.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 187:
185: throughout DoD common user data networks, users of these netw
185(continued): orks
186: should submit requirements for additional Protection Authorit
186(continued): y Flags
187: to DISA DISDB, Washington, D.C. 20305-2000, for review and a
187(continued): pproval.
188: Such review and approval should be sought prior to design,
189: development or deployment of any system which would make use
189(continued): of
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1108.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 187:
185: throughout DoD common user data networks, users of these netw
185(continued): orks
186: should submit requirements for additional Protection Authorit
186(continued): y Flags
187: to DISA DISDB, Washington, D.C. 20305-2000, for review and a
187(continued): pproval.
188: Such review and approval should be sought prior to design,
189: development or deployment of any system which would make use
189(continued): of
2000 found at line 774:
772: data networks, and to maximize interoperability, each activit
772(continued): y should
773: submit its plans for the definition and use of an Additional
773(continued): Security
774: Info Format Code to DISA DISDB, Washington, D.C. 20305-2000
774(continued): for
775: review and approval. DISA DISDB will forward plans to the In
775(continued): ternet
776: Activities Board for architectural review and, if required, a
776(continued): cleared
2000 found at line 774:
772: data networks, and to maximize interoperability, each activit
772(continued): y should
773: submit its plans for the definition and use of an Additional
773(continued): Security
774: Info Format Code to DISA DISDB, Washington, D.C. 20305-2000
774(continued): for
775: review and approval. DISA DISDB will forward plans to the In
775(continued): ternet
776: Activities Board for architectural review and, if required, a
776(continued): cleared
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1114.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 922: 920: issuer Name, 921: list SEQUENCE RCLEntry, 922: lastUpdate UTCTime, 923: nextUpdate UTCTime} 924:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1114.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第922行找到的UTCTime:920:颁发者名称，921:列表序列RCLCentry，922:上次更新UTCTime，923:下一次更新UTCTime}924:
UTCTime found at line 923:
921: list SEQUENCE RCLEntry,
922: lastUpdate UTCTime,
923: nextUpdate UTCTime}
924:
925: RCLEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
UTCTime found at line 923:
921: list SEQUENCE RCLEntry,
922: lastUpdate UTCTime,
923: nextUpdate UTCTime}
924:
925: RCLEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
UTCTime found at line 927:
925: RCLEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
926: subject CertificateSerialNumber,
UTCTime found at line 927:
925: RCLEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
926: subject CertificateSerialNumber,
927: revocationDate UTCTime} 928: 929: 3.4 Certificate Definition and Usage
927:revocationDate UTCTime}928:929:3.4证书定义和用法
UTCTime found at line 1296:
1294:
1295: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1296: notBefore UTCTime,
1297: notAfter UTCTime}
1298:
UTCTime found at line 1296:
1294:
1295: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1296: notBefore UTCTime,
1297: notAfter UTCTime}
1298:
UTCTime found at line 1297:
1295: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1296: notBefore UTCTime,
1297: notAfter UTCTime}
1298:
1299: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE{
UTCTime found at line 1297:
1295: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1296: notBefore UTCTime,
1297: notAfter UTCTime}
1298:
1299: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE{
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1117.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4965:
4963: jwmanly%amherst.bitnet@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
4964: [JWN10] Norris, James W a02jwn1%niu.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.E
4964(continued): DU
4965: [JY24] Yu, Jessica jyy@MERIT.EDU
4966: [JY33] Yoshida, Jun ---none---
4967: [KA4] Auerbach, Karl auerbach@CSL.SRI.COM
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1117.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4965:
4963: jwmanly%amherst.bitnet@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
4964: [JWN10] Norris, James W a02jwn1%niu.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.E
4964(continued): DU
4965: [JY24] Yu, Jessica jyy@MERIT.EDU
4966: [JY33] Yoshida, Jun ---none---
4967: [KA4] Auerbach, Karl auerbach@CSL.SRI.COM
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1123.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2digit found at line 3239: 3237: The syntax for the date is hereby changed to: 3238: 3239: date = 1*2DIGIT month 2*4DIGIT 3240: 3241:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第3239行找到的文件rfc1123.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2digit:3237:日期的语法特此更改为：3238:3239:date=1*2digit月2*4DIGIT 3240:3241:
century found at line 3253:
3251:
3252: All mail software SHOULD use 4-digit years in dates, to
3252(continued): ease
3253: the transition to the next century.
3254:
3255: There is a strong trend towards the use of numeric time
3255(continued): zone
century found at line 3253:
3251:
3252: All mail software SHOULD use 4-digit years in dates, to
3252(continued): ease
3253: the transition to the next century.
3254:
3255: There is a strong trend towards the use of numeric time
3255(continued): zone
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1133.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 493:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1133.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第493行未找到'yyyy'的行上：
491: Telephone: 313 936-2655
492: Fax: 313 747-3745
493: EMail: jyy@merit.edu
494:
495: Hans-Werner Braun
491: Telephone: 313 936-2655
492: Fax: 313 747-3745
493: EMail: jyy@merit.edu
494:
495: Hans-Werner Braun
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1138.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1471:
1469: the full BNF easier to parse.
1470:
1471: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1472:
1473: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1473(continued): ear
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1138.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1471:
1469: the full BNF easier to parse.
1470:
1471: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1472:
1473: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1473(continued): ear
UTCTime found at line 1473:
1471: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1472:
1473: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1473(continued): ear
1474: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1474(continued): d
1475: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1475(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1473:
1471: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1472:
1473: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1473(continued): ear
1474: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1474(continued): d
1475: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1475(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1482: 1480: In practice, a gateway will need to parse various illega 1480(continued): l 1481: variants on 822.date-time. In cases where 822.date-time 1481(continued): 1482: cannot be parsed, it is recommended that the derived UTC 1482(continued): Time 1483: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1484:
UTCTime位于第1482:1480行：实际上，网关需要解析各种illega 1480（续）：l 1481:822.date-time上的变体。如果822.date-time 1481（续）：1482:无法解析，建议将派生的UTC 1482（续）：time 1483:设置为转换时的值。1484:
UTCTime found at line 1485: 1483: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1484: 1485: The UTCTime format which specifies the timezone offset should 1485(continued): be 1486: used. 1487:
第1485行：1483:处的UTCTime设置为转换时的值。1484:1485:指定时区偏移的UTCTime格式应为1485（续）：1486:使用。1487:
UTCTime found at line 4469: 4467: 4468: The extended syntax of zone defined in the JNT Mail Protocol 4468(continued): should 4469: be used in the mapping of UTCTime defined in Chapter 3.
第4469:4467:4468行的UTCTime：JNT邮件协议4468中定义的区域的扩展语法（续）：4469:应用于第3章中定义的UTCTime映射中。
4470: 4471: 6. Lack of 822-MTS originator specification
4470: 4471: 6. 缺乏822-MTS发起人规范
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1147.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 9715:
9713: cerns to security and management personnel at DDN faci
9713(continued): li-
9714: ties. It is available online, via kermit or anonymous
9714(continued): FTP,
9715: from nic.ddn.mil, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-yy-nn.TXT (where
9715(continued): "yy"
9716: is the year and "nn" is the bulletin number). The SCC
9716(continued): pro-
9717: vides immediate assistance with DDN-related host secur
9717(continued): ity
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1147.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 9715:
9713: cerns to security and management personnel at DDN faci
9713(continued): li-
9714: ties. It is available online, via kermit or anonymous
9714(continued): FTP,
9715: from nic.ddn.mil, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-yy-nn.TXT (where
9715(continued): "yy"
9716: is the year and "nn" is the bulletin number). The SCC
9716(continued): pro-
9717: vides immediate assistance with DDN-related host secur
9717(continued): ity
century found at line 1096:
1094: "NETMON." These tools were independently developed, ar
1094(continued): e
1095: functionally different, run in different environments,
1095(continued): and
1096: are no more related than Richard Burton the 19th centu
1096(continued): ry
1097: explorer and Richard Burton the 20th century actor. B
1097(continued): YU's
1098: tool "NETMON" is listed as "NETMON (I)," MITRE's as "N
1098(continued): ETMON
century found at line 1096:
1094: "NETMON." These tools were independently developed, ar
1094(continued): e
1095: functionally different, run in different environments,
1095(continued): and
1096: are no more related than Richard Burton the 19th centu
1096(continued): ry
1097: explorer and Richard Burton the 20th century actor. B
1097(continued): YU's
1098: tool "NETMON" is listed as "NETMON (I)," MITRE's as "N
1098(continued): ETMON
century found at line 1097:
1095: functionally different, run in different environments,
1095(continued): and
1096: are no more related than Richard Burton the 19th centu
1096(continued): ry
1097: explorer and Richard Burton the 20th century actor. B
1097(continued): YU's
1098: tool "NETMON" is listed as "NETMON (I)," MITRE's as "N
1098(continued): ETMON
1099: (II)," and the tool from SNMP Research as "NETMON (III
1099(continued): )."
century found at line 1097:
1095: functionally different, run in different environments,
1095(continued): and
1096: are no more related than Richard Burton the 19th centu
1096(continued): ry
1097: explorer and Richard Burton the 20th century actor. B
1097(continued): YU's
1098: tool "NETMON" is listed as "NETMON (I)," MITRE's as "N
1098(continued): ETMON
1099: (II)," and the tool from SNMP Research as "NETMON (III
1099(continued): )."
2000 found at line 4134:
4132: libraries), but this has not been done. Curses i
4132(continued): s very
4133: slow and cpu intensive on VMS, but the tool has b
4133(continued): een
2000 found at line 4134:
4132: libraries), but this has not been done. Curses i
4132(continued): s very
4133: slow and cpu intensive on VMS, but the tool has b
4133(continued): een
4134: run in a window on a VAXstation 2000. Just don't 4134(continued): try 4135: to run it on a terminal connected to a 11/750. 4136:
4134:在VAXstation 2000的窗口中运行。只是不要4134（续）：尝试4135：在连接到11/750的终端上运行它。4136:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1148.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1475:
1473: the full BNF easier to parse.
1474:
1475: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1476:
1477: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1477(continued): ear
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1148.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1475:
1473: the full BNF easier to parse.
1474:
1475: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1476:
1477: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1477(continued): ear
UTCTime found at line 1477:
1475: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1476:
1477: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1477(continued): ear
1478: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1478(continued): d
1479: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1479(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1477:
1475: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1476:
1477: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1477(continued): ear
1478: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1478(continued): d
1479: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1479(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1486: 1484: In practice, a gateway will need to parse various illega 1484(continued): l 1485: variants on 822.date-time. In cases where 822.date-time 1485(continued): 1486: cannot be parsed, it is recommended that the derived UTC 1486(continued): Time 1487: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1488:
UTCTime位于第1486:1484行：实际上，网关需要解析各种illega 1484（续）：l 1485:822.date-time上的变体。如果822.date-time 1485（续）：1486:无法解析，建议将派生的UTC 1486（续）：time 1487:设置为转换时的值。1488:
UTCTime found at line 1489: 1487: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1488: 1489: The UTCTime format which specifies the timezone offset should 1489(continued): be 1490: used. 1491:
第1489行：1487:处的UTCTime设置为转换时的值。1488:1489:指定时区偏移的UTCTime格式应为1489（续）：1490:使用。1491:
UTCTime found at line 4566: 4564: 4565: The extended syntax of zone defined in the JNT Mail Protocol 4565(continued): should 4566: be used in the mapping of UTCTime defined in Chapter 3. 4567: 4568: 6. Lack of 822-MTS originator specification
UTCTime位于第4566:4564:4565行：JNT邮件协议4565（续）中定义的区域的扩展语法：应在第3章中定义的UTCTime映射中使用4566:。4567: 4568: 6. 缺乏822-MTS发起人规范
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1152.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 937: 935: Reservation Multiple-Access). 936: 937: Finally, Yechiam Yemeni (YY, Columbia University) discussed h 937(continued): is work 938: on a protocol silicon compiler. In order to exploit the pote 938(continued): ntial 939: parallelism, he is planning to use one processor per connecti 939(continued): on.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1152.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第937行中找不到'yyyy'：935：保留多址访问）。936:937：最后，Yechiam Yemeni（YY，哥伦比亚大学）讨论了h 937（续）：是工作938：关于协议硅编译器。为了开发pote 938（续）：NTAL 939：并行，他计划在每个connecti 939（续）：on上使用一个处理器。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1153.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 119:
117:
118:
119: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
120: From: listname-REQUEST@fqhn
121: Reply-To: listname@fqhn
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1153.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 119:
117:
118:
119: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
120: From: listname-REQUEST@fqhn
121: Reply-To: listname@fqhn
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 122: 120: From: listname-REQUEST@fqhn 121: Reply-To: listname@fqhn 122: Subject: listname Digest Vyy #nn 123: To: listname@fqhn 124:
在第122行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：120:From:listname-REQUEST@fqhn121：答复：listname@fqhn122:主题：列表名称摘要Vyy#nn 123:收件人：listname@fqhn 124:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 125: 123: To: listname@fqhn 124: 125: listname Digest ddd, dd mmm yy Volume yy : Iss 125(continued): ue nn 126: 127: Today's Topics:
第125行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：123:To:listname@fqhn124:125:listname摘要ddd，dd-mmm-yy卷yy:Iss 125（续）：ue nn 126:127：今天的主题：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 137:
135: ----------------------------------------------------------------
135(continued): ------
136:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 137:
135: ----------------------------------------------------------------
135(continued): ------
136:
137: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
138: From: Joe User <username@fqhn>
139: Subject: Message One Subject
137: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
138: From: Joe User <username@fqhn>
139: Subject: Message One Subject
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 147:
145: ------------------------------
146:
147: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
148: From: Jane User <username@fqhn>
149: Subject: Message Two Subject
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 147:
145: ------------------------------
146:
147: Date: ddd, dd mmm yy hh:mm:ss zzz
148: From: Jane User <username@fqhn>
149: Subject: Message Two Subject
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 157:
155: ------------------------------
156:
157: End of listname Digest Vyy Issue #nn
158: ************************************
159:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 157:
155: ------------------------------
156:
157: End of listname Digest Vyy Issue #nn
158: ************************************
159:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1161.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 322:
320: on the protocol-ID
321:
322: 03019000
323:
324: 5. Acknowledgements
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1161.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 322:
320: on the protocol-ID
321:
322: 03019000
323:
324: 5. Acknowledgements
2000 found at line 210:
208: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
209:
210: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
211:
212: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
212(continued): istening
2000 found at line 210:
208: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
209:
210: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
211:
212: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
212(continued): istening
2000 found at line 291:
289: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
290:
291: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
292:
293: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
293(continued): istening
2000 found at line 291:
289: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
290:
291: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
292:
293: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
293(continued): istening
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1164.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1267:
1265: Phone: (313) 936-3000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1164.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1267:
1265: Phone: (313) 936-3000
1266: 1267: Email: JYY@MERIT.EDU 1268: 1269:
1266:1267:电子邮件：JYY@MERIT.EDU 1268: 1269:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1166.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 8270:
8268: [JWN10] Norris, James W.
8269: a02jwn1%niu.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
8270: [JY24] Yu, Jessica jyy@MERIT.EDU
8271: [JY33] Yoshida, Jun ---none---
8272: [JY35] Young, Jeff ---none---
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1166.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 8270:
8268: [JWN10] Norris, James W.
8269: a02jwn1%niu.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
8270: [JY24] Yu, Jessica jyy@MERIT.EDU
8271: [JY33] Yoshida, Jun ---none---
8272: [JY35] Young, Jeff ---none---
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1167.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 89: 87: are also likely play a role along with Switched Multi-megabit 87(continued): Data 88: Service (SMDS) provided by telecommunications carriers. It a 88(continued): lso 89: would be fair to ask what role FTS-2000 might play in the sys 89(continued): tem, at 90: least in support of government access to the NREN, and possib 90(continued): ly in 91: support of national agency network facilities.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1167.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第89行：87:中找到，它们也可能与交换的兆比特87（续）：数据88：电信运营商提供的服务（SMD）一起发挥作用。88（续）：lso 89：公平地问FTS-2000在系统89（续）：tem中可能扮演什么角色，至少90：支持政府访问NREN，以及91中的possib 90（续）：ly：支持国家机构网络设施。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1173.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 72:
70: only choice; I don't see any prospect of either the governmen
70(continued): t or
71: private enterprise building a monolithic, centralized, ubiqui
71(continued): tous "Ma
72: Datagram" network provider in this century.
73:
74: 2. Responsibilities of Network Managers
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1173.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 72:
70: only choice; I don't see any prospect of either the governmen
70(continued): t or
71: private enterprise building a monolithic, centralized, ubiqui
71(continued): tous "Ma
72: Datagram" network provider in this century.
73:
74: 2. Responsibilities of Network Managers
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1176.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1435:
1433: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
1434:
1435: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
1436:
1437: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from S
1437(continued): P
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1176.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1435:
1433: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
1434:
1435: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
1436:
1437: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from S
1437(continued): P
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1185.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 208:
206: 1.1MBps, no matter how high the theoretical transfer rate
206(continued): of the
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1185.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 208:
206: 1.1MBps, no matter how high the theoretical transfer rate
206(continued): of the
207: path. This corresponds to cycling the sequence number spa
207(continued): ce in
208: Twrap= 2000 secs, which is safe in today's Internet.
209:
210: Based on this reasoning, an earlier RFC [McKenzie89] has c
210(continued): autioned
207: path. This corresponds to cycling the sequence number spa
207(continued): ce in
208: Twrap= 2000 secs, which is safe in today's Internet.
209:
210: Based on this reasoning, an earlier RFC [McKenzie89] has c
210(continued): autioned
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1190.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 7630: 7628: link failure 7629: 7630: 2000 DefaultRecoveryTimeout Interval between successive 7630(continued): 7631: HELLOs to/from active neigh 7631(continued): bors 7632:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第7630行找到的文件rfc1190.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:link failure 7629:7630:2000 DefaultRecoveryTimeout连续7630之间的间隔（续）：7631:HELLOs to/from active neigh 7631（续）：bors 7632:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1191.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 925:
923: 65535 Hyperchannel RFC 1044
924: 65535
925: 32000 Just in case
926: 17914 16Mb IBM Token Ring ref. [6]
927: 17914
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1191.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 925:
923: 65535 Hyperchannel RFC 1044
924: 65535
925: 32000 Just in case
926: 17914 16Mb IBM Token Ring ref. [6]
927: 17914
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1203.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2102:
2100: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
2101:
2102: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
2103:
2104: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from SP
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1203.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2102:
2100: "NO" SP text_line / "BAD" SP text_line)
2101:
2102: date ::= string in form "dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss-zzz"
2103:
2104: envelope ::= "(" env_date SP env_subject SP env_from SP
2000 found at line 2614:
2612: question. For example:
2613:
2614: tag42 FETCH 197 BODY 2000:3999
2615:
2616: would fetch the second two thousand bytes of the body of
2616(continued): message
2000 found at line 2614:
2612: question. For example:
2613:
2614: tag42 FETCH 197 BODY 2000:3999
2615:
2616: would fetch the second two thousand bytes of the body of
2616(continued): message
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1207.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 136: 134: directory. Information includes packet counts by NSS and 134(continued): byte 135: counts for type of use (ftp, smtp, telnet, etc.). Filenam 135(continued): es are 136: of the form 'NSFyy-mm.type'.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1207.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第136:134行：目录中未找到'yyyy'。信息包括NSS的数据包计数和134（续）：字节135：使用类型（ftp、smtp、telnet等）的计数。文件编号135（续）：编号136：形式为“NSFyy mm.type”。
137: 138: Files are available for anonymous ftp; use 'guest' as the
137:138：文件可用于匿名ftp；使用“guest”作为
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1210.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1548:
1546: Franci Bigi (1)
1547: CEC
1548: Rue de la Loi 2000
1549: B-1049
1550: Brussels
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1210.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1548:
1546: Franci Bigi (1)
1547: CEC
1548: Rue de la Loi 2000
1549: B-1049
1550: Brussels
2000 found at line 1756: 1754: Rolf Speth (1) 1755: CEC 1756: Rue de la Loi 2000 1757: B-1049 1758: Brussels
2000发现于1756:1754:Rolf Speth（1）1755:CEC 1756:Rue de la Loi 2000 1757:B-1049 1758:布鲁塞尔
2000 found at line 1773: 1771: Jose Torcato (1), (2) 1772: CEC, TR 61 0/10 1773: Rue de la Loi 2000 1774: B-1049 1775: Brussels
2000发现于第1773行：1771:Jose Torcato（1）、（2）1772:CEC，TR 61 0/10 1773:Rue de la Loi 2000 1774:B-1049 1775:布鲁塞尔
2000 found at line 1801: 1799: Karel De Vriendt (1) 1800: CEC 1801: Rue de la Loi 2000 1802: B-1049 1803: Brussels
2000发现于第1801行：1799:Karel De Vriendt（1）1800:CEC 1801:Rue De la Loi 2000 1802:B-1049 1803:布鲁塞尔
2000 found at line 1837: 1835: Rosalie Zobel (1) (2) 1836: CEC 1837: Rue de la Loi 2000 1838: B-1049 1839: Brussels
2000发现于第1837行：1835:Rosalie Zobel（1）（2）1836:CEC 1837:Rue de la Loi 2000 1838:B-1049 1839:布鲁塞尔
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1211.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 1591:
1589:
1590: westine 49% mconnect OSI3.NCSL.NIST.GOV
1591: connecting to host OSI3.NCSL.NIST.GOV (0x6c300681), port 0x19
1591(continued): 00
1592: connection open
1593: 220 osi3.ncsl.nist.gov sendmail 4.0/NIST(rbj/dougm) ready at
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1211.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 1591:
1589:
1590: westine 49% mconnect OSI3.NCSL.NIST.GOV
1591: connecting to host OSI3.NCSL.NIST.GOV (0x6c300681), port 0x19
1591(continued): 00
1592: connection open
1593: 220 osi3.ncsl.nist.gov sendmail 4.0/NIST(rbj/dougm) ready at
2000 found at line 2363: 2361: Office Automation Division 2362: Code H610 2363: Washington, DC 20305-2000 2364: 2365: Hostname: DCA-EMS.DCA.MIL
2000位于第2363:2361行：办公自动化部2362：代码H610 2363：华盛顿特区20305-2000 2364:2365：主机名：DCA-EMS.DCA.MIL
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1218.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1249:
1247: Rapport Communication, Inc.
1248: 3055 Q Street NW
1249: Washington, DC 20007
1250:
1251: Tel: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1218.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1249:
1247: Rapport Communication, Inc.
1248: 3055 Q Street NW
1249: Washington, DC 20007
1250:
1251: Tel: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1224.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 983: 981: and placed in an ethernet packet). 120 request packets ar 981(continued): e sent 982: each cycle (3 for each of 40 nodes), and 120 response pack 982(continued): ets are 983: expected. 72000 bytes (240 packets at 300 bytes each) mus 983(continued): t be 984: transferred during each poll cycle, merely to determine th 984(continued): at the 985: network is fine.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1224.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000位于第983:981:行，并放置在以太网数据包中）。120个请求包ar 981（续）：e发送982：每个周期（40个节点中的每个节点3个），120个响应包982（续）：预期ets为983。72000字节（240个数据包，每个300字节）mus 983（续）：在每个轮询周期内不会传输984:数据，仅用于确定985:网络上的th 984（续）：正常。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1244.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2481:
2479: and concerns to security and management personnel at
2479(continued): DDN
2480: facilities. It is available online, via kermit or a
2480(continued): nonymous
2481: FTP, from the host NIC.DDN.MIL, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-
2481(continued): yy-
2482: nn.TXT (where "yy" is the year and "nn" is the bulle
2482(continued): tin
2483: number). The SCC provides immediate assistance with
2483(continued): DDN-
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1244.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2481:
2479: and concerns to security and management personnel at
2479(continued): DDN
2480: facilities. It is available online, via kermit or a
2480(continued): nonymous
2481: FTP, from the host NIC.DDN.MIL, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-
2481(continued): yy-
2482: nn.TXT (where "yy" is the year and "nn" is the bulle
2482(continued): tin
2483: number). The SCC provides immediate assistance with
2483(continued): DDN-
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2482:
2480: facilities. It is available online, via kermit or a
2480(continued): nonymous
2481: FTP, from the host NIC.DDN.MIL, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-
2481(continued): yy-
2482: nn.TXT (where "yy" is the year and "nn" is the bulle
2482(continued): tin
2483: number). The SCC provides immediate assistance with
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2482:
2480: facilities. It is available online, via kermit or a
2480(continued): nonymous
2481: FTP, from the host NIC.DDN.MIL, in SCC:DDN-SECURITY-
2481(continued): yy-
2482: nn.TXT (where "yy" is the year and "nn" is the bulle
2482(continued): tin
2483: number). The SCC provides immediate assistance with
2483(continued): DDN-
2484: related host security problems; call (800) 235-3155
2484(continued): (6:00
2483(continued): DDN-
2484: related host security problems; call (800) 235-3155
2484(continued): (6:00
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1251.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 316: 314: where growing above 100 network numbers seemed excess 314(continued): ive. 315: Todays number of networks in the global infrastructur 315(continued): e 316: exceeds 2000 connected networks, and many more if iso 316(continued): lated 317: network islands get included. 318:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1251.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000位于第316行：314：超过100的网络数量似乎超过314（续）：ive。315：当今全球基础设施中的网络数量315（续）：e 316：超过2000个连接的网络，如果包括iso 316（续）：317：网络孤岛，则更多。318:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1254.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 592:
590: number of packet arrivals, over which packets are dropped wit
590(continued): h
591: uniform probability. For instance, in a sample implementatio
591(continued): n, if
592: this interval spanned 2000 packet arrivals, and a suitable
593: probability of drop was 0.001, then two random variables woul
593(continued): d be
594: drawn in a uniform distribution in the range of 1 to 2,000.
594(continued): The
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1254.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 592:
590: number of packet arrivals, over which packets are dropped wit
590(continued): h
591: uniform probability. For instance, in a sample implementatio
591(continued): n, if
592: this interval spanned 2000 packet arrivals, and a suitable
593: probability of drop was 0.001, then two random variables woul
593(continued): d be
594: drawn in a uniform distribution in the range of 1 to 2,000.
594(continued): The
2000 found at line 859: 857: indicates that to get good, consistent performance, we may ne 857(continued): ed to 858: have up to 5 to 10 times the number of active source-destinat 858(continued): ion 859: pairs. In a typical gateway, this may require around 1000 to 859(continued): 2000 860: queues. 861:
在第859行找到的2000:857:表示为了获得良好、一致的性能，我们可以将NE857（续）：ed设置为858:具有多达5到10倍的活动源目标858（续）：ion 859:对。在典型的网关中，这可能需要大约1000到859（续）：2000 860：队列。861:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1255.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1361:
1359: Rapport Communication, Inc.
1360: 3055 Q Street NW
1361: Washington, DC 20007
1362:
1363: Tel: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1255.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1361:
1359: Rapport Communication, Inc.
1360: 3055 Q Street NW
1361: Washington, DC 20007
1362:
1363: Tel: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1259.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 345:
343: should never go back to any monopoly arrangement like the pre
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1259.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 345:
343: should never go back to any monopoly arrangement like the pre
343(continued): - 344: divestiture AT&T which held back market-driven innovation in 345: telecommunications for half a century. Given the interconnec 345(continued): tion 346: technology now available, we should never again have to accep 346(continued): t the 347: argument that we have to sacrifice interoperability for effic 347(continued): iency,
343（续）：-344：剥离AT&T，这在345年阻碍了市场驱动的创新：电信业半个世纪。考虑到Interconnect 345（续）：第346条：现有技术，我们再也不必接受346条（续）：第347条：我们必须牺牲互操作性以换取效率的论点（续）：效率，
century found at line 594:
592:
593: In light of the possibilities for new service offerings by
593(continued): the
594: 21st century, as well as the growing importance of
595: telecommunications and information services to US economic
595(continued): and
596: social development, limiting our concept of universal serv
596(continued): ice to
century found at line 594:
592:
593: In light of the possibilities for new service offerings by
593(continued): the
594: 21st century, as well as the growing importance of
595: telecommunications and information services to US economic
595(continued): and
596: social development, limiting our concept of universal serv
596(continued): ice to
century found at line 744: 742: If we have the vision and commitment to try this, the transfo 742(continued): rmation 743: of the network frontier from wilderness to civilization need 743(continued): not 744: display the brutality of 19th century imperialism. As commer 744(continued): cial 745: opportunities to offer applications and services develop, 746: entrepreneurs will discover that ease of use sells. The norma 746(continued): l,
第744行发现的世纪：742：如果我们有远见和决心尝试这一点，那么从荒野到文明的网络边界的转换742（续）：信息743：需要743（续）：而不是744：展示19世纪帝国主义的残暴。正如commer 744（续）：第745页：提供应用程序和服务的机会不断发展，第746页：企业家们将发现易用性是有价值的。诺玛746（续）：l，
2000 found at line 1115: 1113: California v. FCC (9th Cir. 1990). 1114: 1115: 18. NTIA Telecomm 2000 at 79. 1116: 1117: 19. Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on
2000发现于第1115:1113行：加利福尼亚v。联邦通信委员会（1990年第九巡回法庭）。1114: 1115: 18. NTIA电信2000年第79页。1116: 1117: 19. 能源和商业委员会
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1270.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 594:
592: Hopkinton, Mass. 01748
593:
594: Phone: (508) 435-2000
595:
596: Email: kasten@europa.clearpoint.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1270.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 594:
592: Hopkinton, Mass. 01748
593:
594: Phone: (508) 435-2000
595:
596: Email: kasten@europa.clearpoint.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1274.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1051:
1049: lastModifiedTime ATTRIBUTE
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1274.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1051:
1049: lastModifiedTime ATTRIBUTE
1050: WITH ATTRIBUTE-SYNTAX
1051: uTCTimeSyntax
1052: ::= {pilotAttributeType 23}
1053:
1050: WITH ATTRIBUTE-SYNTAX
1051: uTCTimeSyntax
1052: ::= {pilotAttributeType 23}
1053:
UTCTime found at line 2990:
2988: lastModifiedTime ATTRIBUTE
2989: WITH ATTRIBUTE-SYNTAX
2990: uTCTimeSyntax
2991: ::= {pilotAttributeType 23}
2992:
UTCTime found at line 2990:
2988: lastModifiedTime ATTRIBUTE
2989: WITH ATTRIBUTE-SYNTAX
2990: uTCTimeSyntax
2991: ::= {pilotAttributeType 23}
2992:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1276.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 558:
556: }
557:
558: EDBVersion ::= UTCTime
558(continued): 40
559:
560: ___________________Figure_2:__Replication_Protocol______________
560(continued): _______
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1276.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 558:
556: }
557:
558: EDBVersion ::= UTCTime
558(continued): 40
559:
560: ___________________Figure_2:__Replication_Protocol______________
560(continued): _______
UTCTime found at line 938:
936: }
937:
938: EDBVersion ::= UTCTime
939: END
940:
UTCTime found at line 938:
936: }
937:
938: EDBVersion ::= UTCTime
939: END
940:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1283.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 317: 315: on the protocol-ID 316: 317: 03019000 318: 319: This is an X.25 protocol-ID assigned for local purposes.
+=+=+=+=+=+=在协议ID 316:317:03019000 318:319的第317:315行找到文件rfc1283.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900:这是为本地目的分配的X.25协议ID。
2000 found at line 206:
204: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
205:
206: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
207:
208: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
208(continued): istening
2000 found at line 206:
204: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g.,
205:
206: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00
207:
208: Similarly, SNMP traps are, by convention, sent to a manager l
208(continued): istening
2000 found at line 278: 276: (1) <nsap> is a hex string defining the nsap, e.g., 277:
第278:276：（1）行中的2000是定义nsap的十六进制字符串，例如277:
278: "snmp"/NS+4900590800200038bafe00 279: 280:
278:“snmp”/NS+4900590800038BAFE00 279:280:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1284.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1146: 1144: Hopkinton Mass 01748 1145: 1146: Phone: 508-435-2000 1147: EMail: kasten@europa.clearpoint.com 1148:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1284.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第1146:1144行找到：霍普金顿马萨诸塞州01748 1145:1146:电话：508-435-2000 1147:电子邮件：kasten@europa.clearpoint.com 1148:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1285.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 219:
217: -- The unique identifier for the FDDI station. This i
217(continued): s a
218: -- string of 8 octets, represented as
219: -- X' yy yy xx xx xx xx
219(continued): xx xx'
220: -- with the low order 6 octet (xx) from a unique IEEE
221: -- assigned address. The high order two bits of the I
221(continued): EEE
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1285.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 219:
217: -- The unique identifier for the FDDI station. This i
217(continued): s a
218: -- string of 8 octets, represented as
219: -- X' yy yy xx xx xx xx
219(continued): xx xx'
220: -- with the low order 6 octet (xx) from a unique IEEE
221: -- assigned address. The high order two bits of the I
221(continued): EEE
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 232:
230:
231: -- (Universal/Local) bit should both be zero. The fir
231(continued): st two
232: -- octets, the yy octets, are implementor-defined.
233: --
234: -- The representation of the address portion of the st
234(continued): ation id
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 232:
230:
231: -- (Universal/Local) bit should both be zero. The fir
231(continued): st two
232: -- octets, the yy octets, are implementor-defined.
233: --
234: -- The representation of the address portion of the st
234(continued): ation id
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1290.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 549: 547: Anonymous FTP to nis.nsf.net 548: cd stats 549: get nsfyy-mm.ptraffic where yy is year, 91 and mm is mont 549(continued): h, 06 550: get nsf91-06.ptraffic ptraffic is the packet traffic 551:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第549行未找到'yyyy'的行上：547：匿名FTP到nis.nsf.net 548:cd stats 549:get nsfyy-mm.ptraffic，其中yy是年，91，mm是月549（续）：h，06550:get nsf91-06.ptraffic是数据包流量551:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 552: 550: get nsf91-06.ptraffic ptraffic is the packet traffic 551: 552: get nsfyy-mm.btraffic where yy is year, 91 and mm is mont 552(continued): h, 06 553: get nsf91-06.btraffic btraffic is the byte traffic 554:
第552行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：550:get nsf91-06.ptraffic ptraffic是数据包流量551:552:get nsfyy-mm.btraffic，其中yy是年，91，mm是月552（续）：h，06 553:get nsf91-06.btraffic btraffic是字节流量554:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1292.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 3648:
3646:
3647:
3648: When comparing attributes of UTCtime syntax, if the secon
3648(continued): ds field
3649: is omitted, QUIPU does not perform the match correctly (i
3649(continued): .e., the
3650: seconds field in the attribute values should be ignored,
3650(continued): but are
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1292.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 3648:
3646:
3647:
3648: When comparing attributes of UTCtime syntax, if the secon
3648(continued): ds field
3649: is omitted, QUIPU does not perform the match correctly (i
3649(continued): .e., the
3650: seconds field in the attribute values should be ignored,
3650(continued): but are
2000 found at line 4158: 4156: 4157: UCOM.X 500 runs on: Sun 3, Sun 4, IBM RS 6000, Philips P 9000 4157(continued): , DEC 4158: machines, Bull DPX 2000, HP 9000/300, Siemens IN 6000 and 386 4158(continued): -based 4159: PCs. It can easily be ported to any UNIX machine. 4160:
2000位于第4158:4156:4157:UCOM.X 500行，运行于：Sun 3、Sun 4、IBM RS 6000、飞利浦P 9000 4157（续）、DEC 4158:machines、Bull DPX 2000、HP 9000/300、Siemens IN 6000和386 4158（续）：基于4159:PC的计算机上。它可以轻松地移植到任何UNIX计算机上。4160:
2000 found at line 4803:
4801: HARDWARE PLATFORMS
4802:
4803: 3Com's OSI/TCP CS/2000 and CS/2100.
4804:
4805: SOFTWARE PLATFORMS
2000 found at line 4803:
4801: HARDWARE PLATFORMS
4802:
4803: 3Com's OSI/TCP CS/2000 and CS/2100.
4804:
4805: SOFTWARE PLATFORMS
2000 found at line 4807: 4805: SOFTWARE PLATFORMS 4806: 4807: The "SW/2000-OT Vers 1.0" software runs on 3Com's OSI/TCP CS/ 4807(continued): 2000 and 4808: CS/2100, both stand-alone systems. 4809:
2000位于第4807:4805行：软件平台4806:4807：“SW/2000-OT Vers 1.0”软件运行在3Com的OSI/TCP CS/4807（续）：2000和4808:CS/2100上，这两个系统都是独立系统。4809:
2000 found at line 4812: 4810: AVAILABILITY 4811: 4812: The dual-stack OSI/TCP terminal server and its "SW/2000-OT Ve 4812(continued): rs 1.0" 4813: software is available from: 4814:
2000第4812行：4810：可用性4811:4812：双栈OSI/TCP终端服务器及其“SW/2000-OT Ve 4812（续）：rs 1.0”4813：软件可从以下地址获得：4814：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1295.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 98:
96: Rapport Communication
97: 3055 Q Street NW
98: Washington, DC 20007
99:
100: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1295.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 98:
96: Rapport Communication
97: 3055 Q Street NW
98: Washington, DC 20007
99:
100: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1303.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 189:
187: TYPE NOTATION ::=
188: "LAST-UPDATED"
189: value(update UTCTime)
190: "PRODUCT-RELEASE"
191: value(release DisplayString
191(continued): )
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1303.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 189:
187: TYPE NOTATION ::=
188: "LAST-UPDATED"
189: value(update UTCTime)
190: "PRODUCT-RELEASE"
191: value(release DisplayString
191(continued): )
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1305.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 428:
426: mechanisms to synchronize time in principle to precisions in the
426(continued): order
427: of nanoseconds while preserving a non-ambiguous date well into t
427(continued): he next
428: century. The protocol includes provisions to specify the charact
428(continued): eristics
429: and estimate the error of the local clock and the time server to
429(continued): which
430: it may be synchronized. It also includes provisions for operatio
430(continued): n with a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1305.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 428:
426: mechanisms to synchronize time in principle to precisions in the
426(continued): order
427: of nanoseconds while preserving a non-ambiguous date well into t
427(continued): he next
428: century. The protocol includes provisions to specify the charact
428(continued): eristics
429: and estimate the error of the local clock and the time server to
429(continued): which
430: it may be synchronized. It also includes provisions for operatio
430(continued): n with a
century found at line 4529:
4527: political and ritual needs characteristic of the societies in wh
4527(continued): ich they
4528: flourished. Astronomical observations to establish the winter an
4528(continued): d summer
4529: solstices were in use three to four millennia ago. By the 14th c
4529(continued): entury
4530: BC the Shang Chinese had established the solar year as 365.25 da
4530(continued): ys and
4531: the lunar month as 29.5 days. The lunisolar calendar, in which t
4531(continued): he
century found at line 4529:
4527: political and ritual needs characteristic of the societies in wh
4527(continued): ich they
4528: flourished. Astronomical observations to establish the winter an
4528(continued): d summer
4529: solstices were in use three to four millennia ago. By the 14th c
4529(continued): entury
4530: BC the Shang Chinese had established the solar year as 365.25 da
4530(continued): ys and
4531: the lunar month as 29.5 days. The lunisolar calendar, in which t
4531(continued): he
century found at line 4548:
4546: with the Shang Chinese, the ancient Egyptians had thus establish
4546(continued): ed the
4547: solar year at 365.25 days, or within about 11 minutes of the pre
4547(continued): sent
4548: measured value. In 432 BC, about a century after the Chinese had
century found at line 4548:
4546: with the Shang Chinese, the ancient Egyptians had thus establish
4546(continued): ed the
4547: solar year at 365.25 days, or within about 11 minutes of the pre
4547(continued): sent
4548: measured value. In 432 BC, about a century after the Chinese had
4548(continued): done
4549: so, the Greek astronomer Meton calculated there were 110 lunar m
4549(continued): onths of
4550: 29 days and 125 lunar months of 30 days for a total of 235 lunar
4550(continued): months
4548(continued): done
4549: so, the Greek astronomer Meton calculated there were 110 lunar m
4549(continued): onths of
4550: 29 days and 125 lunar months of 30 days for a total of 235 lunar
4550(continued): months
century found at line 4565:
4563: not complete until 8 AD.
4564:
4565: The seven-day Sumerian week was introduced only in the fourth ce
4565(continued): ntury AD
4566: by Emperor Constantine I. During the Roman era a 15-year census
4566(continued): cycle,
4567: called the Indiction cycle, was instituted for taxation purposes
4567(continued): . The
century found at line 4565:
4563: not complete until 8 AD.
4564:
4565: The seven-day Sumerian week was introduced only in the fourth ce
4565(continued): ntury AD
4566: by Emperor Constantine I. During the Roman era a 15-year census
4566(continued): cycle,
4567: called the Indiction cycle, was instituted for taxation purposes
4567(continued): . The
century found at line 4588:
4586: but 14 of these were removed in the Gregorian calendar. While th
4586(continued): e
4587: Gregorian calendar is in use throughout most of the world today,
4587(continued): some
4588: countries did not adopt it until early in the twentieth century.
4588(continued):
4589: While it remains a fascinating field for time historians, the ab
4589(continued): ove
4590: narrative provides conclusive evidence that conjugating calendar
4590(continued): dates
century found at line 4588:
4586: but 14 of these were removed in the Gregorian calendar. While th
4586(continued): e
4587: Gregorian calendar is in use throughout most of the world today,
4587(continued): some
4588: countries did not adopt it until early in the twentieth century.
4588(continued):
4589: While it remains a fascinating field for time historians, the ab
4589(continued): ove
4590: narrative provides conclusive evidence that conjugating calendar
4590(continued): dates
century found at line 4620:
4618: sometimes used to represent dates near our own era in convention
4618(continued): al time
4619: and with fewer digits, is defined as MJD = JD <196> 2,400,000.5.
4619(continued):
4620: Following the convention that our century began at 0h on 1 Janua
4620(continued): ry 1900,
4621: at which time the tropical year was already 12h old, that eclect
4621(continued): ic
4622: instant corresponds to MJD 15,020.0. Thus, the Julian timescale
4622(continued): ticks in
century found at line 4620:
4618: sometimes used to represent dates near our own era in convention
4618(continued): al time
4619: and with fewer digits, is defined as MJD = JD <196> 2,400,000.5.
4619(continued):
4620: Following the convention that our century began at 0h on 1 Janua
4620(continued): ry 1900,
4621: at which time the tropical year was already 12h old, that eclect
4621(continued): ic
4622: instant corresponds to MJD 15,020.0. Thus, the Julian timescale
4622(continued): ticks in
century found at line 4640:
4638: through observations of the Sun, Moon and planets. In 1958 the s
4638(continued): tandard
4639: second was defined as 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical year tha
4639(continued): t began
4640: this century. On this scale the tropical year is 365.2421987 day
4640(continued): s and
4641: the lunar month - one complete revolution of the Moon around the
century found at line 4640:
4638: through observations of the Sun, Moon and planets. In 1958 the s
4638(continued): tandard
4639: second was defined as 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical year tha
4639(continued): t began
4640: this century. On this scale the tropical year is 365.2421987 day
4640(continued): s and
4641: the lunar month - one complete revolution of the Moon around the
4641(continued): Earth -
4642: is 29.53059 days; however, the actual tropical year can be deter
4642(continued): mined
4641(continued): Earth -
4642: is 29.53059 days; however, the actual tropical year can be deter
4642(continued): mined
1900 found at line 851:
849: product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has been
850: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsigned
850(continued): fixed-
851: point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 1900. The i
851(continued): nteger
852: part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the last 3
852(continued): 2 bits.
853: This format allows convenient multiple-precision arithmetic and
1900 found at line 851:
849: product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has been
850: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsigned
850(continued): fixed-
851: point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 1900. The i
851(continued): nteger
852: part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the last 3
852(continued): 2 bits.
853: This format allows convenient multiple-precision arithmetic and
1900 found at line 873:
871: integer part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will overfl
871(continued): ow some
872: time in 2036. Should NTP be in use in 2036, some external means
872(continued): will be
873: necessary to qualify time relative to 1900 and time relative to
873(continued): 2036
874: (and other multiples of 136 years). Timestamped data requiring s
874(continued): uch
875: qualification will be so precious that appropriate means should
875(continued): be
1900 found at line 873:
871: integer part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will overfl
871(continued): ow some
872: time in 2036. Should NTP be in use in 2036, some external means
872(continued): will be
873: necessary to qualify time relative to 1900 and time relative to
873(continued): 2036
874: (and other multiples of 136 years). Timestamped data requiring s
874(continued): uch
875: qualification will be so precious that appropriate means should
875(continued): be
1900 found at line 4620:
4618: sometimes used to represent dates near our own era in convention
4618(continued): al time
4619: and with fewer digits, is defined as MJD = JD <196> 2,400,000.5.
4619(continued):
4620: Following the convention that our century began at 0h on 1 Janua
4620(continued): ry 1900,
4621: at which time the tropical year was already 12h old, that eclect
4621(continued): ic
4622: instant corresponds to MJD 15,020.0. Thus, the Julian timescale
4622(continued): ticks in
1900 found at line 4620:
4618: sometimes used to represent dates near our own era in convention
4618(continued): al time
4619: and with fewer digits, is defined as MJD = JD <196> 2,400,000.5.
4619(continued):
4620: Following the convention that our century began at 0h on 1 Janua
4620(continued): ry 1900,
4621: at which time the tropical year was already 12h old, that eclect
4621(continued): ic
4622: instant corresponds to MJD 15,020.0. Thus, the Julian timescale
4622(continued): ticks in
1900 found at line 4724:
4722: always coincident with it. At 0h on 1 January 1972 (MJD 41,317.0
4722(continued): ), the
4723: first tick of the UTC Era, the NTP clock was set to 2,272,060,80
4723(continued): 0,
4724: representing the number of standard seconds since 0h on 1 Januar
4724(continued): y 1900
1900 found at line 4724:
4722: always coincident with it. At 0h on 1 January 1972 (MJD 41,317.0
4722(continued): ), the
4723: first tick of the UTC Era, the NTP clock was set to 2,272,060,80
4723(continued): 0,
4724: representing the number of standard seconds since 0h on 1 Januar
4724(continued): y 1900
4725: (MJD 15,020.0). The insertion of leap seconds in UTC and subsequ
4725(continued): ently
4726: into NTP does not affect the UTC or NTP oscillator, only the con
4726(continued): version
4725: (MJD 15,020.0). The insertion of leap seconds in UTC and subsequ
4725(continued): ently
4726: into NTP does not affect the UTC or NTP oscillator, only the con
4726(continued): version
2000 found at line 4489:
4487: the Mid-Continent Chain, the deployment of LORAN-C transmitters
4487(continued): now
4488: provides complete coverage of the U.S. LORAN-C timing receivers,
4488(continued): such as
4489: the Austron 2000, are specialized and extremely expensive (up to
4489(continued):
4490: $20,000). They are used primarily to monitor local cesium clocks
4490(continued): and are
4491: not suited for unattended, automatic operation. While the LORAN-
4491(continued): C system
2000 found at line 4489:
4487: the Mid-Continent Chain, the deployment of LORAN-C transmitters
4487(continued): now
4488: provides complete coverage of the U.S. LORAN-C timing receivers,
4488(continued): such as
4489: the Austron 2000, are specialized and extremely expensive (up to
4489(continued):
4490: $20,000). They are used primarily to monitor local cesium clocks
4490(continued): and are
4491: not suited for unattended, automatic operation. While the LORAN-
4491(continued): C system
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1309.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 48:
46:
47: As the pace of industry, science, and technological developme
47(continued): nt
48: quickened over the past century, it became increasingly proba
48(continued): ble that
49: someone in a geographically distant location would be trying
49(continued): to solve
50: the same problems you were trying to solve, or that someone i
50(continued): n a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1309.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 48:
46:
47: As the pace of industry, science, and technological developme
47(continued): nt
48: quickened over the past century, it became increasingly proba
48(continued): ble that
49: someone in a geographically distant location would be trying
49(continued): to solve
50: the same problems you were trying to solve, or that someone i
50(continued): n a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1314.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1109:
1107: 00DE YPosition 011F 0005 00000001 00
1107(continued): 00016C
1108: 00EA Group4Options 0125 0004 00000001 00
1108(continued): 000002
1109: 00F6 ResolutionUnit 0128 0003 00000001 00
1109(continued): 020000
1110: 0102 Software 0131 0002 00000008 00
1110(continued): 000174
1111: 010E DateTime 0132 0002 00000014 00
1111(continued): 00017C
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1314.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1109:
1107: 00DE YPosition 011F 0005 00000001 00
1107(continued): 00016C
1108: 00EA Group4Options 0125 0004 00000001 00
1108(continued): 000002
1109: 00F6 ResolutionUnit 0128 0003 00000001 00
1109(continued): 020000
1110: 0102 Software 0131 0002 00000008 00
1110(continued): 000174
1111: 010E DateTime 0132 0002 00000014 00
1111(continued): 00017C
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1323.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 320:
318: 1.1MBps, no matter how high the theoretical transfer rate
318(continued): of the
319: path. This corresponds to cycling the sequence number spa
319(continued): ce in
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1323.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 320:
318: 1.1MBps, no matter how high the theoretical transfer rate
318(continued): of the
319: path. This corresponds to cycling the sequence number spa
319(continued): ce in
320: Twrap= 2000 secs, which is safe in today's Internet.
321:
322: It is important to understand that the culprit is not the
322(continued): larger
320: Twrap= 2000 secs, which is safe in today's Internet.
321:
322: It is important to understand that the culprit is not the
322(continued): larger
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1325.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 611: 609: In addition, back issues of the Report are available for a 609(continued): nonymous 610: FTP from the host NIS.NSF.NET in the 'imr' directory with 610(continued): the file 611: names in the form IMRYY-MM.TXT, where YY is the last two d 611(continued): igits of 612: the year and MM two digits for the month. For example, th 612(continued): e June 613: 1991 Report is in the file IMR91-06.TXT.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第611行未找到'yyy'的行上：609:此外，报告的过期版本可用于609（续）:nonymous 610:FTP从主机NIS.NSF.NET在'imr'目录下使用610（续）:611:文件名的格式为IMRYY-MM.txt，其中yy是最后两个d 611（续）：igits of 612：年份和MM两位数字表示月份。例如，th 612（续）：e June 613:1991报告位于文件IMR91-06.TXT中。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1327.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2618: 2616: attributes remaining in the O/R address shall be encoded 2616(continued): on 2617: the LHS. This is to ensure a reversible mapping. For 2618: example, if the is an addres /S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/ and 2618(continued): a 2619: mapping for /ADMD=A/C=NN/ is used, then /S=XX/O=YY/ is 2620: encoded on the LHS.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1327.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第2618行中未找到'yyyy'：2616：应对O/R地址中剩余的属性进行编码2616（续）：在2617：LHS上。这是为了确保可逆映射。对于2618:示例，如果是地址/S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/和2618（续）：使用了/ADMD=A/C=NN/的2619:映射，则/S=XX/O=YY/在LHS上是2620:编码的。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2619: 2617: the LHS. This is to ensure a reversible mapping. For 2618: example, if the is an addres /S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/ and 2618(continued): a 2619: mapping for /ADMD=A/C=NN/ is used, then /S=XX/O=YY/ is 2620: encoded on the LHS. 2621:
第2619行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：2617:LHS。这是为了确保可逆映射。对于2618:示例，如果是地址/S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/和2618（续）：使用了/ADMD=A/C=NN/的2619:映射，则/S=XX/O=YY/在LHS上是2620:编码的。2621:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2665:
2663:
2664: C = "XX"
2665: ADMD = "YY"
2666: O = "ZZ"
2667: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2665:
2663:
2664: C = "XX"
2665: ADMD = "YY"
2666: O = "ZZ"
2667: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2667:
2665: ADMD = "YY"
2666: O = "ZZ"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2667:
2665: ADMD = "YY"
2666: O = "ZZ"
2667: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
2668:
2669: This is mapped first to an RFC 822 address, and then back to
2669(continued): the
2667: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
2668:
2669: This is mapped first to an RFC 822 address, and then back to
2669(continued): the
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2673:
2671:
2672: C = "XX"
2673: ADMD = "YY"
2674: O = "ZZ"
2675: Surname = "Smith"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2673:
2671:
2672: C = "XX"
2673: ADMD = "YY"
2674: O = "ZZ"
2675: Surname = "Smith"
UTCTime found at line 1483:
1481: the full BNF easier to parse.
1482:
1483: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1484:
1485: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1485(continued): ear
UTCTime found at line 1483:
1481: the full BNF easier to parse.
1482:
1483: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1484:
1485: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1485(continued): ear
UTCTime found at line 1485:
1483: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1484:
1485: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1485(continued): ear
1486: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1486(continued): d
1487: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1487(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1485:
1483: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1484:
1485: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Y
1485(continued): ear
1486: (lowest two digits), Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, secon
1486(continued): d
1487: (optional), and Timezone. 822.date-time also contains an opt
1487(continued): ional
UTCTime found at line 1494: 1492: In practice, a gateway will need to parse various illega 1492(continued): l 1493: variants on 822.date-time. In cases where 822.date-time 1493(continued): 1494: cannot be parsed, it is recommended that the derived UTC 1494(continued): Time 1495: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1496:
UTCTime位于第1494:1492行：实际上，网关需要解析各种illega 1492（续）：l 1493:822.date-time上的变体。如果822.date-time 1493（续）：1494:无法解析，建议将派生的UTC 1494（续）：time 1495:设置为转换时的值。1496:
UTCTime found at line 1497: 1495: is set to the value at the time of translation. 1496: 1497: When mapping to X.400, the UTCTime format which specifies the 1497(continued): 1498: timezone offset shall be used. 1499:
第1497行：1495:处的UTCTime设置为转换时的值。1496:1497:映射到X.400时，应使用指定1497（续）：1498:时区偏移的UTCTime格式。1499:
UTCTime found at line 5143: 5141: 5142: The extended syntax of zone defined in the JNT Mail Protoc 5142(continued): ol shall 5143: be used in the mapping of UTCTime defined in Chapter 3. 5144: 5145: 7. Lack of 822-MTS originator specification
第5143:5141:5142行的UTCTime：JNT邮件协议5142（续）：ol中定义的区域扩展语法应在第3章中定义的UTCTime映射中使用5143:。5144: 5145: 7. 缺乏822-MTS发起人规范
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1330.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1770:
1768: While ESnet will provide X.400 routing service for systems, i
1768(continued): t cannot
1769: provide routing via commercial X.400 carriers at this time.
1769(continued): The
1770: FTS-2000 charge for routing X.400 messages is $.45 (US) plus
1770(continued): X.25
1771: packet charges. This could result in a charge of several dol
1771(continued): lars for
1772: large messages, a real possibility with the multi-media capac
1772(continued): ity of
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1330.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1770:
1768: While ESnet will provide X.400 routing service for systems, i
1768(continued): t cannot
1769: provide routing via commercial X.400 carriers at this time.
1769(continued): The
1770: FTS-2000 charge for routing X.400 messages is $.45 (US) plus
1770(continued): X.25
1771: packet charges. This could result in a charge of several dol
1771(continued): lars for
1772: large messages, a real possibility with the multi-media capac
1772(continued): ity of
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1336.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 378: 376: where growing above 100 network numbers seemed excess 376(continued): ive. 377: Todays number of networks in the global infrastructur 377(continued): e 378: exceeds 2000 connected networks, and many more if iso 378(continued): lated 379: network islands get included. 380:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1336.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第378行找到：376:其中超过100的网络数量似乎超过376（续）：ive。377：当今全球基础设施中的网络数量377（续）：e 378：超过2000个连接的网络，如果包括iso 378（续）：379：网络孤岛，则更多。380:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1338.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 401:
399: 3.2. Historic growth rates
400:
401: MM/YY ROUTES MM/YY ROUTES
402: ADVERTISED ADVERTIS
402(continued): ED
403: ------------------------ ------------------
403(continued): -----
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1338.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 401:
399: 3.2. Historic growth rates
400:
401: MM/YY ROUTES MM/YY ROUTES
402: ADVERTISED ADVERTIS
402(continued): ED
403: ------------------------ ------------------
403(continued): -----
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1060: 1058: 1071 Beal Ave. 1059: Ann Arbor, MI 48109 1060: email: jyy@merit.edu 1061: 1062:
在第1060:1058:1071行Beal Ave.1059:Ann Arbor，MI 48109 1060找到不带“yyy”的“yy”：电子邮件：jyy@merit.edu 1061: 1062:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1340.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3390:
3388: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport
3388(continued): (LAT) - old
3389: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private
3389(continued): use
3390: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster
3390(continued): groups
3391: Sys. Communication Architecture (SCA)
3392: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test
3392(continued): protocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1340.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3390:
3388: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport
3388(continued): (LAT) - old
3389: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private
3389(continued): use
3390: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster
3390(continued): groups
3391: Sys. Communication Architecture (SCA)
3392: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test
3392(continued): protocol
1900 found at line 4066:
4064: 014.000.000.063 2422-650-23500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4064(continued): [OXG]
4065: 014.000.000.064 2422-330-02500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4065(continued): [OXG]
4066: 014.000.000.065 2422-350-01900 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4066(continued): [OXG]
4067: 014.000.000.066 2422-410-00700 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4067(continued): [OXG]
4068: 014.000.000.067 2422-539-06200 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4068(continued): [OXG]
1900 found at line 4066:
4064: 014.000.000.063 2422-650-23500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4064(continued): [OXG]
4065: 014.000.000.064 2422-330-02500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4065(continued): [OXG]
4066: 014.000.000.065 2422-350-01900 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4066(continued): [OXG]
4067: 014.000.000.066 2422-410-00700 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4067(continued): [OXG]
4068: 014.000.000.067 2422-539-06200 00 Tollpost-Globe AS
4068(continued): [OXG]
2000 found at line 1300:
1298: nkd 1650/tcp
1299: nkd 1650/udp
1300: callbook 2000/tcp
1301: callbook 2000/udp
1302: dc 2001/tcp
2000 found at line 1300:
1298: nkd 1650/tcp
1299: nkd 1650/udp
1300: callbook 2000/tcp
1301: callbook 2000/udp
1302: dc 2001/tcp
2000 found at line 1301:
1299: nkd 1650/udp
1300: callbook 2000/tcp
1301: callbook 2000/udp
1302: dc 2001/tcp
1303: wizard 2001/udp curry
2000 found at line 1301:
1299: nkd 1650/udp
1300: callbook 2000/tcp
1301: callbook 2000/udp
1302: dc 2001/tcp
1303: wizard 2001/udp curry
2000 found at line 4013:
4011: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25
4011(continued): [GB7]
4012: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
4012(continued): [JFW]
4013: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
4013(continued): [AXH]
4014: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
4014(continued): [VXT]
4015: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25
2000 found at line 4013:
4011: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25
4011(continued): [GB7]
4012: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25
4012(continued): [JFW]
4013: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET
4013(continued): [AXH]
4014: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1
4014(continued): [VXT]
4015: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25
4015(continued): [GB7]
4015（续）：[GB7]
2000 found at line 4838:
4836: AIX/370 LOCUS SWIFT
4837: AIX-PS/2 MACOS TAC
4838: BS-2000 MINOS TANDEM
4839: CEDAR MOS TENEX
4840: CGW MPE5 TOPS10
2000 found at line 4838:
4836: AIX/370 LOCUS SWIFT
4837: AIX-PS/2 MACOS TAC
4838: BS-2000 MINOS TANDEM
4839: CEDAR MOS TENEX
4840: CGW MPE5 TOPS10
2000 found at line 5188: 5186: HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-3 5187: HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3278-4 5188: HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3278-5 5189: HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IBM-3279-2 5190: HITACHI-5601 IBM-3279-3
2000第5188行：5186:HAZELTINE-1520 IBM-3278-35187:HAZELTINE-1552 IBM-3278-45188:HAZELTINE-2000 IBM-3278-5 5189:HAZELTINE-ESPRIT IBM-3279-25190:HITACHI-5601 IBM-3279-3
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1348.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 143:
141: Or in net 11110031f67293.nsap-in-addr.arpa:
142:
143: 67894444333322220000 NSAP-PTR host.school.de.
144:
145: The RR data is the ASCII representation of the digits. It is
145(continued): encoded
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1348.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 143:
141: Or in net 11110031f67293.nsap-in-addr.arpa:
142:
143: 67894444333322220000 NSAP-PTR host.school.de.
144:
145: The RR data is the ASCII representation of the digits. It is
145(continued): encoded
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1357.txt +=+=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 260:
258:
259: ID (M) -- This is the second field of any record. It is also a
260: mandatory field. Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where X
260(continued): XX is
261: the publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher
261(continued): )
262: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the publicati
262(continued): on as
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1357.txt +=+=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 260:
258:
259: ID (M) -- This is the second field of any record. It is also a
260: mandatory field. Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where X
260(continued): XX is
261: the publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher
261(continued): )
262: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the publicati
262(continued): on as
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 262: 260: mandatory field. Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where X 260(continued): XX is 261: the publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher 261(continued): ) 262: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the publicati 262(continued): on as 263: assigned by the publisher. This ID is typically printed 263(continued): on 264: the cover, and may contain slashes.
第262行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：260:必填字段。其格式为“ID:：XXX//YYY”，其中X 260（续）：XX为261：发布者ID（发布者261的受控符号）（续）：262：且YYY为发布者分配的publicati 262（续）：on as 263:的ID（如报告编号）。此ID通常打印在封面的263（续）页上，可能包含斜杠。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 682:
680:
681: In order to avoid conflicts among the symbols of the publishi
681(continued): ng
682: organizations (the XXX part of the "ID:: XXX//YYY") it is sug
682(continued): gested
683: that the various organizations that publish reports (such as
684: universities, departments, and laboratories) register their
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 682:
680:
681: In order to avoid conflicts among the symbols of the publishi
681(continued): ng
682: organizations (the XXX part of the "ID:: XXX//YYY") it is sug
682(continued): gested
683: that the various organizations that publish reports (such as
684: universities, departments, and laboratories) register their
2-digit found at line 291: 289: 290: The format for ENTRY date is "Month Day, Year". The mon 290(continued): th must 291: be alphabetic (spelled out). The "Day" is a 1- or 2-d 291(continued): igit 292: number. The "Year" is a 4-digit number. 293:
第291:289:290行有两位数字：输入日期的格式为“年月日”。mon 290（续）：第291条：必须按字母顺序（拼写）。“天”是一个1-d或2-d 291（续）：igit 292:数字。“年”是一个4位数字。293:
2-digit found at line 457: 455: DATE (O) -- The publication date. The formats are "Month Year" 455(continued): and 456: "Month Day, Year". The month must be alphabetic (spelle 456(continued): d out). 457: The "Day" is a 1- or 2-digit number. The "Year" is a 4- 457(continued): digit 458: number. 459:
第457:455:DATE（O）行中的两位数字——发布日期。格式为“月-年”455（续）：和456：“月-日，年”。月份必须按字母顺序排列（拼写456（续）：d）。457：“天”是一个1位或2位数字。“年份”是4-457（续）：数字458：数字。459:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1361.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 132:
130: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
130(continued): been
131: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
131(continued): ned
132: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
132(continued): 00. The
133: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
133(continued): the
134: last 32 bits. This format allows convenient multiple-precisio
134(continued): n
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1361.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 132:
130: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
130(continued): been
131: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
131(continued): ned
132: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
132(continued): 00. The
133: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
133(continued): the
134: last 32 bits. This format allows convenient multiple-precisio
134(continued): n
1900 found at line 145:
143: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2
143(continued): 036,
144: some external means will be necessary to qualify time relativ
144(continued): e to
1900 found at line 145:
143: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2
143(continued): 036,
144: some external means will be necessary to qualify time relativ
144(continued): e to
145: 1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 ye
145(continued): ars).
146: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
146(continued): ious
147: that appropriate means should be readily available. There wil
147(continued): l exist
145: 1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 ye
145(continued): ars).
146: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
146(continued): ious
147: that appropriate means should be readily available. There wil
147(continued): l exist
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1379.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 847:
845:
846:
847: objective an MSL of at least 2000 seconds. If there were no
847(continued): TIME-
848: WAIT delay, the ultimate limit on transaction rate would be s
848(continued): et by
849: speed-of-light delays in the network and by the latency of ho
849(continued): st
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1379.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 847:
845:
846:
847: objective an MSL of at least 2000 seconds. If there were no
847(continued): TIME-
848: WAIT delay, the ultimate limit on transaction rate would be s
848(continued): et by
849: speed-of-light delays in the network and by the latency of ho
849(continued): st
2000 found at line 988:
986: the official delay of 240 seconds, formula [1] implies a u
986(continued): pper
987: bound (as RTT -> 0) of TRmax = 268 Tps; with our target MS
987(continued): L of
988: 2000 sec, TRmax = 32 Tps. These values are unacceptably l
988(continued): ow.
989:
990: To improve this transaction rate, we could use TCP timesta
990(continued): mps to
2000 found at line 988:
986: the official delay of 240 seconds, formula [1] implies a u
986(continued): pper
987: bound (as RTT -> 0) of TRmax = 268 Tps; with our target MS
987(continued): L of
988: 2000 sec, TRmax = 32 Tps. These values are unacceptably l
988(continued): ow.
989:
990: To improve this transaction rate, we could use TCP timesta
990(continued): mps to
2000 found at line 1079: 1077: segment lifetime MSL. For reasonable limiting values of R 1077(continued): , Ts, 1078: and MSL, formula [6] leads to a very low value of TRmax. 1078(continued): For 1079: example, with MSL= 2000 secs, R=10**9 Bps, and Ts = 0.5 se 1079(continued): c, TRmax 1080: < 2*10**-3 Tps. 1081:
2000在1079:1077行找到：段寿命MSL。对于R 1077（续）、Ts、1078:和MSL的合理限值，公式[6]导致TRmax的值非常低。1078（续）：对于1079：例如，MSL=2000秒，R=10**9个基点，Ts=0.5 se 1079（续）：c，TRmax 1080:<2*10**-3 Tps。1081:
2000 found at line 1136:
1134: TRmax * MSL < 2**31
1135:
1136: For example, if MSL = 2000 seconds then TRmax < 10**6 Tp.
1136(continued): These
1137: are acceptable limits for transaction processing. However
1137(continued): , if
1138: they are not, we could augment CC with TCP timestamps to o
1138(continued): btain
2000 found at line 1136:
1134: TRmax * MSL < 2**31
1135:
1136: For example, if MSL = 2000 seconds then TRmax < 10**6 Tp.
1136(continued): These
1137: are acceptable limits for transaction processing. However
1137(continued): , if
1138: they are not, we could augment CC with TCP timestamps to o
1138(continued): btain
2000 found at line 1276: 1274: 1275: (a) no timestamps 2**31/MSL MSL 3rd seq 1275(continued): uence 1276: e.g., MSL=2000 sec 1276(continued): space 1277: TRmax = 10**6 1278:
2000在第1276行找到：1274:1275：（a）没有时间戳2**31/MSL MSL第三序列1275（续）：1276：例如，MSL=2000秒1276（续）：空格1277:TRmax=10**6 1278:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1405.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 378:
376: maps into
377:
378: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
379: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
380:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1405.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 378:
376: maps into
377:
378: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
379: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
380:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 384:
382:
383: xx = country code of the gateway performing the convers
383(continued): ion
384: yyy = Admd of the gateway performing the conversion
385: zzz = Prmd of the gateway performing the conversion
386: ooo = Organisation of the gateway performing the convers
386(continued): ion
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 384:
382:
383: xx = country code of the gateway performing the convers
383(continued): ion
384: yyy = Admd of the gateway performing the conversion
385: zzz = Prmd of the gateway performing the conversion
386: ooo = Organisation of the gateway performing the convers
386(continued): ion
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 474:
472: it is connected to. In this case the mapping is trivial:
473:
474: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
475: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
476:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 474:
472: it is connected to. In this case the mapping is trivial:
473:
474: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
475: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
476:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 477:
475: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
476:
477: (see sect. 5.2 for explication of 'xx','yyy','zzz','ooo','uuu
477(continued): ','net')
478:
479: maps into
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 477:
475: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
476:
477: (see sect. 5.2 for explication of 'xx','yyy','zzz','ooo','uuu
477(continued): ','net')
478:
479: maps into
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 487:
485: described into section 5.4 apply:
486:
487: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
488: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
489:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 487:
485: described into section 5.4 apply:
486:
487: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
488: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
489:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 492: 490: maps into 491: 492: gwnode::gw%"C=xx;ADMD=yyy;PRMD=www;DD.Dnet=net; 493: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;" 494:
第492:490行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：映射到491:492:gwnode:：gw%“C=xx；ADMD=yyy；PRMD=www；DD.Dnet=net；493:DD.Mail-11=route:：node:：localpart；”494:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 595:
593: maps into
594:
595: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
596: DD.Mail-11=route::gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
597:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 595:
593: maps into
594:
595: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
596: DD.Mail-11=route::gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
597:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1409.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 311: 309: IAC SB AUTHENTICATION RE 309(continued): PLY 310: KERBEROS_V4 CLIENT|MUTUA 310(continued): L 311: RESPONSE yy yy yy yy yy 311(continued): yy yy yy 312: IAC SE 313:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第311行没有找到'yyy'的行上：309:IAC SB AUTHENTICATION RE 309（续）：PLY 310:KERBEROS_V4 CLIENT | MUTUA 310（续）：L 311:RESPONSE yy yy yy yy yy yy yy 311（续）：yy yy yy yy yy 312:IAC SE 313:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1411.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 163: 161: IAC SB AUTHENTICATION RE 161(continued): PLY 162: KERBEROS_V4 CLIENT|MUTUA 162(continued): L 163: RESPONSE yy yy yy yy yy 163(continued): yy yy yy 164: IAC SE 165:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第163行未找到'yyy'的行上：161:IAC SB身份验证RE 161（续）：PLY 162:KERBEROS|V4客户端| MUTUA 162（续）：L 163:RESPONSE yy yy yy yy yy yy 163（续）：yy yy yy yy yy 164:IAC SE 165:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1415.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 2814: 2812: 2 1016 Grouping threshold violation | 503 2812(continued): 2813: 2 1017 Inconsistent PDU request | 503 2813(continued): 2814: 2 2000 Association with user not allowed | 532 2814(continued): 2815: 2 2002 Unsupported service class | 504 2815(continued): 2816: 0 2003 Unsupported functional unit | 211 2816(continued):
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第2814行找到的文件rfc1415.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000：2812:2 1016分组阈值冲突| 503 2812（续）：2813:2 1017不一致的PDU请求| 503 2813（续）：2814:2 2000与不允许的用户关联| 532 2814（续）：2815:2 2002不支持的服务类| 504 2815（续）：2816:0 2003不支持的功能单元| 211 2816（续）：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1416.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 318: 316: IAC SB AUTHENTICATION RE 316(continued): PLY 317: KERBEROS_V4 CLIENT|MUTUA 317(continued): L 318: RESPONSE yy yy yy yy yy 318(continued): yy yy yy 319: IAC SE 320:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第318行未找到'yyy'的行上：316:IAC SB身份验证RE 316（续）：PLY 317:KERBEROS|V4客户端| MUTUA 317（续）：L 318:响应yy yy yy yy yy yy 318（续）：yy yy yy yy 319:IAC SE 320:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1417.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 156: 154: c/o Rapport Communication 155: 3055 Q Street NW 156: Washington, DC 20007 157: US 158:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1417.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第156行找到：154:c/o和谐沟通155:3055 Q Street NW 156:Washington，DC 20007 157:US 158:
2000 found at line 198:
196: Rapport Communication
197: 3055 Q Street NW
198: Washington, DC 20007
199:
200: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
2000 found at line 198:
196: Rapport Communication
197: 3055 Q Street NW
198: Washington, DC 20007
199:
200: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1421.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1148:
1146: BAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZCZXRhIDEx
1146(continued): DTAL
1147: BgNVBAsTBFRMQ0EwHhcNOTEwOTAxMDgwMDAwWhcNOTIwOTAxMDc1OTU5WjBR
1147(continued): MQsw
1148: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1148(continued): DzAN
1149: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1149(continued): YgAw
1150: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1150(continued): O5XW
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1421.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1148:
1146: BAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZCZXRhIDEx
1146(continued): DTAL
1147: BgNVBAsTBFRMQ0EwHhcNOTEwOTAxMDgwMDAwWhcNOTIwOTAxMDc1OTU5WjBR
1147(continued): MQsw
1148: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1148(continued): DzAN
1149: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1149(continued): YgAw
1150: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1150(continued): O5XW
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1150:
1148: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1148(continued): DzAN
1149: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1149(continued): YgAw
1150: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1150(continued): O5XW
1151: cqAz/7R7XhjYCm0PcqbdzoACZtIlETrKrcJiDYoP+DkZ8k1gCk7hQHpbIwID
1151(continued): AQAB
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1150:
1148: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1148(continued): DzAN
1149: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1149(continued): YgAw
1150: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1150(continued): O5XW
1151: cqAz/7R7XhjYCm0PcqbdzoACZtIlETrKrcJiDYoP+DkZ8k1gCk7hQHpbIwID
1151(continued): AQAB
1152: MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAA38AAICPv4f9Gx/tY4+p+4DB7MV+tKZnvBoy8zgo
1152(continued): MGOx
1152: MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAA38AAICPv4f9Gx/tY4+p+4DB7MV+tKZnvBoy8zgo
1152(continued): MGOx
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1256:
1254: BAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZCZXRhIDEx
1254(continued): DTAL
1255: BgNVBAsTBFRMQ0EwHhcNOTEwOTAxMDgwMDAwWhcNOTIwOTAxMDc1OTU5WjBR
1255(continued): MQsw
1256: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1256(continued): DzAN
1257: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1257(continued): YgAw
1258: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1258(continued): O5XW
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1256:
1254: BAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZCZXRhIDEx
1254(continued): DTAL
1255: BgNVBAsTBFRMQ0EwHhcNOTEwOTAxMDgwMDAwWhcNOTIwOTAxMDc1OTU5WjBR
1255(continued): MQsw
1256: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1256(continued): DzAN
1257: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1257(continued): YgAw
1258: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1258(continued): O5XW
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1258:
1256: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1256(continued): DzAN
1257: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1257(continued): YgAw
1258: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1258(continued): O5XW
1259: cqAz/7R7XhjYCm0PcqbdzoACZtIlETrKrcJiDYoP+DkZ8k1gCk7hQHpbIwID
1259(continued): AQAB
1260: MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAA38AAICPv4f9Gx/tY4+p+4DB7MV+tKZnvBoy8zgo
1260(continued): MGOx
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1258:
1256: CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4x
1256(continued): DzAN
1257: BgNVBAsTBkJldGEgMTEPMA0GA1UECxMGTk9UQVJZMHAwCgYEVQgBAQICArwD
1257(continued): YgAw
1258: XwJYCsnp6lQCxYykNlODwutF/jMJ3kL+3PjYyHOwk+/9rLg6X65B/LD4bJHt
1258(continued): O5XW
1259: cqAz/7R7XhjYCm0PcqbdzoACZtIlETrKrcJiDYoP+DkZ8k1gCk7hQHpbIwID
1259(continued): AQAB
1260: MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAA38AAICPv4f9Gx/tY4+p+4DB7MV+tKZnvBoy8zgo
1260(continued): MGOx
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1422.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1596:
1594:
1595: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1596: notBefore UTCTime,
1597: notAfter UTCTime}
1598:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1422.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 1596:
1594:
1595: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1596: notBefore UTCTime,
1597: notAfter UTCTime}
1598:
UTCTime found at line 1597:
1595: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1596: notBefore UTCTime,
1597: notAfter UTCTime}
1598:
1599: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE{
UTCTime found at line 1597:
1595: Validity ::= SEQUENCE{
1596: notBefore UTCTime,
1597: notAfter UTCTime}
1598:
1599: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE{
UTCTime found at line 1640: 1638: signature AlgorithmIdentifier, 1639: issuer Name, 1640: lastUpdate UTCTime, 1641: nextUpdate UTCTime, 1642: revokedCertificates
在第1640行找到UTCTime:1638:signature AlgorithmIdentifier，1639:issuer Name，1640:lastUpdate UTCTime，1641:nextUpdate UTCTime，1642:revokedCertificates
UTCTime found at line 1641: 1639: issuer Name, 1640: lastUpdate UTCTime, 1641: nextUpdate UTCTime, 1642: revokedCertificates 1643: SEQUENCE OF CRLEntry OPTIONAL}
在第1641行找到UTCTime:1639:issuer Name，1640:lastUpdate UTCTime，1641:nextUpdate UTCTime，1642:revokedCertificates 1643:CRLEntry可选序列}
UTCTime found at line 1647:
1645: CRLEntry ::= SEQUENCE{
1646: userCertificate SerialNumber,
1647: revocationDate UTCTime}
1648:
1649: References
UTCTime found at line 1647:
1645: CRLEntry ::= SEQUENCE{
1646: userCertificate SerialNumber,
1647: revocationDate UTCTime}
1648:
1649: References
century found at line 463: 461: confusion relating to daylight savings time. Note that UTCT 462: expresses the value of a year modulo 100 (with no indication 462(continued): of 463: century), hence comparisons involving dates in different cent 463(continued): uries 464: must be performed with care. 465:
第463行发现的世纪：461：与夏令时有关的混淆。请注意，UTCT 462：表示一年的值，模为100（无表示462（续）：463：世纪），因此，必须小心进行涉及不同分463（续）：uries 464：日期的比较。465:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1432.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 711:
709: Digital Press
710: buddenhagen@cecv01.enet.dec.com McGraw-Hill
711: 617-276-1498 212-512-2000
712: fax: 617-276-4314 1221 Ave. of the Ameri
712(continued): cas
713: Digital Equipment Corporation New York, NY 10020
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1432.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 711:
709: Digital Press
710: buddenhagen@cecv01.enet.dec.com McGraw-Hill
711: 617-276-1498 212-512-2000
712: fax: 617-276-4314 1221 Ave. of the Ameri
712(continued): cas
713: Digital Equipment Corporation New York, NY 10020
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1437.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 185: 183: generation of the X.400 specification, X.400-1996. This will 183(continued): give 184: the community ample time to define a more complete specificat 184(continued): ion for 185: matter transport as part of X.400-2000, and possibly even a r 185(continued): eadily-186: implementable specification as part of X.400-2004, although s 186(continued): ome will 187: no doubt argue that this would be too strong a break with tra 187(continued): dition.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1437.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000可在第185行找到：183:X.400规范的生成，X.400-1996。这将使183（续）：184：社区有足够的时间定义更完整的规范184（续）：185：物质运输作为X.400-2000的一部分，甚至可能是r 185（续）：Eadly-186：可实现规范作为X.400-2004的一部分，尽管s 186（续）当前位置ome will 187:毫无疑问，与tra 187的决裂将过于强烈（续）：传统。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1440.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 332:
330: The time stamp on the file as it appears at the sending site
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1440.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 332:
330: The time stamp on the file as it appears at the sending site
330(continued): may be 331: sent and applied to the copy at the receiving site. The form 331(continued): is US 332: mm/dd/yy and hh:mm:ss. A time zone is optional. If the time 332(continued): zone is 333: omitted, local time is assumed. If the DATE command is omitt 333(continued): ed, time 334: and date of arrival are assumed.
330（续）：可能是331：在接收站点发送并应用于副本。表格331（续）：为US 332:mm/dd/yy和hh:mm:ss。时区是可选的。如果时间332（续）：区域为333：省略，则假定为本地时间。如果省略日期命令333（续）：ed，则假定时间334:和到达日期。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1442.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 362:
360: BEGIN
361: TYPE NOTATION ::=
362: "LAST-UPDATED" value(Update UTCTime)
362(continued):
363: "ORGANIZATION" Text
364: "CONTACT-INFO" Text
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1442.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 362:
360: BEGIN
361: TYPE NOTATION ::=
362: "LAST-UPDATED" value(Update UTCTime)
362(continued):
363: "ORGANIZATION" Text
364: "CONTACT-INFO" Text
UTCTime found at line 378:
376: | Revisions Revision
377: Revision ::=
378: "REVISION" value(Update UTCTime)
379: "DESCRIPTION" Text
380:
UTCTime found at line 378:
376: | Revisions Revision
377: Revision ::=
378: "REVISION" value(Update UTCTime)
379: "DESCRIPTION" Text
380:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1453.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 516: 514: 515: [XTP92] Xpress Transfer Protocol, version 3.6, XTP Forum, 515(continued): 516: 1900 State Street, Suite D, Santa Barbara, Califo 516(continued): rnia 517: 93101 USA, January 11, 1992. 518:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1453.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900可在第516行找到：514:515:[XTP92]Xpress传输协议，版本3.6，XTP论坛，515（续）：516:1900加利福尼亚州圣巴巴拉州州立街D套房516（续）：rnia 517:93101美国，1992年1月11日。518:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1458.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1026: 1024: Reading, MA 01867 1025: 1026: Phone: (617) 942-2000 1027: EMail: rebraudes@tasc.com 1028:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1458.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第1026行找到：1024:读取，MA 01867 1025:1026:电话：（617）942-2000 1027:电子邮件：rebraudes@tasc.com 1028:
2000 found at line 1035: 1033: Reading, MA 01867 1034:
2000在第1035行找到：1033:Reading，MA 01867 1034:
1035: Phone: (617) 942-2000 1036: EMail: gszabele@tasc.com 1037:
1035:电话：（617）942-2000 1036:电子邮件：gszabele@tasc.com 1037:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1465.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 499:
497: Switzerland
498:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1465.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 499:
497: Switzerland
498:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 500:
498:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
502: The <Update-info> contains also the format ident
502(continued): ifier.
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 500:
498:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
502: The <Update-info> contains also the format ident
502(continued): ifier.
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 501:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
502: The <Update-info> contains also the format ident
502(continued): ifier.
503:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 501:
499: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
500: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
501: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
502: The <Update-info> contains also the format ident
502(continued): ifier.
503:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 512:
510:
511: The date of the last update of a document is giv
511(continued): en in
512: the form 'yymmdd'.
513: A start date must be set. A document can be pub
513(continued): lished
514: this way before the information in it is valid.
514(continued): (This
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 512:
510:
511: The date of the last update of a document is giv
511(continued): en in
512: the form 'yymmdd'.
513: A start date must be set. A document can be pub
513(continued): lished
514: this way before the information in it is valid.
514(continued): (This
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1673:
1671: | <DirectoryName> )
1672:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
1674: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
1675: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1673:
1671: | <DirectoryName> )
1672:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
1674: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
1675: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1674:
1672:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1674:
1672:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
1674: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \ 1675: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR> 1676:
1674:“开始=“'yymmdd'\1675:[“结束=“'yymmdd']”小于CR>1676:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1675:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
1674: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
1675: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
1676:
1677: <window-size> ::= "RTS-window-size: " \
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1675:
1673: <Update-info> ::= "Update: FORMAT=V3; DATE=" 'yymmdd' \
1674: "; START=" 'yymmdd' \
1675: ["; END=" 'yymmdd'] <CR>
1676:
1677: <window-size> ::= "RTS-window-size: " \
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1467.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 408:
406:
407: [6] Solensky, F., Internet Growth Charts, "big-internet" mail
407(continued): ing
408: list, munnari.oz.au:big-internet/nsf-netnumbers-<yymm>.ps
408(continued):
409:
410: 9. Other relevant documents
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1467.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 408:
406:
407: [6] Solensky, F., Internet Growth Charts, "big-internet" mail
407(continued): ing
408: list, munnari.oz.au:big-internet/nsf-netnumbers-<yymm>.ps
408(continued):
409:
410: 9. Other relevant documents
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1470.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 247:
245:
246: DATE OF MOST RECENT UPDATE TO THIS CATALOG ENTRY
247: <YYMMDD>
248:
249: Keywords
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1470.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 247:
245:
246: DATE OF MOST RECENT UPDATE TO THIS CATALOG ENTRY
247: <YYMMDD>
248:
249: Keywords
2000 found at line 4696: 4694: libraries), but this has not been done. Curses i 4694(continued): s very 4695: slow and cpu intensive on VMS, but the tool has b 4695(continued): een 4696: run in a window on a VAXstation 2000. Just don't 4696(continued): try 4697: to run it on a terminal connected to a 11/750. 4698:
2000在第4696行：4694:libraries）中找到，但这尚未完成。诅咒i 4694（续）：s very 4695:速度慢，在虚拟机上占用大量cpu，但该工具有b 4695（续）：een 4696:在VAXstation 2000的窗口中运行。只是不要4696（续）：尝试4697：在连接到11/750的终端上运行它。4698:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1479.txt +=+=+=+=+= century found at line 752: 750: We note that none of the IDPR protocols contain explicit prov 750(continued): isions 751: for dealing with an exhausted timestamp space. As timestamp 751(continued): space 752: exhaustion will not occur until well into the next century, w 752(continued): e expect 753: timestamp space viability to outlast the IDPR protocols. 754:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1479.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=第752行找到的century:我们注意到，没有一个IDPR协议包含显式prov 750（续）：isions 751:用于处理耗尽的时间戳空间。由于时间戳751（续）：空间752：直到下个世纪才会耗尽，w 752（续）：e预计753：时间戳空间的生存能力将超过IDPR协议。754:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1486.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 745:
743: Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1993 20:34:12 -0800
744: Subject: Comments on "An Experiment in Remote Printing"
745: Message-ID: <19930411203412000.123@tpd.org>
746: MIME-Version: 1.0
747: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1486.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 745:
743: Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1993 20:34:12 -0800
744: Subject: Comments on "An Experiment in Remote Printing"
745: Message-ID: <19930411203412000.123@tpd.org>
746: MIME-Version: 1.0
747: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1488.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 302: 300: 2.21. UTC Time 301: 302: Values of type uTCTimeSyntax are encoded as if they were Prin 302(continued): table 303: Strings with the strings containing a UTCTime value. 304:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第302:300:2.21行找到文件rfc1488.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=UTCTime。UTC时间301:302:uTCTimeSyntax类型的值被编码为Prin 302（续）：表303：包含UTCTime值的字符串。304:
UTCTime found at line 303: 301: 302: Values of type uTCTimeSyntax are encoded as if they were Prin 302(continued): table 303: Strings with the strings containing a UTCTime value. 304: 305: 2.22. Guide (search guide)
第303行的UTCTime:301:302：uTCTimeSyntax类型的值被编码为Prin 302（续）：表303：包含UTCTime值的字符串。304: 305: 2.22. 指南（搜索指南）
UTCTime found at line 377:
375: <algorithm-id> ::= <oid> '#' <algorithm-parameters>
376:
377: <utc-time> ::= an encoded UTCTime value
378:
379: <hex-string> ::= <hex-digit> | <hex-digit> <hex-string>
UTCTime found at line 377:
375: <algorithm-id> ::= <oid> '#' <algorithm-parameters>
376:
377: <utc-time> ::= an encoded UTCTime value
378:
379: <hex-string> ::= <hex-digit> | <hex-digit> <hex-string>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1500.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1950: 1948: The text version is sent. 1948(continued): 1949: 1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 1950(continued): umber. 1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 1951(continued): '. 1952:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1500.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第1950:1948行未找到'yyyy'的行上：发送文本版本。1948（续）：1949:1950:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中'nnnn'是rfc n 1950（续）：编号。1951年：“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 1951（续）：”。1952:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1507.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 5111: 5109:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1507.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第5111行找到的UTCTime:5109:
5110: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
5111: NotBefore UTCTime,
5112: NotAfter UTCTime
5113: }
5110: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
5111: NotBefore UTCTime,
5112: NotAfter UTCTime
5113: }
UTCTime found at line 5112:
5110: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
5111: NotBefore UTCTime,
5112: NotAfter UTCTime
5113: }
5114:
UTCTime found at line 5112:
5110: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
5111: NotBefore UTCTime,
5112: NotAfter UTCTime
5113: }
5114:
UTCTime found at line 6297:
6295: Version ::= INTEGER { 1988(0)} SerialNumber ::= INTEGER
6295(continued): Validity
6296: ::= SEQUENCE{
6297: notBefore UTCTime,
6298: notAfter UTCTime}
6299:
UTCTime found at line 6297:
6295: Version ::= INTEGER { 1988(0)} SerialNumber ::= INTEGER
6295(continued): Validity
6296: ::= SEQUENCE{
6297: notBefore UTCTime,
6298: notAfter UTCTime}
6299:
UTCTime found at line 6298:
6296: ::= SEQUENCE{
6297: notBefore UTCTime,
6298: notAfter UTCTime}
6299:
6300: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
UTCTime found at line 6298:
6296: ::= SEQUENCE{
6297: notBefore UTCTime,
6298: notAfter UTCTime}
6299:
6300: SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1512.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 243:
241: FddiSMTStationIdType ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (8))
242: -- The unique identifier for the FDDI station. This i
242(continued): s a
243: -- string of 8 octets, represented as X' yy yy xx xx x
243(continued): x xx
244: -- xx xx' with the low order 6 octet (xx) from a uniqu
244(continued): e IEEE
245: -- assigned address. The high order two bits of the I
245(continued): EEE
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1512.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 243:
241: FddiSMTStationIdType ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (8))
242: -- The unique identifier for the FDDI station. This i
242(continued): s a
243: -- string of 8 octets, represented as X' yy yy xx xx x
243(continued): x xx
244: -- xx xx' with the low order 6 octet (xx) from a uniqu
244(continued): e IEEE
245: -- assigned address. The high order two bits of the I
245(continued): EEE
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 248:
246: -- address, the group address bit and the administrati
246(continued): on bit
247: -- (Universal/Local) bit should both be zero. The fir
247(continued): st two
248: -- octets, the yy octets, are implementor-defined.
249: --
250: -- The representation of the address portion of the st
250(continued): ation id
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 248:
246: -- address, the group address bit and the administrati
246(continued): on bit
247: -- (Universal/Local) bit should both be zero. The fir
247(continued): st two
248: -- octets, the yy octets, are implementor-defined.
249: --
250: -- The representation of the address portion of the st
250(continued): ation id
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1519.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 401:
399: 3.2 Historic growth rates
400:
401: MM/YY ROUTES MM/YY ROUTES
402: ADVERTISED ADVERTIS
402(continued): ED
403: ------------------------ ------------------
403(continued): -----
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1519.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 401:
399: 3.2 Historic growth rates
400:
401: MM/YY ROUTES MM/YY ROUTES
402: ADVERTISED ADVERTIS
402(continued): ED
403: ------------------------ ------------------
403(continued): -----
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1318: 1316: Ann Arbor, MI 48109 1317: 1318: EMail: jyy@merit.edu 1319: 1320:
在第1318:1316:Ann Arbor，MI 48109 1317:1318第1318行中找到了不带“yyy”的行中的“yy”：电子邮件：jyy@merit.edu 1319: 1320:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1527.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 793:
791: ubiquitous as the current telephone network and provides all
792: Americans with access to information in much the same way as
792(continued): public
793: libraries were created for a similar purpose a century ago.
794:
795: Congress must understand that the NREN is not just a new tech
795(continued): nology
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1527.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 793:
791: ubiquitous as the current telephone network and provides all
792: Americans with access to information in much the same way as
792(continued): public
793: libraries were created for a similar purpose a century ago.
794:
795: Congress must understand that the NREN is not just a new tech
795(continued): nology
century found at line 875: 873: regulated companies from becoming viable players. We must re 873(continued): alize 874: that we are about to enter a power struggle for the control o 874(continued): f the 875: information resources of the 21st century that promises to be 875(continued): every 876: bit as harsh and bruising as the power struggle for natural r 876(continued): esources 877: was at the end of the last century.
第875行发现的世纪：873：受监管的公司无法成为可行的参与者。我们必须重新认识873（续）：实现874：我们即将进入一场争夺控制权的权力斗争874（续）：对于875：承诺成为875的21世纪信息资源（续）：每876：一点都和争夺自然资源的权力斗争一样残酷和残酷876（续）：e资源877：在上个世纪末。
century found at line 877:
875: information resources of the 21st century that promises to be
875(continued): every
876: bit as harsh and bruising as the power struggle for natural r
876(continued): esources
877: was at the end of the last century.
878:
879: While the intentions of most appear to be good, as this study
879(continued): has
century found at line 877:
875: information resources of the 21st century that promises to be
875(continued): every
876: bit as harsh and bruising as the power struggle for natural r
876(continued): esources
877: was at the end of the last century.
878:
879: While the intentions of most appear to be good, as this study
879(continued): has
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1537.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 165: 163: Example: zone file for foo.xx: 164: 165: pqr MX 100 relay.yy. 166: xyz MX 100 relay.yy (no trailing dot!) 167:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1537.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第165行：163处未找到'yyyy'。示例：foo.xx:164:165:pqr MX 100 relay.yy的区域文件。166:xyz MX 100 relay.yy（无尾随点！）167:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 166: 164: 165: pqr MX 100 relay.yy. 166: xyz MX 100 relay.yy (no trailing dot!) 167: 168:
在第166:164:165:pqr MX 100 relay.yy行中未找到“yyy”的线路上的“yy”。166:xyz MX 100继电器.yy（无尾随点！）167:168：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 177: 175: When fully written out this stands for: 176: 177: pqr.foo.xx. MX 100 relay.yy. 178: xyz.foo.xx. MX 100 relay.yy.foo.xx. (name extension!) 179:
第177行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：175:完全写出时，表示：176:177:pqr.foo.xx。MX 100继电器.yy。178:xyz.foo.xx。MX 100继电器.yy.foo.xx。（名称扩展！）179：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 178: 176: 177: pqr.foo.xx. MX 100 relay.yy. 178: xyz.foo.xx. MX 100 relay.yy.foo.xx. (name extension!) 179: 180: 6. Missing secondary servers
第178:176:177:pqr.foo.xx行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。MX 100继电器.yy。178:xyz.foo.xx。MX 100继电器.yy.foo.xx。（姓名扩展！）179:180:6。缺少辅助服务器
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 256: 254: 255: foo.xx. MX 100 gateway.xx. 256: MX 200 fallback.yy. 257: *.foo.xx. MX 100 gateway.xx. 258: MX 200 fallback.yy.
第256:254:255:foo.xx行中未找到“yyy”的行中的“yy”。MX 100网关.xx。256:MX 200 fallback.yy。257:*foo.xx。MX 100网关.xx。258:MX 200 fallback.yy。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 258: 256: MX 200 fallback.yy. 257: *.foo.xx. MX 100 gateway.xx. 258: MX 200 fallback.yy. 259: 8. Hostnames 260:
在第258:256:MX 200 fallback.yy行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。257:*foo.xx。MX 100网关.xx。258:MX 200 fallback.yy。259: 8. 主机名260:
2000 found at line 89:
87: 86400 ; Refresh 24 hours
88: 7200 ; Retry 2 hours
2000 found at line 89:
87: 86400 ; Refresh 24 hours
88: 7200 ; Retry 2 hours
89: 2592000 ; Expire 30 days 90: 345600 ; Minimum TTL 4 days 91:
89: 2592000 ; 过期30天90:345600；至少TTL 4天91：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1540.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1836: The text version is sent. 1836(continued): 1837: 1838: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 1838(continued): umber. 1839: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 1839(continued): '. 1840:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1540.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1836:发送文本版本。1836（续）：1837:1838:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 1838（续）：编号。1839:“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 1839（续）：”。1840:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1839:
1837:
1838: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1838(continued): umber.
1839: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1839(continued): '.
1840:
1841: help to get information on how
1841(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1839:
1837:
1838: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1838(continued): umber.
1839: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1839(continued): '.
1840:
1841: help to get information on how
1841(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1555.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 155: 153: In addition, Listserv usually maintains automatic archives of 153(continued): all 154: postings to a list. These archives, contained in the file "l 154(continued): istname 155: LOGyymm", do not contain the MIME headers, so all encoding 156: information will be lost. This is a limitation of the Listse 156(continued): rv 157: software.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1555.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第155行未找到'yyyy'的行上：153:此外，Listserv通常维护153的自动存档（续）：所有154:过账到列表。包含在文件“l 154（续）：istname 155:LOGyymm”中的这些归档文件不包含MIME头，因此所有编码156:信息都将丢失。这是列表SE 156（续）：rv 157：软件的一个限制。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1564.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 811: 809: 810: The following searches should be tried. Unless otherwise sta 810(continued): ted, the 811: "XXX" or "YYY" part of the search filter should be chosen in 811(continued): such a 812: way as to return a single result. Unless stated otherwise th 812(continued): e 813: results should return all attributes for the entry.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1564.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第811:809:810行中未找到'yyy'。应尝试以下搜索。除非sta 810（续）：ted另有规定，否则应在811（续）中选择搜索筛选器的811:“XXX”或“YYY”部分，例如812:方式，以返回单个结果。除非另有说明，否则th 812（续）：e 813：结果应返回条目的所有属性。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 848:
846:
847: objectClass=person AND
848: (commonName=XXX* OR telephoneNumber=*YYY)
849:
850: 75. Search returning all entries (i.e., 100 entries in the si
850(continued): ngle
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 848:
846:
847: objectClass=person AND
848: (commonName=XXX* OR telephoneNumber=*YYY)
849:
850: 75. Search returning all entries (i.e., 100 entries in the si
850(continued): ngle
2000 found at line 527:
525:
526: 42. If the DSA runs as a static server, state the start-up ti
526(continued): me for a
527: DSA with a database of 20000 entries. If this varies wid
527(continued): ely
528: according to configuration options, give figures for the
528(continued): various
529: options. ...............................................
529(continued): ........
2000 found at line 527:
525:
526: 42. If the DSA runs as a static server, state the start-up ti
526(continued): me for a
527: DSA with a database of 20000 entries. If this varies wid
527(continued): ely
528: according to configuration options, give figures for the
528(continued): various
529: options. ...............................................
529(continued): ........
2000 found at line 709: 707: 708: i. The tests should be made against an organisational databa 708(continued): se of 709: 20000 entries. Some tests are against subsets of this da 709(continued): ta, and 710: so the database should be set up according to the followi 710(continued): ng 711: instructions.
2000在第709:707:708:i行找到。测试应针对组织数据库A 708（续）：se 709:20000条目进行。有些测试是针对da 709（续）：ta和710：的子集进行的，因此应根据以下说明建立数据库710（续）：ng 711：说明。
2000 found at line 713: 711: instructions. 712: 713: Create an organisational DSA with 20000 entries below the 713(continued): 714: organisation node. Sub-divide this data into a number of 714(continued): 715: organisational units, one of which should contain 1000 en 715(continued): tries,
2000在第713行：711：说明中找到。712:713：创建一个组织DSA，在713（续）：714：组织节点下有20000个条目。将该数据细分为若干714（续）：715：组织单位，其中一个应包含1000个en 715（续）：试验，
2000 found at line 808:
806: unit.
807:
808: ii. An organisation subtree search, on the subtree of 20000 e
808(continued): ntries.
809:
810: The following searches should be tried. Unless otherwise sta
810(continued): ted, the
2000 found at line 808:
806: unit.
807:
808: ii. An organisation subtree search, on the subtree of 20000 e
808(continued): ntries.
809:
810: The following searches should be tried. Unless otherwise sta
810(continued): ted, the
2000 found at line 851:
849:
850: 75. Search returning all entries (i.e., 100 entries in the si
850(continued): ngle
851: level search, and all 20000 entries in the subtree search
851(continued): :
852:
853: objectClass=*
2000 found at line 851:
849:
850: 75. Search returning all entries (i.e., 100 entries in the si
850(continued): ngle
851: level search, and all 20000 entries in the subtree search
851(continued): :
852:
853: objectClass=*
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1578.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1946: 1944: 700 13th Street, NW 1945: Suite 950 1946: Washington, DC 20005 1947: USA 1948:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1578.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000位于第1946行：1944:700西北第13街1945:950号套房1946:华盛顿特区20005 1947:美国1948:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1589.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1979:
1977: presumably with negligible frequency error.
1978:
1979: #define MAXPHASE 512000 /* max phase error (us) */
1980: #ifdef PPS_SYNC
1981: #define MAXFREQ 100 /* max frequency error (ppm)
1981(continued): */
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1589.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1979:
1977: presumably with negligible frequency error.
1978:
1979: #define MAXPHASE 512000 /* max phase error (us) */
1980: #ifdef PPS_SYNC
1981: #define MAXFREQ 100 /* max frequency error (ppm)
1981(continued): */
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1593.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1088: 1086: response(6) 1087: 1088: -- enumeration values between 2000 and 3999 are r 1088(continued): eserved 1089: -- for IP socket traces, 1090:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第1088行找到的文件rfc1593.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:response（6）1087:1088:--2000和3999之间的枚举值为r 1088（续）：保留1089:--对于IP套接字跟踪，1090:
2000 found at line 1149: 1147: testReq(26), 1148: 1149: -- enumeration values between 2000 and 3999 are r 1149(continued): eserved 1150: -- for IP socket traces. 1151: ipTestFrame(2001),
2000位于第1149:1147:testReq（26）行，1148:1149:--2000和3999之间的枚举值为r 1149（续）：保留1150:--用于IP套接字跟踪。1151:ipTestFrame（2001年），
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1594.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 379: 377: The text version is sent. 377(continued): 378:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1594.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第379行未找到'yyyy'的行上：377:发送文本版本。377（续）：378：
379: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 379(continued): umber. 380: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 380(continued): '. 381:
379:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中'nnnn'是rfc n 379（续）：编号。380:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 380（续）：'。381:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 380:
378:
379: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
379(continued): umber.
380: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
380(continued): '.
381:
382: help to get information on how
382(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 380:
378:
379: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
379(continued): umber.
380: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
380(continued): '.
381:
382: help to get information on how
382(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 574: 572: In addition, back issues of the Report are available for a 572(continued): nonymous 573: FTP from the host ftp.isi.edu in the in-notes/imr director 573(continued): y, with 574: the file names in the form imryymm.txt, where yy is the la 574(continued): st two 575: digits of the year and mm two digits for the month. For e 575(continued): xample, 576: the July 1992 Report is in the file imr9207.txt.
第574行中没有“yyy”的行上有“yy”：572:此外，在In notes/imr director 573（续）：y中，主机FTP.isi.edu提供了572（续）：非ymous 573:FTP的报告背面版本，其中574:imrymm.txt格式的文件名，其中yy是la 574（续）：st两个575：年份的数字和mm两个月的数字。对于e 575（续）：例如，576:1992年7月的报告在imr9207.txt文件中。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1595.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 300: 298: 299: ifSpeed Speed of line rate for SONET/SDH, 300: (e.g., 155520000 bps). 301: 302: ifPhysAddress The value of the Circuit Identifier 302(continued): .
+=+=+=+=+=+==在第300行找到的文件rfc1595.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:298:299:IFSONET/SDH的线速率速度，300:（例如，155520000 bps）。301:302:IFPHY按下电路标识符302的值（续）：。
2000 found at line 357:
355: ifSpeed set to speed of SONET/SDH path
356: (e.g., an STS-1 path has a
357: rate of 50112000 bps.)
358:
359: ifPhysAddress Circuit Identifier or OCTET STRING
359(continued): of
2000 found at line 357:
355: ifSpeed set to speed of SONET/SDH path
356: (e.g., an STS-1 path has a
357: rate of 50112000 bps.)
358:
359: ifPhysAddress Circuit Identifier or OCTET STRING
359(continued): of
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1600.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1950: 1948: The text version is sent. 1948(continued):
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1600.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第1950:1948行未找到'yyyy'的行上：发送文本版本。1948年（续）：
1949: 1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 1950(continued): umber. 1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 1951(continued): '. 1952:
1949:1950:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中'nnnn'是rfc n 1950（续）：编号。1951年：“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 1951（续）：”。1952:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1607.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 12:
10:
11:
12: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY
13:
14: Status of this Memo
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1607.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 12:
10:
11:
12: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY
13:
14: Status of this Memo
century found at line 60: 58: Cerf
第60行发现的世纪：58:Cerf
60: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 60(continued): ril 1994 61: 62:
60:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 60（续）：ril 1994 61:62：
century found at line 116: 114: Cerf
第116行发现的世纪：114:Cerf
116: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 116(continued): ril 1994 117: 118:
116:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 116（续）：ril 1994 117:118：
century found at line 172: 170: Cerf
第172行发现的世纪：170:Cerf
172: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap
172:RFC1607《21世纪展望》1美联社
172(continued): ril 1994 173: 174:
172（续）：1994年11月173日：174日：
century found at line 228: 226: Cerf
第228行发现的世纪：226:Cerf
228: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 228(continued): ril 1994 229: 230:
228:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 228（续）：ril 1994 229:230：
century found at line 284: 282: Cerf
第284行：282:Cerf中发现的世纪
284: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 284(continued): ril 1994 285: 286:
284:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 284（续）：ril 1994 285:286：
century found at line 340: 338: Cerf
第340行发现的世纪：338:Cerf
340: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 340(continued): ril 1994 341: 342:
340:RFC 1607《21世纪展望》1 Ap 340（续）：ril 1994 341:342：
century found at line 396: 394: Cerf
第396行发现的世纪：394:Cerf
396: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 396(continued): ril 1994 397: 398:
396:RFC1607《21世纪展望》1 Ap 396（续）：ril 1994 397:398：
century found at line 452: 450: Cerf
第452行发现的世纪：450:Cerf
452: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 452(continued): ril 1994 453: 454:
452:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 452（续）：ril 1994 453:454：
century found at line 508: 506: Cerf
第508行发现的世纪：506:Cerf
508: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 508(continued): ril 1994 509: 510:
508:RFC1607 21世纪的观点1 Ap 508（续）：ril 1994 509:510：
century found at line 564: 562: Cerf [ 562(continued): Page 10] 563: 564: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 564(continued): ril 1994 565: 566:
第564:562行：Cerf[562（续）：第10页]563:564:RFC1607《21世纪》的一个观点1 Ap 564（续）：ril 1994 565:566：
century found at line 620: 618: Cerf [ 618(continued): Page 11] 619: 620: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 620(continued): ril 1994 621: 622:
第620:618行：Cerf[618（续）：第11页]619:620:RFC 1607《21世纪》第一期Ap 620（续）：ril 1994 621:622：
century found at line 676: 674: Cerf [ 674(continued): Page 12] 675: 676: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 676(continued): ril 1994 677: 678:
第676行：674:Cerf[674（续）：第12页]675:676:RFC 1607《21世纪展望》1 Ap 676（续）：ril 1994 677:678：
century found at line 732: 730: Cerf [ 730(continued): Page 13] 731: 732: RFC 1607 A View from the 21st Century 1 Ap 732(continued): ril 1994 733: 734:
第732:730行：中央应急循环基金[730（续）：第13页]731:732:RFC 1607《21世纪展望》1 Ap 732（续）：ril 1994 733:734：
2000 found at line 663: 661: transmission, switching and computing in a cost-effective 662: way. For a long time, this technology involved rather
2000年，第663行：661：以成本效益高的662：方式传输、交换和计算。很长一段时间以来，这项技术涉及
663: bulky equipment - some of the early 3DV clips from 2000- 664: 2005 showed rooms full of gear required to steer beams 665: around. A very interesting combination of fiber optics and
663：笨重的设备——2000-664:2005的一些早期3DV剪辑显示，房间里满是操纵光束665:的设备。光纤和光纤的有趣结合
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1608.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 240:
238: provider :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
239: /* points to network provider */
240: onlineDate :: uTCTimeSyntax
241: /* date when network got connected to the Internet */
242:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1608.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 240:
238: provider :: DistinguishedNameSyntax,
239: /* points to network provider */
240: onlineDate :: uTCTimeSyntax
241: /* date when network got connected to the Internet */
242:
UTCTime found at line 370:
368: asGuardian :: DistinguishedNameSyntax, */
369: /* DN of guardian of this AS */
370: lastModifiedDate :: UTCtimeSyntax */
371: /* important as routes change frequently */
372:
UTCTime found at line 370:
368: asGuardian :: DistinguishedNameSyntax, */
369: /* DN of guardian of this AS */
370: lastModifiedDate :: UTCtimeSyntax */
371: /* important as routes change frequently */
372:
UTCTime found at line 423:
421: that the number was assigned to. This does not
422: imply that assTo "owns" this number now. */
423: assDate :: uTCTimeSyntax,
424: /* date of assignment for this number */
425: nicHandle :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
UTCTime found at line 423:
421: that the number was assigned to. This does not
422: imply that assTo "owns" this number now. */
423: assDate :: uTCTimeSyntax,
424: /* date of assignment for this number */
425: nicHandle :: CaseIgnoreStringSyntax,
UTCTime found at line 1048: 1046: speed: id-nw-at.10 :numericString 1047: traffic: id-nw-at.11 :numericString 1048: configurationDate: id-nw-at.12 :utcTime 1049: configurationHistory: id-nw-at.13 :caseIgnoreString 1049(continued): 1050: nodeName,nd: id-nw-at.14 :caseIgnoreString 1050(continued):
第1048:1046行的UTCTime:speed:id-nw-at.10:numericString 1047:traffic:id-nw-at.11:numericString 1048:configurationDate:id-nw-at.12:UTCTime 1049:configurationHistory:id-nw-at.13:caseIgnoreString 1049（续）：1050:nodeName，nd:id-nw-at.14:caseIgnoreString 1050（续）：
UTCTime found at line 1071: 1069: 1070: 1071: onlineDate: id-nw-at.27 :utcTime 1072: ipNodeName,IPnd: id-nw-at.28 :caseIgnoreString 1072(continued): 1073: protocol: id-nw-at.29 :caseIgnoreString 1073(continued):
UTCTime位于第1071:1069:1070:1071行：Online日期：id-nw-at.27:UTCTime 1072:ipNodeName，IPnd:id-nw-at.28:CaseInOresting 1072（续）：1073:protocol:id-nw-at.29:CaseInOresting 1073（续）：
UTCTime found at line 1083:
1081: assBy: id-nw-at.37 :DN
1082: assTo: id-nw-at.38 :DN
1083: assDate: id-nw-at.39 :utcTime
UTCTime found at line 1083:
1081: assBy: id-nw-at.37 :DN
1082: assTo: id-nw-at.38 :DN
1083: assDate: id-nw-at.39 :utcTime
1084: nicHandle: id-nw-at.40 :caseIgnoreString
1084(continued):
1085: relNwElement: id-nw-at.41 :DN
1084: nicHandle: id-nw-at.40 :caseIgnoreString
1084(continued):
1085: relNwElement: id-nw-at.41 :DN
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1609.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 588:
586: /* (average) use in percent of nominal bandwidth
587: [ this needs more specification later ] */
588: configurationDate :: uTCTimeSyntax,
589: /* date when network was configured in current
590: shape */
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1609.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 588:
586: /* (average) use in percent of nominal bandwidth
587: [ this needs more specification later ] */
588: configurationDate :: uTCTimeSyntax,
589: /* date when network was configured in current
590: shape */
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1610.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1950: 1948: The text version is sent. 1948(continued): 1949: 1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 1950(continued): umber. 1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 1951(continued): '. 1952:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1610.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第1950:1948行中未找到'yyyy'的行上：发送文本版本。1948（续）：1949:1950:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中'nnnn'是rfc n 1950（续）：编号。1951年：“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 1951（续）：”。1952:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
century found at line 926:
924: An Experimental protocol.
925:
926: 1607 - A View from the 21st Century
927:
928: This is an information document and does not specif
928(continued): y any
century found at line 926:
924: An Experimental protocol.
925:
926: 1607 - A View from the 21st Century
927:
928: This is an information document and does not specif
928(continued): y any
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1614.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1565: 1563: The general format of a Gopher+ view descriptor is: 1564:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1614.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第1565行未找到'yyyy'：1563:Gopher+视图描述符的一般格式为：1564:
1565: xxx/yyy zzz: <nnnK> 1566: 1567:
1565:xxx/yyy zzz:1566:1567:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1575:
1573:
1574:
1575: where xxx is a general type-of-information advisory, yyy is w
1575(continued): hat
1576: information format you need understand to interpret this info
1576(continued): rmation,
1577: zzz is a language advisory (coded using POSIX definitions), a
1577(continued): nd nnn
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1575:
1573:
1574:
1575: where xxx is a general type-of-information advisory, yyy is w
1575(continued): hat
1576: information format you need understand to interpret this info
1576(continued): rmation,
1577: zzz is a language advisory (coded using POSIX definitions), a
1577(continued): nd nnn
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1584: 1582: the need to be consistent in the use of type/encoding attribu 1582(continued): tes with 1583: the MIME specification. The Gopher+ Type Registry may thus 1584: eventually disappear, together with the set of xxx/yyy values 1584(continued): it 1585: currently contains.) 1586:
第1584行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：1582：在使用类型/编码属性1582时需要保持一致（续）：tes与1583:MIME规范。Gopher+类型注册表可能因此1584:最终消失，以及一组xxx/yyy值1584（续）：它1585:当前包含。）1586：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1625.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 255: 253: ( use = "wb", relation = "ro", term = 0 ) 254: AND 255: ( use = "wb", relation = "ro", term = 2000 ) 256: ) 257:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1625.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第255行找到：253:（use=“wb”，relation=“ro”，term=0）254:和255:（use=“wb”，relation=“ro”，term=2000）256:）257:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1632.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 3795:
3793: association is rejected. However, if a chain operation is r
3793(continued): equired
3794: to check the DN, the bind IS allowed.
3795: - When comparing attributes of UTCtime syntax, if the seconds
3795(continued): field
3796: is omitted, QUIPU does not perform the match correctly (i.e
3796(continued): ., the
3797: seconds field in the attribute values should be ignored, bu
3797(continued): t are
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1632.txt +=+=+=+=+=
UTCTime found at line 3795:
3793: association is rejected. However, if a chain operation is r
3793(continued): equired
3794: to check the DN, the bind IS allowed.
3795: - When comparing attributes of UTCtime syntax, if the seconds
3795(continued): field
3796: is omitted, QUIPU does not perform the match correctly (i.e
3796(continued): ., the
3797: seconds field in the attribute values should be ignored, bu
3797(continued): t are
2000 found at line 1214:
1212: 1-800-257-OPEN (U.S. and Canada)
1213: 1-612-482-6736 (worldwide)
1214: FAX: 1-612-482-2000 (worldwide)
1215: EMAIL: info@cdc.com
1216: or
2000 found at line 1214:
1212: 1-800-257-OPEN (U.S. and Canada)
1213: 1-612-482-6736 (worldwide)
1214: FAX: 1-612-482-2000 (worldwide)
1215: EMAIL: info@cdc.com
1216: or
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1635.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 605:
603: Most archive machines perform other functions as well. Pleas
603(continued): e
604: respect the needs of their primary users and restrict your FT
604(continued): P access
605: to non-prime hours (generally between 1900 and 0600 hours loc
605(continued): al time
606: for that site) whenever possible. It is especially important
606(continued): to
607: remember this for sites located on another continent or acros
607(continued): s a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1635.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 605:
603: Most archive machines perform other functions as well. Pleas
603(continued): e
604: respect the needs of their primary users and restrict your FT
604(continued): P access
605: to non-prime hours (generally between 1900 and 0600 hours loc
605(continued): al time
606: for that site) whenever possible. It is especially important
606(continued): to
607: remember this for sites located on another continent or acros
607(continued): s a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1645.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 590: 588: 554 Error, failed (technical reason) 589: 590: 4.4.6 HOLDuntil <YYMMDDHHMMSS> [+/-GMTdifference] 591: 592: The HOLDuntil command allows for the delayed delivery of a me 592(continued): ssage,
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第590行未找到'yyyy'的行上：588:554错误，失败（技术原因）589:590:4.4.6保持直到<yymddhhmmss>[+/-GMTdifference]591:592:holdintil命令允许延迟传递me 592（续）：消息，
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1646.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 428:
426:
427: Command Rejected 0X10030000
428: Intervention Required 0X08020000
429: Data Check 0X10010000
430: Operation Check 0X10050000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1646.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 428:
426:
427: Command Rejected 0X10030000
428: Intervention Required 0X08020000
429: Data Check 0X10010000
430: Operation Check 0X10050000
2000 found at line 431:
429: Data Check 0X10010000
430: Operation Check 0X10050000
431: Component Disconnected (LU) 0X08020000
432:
433: Note 2*: Device End - A positive response to the Server's
433(continued): data
2000 found at line 431:
429: Data Check 0X10010000
430: Operation Check 0X10050000
431: Component Disconnected (LU) 0X08020000
432:
433: Note 2*: Device End - A positive response to the Server's
433(continued): data
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1647.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1355:
1353: 0x00 Command Reject 0x10030000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1647.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1355:
1353: 0x00 Command Reject 0x10030000
1353(continued): 1354: 1355: 0x01 Intervention Required 0x08020000 1355(continued): 1356: 1357: 0x02 Operation Check 0x10050000 1357(continued):
1353（续）：1354:1355:0x01需要干预0x08020001355（续）：1356:1357:0x02操作检查0x10050000 1357（续）：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1671.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 410: 408: Phone: +41 22 767-4967 409: Fax: +41 22 767-7155 410: Telex: 419000 cer ch 411: EMail: brian@dxcoms.cern.ch 412:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1671.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第410行找到：408:电话：+4122767-4967409:传真：+4122767-7155410:电传：419000 cer ch 411:电子邮件：brian@dxcoms.cern.ch 412:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1679.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 95:
93: examined below. The time frame for design, development, and
94: deployment of HPN based systems and subsystems is 1996 into t
94(continued): he
95: twenty first century.
96:
97: Three general problem domains have been identified by the HPN
97(continued): working
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1679.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 95:
93: examined below. The time frame for design, development, and
94: deployment of HPN based systems and subsystems is 1996 into t
94(continued): he
95: twenty first century.
96:
97: Three general problem domains have been identified by the HPN
97(continued): working
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1689.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 6899:
6897: vision of how information management must change in the 1990s
6897(continued): to meet
6898: the social and economic opportunities and challenges of the 2
6898(continued): 1st
6899: century. Members of the Coalition Task Force include, among
6899(continued): others,
6900: higher education institutions, publishers, network service pr
6900(continued): oviders,
6901: computer hardware, software, and systems companies, library n
6901(continued): etworks
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1689.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 6899:
6897: vision of how information management must change in the 1990s
6897(continued): to meet
6898: the social and economic opportunities and challenges of the 2
6898(continued): 1st
6899: century. Members of the Coalition Task Force include, among
6899(continued): others,
6900: higher education institutions, publishers, network service pr
6900(continued): oviders,
6901: computer hardware, software, and systems companies, library n
6901(continued): etworks
2000 found at line 421:
419: archie did for the world of ftp. A central server periodi
419(continued): cally
420: scans the complete menu hierarchies of Gopher servers appe
420(continued): aring on
2000 found at line 421:
419: archie did for the world of ftp. A central server periodi
419(continued): cally
420: scans the complete menu hierarchies of Gopher servers appe
420(continued): aring on
421: an ever-expanding list (over 2000 sites as of November 199 421(continued): 3). The 422: resulting index is provided by a veronica server and can b 422(continued): e 423: accessed by any gopher client.
421：不断扩大的名单（截至1999年11月超过2000个地点421（续）：3）。422:结果索引由veronica服务器提供，可由任何gopher客户端访问。
2000 found at line 471: 469: 470: There are currently (as of November 1993) some 500 registe 470(continued): red WAIS 471: databases with an estimated 2000 additional databases that 471(continued): are not 472: yet registered. There are approximately another 100 comme 472(continued): rcial 473: WAIS databases.
2000在第471:469:470行找到：截至1993年11月，目前约有500个注册数据库470（续）：红色WAIS 471：数据库，估计还有2000个其他数据库471（续）：尚未注册。大约还有100个comme 472（续）：rcial 473:WAIS数据库。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1693.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 574:
572: 4 Baker Boston $849 Sportswea
572(continued): r
573: 5 Baker Washington $3,100 Weights
574: 6 Baker Washington $2000 Camping G
574(continued): ear
575: 7 Baker Atlanta $290 Baseball
575(continued): Gloves
576: 8 Baker Boston $1,500 Sportswea
576(continued): r
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1693.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 574:
572: 4 Baker Boston $849 Sportswea
572(continued): r
573: 5 Baker Washington $3,100 Weights
574: 6 Baker Washington $2000 Camping G
574(continued): ear
575: 7 Baker Atlanta $290 Baseball
575(continued): Gloves
576: 8 Baker Boston $1,500 Sportswea
576(continued): r
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1696.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 109: 107: 108: mdmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY 109: LAST-UPDATED "9406120000Z" 110: ORGANIZATION "IETF Modem Management Working Group" 111:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1696.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第109行找到：107:108:mdmMIB模块-IDENTITY 109:LAST-UPDATED“9406120000Z”110:ORGANIZATION“IETF调制解调器管理工作组”111:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1698.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 513:
511: 31 80 {1 - RDN, [SET OF]
512: 30 80 {2 - AttributeValueAssertion, [SEQUENCE]
513: 06 03 5504yy -- OID identifying an attribute named in
514: -- the Directory standard
515: -- which one is determined by yy
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1698.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 513:
511: 31 80 {1 - RDN, [SET OF]
512: 30 80 {2 - AttributeValueAssertion, [SEQUENCE]
513: 06 03 5504yy -- OID identifying an attribute named in
514: -- the Directory standard
515: -- which one is determined by yy
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 515:
513: 06 03 5504yy -- OID identifying an attribute named in
514: -- the Directory standard
515: -- which one is determined by yy
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 515:
513: 06 03 5504yy -- OID identifying an attribute named in
514: -- the Directory standard
515: -- which one is determined by yy
516: 13 La xxxxxx -- [Printable string]
517: -- could be T61 string, with tag 14
516: 13 La xxxxxx -- [Printable string]
517: -- could be T61 string, with tag 14
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 522: 520: 521: The most likely attributes for an RDN have the following hex 521(continued): values 522: for yy. 523: 524: CommonName 03
第522:520:521行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：RDN的最可能属性具有以下十六进制521（续）：值522:yy。523:524:CommonName 03
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 903: 901: 902: 903: yy is exactly one octet (i.e., one hex digit per y) holdin 903(continued): g part 904: of the length 905:
在第903:901:902:903:yy行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”正好是903中的一个八位字节（即每y一个十六进制数字）（续）：g第904部分：长度905：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 918: 916: innermost nest of construction) 917: 918: yy - as part of a value - a variable value, each y represe 918(continued): nts one 919: hex digit 920:
在第918:916行：最里面的构造嵌套）917:918:yy-作为值的一部分-一个变量值，每个y代表918（续）：nts一个919:十六进制数字920:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1699.txt +=+=+=+=+= century found at line 1050: 1048: 1049: 1050: 1607 Cerf Apr 94 A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 1051: 1052: This document is a composition of letters discussing a possible 1052(continued): future.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1699.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=世纪发现于第1050行：1048:1049:1050:1607 Cerf 1994年4月《21世纪展望》1051:1052：本文件是讨论可能的1052（续）：未来的信件组成。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1700.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 9905:
9903: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT) -
9903(continued): old
9904: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private us
9904(continued): e
9905: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster group
9905(continued): s
9906: Sys. Communication Architecture
9906(continued): (SCA)
9907: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test prot
9907(continued): ocol
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1700.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 9905:
9903: AB-00-03-00-00-00 6004 DEC Local Area Transport (LAT) -
9903(continued): old
9904: AB-00-04-00-xx-xx ???? Reserved DEC customer private us
9904(continued): e
9905: AB-00-04-01-xx-yy 6007 DEC Local Area VAX Cluster group
9905(continued): s
9906: Sys. Communication Architecture
9906(continued): (SCA)
9907: CF-00-00-00-00-00 9000 Ethernet Configuration Test prot
9907(continued): ocol
1900 found at line 10173:
10171: 014.000.000.063 2422-650-23500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10171(continued): G]
10172: 014.000.000.064 2422-330-02500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10172(continued): G]
10173: 014.000.000.065 2422-350-01900 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10173(continued): G]
10174: 014.000.000.066 2422-410-00700 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10174(continued): G]
10175: 014.000.000.067 2422-539-06200 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10175(continued): G]
1900 found at line 10173:
10171: 014.000.000.063 2422-650-23500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10171(continued): G]
10172: 014.000.000.064 2422-330-02500 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10172(continued): G]
10173: 014.000.000.065 2422-350-01900 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10173(continued): G]
10174: 014.000.000.066 2422-410-00700 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10174(continued): G]
10175: 014.000.000.067 2422-539-06200 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10175(continued): G]
1900 found at line 10255:
10253:
10254:
10255: 014.000.000.131 2422-190-41900 00 T-G Airfreight AS [OX
10255(continued): G]
10256: 014.000.000.132 2422-616-16100 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10256(continued): G]
10257: 014.000.000.133 2422-150-50700-00 Tollpost-Globe Int. [OX
10257(continued): G]
1900 found at line 10255:
10253:
10254:
10255: 014.000.000.131 2422-190-41900 00 T-G Airfreight AS [OX
10255(continued): G]
10256: 014.000.000.132 2422-616-16100 00 Tollpost-Globe AS [OX
10256(continued): G]
10257: 014.000.000.133 2422-150-50700-00 Tollpost-Globe Int. [OX
10257(continued): G]
1900 found at line 11112: 11110: 1569 621 ?? Something from Emulex 11111: 1571 623 UNKNOWN??? Running on a Novell Server 11112: 1900 076C Xerox 11113: 2857 0b29 Site Lock 11114: 3113 0c29 Site Lock Applications
在第11112:11110:1569621行找到1900？？Emulex 11111:1571623中的一些未知信息？？？在Novell服务器11112:1900 076C Xerox 11113:2857 0b29站点锁定11114:3113 0c29站点锁定应用程序上运行
2000 found at line 2822:
2820: tcp-id-port 1999/tcp cisco identification port
2821: tcp-id-port 1999/udp cisco identification port
2822: callbook 2000/tcp
2823: callbook 2000/udp
2824: dc 2001/tcp
2000 found at line 2822:
2820: tcp-id-port 1999/tcp cisco identification port
2821: tcp-id-port 1999/udp cisco identification port
2822: callbook 2000/tcp
2823: callbook 2000/udp
2824: dc 2001/tcp
2000 found at line 2823:
2821: tcp-id-port 1999/udp cisco identification port
2822: callbook 2000/tcp
2823: callbook 2000/udp
2824: dc 2001/tcp
2825: wizard 2001/udp curry
2000 found at line 2823:
2821: tcp-id-port 1999/udp cisco identification port
2822: callbook 2000/tcp
2823: callbook 2000/udp
2824: dc 2001/tcp
2825: wizard 2001/udp curry
2000 found at line 10120:
10118: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25 [GB
10118(continued): 7]
10119: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25 [JF
10119(continued): W]
2000 found at line 10120:
10118: 014.000.000.018 2624-522-80900 52 FGAN-SIEMENS-X25 [GB
10118(continued): 7]
10119: 014.000.000.019 2041-170-10000 00 SHAPE-X25 [JF
10119(continued): W]
10120: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET [AX
10120(continued): H]
10121: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1 [VX
10121(continued): T]
10122: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25 [GB
10122(continued): 7]
10120: 014.000.000.020 5052-737-20000 50 UQNET [AX
10120(continued): H]
10121: 014.000.000.021 3020-801-00057 50 DMC-CRC1 [VX
10121(continued): T]
10122: 014.000.000.022 2624-522-80329 02 FGAN-FGANFFMVAX-X25 [GB
10122(continued): 7]
2000 found at line 11572:
11570: AMIGA-1200/LC040
11571: AMIGA-1200/040
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
2000 found at line 11572:
11570: AMIGA-1200/LC040
11571: AMIGA-1200/040
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
2000 found at line 11573:
11571: AMIGA-1200/040
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
2000 found at line 11573:
11571: AMIGA-1200/040
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
2000 found at line 11574:
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
2000 found at line 11574:
11572: AMIGA-2000
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
2000 found at line 11575:
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
2000 found at line 11575:
11573: AMIGA-2000/010
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
2000 found at line 11576:
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
2000 found at line 11576:
11574: AMIGA-2000/020
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
2000 found at line 11577:
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
2000 found at line 11577:
11575: AMIGA-2000/EC030
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
2000 found at line 11578:
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
11580: AMIGA-3000
2000 found at line 11578:
11576: AMIGA-2000/030
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
11580: AMIGA-3000
2000 found at line 11579:
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
11580: AMIGA-3000
11581: AMIGA-3000/EC040
2000 found at line 11579:
11577: AMIGA-2000/LC040
11578: AMIGA-2000/EC040
11579: AMIGA-2000/040
11580: AMIGA-3000
11581: AMIGA-3000/EC040
2000 found at line 12014:
12012: AIX/370
12013: AIX-PS/2
12014: BS-2000
12015: CEDAR
12016: CGW
2000 found at line 12014:
12012: AIX/370
12013: AIX-PS/2
12014: BS-2000
12015: CEDAR
12016: CGW
2000 found at line 12356: 12354: HAZELTINE-1520 12355: HAZELTINE-1552 12356: HAZELTINE-2000 12357: HAZELTINE-ESPRIT 12358: HITACHI-5601
2000位于第12356行：12354:HAZELTINE-1520 12355:HAZELTINE-1552 12356:HAZELTINE-2000 12357:HAZELTINE-ESPRIT 12358:HITACHI-5601
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1705.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1166: 1164: will be made. 1165: 1166: node.sub.domain.name IN TA xx.yy.zz.aa.bb.cc.dd.ee 1167: 1168: ee.dd.cc.bb.aa.zz.yy.aa.in-addr.tcp IN PTR node.sub.domain.n 1168(continued): ame.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1705.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第1166:1164:行中未找到'yyy'。1165:1166:TA xx.yy.zz.aa.bb.cc.dd.ee 1167:1168:ee.dd.cc.bb.aa.zz.yy.aa.IN-addr.tcp在PTR node.sub.domain.n 1168中（续）：ame。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1168: 1166: node.sub.domain.name IN TA xx.yy.zz.aa.bb.cc.dd.ee 1167: 1168: ee.dd.cc.bb.aa.zz.yy.aa.in-addr.tcp IN PTR node.sub.domain.n 1168(continued): ame. 1169: 1170: Using these entries, along with the existing DNS A records, a 1170(continued):
在PTR node.sub.domain.n 1168（续）：ame中的TA xx.yy.zz.aa.bb.cc.dd.ee 1167:1168:ee.dd.cc.bb.aa.zz.yy.aa.IN-addr.tcp中的第1168行：1166:node.sub.domain.name找到不带“yyy”的行上的“yy”。1169:1170：使用这些条目以及现有DNS A记录，A 1170（续）：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1172: 1170: Using these entries, along with the existing DNS A records, a 1170(continued): 1171: requesting node can determine where the remote node is locate 1171(continued): d. The 1172: format xx.yy.zz is the IEEE assigned portion and aa.bb.cc.dd. 1172(continued): ee is 1173: the encoded machine serial number as described in section 4.1 1173(continued): . 1174:
在第1172行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：1170:使用这些条目以及现有DNS a记录，1170（续）：1171:请求节点可以确定远程节点位于1171（续）：d的位置。1172：格式xx.yy.zz是IEEE指定的部分和aa.bb.cc.dd。1172（续）：ee为1173：第4.1 1173节（续）所述的编码机器序列号：。1174:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1712.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 208:
206: @ IN SOA marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au. postmaster.cs.curtin
206(continued): .edu.au.
207: (
208: 94070503 ; Serial (yymmddnn)
209: 10800 ; Refresh (3 hours)
210: 3600 ; Retry (1 hour)
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1712.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 208:
206: @ IN SOA marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au. postmaster.cs.curtin
206(continued): .edu.au.
207: (
208: 94070503 ; Serial (yymmddnn)
209: 10800 ; Refresh (3 hours)
210: 3600 ; Retry (1 hour)
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1713.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 104: 102: University, but then Eric Wassenaar from Nikhef did a major r 102(continued): ewrite 103: and still seems to be actively working on improving it. The 103(continued): program 104: is available from ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host_YYMMDD 104(continued): .tar.Z 105: (YYMMDD is the date of the latest release). 106:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1713.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第104行：102：大学，但是Nikhef的Eric Wassenaar做了一个主要的r 102（续）：ewrite 103:并且似乎仍在积极改进它。103（续）：程序104：可从ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host_YYMMDD 104（续）：tar.Z 105：（YYMMDD是最新发布的日期）。106:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 105:
103: and still seems to be actively working on improving it. The
103(continued): program
104: is available from ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host_YYMMDD
104(continued): .tar.Z
105: (YYMMDD is the date of the latest release).
106:
107: By default, host just maps host names to Internet addresses,
107(continued): querying
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 105:
103: and still seems to be actively working on improving it. The
103(continued): program
104: is available from ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host_YYMMDD
104(continued): .tar.Z
105: (YYMMDD is the date of the latest release).
106:
107: By default, host just maps host names to Internet addresses,
107(continued): querying
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1714.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 414:
412: Example of use:
413:
414: -limit 2000
415:
416: 2.3.3 schema
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1714.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 414:
412: Example of use:
413:
414: -limit 2000
415:
416: 2.3.3 schema
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1718.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 969:
967: mailing list. File names beginning with "1" (one) contain ge
967(continued): neral
968: IETF information. This is only a partial list of the availab
968(continued): le
969: files. (The 'yymm' below refers to the year and month.)
970:
971: o 0mtg-agenda.txt Agenda for the meeting
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1718.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 969:
967: mailing list. File names beginning with "1" (one) contain ge
967(continued): neral
968: IETF information. This is only a partial list of the availab
968(continued): le
969: files. (The 'yymm' below refers to the year and month.)
970:
971: o 0mtg-agenda.txt Agenda for the meeting
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 972:
970:
971: o 0mtg-agenda.txt Agenda for the meeting
972: o 0mtg-at-a-glance-yymm.txt Logistics information for t
972(continued): he meeting
973: o 0mtg-rsvp.txt Meeting registration form
974: o 0mtg-sites.txt Future meeting sites and da
974(continued): tes
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 972:
970:
971: o 0mtg-agenda.txt Agenda for the meeting
972: o 0mtg-at-a-glance-yymm.txt Logistics information for t
972(continued): he meeting
973: o 0mtg-rsvp.txt Meeting registration form
974: o 0mtg-sites.txt Future meeting sites and da
974(continued): tes
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 975:
973: o 0mtg-rsvp.txt Meeting registration form
974: o 0mtg-sites.txt Future meeting sites and da
974(continued): tes
975: o 0mtg-multicast-guide-yymm.txt Schedule for MBone-multicas
975(continued): t sessions
976: o 0mtg-traveldirections-yymm.txt Directions to the meeting s
976(continued): ite
977: o 0tao.txt This document
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 975:
973: o 0mtg-rsvp.txt Meeting registration form
974: o 0mtg-sites.txt Future meeting sites and da
974(continued): tes
975: o 0mtg-multicast-guide-yymm.txt Schedule for MBone-multicas
975(continued): t sessions
976: o 0mtg-traveldirections-yymm.txt Directions to the meeting s
976(continued): ite
977: o 0tao.txt This document
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 976: 974: o 0mtg-sites.txt Future meeting sites and da 974(continued): tes 975: o 0mtg-multicast-guide-yymm.txt Schedule for MBone-multicas 975(continued): t sessions 976: o 0mtg-traveldirections-yymm.txt Directions to the meeting s 976(continued): ite 977: o 0tao.txt This document 978:
第976:974:o 0mtg-sites.txt行未来会议地点和da 974（续）：tes 975:o 0mtg-multicast-guide-yymm.txt MBone multicas 975时间表（续）：t sessions 976:o 0mtg-traveldirections-yymm.txt会议指示s 976（续）：ite 977:o 0tao.txt本文件978：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1720.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2230: 2228: The text version is sent. 2228(continued): 2229:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1720.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第2230行中未找到'yyyy'：2228:发送文本版本。2228（续）：2229：
2230: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2230(continued): umber. 2231: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 2231(continued): '. 2232:
2230:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2230（续）：编号。2231:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 2231（续）：'。2232:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2231:
2229:
2230: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2230(continued): umber.
2231: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2231(continued): '.
2232:
2233: help to get information on how
2233(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2231:
2229:
2230: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2230(continued): umber.
2231: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2231(continued): '.
2232:
2233: help to get information on how
2233(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1730.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3334:
3332: date ::= date_text / <"> date_text <">
3333:
3334: date_day ::= 1*2digit
3335: ;; Day of month
3336:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1730.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3334:
3332: date ::= date_text / <"> date_text <">
3333:
3334: date_day ::= 1*2digit
3335: ;; Day of month
3336:
2digit found at line 3337:
3335: ;; Day of month
3336:
3337: date_day_fixed ::= (SPACE digit) / 2digit
3338: ;; Fixed-format version of date_day
3339:
2digit found at line 3337:
3335: ;; Day of month
3336:
3337: date_day_fixed ::= (SPACE digit) / 2digit
3338: ;; Fixed-format version of date_day
3339:
2digit found at line 3348:
3346: date_year ::= 4digit
3347:
3348: date_year_old ::= 2digit
3349: ;; OBSOLETE, (year - 1900)
3350:
2digit found at line 3348:
3346: date_year ::= 4digit
3347:
3348: date_year_old ::= 2digit
3349: ;; OBSOLETE, (year - 1900)
3350:
2digit found at line 3657:
3655: TEXT_CHAR ::= <any CHAR except CR and LF>
3656:
3657: time ::= 2digit ":" 2digit ":" 2digit
3658: ;; Hours minutes seconds
3659:
2digit found at line 3657:
3655: TEXT_CHAR ::= <any CHAR except CR and LF>
3656:
3657: time ::= 2digit ":" 2digit ":" 2digit
3658: ;; Hours minutes seconds
3659:
1900 found at line 3349:
3347:
3348: date_year_old ::= 2digit
1900 found at line 3349:
3347:
3348: date_year_old ::= 2digit
3349: ;; OBSOLETE, (year - 1900)
3350:
3351: date_time ::= <"> (date_time_new / date_time_old) <">
3349: ;; OBSOLETE, (year - 1900)
3350:
3351: date_time ::= <"> (date_time_new / date_time_old) <">
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1732.txt +=+=+=+=+= century found at line 254: 252: 253: The format of dates and times has changed due to the impen 253(continued): ding end 254: of the century. Clients that fail to accept a four-digit 254(continued): year or 255: a signed four-digit timezone value will not work properly 255(continued): with 256: IMAP4.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1732.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=第254行：252:253处找到的世纪：日期和时间的格式因世纪的第253行而更改（续）：结束254:。无法接受四位数254（续）：年或255：带符号四位数时区值的客户端将无法正常工作255（续）：带256:IMAP4。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1733.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 94: 92: message or part of a message. For example, a user connected 92(continued): to an 93: IMAP4 server via a dialup link can determine that a message h 93(continued): as a 94: 2000 byte text segment and a 40 megabyte video segment, and e 94(continued): lect to 95: fetch only the text segment. 96:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1733.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000位于第94行：92：消息或消息的一部分。例如，通过拨号链接将92（续）：连接到93:IMAP4服务器的用户可以确定消息h 93（续）：作为94:2000字节的文本段和40兆字节的视频段，以及e 94（续）：选择到95：仅获取文本段。96:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1739.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 1044:
1042: 1.EDU Reserved Domain
1043: 2.EDU Reserved Domain
1044: 22CF.EDU 22nd Century Foundation
1045: 3.EDU Reserved Domain
1046: ** There are 1499 more matches. Show them? N
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1739.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 1044:
1042: 1.EDU Reserved Domain
1043: 2.EDU Reserved Domain
1044: 22CF.EDU 22nd Century Foundation
1045: 3.EDU Reserved Domain
1046: ** There are 1499 more matches. Show them? N
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1740.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 383: 381: This field denotes the version of AppleSingle format in th 381(continued): e event 382: the format evolves (more fields may be added to the header 382(continued): ). The 383: version described in this note is version $00020000 or 384: 0x00020000. 385:
+=+=+=+=+=+=rfc1740.txt文件+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第383行找到：381：此字段表示th 381中AppleSingle格式的版本（续）：e事件382：格式发生变化（更多字段可添加到标头382（续）：）。本说明中描述的383:版本为$00020000或384:0x00020000。385:
2000 found at line 384: 382: the format evolves (more fields may be added to the header 382(continued): ). The 383: version described in this note is version $00020000 or
2000第384行：382：格式不断演变（更多字段可添加到标题382（续）：）。本说明中描述的383:版本为版本$00020000或
384: 0x00020000. 385: 386: Filler
384:0x00020000。385:386:填料
2000 found at line 590:
588: #define F_fStationary 0x0800 /* file is a stationary pad */
588(continued):
589: #define F_fNameLocked 0x1000 /* file can't be renamed by Fi
589(continued): nder */
590: #define F_fHasBundle 0x2000 /* file has a bundle */
591: #define F_fInvisible 0x4000 /* file's icon is invisible */
591(continued):
592: #define F_fAlias 0x8000 /* file is an alias file (Syst
592(continued): em 7) */
2000 found at line 590:
588: #define F_fStationary 0x0800 /* file is a stationary pad */
588(continued):
589: #define F_fNameLocked 0x1000 /* file can't be renamed by Fi
589(continued): nder */
590: #define F_fHasBundle 0x2000 /* file has a bundle */
591: #define F_fInvisible 0x4000 /* file's icon is invisible */
591(continued):
592: #define F_fAlias 0x8000 /* file is an alias file (Syst
592(continued): em 7) */
2000 found at line 624:
622:
623: uint32 magicNum; /* internal file type tag */
624: uint32 versionNum; /* format version: 2 = 0x00020000 */
625: uchar8 filler[16]; /* filler, currently all bits 0 */
626: uint16 numEntries; /* number of entries which follow */
2000 found at line 624:
622:
623: uint32 magicNum; /* internal file type tag */
624: uint32 versionNum; /* format version: 2 = 0x00020000 */
625: uchar8 filler[16]; /* filler, currently all bits 0 */
626: uint16 numEntries; /* number of entries which follow */
2000 found at line 752:
750:
751: /* Times are stored as a "signed number of seconds before of
751(continued): after
752: * 12:00 a.m. (midnight), January 1, 2000 Greenwich Mean Time
752(continued): (GMT).
753: * Applications must convert to their native date and time
754: * conventions." Any unknown entries are set to 0x80000000
2000 found at line 752:
750:
751: /* Times are stored as a "signed number of seconds before of
751(continued): after
752: * 12:00 a.m. (midnight), January 1, 2000 Greenwich Mean Time
752(continued): (GMT).
753: * Applications must convert to their native date and time
754: * conventions." Any unknown entries are set to 0x80000000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1747.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 736:
734:
735: sdlcPortAdminTopology == multipoint
735(continued): "
736: DEFVAL { 2000 }
737: ::= { sdlcPortAdminEntry 9 }
738:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1747.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 736:
734:
735: sdlcPortAdminTopology == multipoint
735(continued): "
736: DEFVAL { 2000 }
737: ::= { sdlcPortAdminEntry 9 }
738:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1752.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1929:
1927:
1928: We recommend that a new IPng Transition (NGTRANS) Working Gro
1928(continued): up be
1929: formed with Bob Gilligan of Sun Microsystems and xxx of yyy a
1929(continued): s co-
1930: chairs to design the mechanisms and procedures to support the
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1752.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1929:
1927:
1928: We recommend that a new IPng Transition (NGTRANS) Working Gro
1928(continued): up be
1929: formed with Bob Gilligan of Sun Microsystems and xxx of yyy a
1929(continued): s co-
1930: chairs to design the mechanisms and procedures to support the
1930(continued):
1931: transition of the Internet from IPv4 to IPv6 and to give advi
1931(continued): ce on
1930(continued):
1931: transition of the Internet from IPv4 to IPv6 and to give advi
1931(continued): ce on
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1758.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 180: 178: c/o Rapport Communication 179: 2721 N Street NW 180: Washington, DC 20007 181: US 182:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1758.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第180行找到：178:c/o和谐沟通179:2721 N Street NW 180:Washington，DC 20007 181:US 182:
2000 found at line 205:
203: Rapport Communication
204: 2721 N Street NW
205: Washington, DC 20007
206:
207: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
2000 found at line 205:
203: Rapport Communication
204: 2721 N Street NW
205: Washington, DC 20007
206:
207: Phone: +1 202-342-2727
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1759.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1488: 1486: -- on Unicode in the MIBenum range of 1000-1999. 1487: -- See IANA Registry for vendor developed character sets 1488: -- in the MIBenum range of 2000-xxxx. 1489: } 1490:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1759.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在MIBenum 1000-1999范围内的Unicode上的第1488:1486:--行找到。1487:--有关供应商开发的字符集，请参阅IANA注册表1488:--MIBenum范围为2000 xxxx。1489: } 1490:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1769.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 218:
216: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
216(continued): been
217: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
217(continued): ned
218: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
218(continued): 00. The
219: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
219(continued): the
220: last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low-o
220(continued): rder
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1769.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 218:
216: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
216(continued): been
217: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
217(continued): ned
218: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
218(continued): 00. The
219: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
219(continued): the
220: last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low-o
220(continued): rder
1900 found at line 248:
246: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2
246(continued): 036,
247: some external means will be necessary to qualify time relativ
247(continued): e to
248: 1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 ye
248(continued): ars).
249: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
1900 found at line 248:
246: overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2
246(continued): 036,
247: some external means will be necessary to qualify time relativ
247(continued): e to
248: 1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 ye
248(continued): ars).
249: Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so prec
249(continued): ious
250: that appropriate means should be readily available. There wil
250(continued): l exist
249(continued): ious
250: that appropriate means should be readily available. There wil
250(continued): l exist
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1778.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 309: 307: 2.21. UTC Time 308: 309: Values of type uTCTimeSyntax are encoded as if they were Prin 309(continued): table 310: Strings with the strings containing a UTCTime value. 311:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第309:307:2.21行找到文件rfc1778.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=UTCTime。UTC时间308:309：uTCTimeSyntax类型的值被编码为Prin 309（续）：表310：包含UTCTime值的字符串。311:
UTCTime found at line 310: 308: 309: Values of type uTCTimeSyntax are encoded as if they were Prin 309(continued): table 310: Strings with the strings containing a UTCTime value. 311: 312: 2.22. Guide (search guide)
在第310:308:309行找到的UTCTime：uTCTimeSyntax类型的值被编码为Prin 309（续）：表310：包含UTCTime值的字符串。311: 312: 2.22. 指南（搜索指南）
UTCTime found at line 399:
397:
398:
399: <utc-time> ::= an encoded UTCTime value
400:
401: <hex-string> ::= <hex-digit> | <hex-digit> <hex-string>
UTCTime found at line 399:
397:
398:
399: <utc-time> ::= an encoded UTCTime value
400:
401: <hex-string> ::= <hex-digit> | <hex-digit> <hex-string>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1780.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2118: 2116: The text version is sent. 2116(continued): 2117: 2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2118(continued): umber. 2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 2119(continued): '. 2120:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1780.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第2118行未找到'yyyy'的行上：2116:发送文本版本。2116（续）：2117:2118:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2118（续）：编号。2119:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 2119（续）：'。2120:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2119:
2117:
2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2118(continued): umber.
2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2119(continued): '.
2120:
2121: help to get information on how
2121(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2119:
2117:
2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2118(continued): umber.
2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2119(continued): '.
2120:
2121: help to get information on how
2121(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1786.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2992: 2990: USA 2991: +1 313 936 2655 2992: jyy@merit.edu 2993: 2994:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1786.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第2992行：2990:USA 2991:+1 313 936 2655 2992:jyy@merit.edu 2993: 2994:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3694: 3692: 3693: Format: 3694: <email-address> YYMMDD 3695: 3696:
第3694:3692:3693行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：格式：3694:<email address>yymmd 3695:3696:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3704: 3702: 3703: <email-address> should be the address of the person wh 3703(continued): o made 3704: the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this change w 3704(continued): as made. 3705: 3706: Example:
在第3704:3702:3703行找到的不带“yyy”的行上的“yy:<email address>应该是wh 3703（续）：o进行了3704:最后一次更改的人的地址。YYMMDD表示本次变更的日期w 3704（续）：生效日期。3705:3706:示例：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3950:
3948:
3949: Format:
3950: <email-address> YYMMDD
3951:
3952: <email-address> should be the address of the person
3952(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3950:
3948:
3949: Format:
3950: <email-address> YYMMDD
3951:
3952: <email-address> should be the address of the person
3952(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3953: 3951: 3952: <email-address> should be the address of the person 3952(continued): who 3953: made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this 3953(continued): change 3954: was made. 3955:
第3953:3951:3952行中未找到“yyy”的行中的“yy:<email address>应为3952人的地址（续）：3953:做出最后更改的人。YYMMDD表示本3953（续）：变更3954:的日期。3955:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4170:
4168:
4169: Format:
4170: <email-address> YYMMDD
4171:
4172: <email-address> should be the address of the person
4172(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4170:
4168:
4169: Format:
4170: <email-address> YYMMDD
4171:
4172: <email-address> should be the address of the person
4172(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4173: 4171: 4172: <email-address> should be the address of the person 4172(continued): who 4173: made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this 4173(continued): change 4174: was made. 4175:
在第4173:4171:4172:<email address>行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”应为4172人的地址（续）：4173:进行最后更改的人。YYMMDD表示本4173（续）：变更4174:的日期。4175:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4305: 4303: 4304: Format: 4305: YYMMDD 4306: 4307: YYMMDD denotes the date this route was withdrawn.
第4305:4303:4304行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：格式：4305:yymdd 4306:4307:yymdd表示此路由被撤回的日期。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4307: 4305: YYMMDD 4306: 4307: YYMMDD denotes the date this route was withdrawn. 4308: 4309:
在第4307:4305:YYMMDD 4306:4307:YYMMDD行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”表示该路线被撤回的日期。4308: 4309:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4394:
4392:
4393: Format:
4394: <email-address> YYMMDD
4395:
4396: <email-address> should be the address of the person
4396(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4394:
4392:
4393: Format:
4394: <email-address> YYMMDD
4395:
4396: <email-address> should be the address of the person
4396(continued): who
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 4397: 4395: 4396: <email-address> should be the address of the person 4396(continued): who 4397: made the last change. YYMMDD denotes the date this 4397(continued): change 4398: was made. 4399:
在第4397:4395:4396:<email address>行中未找到“yyy”的行中的“yy”应为进行最后更改的人4396的地址（续）：他4397:。YYMMDD表示本4397（续）：变更4398:的日期。4399:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1800.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1950:
1948: The text version is sent.
1948(continued):
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1800.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1950:
1948: The text version is sent.
1948(continued):
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber. 1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 1951(continued): '. 1952:
1950年（续）：编号。1951年：“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 1951（续）：”。1952:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1951:
1949:
1950: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
1950(continued): umber.
1951: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
1951(continued): '.
1952:
1953: help to get information on how
1953(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1806.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group R
7(continued): . Troost
8: Request for Comments: 1806 New Century
8(continued): Systems
9: Category: Experimental S
9(continued): . Dorner
10: QUALCOMM Inco
10(continued): rporated
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1806.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group R
7(continued): . Troost
8: Request for Comments: 1806 New Century
8(continued): Systems
9: Category: Experimental S
9(continued): . Dorner
10: QUALCOMM Inco
10(continued): rporated
century found at line 402: 400: 401: Rens Troost 402: New Century Systems 403: 324 East 41st Street #804 404: New York, NY, 10017 USA
century位于第402行：400:401:Rens Troost 402:New century Systems 403:324 East 41st Street#804 404:New York，NY，10017 USA
century found at line 408: 406: Phone: +1 (212) 557-2050 407: Fax: +1 (212) 557-2049 408: EMail: rens@century.com 409: 410:
第408行：406:电话：+1（212）557-2050 407:传真：+1（212）557-2049 408:电子邮件：rens@century.com 409: 410:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1807.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 318: 316: mandatory field. The ID field identifies the bibliogra 316(continued): phic 317: record and is used in management of these records.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1807.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第318行：316:必填字段中未找到'yyyy'。ID字段标识bibliogra 316（续）：phic 317：记录，并用于管理这些记录。
318: Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where XXX is the
319: publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher)
320: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the
318: Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where XXX is the
319: publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher)
320: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 320: 318: Its format is "ID:: XXX//YYY", where XXX is the 319: publisher-ID (the controlled symbol of the publisher) 320: and YYY is the ID (e.g., report number) of the 321: publication as assigned by the publisher. This ID is 322: typically printed on the cover, and may contain slashes. 322(continued):
第320行中没有“yyyy”的行上的“yy”：318：其格式为“ID:：XXX//YYY”，其中XXX是319:publisher-ID（发布者的受控符号）320：且YYY是发布者分配的321:publication的ID（例如，报告编号）。此ID为322：通常打印在封面上，可能包含斜杠。322（续）：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 767:
765: in its "ID::".
766:
767: Format: END:: XXX//YYY
768:
769: Example: END:: OUKS//CS-TR-91-123
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 767:
765: in its "ID::".
766:
767: Format: END:: XXX//YYY
768:
769: Example: END:: OUKS//CS-TR-91-123
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 778:
776:
777: In order to avoid conflicts among the symbols of the publishi
777(continued): ng
778: organizations (the XXX part of the "ID:: XXX//YYY") it is sug
778(continued): gested
779: that the various organizations that publish reports (such as
780: universities, departments, and laboratories) register their
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 778:
776:
777: In order to avoid conflicts among the symbols of the publishi
777(continued): ng
778: organizations (the XXX part of the "ID:: XXX//YYY") it is sug
778(continued): gested
779: that the various organizations that publish reports (such as
780: universities, departments, and laboratories) register their
2-digit found at line 348:
346: The format for ENTRY date is "Month Day, Year". The
347: month must be alphabetic (spelled out). The "Day" is a
348: 1- or 2-digit number. The "Year" is a 4-digit number.
349:
350: Format: ENTRY:: <date>
2-digit found at line 348:
346: The format for ENTRY date is "Month Day, Year". The
347: month must be alphabetic (spelled out). The "Day" is a
348: 1- or 2-digit number. The "Year" is a 4-digit number.
349:
350: Format: ENTRY:: <date>
2-digit found at line 513: 511: DATE (O) -- The publication date. The formats are "Month Year" 512: and "Month Day, Year". The month must be alphabetic 513: (spelled out). The "Day" is a 1- or 2-digit number. Th 513(continued): e 514: "Year" is a 4- digit number. 515:
在第513行找到两位数字：511:DATE（O）——发布日期。格式为“月-年”512:和“月-日，年”。月份必须是字母513：（拼写）。“天”是一个1位或2位数字。TH513（续）：E514：“年”是一个4位数字。515:
1900 found at line 406:
404: omitted, the record is assumed to be a new record and no
404(continued): t
405: a revision. If the revision date is specified as 0, thi
405(continued): s
1900 found at line 406:
404: omitted, the record is assumed to be a new record and no
404(continued): t
405: a revision. If the revision date is specified as 0, thi
405(continued): s
406: is assumed to be January 1, 1900 (the previous RFC, used 406(continued): 407: revision data of 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. this specification is 407(continued): for 408: programs that might process records from RFC1357).
406：假设为1900年1月1日（先前的RFC，使用406（续）：407：0、1、2、3等的修订数据。本规范为407（续）：对于408：可能处理RFC1357记录的程序）。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1815.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 187:
185: 8 BASIC GREEK 0370-03CF
186: 10 CYRILLIC 0400-04FF
187: 32 GENERAL PUNCTUATION 2000-206F See note 1,
187(continued): below.
188: 39 MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS 2200-22FF See note 1,
188(continued): below.
189: 44 BOX DRAWING 2500-257F
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1815.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 187:
185: 8 BASIC GREEK 0370-03CF
186: 10 CYRILLIC 0400-04FF
187: 32 GENERAL PUNCTUATION 2000-206F See note 1,
187(continued): below.
188: 39 MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS 2200-22FF See note 1,
188(continued): below.
189: 44 BOX DRAWING 2500-257F
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1819.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 5855: 5853: 5 HelloLossFactor Number of consecutively missed H 5853(continued): ELLO 5854: messages before declaring link f 5854(continued): ailure 5855: 2000 DefaultRecoveryTimeout Interval between successive HELL 5855(continued): Os 5856: to/from active neighbors 5857:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1819.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第5855行找到：5853:5连续丢失的H 5853的HelloLossFactor数（续）：ELLO 5854:声明链接前的消息f 5854（续）：故障5855:2000默认恢复时间间隔连续的HELL 5855之间（续）：Os 5856:到/从活动邻居5857:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1831.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 401: 399: 7.3 Program Number Assignment 400: 401: Program numbers are given out in groups of hexadecimal 200000 401(continued): 00 402: (decimal 536870912) according to the following chart: 403:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第401:399:7.3行找到的文件rfc1831.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000程序编号分配400:401：程序编号按十六进制200000 401（续）：00 402：（十进制536870912）分组给出，如下图表所示：403：
2000 found at line 405:
403:
404: 0 - 1fffffff defined by rpc@sun.com
405: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
406: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
407: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
2000 found at line 405:
403:
404: 0 - 1fffffff defined by rpc@sun.com
405: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
406: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
407: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1848.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1881:
1879: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
1880:
1881: AfR1WSeyLhy5AtcX0ktUVlbFC1vvcoCjYWy/yYjVj48eqzUVvGTGMsV6
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1848.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1881:
1879: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
1880:
1881: AfR1WSeyLhy5AtcX0ktUVlbFC1vvcoCjYWy/yYjVj48eqzUVvGTGMsV6
1881(continued): MdlynU
1882: d4jcJgRnQIQvIxm2VRgH8W8MkAlul+RWGu7jnxjp0sNsU562+RZr0f4F
1882(continued): 3K3n4w
1883: onUUP265UvvMj23RSTguZ/nl/OxnFM6SzDgV39V/i/RofqI=
1881(continued): MdlynU
1882: d4jcJgRnQIQvIxm2VRgH8W8MkAlul+RWGu7jnxjp0sNsU562+RZr0f4F
1882(continued): 3K3n4w
1883: onUUP265UvvMj23RSTguZ/nl/OxnFM6SzDgV39V/i/RofqI=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1994:
1992: U6B13vzpE8wMSVefzaCTSpXRSCh08ceVEZrIYS53/CKZV2/Sga71pGNlux
1992(continued): 8MsJpY
1993: Lwdj5Q3NKocg1LMngMo8yrMAe+avMjfOnhui49Xon1Gft+N5XDH/+wI9qx
1993(continued): I9fkQv
1994: NZVDlWIhCYEkxd5ke549tLkJjEqHQbgJW5C+K/uxdiD2dBt+nRCXcuO0Px
1994(continued): 3yKRyY
1995: g/9BgTf36padSHuv48xBg5YaqaEWpEzLI0Qd31vAyP23rqiPhfBn6sjhQ2
1995(continued): KrWhiF
1996: 2l3TV8kQsIGHHZUkaUbqkXJe6PEdWWhwsqCFPDdkpjzQRrTuJH6xleNUFg
1996(continued): +CG1V+
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1994:
1992: U6B13vzpE8wMSVefzaCTSpXRSCh08ceVEZrIYS53/CKZV2/Sga71pGNlux
1992(continued): 8MsJpY
1993: Lwdj5Q3NKocg1LMngMo8yrMAe+avMjfOnhui49Xon1Gft+N5XDH/+wI9qx
1993(continued): I9fkQv
1994: NZVDlWIhCYEkxd5ke549tLkJjEqHQbgJW5C+K/uxdiD2dBt+nRCXcuO0Px
1994(continued): 3yKRyY
1995: g/9BgTf36padSHuv48xBg5YaqaEWpEzLI0Qd31vAyP23rqiPhfBn6sjhQ2
1995(continued): KrWhiF
1996: 2l3TV8kQsIGHHZUkaUbqkXJe6PEdWWhwsqCFPDdkpjzQRrTuJH6xleNUFg
1996(continued): +CG1V+
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1861.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 766: 764: 554 Error, failed (technical reason) 765: 766: 4.5.6 HOLDuntil <YYMMDDHHMMSS> [+/-GMTdifference] 767: 768: The HOLDuntil command allows for the delayed delivery of a me 768(continued): ssage,
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第766:764:554行中未找到'yyyy'错误，失败（技术原因）765:766:4.5.6保持直到<yymddhhmmss>[+/-GMTdifference]767:768:holdintil命令允许延迟传递me 768（续）：消息，
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1061: 1059: the current transaction should be kept in the following forma 1059(continued): t: 1060: 1061: YYMMDDHHMMSS+GMT (example: 950925143501+7) 1062: 1063:
第1061:1059行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：当前交易应按以下格式保存1059（续）：t:1060:1061:YYMMDDHHMMSS+GMT（示例：950925143501+7）1062:1063：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1865.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 1564: 1562: 1563: START 1564: GET ITU-1900 1565: END 1566:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1865.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第1564行找到：1562:1563:开始1564:获取ITU-1900 1565:结束1566:
2000 found at line 1745: 1743: Logistics Management Institute 1744: Attn. Library 1745: 2000 Corporate Ridge 1746: McLean, Virginia, 22102-7805 1747:
2000第1745行：1743：物流管理研究所1744：收件人。图书馆1745:2000 Corporate Ridge 1746:McLean，Virginia，22102-7805 1747:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1866.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1078: 1076: <div class=chapter><h1>foo</h1><p>...</div> 1077: => <H1>,"foo",</H1>,<P>,"..." 1078: xxx <P ID=z23> yyy 1079: => "xxx ",<P>," yyy 1080: Let α & β be finite sets.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第1078行没有找到'yyyy'的行上：<div class=chapter><h1>foo</h1><p>。</div>1077:=><h1>，“foo”，</h1>，<p>，“…”1078:xxx<p ID=z23>yyyyyyyy1079:=>“xxx”，<p>，“yyyyyyyy1080:Let&alpha；&beta>是有限集。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1079:
1077: => <H1>,"foo",</H1>,<P>,"..."
1078: xxx <P ID=z23> yyy
1079: => "xxx ",<P>," yyy
1080: Let α & β be finite sets.
1081: => "Let α & β be finite sets."
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1079:
1077: => <H1>,"foo",</H1>,<P>,"..."
1078: xxx <P ID=z23> yyy
1079: => "xxx ",<P>," yyy
1080: Let α & β be finite sets.
1081: => "Let α & β be finite sets."
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1876.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 103:
101: exponent.
102:
103: Since 20000000m (represented by the value 0x29) is
103(continued): greater
104: than the equatorial diameter of the WGS 84 ellipsoi
104(continued): d
105: (12756274m), it is therefore suitable for use as a
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1876.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 103:
101: exponent.
102:
103: Since 20000000m (represented by the value 0x29) is
103(continued): greater
104: than the equatorial diameter of the WGS 84 ellipsoi
104(continued): d
105: (12756274m), it is therefore suitable for use as a
2000 found at line 219: 217: 218: rwy04L.logan-airport.boston. LOC 42 21 28.764 N 71 00 51.617 218(continued): W 219: -44m 2000m 220: 221:
2000在第219:217:218:rwy04L.logan-AIPORT.boston行找到。LOC 42 21 28.764北纬71 00 51.617 218（续）：西219:-44米2000米220:221：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1880.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2062: 2060: The text version is sent. 2060(continued): 2061: 2062: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2062(continued): umber. 2063: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 2063(continued): '. 2064:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1880.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第2062行中未找到'yyyy'：2060:发送文本版本。2060（续）：2061:2062:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2062（续）：编号。2063:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 2063（续）：'。2064:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2063: 2061: 2062: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2062(continued): umber.
第2063:2061:2062:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy行中没有“yyy”的行上的“yy”，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2062（续）：编号。
2063: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2063(continued): '.
2064:
2065: help to get information on how
2065(continued): to use
2063: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2063(continued): '.
2064:
2065: help to get information on how
2065(continued): to use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1888.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 859:
857: Group Leader, Communications Systems Phone: +41 22 767-
857(continued): 4967
858: Computing and Networks Division Fax: +41 22 767-
858(continued): 7155
859: CERN Telex: 419000 cer
859(continued): ch
860: European Laboratory for Particle Physics Email: brian@dxcoms
860(continued): .cern.ch
861: 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1888.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 859:
857: Group Leader, Communications Systems Phone: +41 22 767-
857(continued): 4967
858: Computing and Networks Division Fax: +41 22 767-
858(continued): 7155
859: CERN Telex: 419000 cer
859(continued): ch
860: European Laboratory for Particle Physics Email: brian@dxcoms
860(continued): .cern.ch
861: 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1889.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 518:
516: Wallclock time (absolute time) is represented using the times
516(continued): tamp
517: format of the Network Time Protocol (NTP), which is in second
517(continued): s
518: relative to 0h UTC on 1 January 1900 [5]. The full resolution
518(continued): NTP
519: timestamp is a 64-bit unsigned fixed-point number with the in
519(continued): teger
520: part in the first 32 bits and the fractional part in the last
520(continued): 32
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1889.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 518:
516: Wallclock time (absolute time) is represented using the times
516(continued): tamp
517: format of the Network Time Protocol (NTP), which is in second
517(continued): s
518: relative to 0h UTC on 1 January 1900 [5]. The full resolution
518(continued): NTP
519: timestamp is a 64-bit unsigned fixed-point number with the in
519(continued): teger
520: part in the first 32 bits and the fractional part in the last
520(continued): 32
2000 found at line 1526:
1524: v ^
1525: ntp_sec =0xb44db705 v ^ dlsr=0x0005.4000 ( 5
1525(continued): .250s)
1526: ntp_frac=0x20000000 v ^ lsr =0xb705:2000 (46853
1526(continued): .125s)
1527: (3024992016.125 s) v ^
1528: r v ^ RR(n)
2000 found at line 1526:
1524: v ^
1525: ntp_sec =0xb44db705 v ^ dlsr=0x0005.4000 ( 5
1525(continued): .250s)
1526: ntp_frac=0x20000000 v ^ lsr =0xb705:2000 (46853
1526(continued): .125s)
1527: (3024992016.125 s) v ^
1528: r v ^ RR(n)
2000 found at line 1535:
1533: A 0xb710:8000 (46864.500 s)
1534: DLSR -0x0005:4000 ( 5.250 s)
1535: LSR -0xb705:2000 (46853.125 s)
1536: -------------------------------
1537: delay 0x 6:2000 ( 6.125 s)
2000 found at line 1535:
1533: A 0xb710:8000 (46864.500 s)
1534: DLSR -0x0005:4000 ( 5.250 s)
1535: LSR -0xb705:2000 (46853.125 s)
1536: -------------------------------
1537: delay 0x 6:2000 ( 6.125 s)
2000 found at line 1537:
1535: LSR -0xb705:2000 (46853.125 s)
1536: -------------------------------
1537: delay 0x 6:2000 ( 6.125 s)
1538:
1539: Figure 2: Example for round-trip time computation
2000 found at line 1537:
1535: LSR -0xb705:2000 (46853.125 s)
1536: -------------------------------
1537: delay 0x 6:2000 ( 6.125 s)
1538:
1539: Figure 2: Example for round-trip time computation
2000 found at line 3182: 3180: * Big-endian mask for version, padding bit and packet type p 3180(continued): air 3181: */ 3182: #define RTCP_VALID_MASK (0xc000 | 0x2000 | 0xfe) 3183: #define RTCP_VALID_VALUE ((RTP_VERSION << 14) | RTCP_SR) 3184:
2000位于第3182行：3180:*版本、填充位和数据包类型p 3180的大端掩码（续）：air 3181:/3182:#定义RTCP_有效_掩码（0xc000 | 0x2000 | 0xfe）3183:#定义RTCP_有效_值（（RTP_版本<<14）| p_SR）3184:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1890.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 293:
291:
292: The sampling frequency should be drawn from the set: 8000, 11
292(continued): 025,
293: 16000, 22050, 24000, 32000, 44100 and 48000 Hz. (The Apple Ma
293(continued): cintosh
294: computers have native sample rates of 22254.54 and 11127.27,
294(continued): which
295: can be converted to 22050 and 11025 with acceptable quality b
295(continued): y
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1890.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 293:
291:
292: The sampling frequency should be drawn from the set: 8000, 11
292(continued): 025,
293: 16000, 22050, 24000, 32000, 44100 and 48000 Hz. (The Apple Ma
293(continued): cintosh
294: computers have native sample rates of 22254.54 and 11127.27,
294(continued): which
295: can be converted to 22050 and 11025 with acceptable quality b
295(continued): y
2000 found at line 568: 566: 567: Sampling rate and channel count are contained in the payload. 567(continued): MPEG-I 568: audio supports sampling rates of 32000, 44100, and 48000 Hz ( 568(continued): ISO/IEC 569: 11172-3, section 1.1; "Scope"). MPEG-II additionally supports 569(continued): ISO/IEC 570: 11172-3 Audio...").
在第568:566:567行找到2000：有效负载中包含采样率和通道计数。567（续）：MPEG-I 568：音频支持32000、44100和48000 Hz的采样率（568（续）：ISO/IEC 569:11172-3，第1.1节，“范围”）。MPEG-II还支持569（续）：ISO/IEC 570:11172-3音频…）。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1898.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1271:
1269: 3rWM5Ir3ier3/7WM5Ir36+v35v73ife1jOWK94n3/7T3/ffm5uD+7N339/f3
1269(continued): 9/eq3ff3
1270: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
1270(continued): 9/exuKX3
1271: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
1271(continued): pf/wi7nw
1272: 3ard3Q==
1273: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1898.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1271:
1269: 3rWM5Ir3ier3/7WM5Ir36+v35v73ife1jOWK94n3/7T3/ffm5uD+7N339/f3
1269(continued): 9/eq3ff3
1270: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
1270(continued): 9/exuKX3
1271: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
1271(continued): pf/wi7nw
1272: 3ard3Q==
1273: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1273:
1271: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
1271(continued): pf/wi7nw
1272: 3ard3Q==
1273: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1274:
1275: #############################################################
1275(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1273:
1271: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
1271(continued): pf/wi7nw
1272: 3ard3Q==
1273: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1274:
1275: #############################################################
1275(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1328:
1326: merchant-date: 19950121100505.nnn
1327: merchant-response-code: failure/success/etc.
1328: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1329: pr-signed-hash:
1330: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1330(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1328:
1326: merchant-date: 19950121100505.nnn
1327: merchant-response-code: failure/success/etc.
1328: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1329: pr-signed-hash:
1330: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1330(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1340:
1338: rHzP5YqaMnk5iRBHvwKb5MaxKXGOOef5ms8M5W8lI2d0XPecH4xNBn8BMAJ6
1338(continued): iSkZmszo
1339: QfDeWgga48g2tqlA6ifZGp7daDR81lumtGMCvg==
1340: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1341:
1342: #############################################################
1342(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1340:
1338: rHzP5YqaMnk5iRBHvwKb5MaxKXGOOef5ms8M5W8lI2d0XPecH4xNBn8BMAJ6
1338(continued): iSkZmszo
1339: QfDeWgga48g2tqlA6ifZGp7daDR81lumtGMCvg==
1340: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1341:
1342: #############################################################
1342(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1474:
1472: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1472(continued): PEc36xgr
1473: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1474: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1475:
1476: #############################################################
1476(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1474:
1472: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1472(continued): PEc36xgr
1473: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1474: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1475:
1476: #############################################################
1476(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1482:
1480: order-id: 12313424234242
1481: merchant-amount: usd 10.00
1482: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1483: pr-signed-hash:
1484: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1484(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1482:
1480: order-id: 12313424234242
1481: merchant-amount: usd 10.00
1482: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1483: pr-signed-hash:
1484: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1484(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1490:
1488: date: 19950121100505.nnn
1489: merchant-signature:
1490: v4qZMe2d7mUXztVdC3ZPMmMgYHlBA7bhR96LSehKP15ylqR/1KwwbBAX8CEq
1490(continued): ns55UIYY
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1490:
1488: date: 19950121100505.nnn
1489: merchant-signature:
1490: v4qZMe2d7mUXztVdC3ZPMmMgYHlBA7bhR96LSehKP15ylqR/1KwwbBAX8CEq
1490(continued): ns55UIYY
1491: GGMwPMGoF+GDPM7GlC6fReQ5wyvV1PnETSVO9/LAyRz0zzRYuyVueOjWDlr5 1491(continued): 1492:
1491:GGMwPMGoF+GDPM7GlC6fReQ5wyvV1PnETSVO9/LAyRz0zzRYuyVueOjWDlr5 1491（续）：1492:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1593:
1591: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1591(continued): PEc36xgr
1592: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1593: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1594:
1595: #############################################################
1595(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1593:
1591: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1591(continued): PEc36xgr
1592: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1593: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1594:
1595: #############################################################
1595(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1602:
1600: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
1601: merchant-amount: usd 10.00
1602: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1603: pr-signed-hash:
1604: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1604(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1602:
1600: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
1601: merchant-amount: usd 10.00
1602: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1603: pr-signed-hash:
1604: a/0meaMHRinNVd8nq/fKsYg5AfTZZUCX0S3gkjAhZTmcrkp6RZvppmDd/P7l
1604(continued): boFLFDBh
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1692:
1690: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1690(continued): PEc36xgr
1691: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1692: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1693:
1694: #############################################################
1694(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1692:
1690: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1690(continued): PEc36xgr
1691: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1692: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1693:
1694: #############################################################
1694(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1804:
1802: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1802(continued): PEc36xgr
1803: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1804: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1805:
1806: #############################################################
1806(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1804:
1802: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1802(continued): PEc36xgr
1803: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1804: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1805:
1806: #############################################################
1806(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1821:
1819: response-code: failure/success/etc.
1820: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
1821: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1822: pr-signed-hash:
1823: 8zqw0ipqtLtte0tBz5/5VPNJPPonfTwkfZPbtuk5lqMykKDvThhO0ycrfT7e
1823(continued): Xrn/hLUC
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1821:
1819: response-code: failure/success/etc.
1820: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
1821: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1822: pr-signed-hash:
1823: 8zqw0ipqtLtte0tBz5/5VPNJPPonfTwkfZPbtuk5lqMykKDvThhO0ycrfT7e
1823(continued): Xrn/hLUC
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1827:
第1827行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：
1825: retrieval-reference-number: 432112344321
1826: authorization-code: a12323
1827: card-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1828: {
1829: card-prefix: nnxxxx [Returned if merchant is not full-PAN]
1825: retrieval-reference-number: 432112344321
1826: authorization-code: a12323
1827: card-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
1828: {
1829: card-prefix: nnxxxx [Returned if merchant is not full-PAN]
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1948:
1946: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1946(continued): PEc36xgr
1947: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1948: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1949:
1950: #############################################################
1950(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1948:
1946: mjD6ickhd+SQZhbRCNerlTiQGhuL4wUAxzGh8aHk2oXjoMpVzWw2EImPu5Qa
1946(continued): PEc36xgr
1947: mNz8vCovDiuy3tZ42IGArxBweasLPLCbm0Y=
1948: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
1949:
1950: #############################################################
1950(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1958: 1956: order-id: 12313424234242 1957: merchant-amount: usd 10.00 1958: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A== 1959: 1960:
第1958行：1956：订单id:12313424234242 1957：商户金额：10.00美元1958:pr哈希：7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==1959:1960:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2050:
2048: CEUEvQhcmruopwEeehv+bejc3fDDZ23JKrbhlZ17lSvFR14PKFsi32pXFqTO
2048(continued): 0ej9GTc5
2049: L6c8nM3tI1qdHNCe0N5f7ASdKS0tYSxAYJLIR6MqPrXjNJEaRx7Vu1odMlkg
2049(continued): rzGOV1fo
2050: 5w33BQHK3U2h+1e5zYBeHY3ZYG4nmylYYXIye4xpuPN4QU0dGrWZoImYE44Q
2050(continued): Owjd5ozl
2051: xulPBjj6cpEI/9wTwR3tpkBb4ZfYirxxnoj9JUkPK9Srv9iJ
2052: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2050:
2048: CEUEvQhcmruopwEeehv+bejc3fDDZ23JKrbhlZ17lSvFR14PKFsi32pXFqTO
2048(continued): 0ej9GTc5
2049: L6c8nM3tI1qdHNCe0N5f7ASdKS0tYSxAYJLIR6MqPrXjNJEaRx7Vu1odMlkg
2049(continued): rzGOV1fo
2050: 5w33BQHK3U2h+1e5zYBeHY3ZYG4nmylYYXIye4xpuPN4QU0dGrWZoImYE44Q
2050(continued): Owjd5ozl
2051: xulPBjj6cpEI/9wTwR3tpkBb4ZfYirxxnoj9JUkPK9Srv9iJ
2052: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2052:
2050: 5w33BQHK3U2h+1e5zYBeHY3ZYG4nmylYYXIye4xpuPN4QU0dGrWZoImYE44Q
2050(continued): Owjd5ozl
2051: xulPBjj6cpEI/9wTwR3tpkBb4ZfYirxxnoj9JUkPK9Srv9iJ
2052: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2053:
2054: #############################################################
2054(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2052:
2050: 5w33BQHK3U2h+1e5zYBeHY3ZYG4nmylYYXIye4xpuPN4QU0dGrWZoImYE44Q
2050(continued): Owjd5ozl
2051: xulPBjj6cpEI/9wTwR3tpkBb4ZfYirxxnoj9JUkPK9Srv9iJ
2052: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2053:
2054: #############################################################
2054(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2064:
2062: response-code: failure/success/etc.
2063: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
2064: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
2065: pr-signed-hash:
2066: IV8gWHx1f8eCkWsCsMOE3M8mnTbQ7IBBcEmyGDAwjdbaLu5Qm/bh06OX1npe
2066(continued): 2d3Hijxy
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2064:
2062: response-code: failure/success/etc.
2063: order-id: 1231-3424-234242
2064: pr-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
2065: pr-signed-hash:
2066: IV8gWHx1f8eCkWsCsMOE3M8mnTbQ7IBBcEmyGDAwjdbaLu5Qm/bh06OX1npe
2066(continued): 2d3Hijxy
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2068:
2066: IV8gWHx1f8eCkWsCsMOE3M8mnTbQ7IBBcEmyGDAwjdbaLu5Qm/bh06OX1npe
2066(continued): 2d3Hijxy
2067: +X8vKcVE6l6To27u7A7UmGm+po9lCUSLxgtyqyn3jWhHZpc5NZpwoTCf2pAK
2067(continued):
2068: card-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
2069: card-number: 4811123456781234
2070: card-type: visa
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2068:
2066: IV8gWHx1f8eCkWsCsMOE3M8mnTbQ7IBBcEmyGDAwjdbaLu5Qm/bh06OX1npe
2066(continued): 2d3Hijxy
2067: +X8vKcVE6l6To27u7A7UmGm+po9lCUSLxgtyqyn3jWhHZpc5NZpwoTCf2pAK
2067(continued):
2068: card-hash: 7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==
2069: card-number: 4811123456781234
2070: card-type: visa
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2151:
2149: transaction: 123123213
2150: date: 19950121100505.nnn
2151: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2152:
2153: #############################################################
2153(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2151:
2149: transaction: 123123213
2150: date: 19950121100505.nnn
2151: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2152:
2153: #############################################################
2153(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2193:
2191: by their CyberCash application...
2192: supported-versions: 08.win, 0.81win, 0.8mac
2193: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2194:
2195: #############################################################
2195(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2193:
2191: by their CyberCash application...
2192: supported-versions: 08.win, 0.81win, 0.8mac
2193: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2194:
2195: #############################################################
2195(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2359:
2357:
2358:
2359: 35XiC9Yn8flE4Va14UxMf2RCR1B/XoV6AEd64KwPeCYyOYvwbRcYpRMBXFLy
2359(continued): YgWM+ME1
2360: +yp7c66SrCBhW4Q8AJYQ+5j5uyO7uKyyq7OhrV0IMpRDPjiQXZMooLZOifJP
2360(continued): mpvJ66hC
2361: VZuWMuA6LR+TJzWUm4sUP9Zb6zMQShedUyOPrtw1vkJXU1vZ5aI8OJAgUcLE
2361(continued): itcD+dsY
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2359:
2357:
2358:
2359: 35XiC9Yn8flE4Va14UxMf2RCR1B/XoV6AEd64KwPeCYyOYvwbRcYpRMBXFLy
2359(continued): YgWM+ME1
2360: +yp7c66SrCBhW4Q8AJYQ+5j5uyO7uKyyq7OhrV0IMpRDPjiQXZMooLZOifJP
2360(continued): mpvJ66hC
2361: VZuWMuA6LR+TJzWUm4sUP9Zb6zMQShedUyOPrtw1vkJXU1vZ5aI8OJAgUcLE
2361(continued): itcD+dsY
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2360:
2358:
2359: 35XiC9Yn8flE4Va14UxMf2RCR1B/XoV6AEd64KwPeCYyOYvwbRcYpRMBXFLy
2359(continued): YgWM+ME1
2360: +yp7c66SrCBhW4Q8AJYQ+5j5uyO7uKyyq7OhrV0IMpRDPjiQXZMooLZOifJP
2360(continued): mpvJ66hC
2361: VZuWMuA6LR+TJzWUm4sUP9Zb6zMQShedUyOPrtw1vkJXU1vZ5aI8OJAgUcLE
2361(continued): itcD+dsY
2362: Df4CzA00fC10POkJ58HZB/pSBfUrHAa+IqMHyZkV/HBi9TjTwmktJi+8T9or
2362(continued): XS0jSvor
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2360:
2358:
2359: 35XiC9Yn8flE4Va14UxMf2RCR1B/XoV6AEd64KwPeCYyOYvwbRcYpRMBXFLy
2359(continued): YgWM+ME1
2360: +yp7c66SrCBhW4Q8AJYQ+5j5uyO7uKyyq7OhrV0IMpRDPjiQXZMooLZOifJP
2360(continued): mpvJ66hC
2361: VZuWMuA6LR+TJzWUm4sUP9Zb6zMQShedUyOPrtw1vkJXU1vZ5aI8OJAgUcLE
2361(continued): itcD+dsY
2362: Df4CzA00fC10POkJ58HZB/pSBfUrHAa+IqMHyZkV/HBi9TjTwmktJi+8T9or
2362(continued): XS0jSvor
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2502: 2500: lw51IHbmo1Jj7H6wyNnRpEjy4tM73jcosBfGeQDHxgyH1uaiFNr2D+WvmuYo
第2502行中未找到“yyyy”的行上的“yy”：2500:LW51IHBMO1JJJ7H6WYNRPEJY4TM73JCOSBFGEQDHXGYH1UAIFNR2D+WvmuYo
2500(continued): 7eun2dsy
2501: Wve2O/FwicWHvkg5aDPsgOjzetsn1JCNZzbW
2502: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2503:
2504: #############################################################
2504(continued): ########
2500(continued): 7eun2dsy
2501: Wve2O/FwicWHvkg5aDPsgOjzetsn1JCNZzbW
2502: $$-CyberCash-End-7Tm/djB05pLIw3JAyy5E7A==-$$
2503:
2504: #############################################################
2504(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2591:
2589: x-opaque: [if can't decrypt]
2590: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
2590(continued): 9/exuKX3
2591: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
2591(continued): pf/wi7nw
2592:
2593: #############################################################
2593(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2591:
2589: x-opaque: [if can't decrypt]
2590: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
2590(continued): 9/exuKX3
2591: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
2591(continued): pf/wi7nw
2592:
2593: #############################################################
2593(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2653:
2651: x-opaque: [if can't decrypt]
2652: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
2652(continued): 9/exuKX3
2653: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
2653(continued): pf/wi7nw
2654:
2655: #############################################################
2655(continued): ########
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2653:
2651: x-opaque: [if can't decrypt]
2652: 9/eFiJK5tLizsoeSmpW7uLS8/7iio7Wisfv38biio7uyufv3tfv35uH+7N3d
2652(continued): 9/exuKX3
2653: 5+z3vuu4oqO7srnsvvz8/venoqO0v7al/7iio7WisYy+iv7s3ff3p6KjtL+2
2653(continued): pf/wi7nw
2654:
2655: #############################################################
2655(continued): ########
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1900.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group B. C
7(continued): arpenter
8: Request for Comments: 1900 Y.
8(continued): Rekhter
9: Category: Informational
9(continued): IAB
10: Febru
10(continued): ary 1996
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1900.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group B. C
7(continued): arpenter
8: Request for Comments: 1900 Y.
8(continued): Rekhter
9: Category: Informational
9(continued): IAB
10: Febru
10(continued): ary 1996
1900 found at line 60: 58: Carpenter & Rekhter Informational
1900发现于第60行：58:Carpenter&Rekhter信息
60: RFC 1900 Renumbering Needs Work Febru 60(continued): ary 1996 61: 62:
60:RFC 1900重新编号需要工作2月60日（续）：ary 1996 61:62：
1900 found at line 116: 114: Carpenter & Rekhter Informational
1900发现于第116行：114：Carpenter&Rekhter信息
116: RFC 1900 Renumbering Needs Work Febru 116(continued): ary 1996 117: 118:
116:RFC 1900重新编号需要工作2月116日（续）：ary 1996 117:118：
1900 found at line 172: 170: Carpenter & Rekhter Informational
1900在第172:170行找到：Carpenter&Rekhter信息
172: RFC 1900 Renumbering Needs Work Febru 172(continued): ary 1996 173: 174:
172:RFC 1900重新编号需要工作2月172（续）：ary 1996 173:174：
1900 found at line 207: 205: Phone: +41 22 767-4967 206: Fax: +41 22 767-7155 207: Telex: 419000 cer ch 208: EMail: brian@dxcoms.cern.ch 209:
1900在第207行找到：205:电话：+4122767-4967206:传真：+4122767-7155207:电传：419000 cer ch 208:电子邮件：brian@dxcoms.cern.ch 209:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1902.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2027:
2025: Several clauses defined in this document use the UTC Time for
2025(continued): mat:
2026:
2027: YYMMDDHHMMZ
2028:
2029: where: YY - last two digits of year
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1902.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2027:
2025: Several clauses defined in this document use the UTC Time for
2025(continued): mat:
2026:
2027: YYMMDDHHMMZ
2028:
2029: where: YY - last two digits of year
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2029:
2027: YYMMDDHHMMZ
2028:
2029: where: YY - last two digits of year
2030: MM - month (01 through 12)
2031: DD - day of month (01 through 31)
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2029:
2027: YYMMDDHHMMZ
2028:
2029: where: YY - last two digits of year
2030: MM - month (01 through 12)
2031: DD - day of month (01 through 31)
UTCTime found at line 136:
134: BEGIN
135: TYPE NOTATION ::=
136: "LAST-UPDATED" value(Update UTCTime)
137: "ORGANIZATION" Text
138: "CONTACT-INFO" Text
UTCTime found at line 136:
134: BEGIN
135: TYPE NOTATION ::=
136: "LAST-UPDATED" value(Update UTCTime)
137: "ORGANIZATION" Text
138: "CONTACT-INFO" Text
UTCTime found at line 152:
150: | Revisions Revision
151: Revision ::=
152: "REVISION" value(Update UTCTime)
153: "DESCRIPTION" Text
154:
UTCTime found at line 152:
150: | Revisions Revision
151: Revision ::=
152: "REVISION" value(Update UTCTime)
153: "DESCRIPTION" Text
154:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1910.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1702:
1700:
1701: usecMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1702: LAST-UPDATED "9601120000Z"
1703: ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv2 Working Group"
1704: CONTACT-INFO
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1910.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1702:
1700:
1701: usecMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1702: LAST-UPDATED "9601120000Z"
1703: ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv2 Working Group"
1704: CONTACT-INFO
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1917.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 259:
257: should be noted that careful extrapolations of the current tr
257(continued): ends
258: suggest that the address space will be exhausted early in the
258(continued): next
259: century.
260:
261: 3. Problem
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1917.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 259:
257: should be noted that careful extrapolations of the current tr
257(continued): ends
258: suggest that the address space will be exhausted early in the
258(continued): next
259: century.
260:
261: 3. Problem
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1920.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2174: 2172: The text version is sent. 2172(continued): 2173: 2174: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2174(continued): umber. 2175: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 2175(continued): '. 2176:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc1920.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第2174行中未找到'yyyy'。2172:发送文本版本。2172（续）：2173:2174:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2174（续）：编号。2175:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 2175（续）：'。2176:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2175:
2173:
2174: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2174(continued): umber.
2175: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2175(continued): '.
2176:
2177: help to get information on how
2177(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2175:
2173:
2174: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2174(continued): umber.
2175: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2175(continued): '.
2176:
2177: help to get information on how
2177(continued): to use
1900 found at line 851:
849: An Experimental protocol.
850:
851: 1900 - Renumbering Needs Work
852:
853: This is an information document and does not specif
853(continued): y any
1900 found at line 851:
849: An Experimental protocol.
850:
851: 1900 - Renumbering Needs Work
852:
853: This is an information document and does not specif
853(continued): y any
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1941.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2826:
2824: 700 13th Street, NW
2825: Suite 950
2826: Washington, DC 20005
2827: Phone: 202-434-8954
2828: EMail: sellers@quest.arc.nasa.gov
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1941.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2826:
2824: 700 13th Street, NW
2825: Suite 950
2826: Washington, DC 20005
2827: Phone: 202-434-8954
2828: EMail: sellers@quest.arc.nasa.gov
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1945.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2-digit found at line 500: 498: Specific repetition: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to 499: "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is, exactly <n> occurrences of 500: (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is 500(continued): a 501: string of three alphabetic characters. 502:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1945.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=第500行找到的2位数字：498：特定重复：“<n>（元素）”相当于499:“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是说，500：（元素）的出现次数正好<n>。因此，2DIGIT是一个2位数字，3ALPHA是500（续）：一个由三个字母组成的501：字符串。502:
2digit found at line 500: 498: Specific repetition: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to 499: "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is, exactly <n> occurrences of 500: (element). Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is 500(continued): a 501: string of three alphabetic characters. 502:
2第500行的数字：498：特定重复：“<n>（元素）”相当于499:“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是说，500：（元素）的出现次数正好<n>。因此，2DIGIT是一个2位数字，3ALPHA是500（续）：一个由三个字母组成的501：字符串。502:
2digit found at line 872:
870: asctime-date = wkday SP date3 SP time SP 4DIGIT
871:
872: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
873: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
874: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
2digit found at line 872:
870: asctime-date = wkday SP date3 SP time SP 4DIGIT
871:
872: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
873: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
874: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
2digit found at line 874:
872: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
873: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
874: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
875: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82)
876: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT ))
2digit found at line 874:
872: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
873: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
874: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
875: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82)
876: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT ))
2digit found at line 876: 874: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT 875: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82) 876: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT )) 877: ; month day (e.g., Jun 2) 878:
在第876行找到的数字：874:date2=2数字“-”月“-”2数字875:；日-月-年（例如，82年6月2日）876:date3=月SP（2DIGIT |（SP 1DIGIT））877:；月日（如6月2日）878：
2digit found at line 879: 877: ; month day (e.g., Jun 2) 878: 879: time = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT 880: ; 00:00:00 - 23:59:59 881:
2在第879行找到的数字：877:；月日（如6月2日）878:879:time=2DIGIT:“2DIGIT:”2DIGIT:“2DIGIT 880:；00:00:00 - 23:59:59 881:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1967.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 276:
274: +-----+----....................----+
275:
276: where: C0 and 80 are representative LZS-DCP headers; nn,
276(continued): xx, yy,
277: and zz are values determined by the packet's conte
277(continued): xt.
278:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1967.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 276:
274: +-----+----....................----+
275:
276: where: C0 and 80 are representative LZS-DCP headers; nn,
276(continued): xx, yy,
277: and zz are values determined by the packet's conte
277(continued): xt.
278:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1980.txt +=+=+=+=+= century found at line 301: 299: ALT="Our products"> 300: <AREA SHAPE=RECT COORDS="0,51,100,100 HREF="technology.htm 300(continued): l" 301: ALT="Technology for the next century"> 302: </MAP> 303:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc1980.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=世纪可在第301:299:ALT=“我们的产品”>300:<AREA SHAPE=RECT COORDS=“0,51100100 HREF=”technology.htm 300（续）：l“301:ALT=“下一世纪的技术”>302:</MAP>303:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1997.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 130: 128: 690 may define research, educational and commercial community 128(continued): values 129: that may be used for policy routing as defined by the operato 129(continued): rs of 130: that AS using community attribute values 0x02B20000 through 131: 0x02B2FFFF). 132:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=rfc1997.txt文件+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000（在第130行：128:690处找到）可定义研究、教育和商业社区128（续）：值129：可用于策略路由，如运算符129所定义（续）：rs为130：使用社区属性值0x02B20000到131:0x02B2FFFF）。132:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1999.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 14:
12: Request for Comments Summary
13:
14: RFC Numbers 1900-1999
15:
16: Status of This Memo
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc1999.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 14:
12: Request for Comments Summary
13:
14: RFC Numbers 1900-1999
15:
16: Status of This Memo
1900 found at line 18:
16: Status of This Memo
17:
18: This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RF
18(continued): C 1900
19: through RFCs 1999. This is a status report on these RFCs. T
19(continued): his memo
20: provides information for the Internet community. It does not
20(continued): specify
1900 found at line 18:
16: Status of This Memo
17:
18: This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RF
18(continued): C 1900
19: through RFCs 1999. This is a status report on these RFCs. T
19(continued): his memo
20: provides information for the Internet community. It does not
20(continued): specify
1900 found at line 60: 58: Elliott Informational
1900在第60行找到：58:Elliott
60: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 60(continued): ary 1997 61: 62:
60:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结60（续）：1997年3月61:62：
1900 found at line 116: 114: Elliott Informational
1900在第116行找到：114:Elliott
116: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 116(continued): ary 1997 117: 118:
116:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结116（续）：1997年11月117:118：
1900 found at line 172: 170: Elliott Informational
1900在第172:170行找到：Elliott
172: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 172(continued): ary 1997 173: 174:
172:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月汇总172（续）：1997年3月173:174：
1900 found at line 228: 226: Elliott Informational
1900在第228行找到：226:Elliott
RFC 2626 The Internet and the Millennium Problem (Year 2000) June 1999
RFC 2626互联网与千年问题（2000年）1999年6月
227: 228: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 228(continued): ary 1997 229: 230:
227:228:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结228（续）：ary 1997 229:230：
1900 found at line 284: 282: Elliott Informational
1900在第284行找到：282:Elliott
284: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 284(continued): ary 1997 285: 286:
284:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结284（续）：1997年3月285:286：
1900 found at line 340: 338: Elliott Informational
1900在第340行找到：338:Elliott
340: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 340(continued): ary 1997 341: 342:
340:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结340（续）：1997年3月341:342：
1900 found at line 396: 394: Elliott Informational
1900在第396行找到：394:Elliott
396: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 396(continued): ary 1997 397: 398:
396:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结396（续）：1997年3月397:398：
1900 found at line 452: 450: Elliott Informational
1900在第452行找到：450:Elliott
452: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 452(continued): ary 1997 453: 454:
452:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结452（续）：1997年3月453:454：
1900 found at line 508: 506: Elliott Informational
1900在第508行找到：506:Elliott
508: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 508(continued): ary 1997 509: 510:
508:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结508（续）：1997年3月509:510：
1900 found at line 564: 562: Elliott Informational [ 562(continued): Page 10] 563: 564: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 564(continued): ary 1997 565: 566:
1900发现于第564行：562:Elliott信息[562（续）：第10页]563:564:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 564摘要（续）：ary 1997 565:566：
1900 found at line 620: 618: Elliott Informational [ 618(continued): Page 11] 619: 620: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 620(continued): ary 1997 621: 622:
1900发现于第620:618行：Elliott信息[618（续）：第11页]619:620:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu的摘要620（续）：ary 1997 621:622：
1900 found at line 676: 674: Elliott Informational [ 674(continued): Page 12] 675: 676: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 676(continued): ary 1997 677: 678:
1900见第676行：674:Elliott信息[674（续）：第12页]675:676:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 676摘要（续）：ary 1997 677:678：
1900 found at line 732: 730: Elliott Informational [ 730(continued): Page 13] 731: 732: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 732(continued): ary 1997 733: 734:
1900发现于第732行：730:Elliott信息[730（续）：第13页]731:732:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 732摘要（续）：ary 1997 733:734：
1900 found at line 788: 786: Elliott Informational [ 786(continued): Page 14] 787:
1900位于第788行：786:Elliott信息[786（续）：第14页]787:
788: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 788(continued): ary 1997 789: 790:
788:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结788（续）：1997年3月789:790：
1900 found at line 844: 842: Elliott Informational [ 842(continued): Page 15] 843: 844: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 844(continued): ary 1997 845: 846:
1900见第844行：842:Elliott信息[842（续）：第15页]843:844:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 844摘要（续）：ary 1997 845:846:
1900 found at line 900: 898: Elliott Informational [ 898(continued): Page 16] 899: 900: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 900(continued): ary 1997 901: 902:
1900发现于第900:898行：Elliott信息[898（续）：第16页]899:900:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月总结900（续）：ary 1997 901:902：
1900 found at line 956: 954: Elliott Informational [ 954(continued): Page 17] 955: 956: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 956(continued): ary 1997 957: 958:
1900发现于第956:954行：Elliott信息[954（续）：第17页]955:956:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 956摘要（续）：ary 1997 957:958：
1900 found at line 1012: 1010: Elliott Informational [ 1010(continued): Page 18] 1011: 1012: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 1012(continued): ary 1997 1013: 1014:
1900发现于第1012:1010行：Elliott信息[1010（续）：第18页]1011:1012:RFC 1999 1900-1999年Janu 1012摘要（续）：ary 1997 1013:1014：
1900 found at line 1068: 1066: Elliott Informational [ 1066(continued): Page 19] 1067:
1900位于第1068行：1066:Elliott信息[1066（续）：第19页]1067:
1068: RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 Janu 1068(continued): ary 1997 1069: 1070:
1068:RFC 1999 1900-1999年1月摘要1068（续）：1997年3月1069:1070：
1900 found at line 1095: 1093: 1094: 1095: 1900 Carpenter Feb 96 Renumbering Needs Work 1096: 1097: Hosts in an IP network are identified by IP addresses, and the I 1097(continued): P
1900位于第1095:1093:1094:1095:1900行Carpenter 1996年2月重新编号需要工作1096:1097:IP网络中的主机由IP地址标识，I 1097（续）：P
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2000.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3070: 3068: The text version is sent. 3068(continued): 3069: 3070: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 3070(continued): umber. 3071: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 3071(continued): '. 3072:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2000.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第3070行中未找到'yyyy'：3068:发送文本版本。3068（续）：3069:3070:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 3070（续）：编号。3071:“yyy”是“txt”或“ps 3071（续）：”。3072:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3071:
3069:
3070: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
3070(continued): umber.
3071: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
3071(continued): '.
3072:
3073: help to get information on how
3073(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3071:
3069:
3070: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
3070(continued): umber.
3071: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
3071(continued): '.
3072:
3073: help to get information on how
3073(continued): to use
1900 found at line 1264:
1262: This memo.
1263:
1264: 1999 - Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1900-1999
1265:
1266: This is an information document and does not specif
1266(continued): y any
1900 found at line 1264:
1262: This memo.
1263:
1264: 1999 - Request for Comments Summary RFC Numbers 1900-1999
1265:
1266: This is an information document and does not specif
1266(continued): y any
2000 found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2000 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
2000 found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2000 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
9: Obsoletes: 1920, 1880, 1800, 1780, 1720, Febru 9(continued): ary 1997 10: 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410, 1360,
9：淘汰：192018801800178017209年2月9日（续）：1997年3月10日：161016001540150014101360，
2000 found at line 60: 58: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第60行：58：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
60: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 60(continued): ary 1997 61: 62:
60:RFC 2000互联网标准2月60日（续）：ary 1997 61:62：
2000 found at line 116: 114: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第116行：114：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
116: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 116(continued): ary 1997 117: 118:
116:RFC 2000互联网标准二月116日（续）：ary 1997 117:118：
2000 found at line 172: 170: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第172:170行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
172: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 172(continued): ary 1997 173: 174:
172:RFC 2000互联网标准二月172（续）：ary 1997 173:174：
2000 found at line 228: 226: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第228行：226：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
228: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 228(continued): ary 1997 229: 230:
228:RFC 2000互联网标准二月228（续）：ary 1997 229:230：
2000 found at line 284: 282: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000可在第284行找到：282：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
284: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 284(continued): ary 1997 285: 286:
284:RFC 2000互联网标准2月284日（续）：1997年3月285:286：
2000 found at line 340: 338: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第340行：338：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
340: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 340(continued): ary 1997 341: 342:
340:RFC 2000互联网标准二月340（续）：ary 1997 341:342：
2000 found at line 396: 394: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第396行：394：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
396: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 396(continued): ary 1997 397: 398:
396:RFC 2000互联网标准2月396日（续）：1997年3月397:398：
2000 found at line 452: 450: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000第452行：450：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
452: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 452(continued): ary 1997 453: 454:
452:RFC 2000互联网标准2月452日（续）：ary 1997 453:454：
2000 found at line 508: 506: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track
2000在第508行找到：506：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道
508: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 508(continued): ary 1997 509: 510:
508:RFC 2000互联网标准2008年2月508日（续）：ary 1997 509:510：
2000 found at line 564: 562: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 562(continued): Page 10] 563: 564: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 564(continued): ary 1997 565: 566:
2000第564:562行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[562（续）：第10页]563:564:RFC 2000互联网标准二月564（续）：ary 1997 565:566:
2000 found at line 620: 618: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 618(continued): Page 11]
2000第620行：618：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[618（续）：第11页]
619: 620: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 620(continued): ary 1997 621: 622:
619:620:RFC 2000互联网标准二月620（续）：ary 1997 621:622：
2000 found at line 676: 674: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 674(continued): Page 12] 675: 676: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 676(continued): ary 1997 677: 678:
2000第676行：674：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[674（续）：第12页]675:676:RFC 2000互联网标准二月676（续）：ary 1997 677:678:
2000 found at line 732: 730: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 730(continued): Page 13] 731: 732: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 732(continued): ary 1997 733: 734:
2000年第732:730行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[730（续）：第13页]731:732:RFC 2000互联网标准2月732（续）：ary 1997 733:734:
2000 found at line 788: 786: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 786(continued): Page 14] 787: 788: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 788(continued): ary 1997 789: 790:
2000第788:786行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[786（续）：第14页]787:788:RFC 2000互联网标准二月788（续）：ary 1997 789:790:
2000 found at line 844: 842: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 842(continued): Page 15] 843: 844: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 844(continued): ary 1997 845: 846:
2000第844:842行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[842（续）：第15页]843:844:RFC 2000互联网标准二月844（续）：ary 1997 845:846:
2000 found at line 900: 898: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 898(continued): Page 16] 899:
2000第900行：898：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[898（续）：第16页]899：
900: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 900(continued): ary 1997 901: 902:
900:RFC 2000互联网标准2009年2月900日（续）：ary 1997 901:902：
2000 found at line 956: 954: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 954(continued): Page 17] 955: 956: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 956(continued): ary 1997 957: 958:
2000第956:954行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[954（续）：第17页]955:956:RFC 2000互联网标准956（续）：ary 1997 957:958:
2000 found at line 1012: 1010: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1010(continued): Page 18] 1011: 1012: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1012(continued): ary 1997 1013: 1014:
2000第1012:1010行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1010（续）：第18页]1011:1012:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1012（续）：ary 1997 1013:1014:
2000 found at line 1068: 1066: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1066(continued): Page 19] 1067: 1068: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1068(continued): ary 1997 1069: 1070:
2000第1068:1066行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1066（续）：第19页]1067:1068:RFC 2000互联网标准1068年2月（续）：ary 1997 1069:1070:
2000 found at line 1124: 1122: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1122(continued): Page 20] 1123: 1124: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1124(continued): ary 1997 1125: 1126:
2000第1124:1122行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1122（续）：第20页]1123:1124:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1124（续）：ary 1997 1125:1126:
2000 found at line 1180: 1178: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1178(continued): Page 21] 1179:
2000第1180行：1178：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1178（续）：第21页]1179:
1180: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1180(continued): ary 1997 1181: 1182:
1180:RFC 2000互联网标准2月1180（续）：ary 1997 1181:1182：
2000 found at line 1236: 1234: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1234(continued): Page 22] 1235: 1236: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1236(continued): ary 1997 1237: 1238:
2000第1236:1234行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1234（续）：第22页]1235:1236:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1236（续）：ary 1997 1237:1238:
2000 found at line 1260: 1258: A Proposed Standard protocol. 1259: 1260: 2000 - Internet Official Protocol Standards 1261: 1262: This memo.
2000，见第1260行：1258：拟议标准协议。1259:1260:2000-互联网官方协议标准1261:1262：本备忘录。
2000 found at line 1292: 1290: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1290(continued): Page 23] 1291: 1292: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1292(continued): ary 1997 1293: 1294:
2000年第1292:1290行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1290（续）：第23页]1291:1292:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1292（续）：ary 1997 1293:1294:
2000 found at line 1348: 1346: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1346(continued): Page 24] 1347: 1348: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1348(continued): ary 1997 1349: 1350:
2000第1348:1346行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1346（续）：第24页]1347:1348:RFC 2000互联网标准1348年2月（续）：ary 1997 1349:1350:
2000 found at line 1404: 1402: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1402(continued): Page 25] 1403: 1404: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1404(continued): ary 1997 1405: 1406:
2000第1404:1402行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1402（续）：第25页]1403:1404:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1404（续）：ary 1997 1405:1406:
2000 found at line 1460: 1458: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1458(continued): Page 26] 1459: 1460: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1460(continued): ary 1997 1461: 1462:
2000第1460:1458行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1458（续）：第26页]1459:1460:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1460（续）：ary 1997 1461:1462:
2000 found at line 1516: 1514: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1514(continued): Page 27] 1515: 1516: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1516(continued): ary 1997 1517: 1518:
2000在第1516:1514行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1514（续）：第27页]1515:1516:RFC 2000互联网标准1516年2月（续）：ary 1997 1517:1518:
2000 found at line 1572: 1570: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1570(continued): Page 28] 1571: 1572: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1572(continued): ary 1997 1573: 1574:
2000第1572:1570行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1570（续）：第28页]1571:1572:RFC 2000互联网标准二月1572（续）：ary 1997 1573:1574:
2000 found at line 1628: 1626: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1626(continued): Page 29] 1627: 1628: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1628(continued): ary 1997 1629: 1630:
2000第1628:1626行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1626（续）：第29页]1627:1628:RFC 2000互联网标准1628年2月（续）：ary 1997 1629:1630:
2000 found at line 1684: 1682: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1682(continued): Page 30] 1683: 1684: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1684(continued): ary 1997 1685: 1686:
2000第1684行：1682：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1682（续）：第30页]1683:1684:RFC 2000互联网标准1684（续）：ary 1997 1685:1686:
2000 found at line 1740: 1738: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1738(continued): Page 31]
2000第1740行：1738：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1738（续）：第31页]
1739: 1740: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1740(continued): ary 1997 1741: 1742:
1739:1740:RFC 2000互联网标准1740年2月（续）：ary 1997 1741:1742:
2000 found at line 1796: 1794: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1794(continued): Page 32] 1795: 1796: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1796(continued): ary 1997 1797: 1798:
2000第1796:1794行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[1794（续）：第32页]1795:1796:RFC 2000互联网标准1796年2月（续）：ary 1997 1797:1798:
2000 found at line 1852: 1850: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1850(continued): Page 33] 1851: 1852: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1852(continued): ary 1997 1853: 1854:
2000第1852:1850行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1850（续）：第33页]1851:1852:RFC 2000互联网标准1852年2月（续）：ary 1997 1853:1854:
2000 found at line 1859:
1857: Protocol Name Status R
1857(continued): FC STD *
1858: ======== ===================================== ======== ==
1858(continued): == === =
1859: -------- Internet Official Protocol Standards Req 20
1859(continued): 00 1
1860: -------- Assigned Numbers Req 17
1860(continued): 00 2
1861: -------- Host Requirements - Communications Req 11
1861(continued): 22 3
2000 found at line 1859:
1857: Protocol Name Status R
1857(continued): FC STD *
1858: ======== ===================================== ======== ==
1858(continued): == === =
1859: -------- Internet Official Protocol Standards Req 20
1859(continued): 00 1
1860: -------- Assigned Numbers Req 17
1860(continued): 00 2
1861: -------- Host Requirements - Communications Req 11
1861(continued): 22 3
2000 found at line 1908: 1906: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1906(continued): Page 34] 1907: 1908: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1908(continued): ary 1997 1909: 1910:
2000第1908:1906行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1906（续）：第34页]1907:1908:RFC 2000互联网标准1908年2月（续）：ary 1997 1909:1910:
2000 found at line 1964: 1962: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 1962(continued): Page 35]
2000年发现于第1964行：1962年：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[1962年（续）：第35页]
1963: 1964: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 1964(continued): ary 1997 1965: 1966:
1963:1964:RFC 2000互联网标准1964年2月（续）：ary 1997 1965:1966：
2000 found at line 2020: 2018: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2018(continued): Page 36] 2019: 2020: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2020(continued): ary 1997 2021: 2022:
2000年见第2020:2018行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2018（续）：第36页]2019:2020:RFC 2000互联网标准2020年2月（续）：ary 1997 2021:2022:
2000 found at line 2076: 2074: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2074(continued): Page 37] 2075: 2076: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2076(continued): ary 1997 2077: 2078:
2000第2076行：2074：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2074（续）：第37页]2075:2076:RFC 2000互联网标准2076年2月（续）：ary 1997 2077:2078:
2000 found at line 2132: 2130: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2130(continued): Page 38] 2131: 2132: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2132(continued): ary 1997 2133: 2134:
2000第2132:2130行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2130（续）：第38页]2131:2132:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2132（续）：ary 1997 2133:2134:
2000 found at line 2188: 2186: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2186(continued): Page 39] 2187: 2188: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2188(continued): ary 1997 2189: 2190:
2000第2188:2186行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2186（续）：第39页]2187:2188:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2188（续）：ary 1997 2189:2190:
2000 found at line 2244:
2242: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [
2242(continued): Page 40]
2243:
2244: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru
2244(continued): ary 1997
2000 found at line 2244:
2242: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [
2242(continued): Page 40]
2243:
2244: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru
2244(continued): ary 1997
2245: 2246:
2245: 2246:
2000 found at line 2300: 2298: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2298(continued): Page 41] 2299: 2300: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2300(continued): ary 1997 2301: 2302:
2000第2300行：2298：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2298（续）：第41页]2299:2300:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2300（续）：ary 1997 2301:2302:
2000 found at line 2356: 2354: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2354(continued): Page 42] 2355: 2356: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2356(continued): ary 1997 2357: 2358:
2000第2356行：2354：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2354（续）：第42页]2355:2356:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2356（续）：ary 1997 2357:2358:
2000 found at line 2412: 2410: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2410(continued): Page 43] 2411: 2412: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2412(continued): ary 1997 2413: 2414:
2000第2412:2410行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2410（续）：第43页]2411:2412:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2412（续）：ary 1997 2413:2414:
2000 found at line 2468: 2466: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2466(continued): Page 44] 2467: 2468: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2468(continued): ary 1997 2469: 2470:
2000第2468行：2466：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2466（续）：第44页]2467:2468:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2468（续）：ary 1997 2469:2470:
2000 found at line 2524: 2522: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2522(continued): Page 45] 2523: 2524: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2524(continued): ary 1997 2525: 2526:
2000第2524:2522行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2522（续）：第45页]2523:2524:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2524（续）：ary 1997 2525:2526:
2000 found at line 2580: 2578: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2578(continued): Page 46] 2579: 2580: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2580(continued): ary 1997 2581: 2582:
2000第2580:2578行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2578（续）：第46页]2579:2580:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2580（续）：ary 1997 2581:2582:
2000 found at line 2636: 2634: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2634(continued): Page 47] 2635: 2636: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2636(continued): ary 1997 2637: 2638:
2000第2636行：2634：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2634（续）：第47页]2635:2636:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2636（续）：ary 1997 2637:2638:
2000 found at line 2692: 2690: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2690(continued): Page 48] 2691: 2692: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2692(continued): ary 1997 2693: 2694:
2000第2692:2690行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2690（续）：第48页]2691:2692:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2692（续）：ary 1997 2693:2694:
2000 found at line 2748: 2746: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2746(continued): Page 49] 2747: 2748: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2748(continued): ary 1997 2749: 2750:
2000第2748:2746行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2746（续）：第49页]2747:2748:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2748（续）：ary 1997 2749:2750:
2000 found at line 2804: 2802: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2802(continued): Page 50] 2803: 2804: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2804(continued): ary 1997 2805: 2806:
2000第2804:2802行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2802（续）：第50页]2803:2804:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2804（续）：ary 1997 2805:2806:
2000 found at line 2860: 2858: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2858(continued): Page 51]
2000第2860行：2858：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2858（续）：第51页]
2859: 2860: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2860(continued): ary 1997 2861: 2862:
2859:2860:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2860（续）：ary 1997 2861:2862:
2000 found at line 2916: 2914: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2914(continued): Page 52] 2915: 2916: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2916(continued): ary 1997 2917: 2918:
2000第2916:2914行：互联网架构委员会标准轨道[2914（续）：第52页]2915:2916:RFC 2000互联网标准2月2916日（续）：ary 1997 2917:2918:
2000 found at line 2972: 2970: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 2970(continued): Page 53] 2971: 2972: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 2972(continued): ary 1997 2973: 2974:
2000第2972行：2970：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[2970（续）：第53页]2971:2972:RFC 2000互联网标准二月2972（续）：ary 1997 2973:2974:
2000 found at line 3028: 3026: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 3026(continued): Page 54] 3027: 3028: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 3028(continued): ary 1997 3029: 3030:
2000第3028:3026行：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[3026（续）：第54页]3027:3028:RFC 2000互联网标准二月3028（续）：ary 1997 3029:3030:
2000 found at line 3084: 3082: Internet Architecture Board Standards Track [ 3082(continued): Page 55] 3083: 3084: RFC 2000 Internet Standards Febru 3084(continued): ary 1997 3085: 3086:
2000第3084行：3082：互联网体系结构委员会标准轨道[3082（续）：第55页]3083:3084:RFC 2000互联网标准二月3084（续）：ary 1997 3085:3086:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2007.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1156:
1154:
1155: Access-Type: gopher
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2007.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1156:
1154:
1155: Access-Type: gopher
1156: URL: <URL:gopher://gopher.cic.net:2000/11/hunt>
1157:
1158: Access-Type: www
1156: URL: <URL:gopher://gopher.cic.net:2000/11/hunt>
1157:
1158: Access-Type: www
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2015.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 153:
151:
152: hIwDY32hYGCE8MkBA/wOu7d45aUxF4Q0RKJprD3v5Z9K1YcRJ2fve87lMlD
152(continued): lx4Oj
153: eW4GDdBfLbJE7VUpp13N19GL8e/AqbyyjHH4aS0YoTk10QQ9nnRvjY8nZL3
153(continued): MPXSZ
154: g9VGQxFeGqzykzmykU6A26MSMexR4ApeeON6xzZWfo+0yOqAq6lb46wsvld
154(continued): Z96YA
155: AABH78hyX7YX4uT1tNCWEIIBoqqvCeIMpp7UQ2IzBrXg6GtukS8NxbukLea
155(continued): mqVW3
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2015.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 153:
151:
152: hIwDY32hYGCE8MkBA/wOu7d45aUxF4Q0RKJprD3v5Z9K1YcRJ2fve87lMlD
152(continued): lx4Oj
153: eW4GDdBfLbJE7VUpp13N19GL8e/AqbyyjHH4aS0YoTk10QQ9nnRvjY8nZL3
153(continued): MPXSZ
154: g9VGQxFeGqzykzmykU6A26MSMexR4ApeeON6xzZWfo+0yOqAq6lb46wsvld
154(continued): Z96YA
155: AABH78hyX7YX4uT1tNCWEIIBoqqvCeIMpp7UQ2IzBrXg6GtukS8NxbukLea
155(continued): mqVW3
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2025.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 751: 749: context-id Random-Integer, -- see Section 6.3 749(continued): 750: pvno BIT STRING, -- protocol versio 750(continued): n number 751: timestamp UTCTime OPTIONAL, -- mandatory for S 751(continued): PKM-2 752: randSrc Random-Integer, 753: targ-name Name,
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第751行找到的文件rfc2025.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=UTCTime:第749行：上下文id随机整数，--参见第6.3节749（续）：750:pvno位字符串，--协议版本750（续）：n编号751：时间戳UTCTime可选，--对于S 751是必需的（续）：PKM-2 752:randSrc随机整数，753:targ名称，
UTCTime found at line 923: 921: context-id Random-Integer, -- see Section 6.3 922: pvno [0] BIT STRING OPTIONAL, -- prot. versio 922(continued): n number 923: timestamp UTCTime OPTIONAL, -- mandatory for S 923(continued): PKM-2 924: randTarg Random-Integer, 925: src-name [1] Name OPTIONAL,
UTCTime位于第923行：921:context id Random Integer，--请参阅第6.3节922:pvno[0]位字符串可选，--prot。版本922（续）：n编号923：时间戳UTCTime可选，--对于S 923是必需的（续）：PKM-2 924:randTarg Random Integer，925:src name[1]name可选，
UTCTime found at line 2159: 2157: context-id Random-Integer, 2158: pvno BIT STRING, 2159: timestamp UTCTime OPTIONAL, -- mandatory for S 2159(continued): PKM-2 2160: randSrc Random-Integer, 2161: targ-name Name,
UTCTime位于第2159行：2157:context id Random Integer，2158:pvno BIT STRING，2159:timestamp UTCTime OPTIONAL，--对于S 2159是必需的（续）：PKM-2 2160:randSrc Random Integer，2161:target name name，
UTCTime found at line 2248: 2246: 2247: pvno [0] BIT STRING OPTIONAL, 2248: timestamp UTCTime OPTIONAL, -- mandatory for S
在第2248:2246:2247行找到UTCTime:pvno[0]位字符串可选，2248:timestamp UTCTime可选，-S必须
2248(continued): PKM-2 2249: randTarg Random-Integer, 2250: src-name [1] Name OPTIONAL,
2248（续）：PKM-2 2249:randTarg随机整数，2250:src名称[1]名称可选，
UTCTime found at line 2459:
2457:
2458: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
2459: notBefore UTCTime,
2460: notAfter UTCTime
2461: }
UTCTime found at line 2459:
2457:
2458: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
2459: notBefore UTCTime,
2460: notAfter UTCTime
2461: }
UTCTime found at line 2460:
2458: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
2459: notBefore UTCTime,
2460: notAfter UTCTime
2461: }
2462:
UTCTime found at line 2460:
2458: Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
2459: notBefore UTCTime,
2460: notAfter UTCTime
2461: }
2462:
UTCTime found at line 2493: 2491: signature AlgorithmIdentifier, 2492: issuer Name, 2493: thisUpdate UTCTime, 2494: nextUpdate UTCTime OPTIONAL, 2495: revokedCertificates SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
UTCTime位于第2493行：2491：签名算法标识符，2492：颁发者名称，2493:thisUpdate UTCTime，2494:nextUpdate UTCTime可选，2495:revokedCertificates序列{
UTCTime found at line 2494: 2492: issuer Name, 2493: thisUpdate UTCTime, 2494: nextUpdate UTCTime OPTIONAL, 2495: revokedCertificates SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE { 2496: userCertificate CertificateSerialNumber,
UTCTime位于第2494行：2492：颁发者名称，2493:thisUpdate UTCTime，2494:nextUpdate UTCTime可选，2495:revokedCertificates序列{2496:UserCertificateSerialNumber，
UTCTime found at line 2497:
2495: revokedCertificates SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
2496: userCertificate CertificateSerialNumber,
2497: revocationDate UTCTime } OPTION
2497(continued): AL
2498: }
2499:
UTCTime found at line 2497:
2495: revokedCertificates SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
2496: userCertificate CertificateSerialNumber,
2497: revocationDate UTCTime } OPTION
2497(continued): AL
2498: }
2499:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2028.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 320:
318: Digital Equipment Corporation
319: 1401 H Street NW
320: Washington DC 20005
321:
322: Phone: +1 202 383 5615
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2028.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 320:
318: Digital Equipment Corporation
319: 1401 H Street NW
320: Washington DC 20005
321:
322: Phone: +1 202 383 5615
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2030.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 321:
319: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
319(continued): been
320: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
320(continued): ned
321: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
321(continued): 00. The
322: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
322(continued): the
323: last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low o
323(continued): rder can
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2030.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 321:
319: main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has
319(continued): been
320: established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsig
320(continued): ned
321: fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 19
321(continued): 00. The
322: integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in
322(continued): the
323: last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low o
323(continued): rder can
1900 found at line 362:
360: 64-bit field will overflow some time in 2036 (second 4,294,96
360(continued): 7,296).
361: Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2036, some external means wil
361(continued): l be
362: necessary to qualify time relative to 1900 and time relative
362(continued): to 2036
363: (and other multiples of 136 years). There will exist a 200-pi
363(continued): cosecond
364: interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when the 64-bit
364(continued): field
1900 found at line 362:
360: 64-bit field will overflow some time in 2036 (second 4,294,96
360(continued): 7,296).
361: Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2036, some external means wil
361(continued): l be
362: necessary to qualify time relative to 1900 and time relative
362(continued): to 2036
363: (and other multiples of 136 years). There will exist a 200-pi
363(continued): cosecond
364: interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when the 64-bit
364(continued): field
1900 found at line 375:
373: following convention: If bit 0 is set, the UTC time is in
373(continued): the
374: range 1968-2036 and UTC time is reckoned from 0h 0m 0s UTC
374(continued): on 1
375: January 1900. If bit 0 is not set, the time is in the rang
375(continued): e 2036-
376: 2104 and UTC time is reckoned from 6h 28m 16s UTC on 7 Feb
376(continued): ruary
377: 2036. Note that when calculating the correspondence, 2000
377(continued): is not a
1900 found at line 375:
373: following convention: If bit 0 is set, the UTC time is in
373(continued): the
374: range 1968-2036 and UTC time is reckoned from 0h 0m 0s UTC
374(continued): on 1
375: January 1900. If bit 0 is not set, the time is in the rang
375(continued): e 2036-
376: 2104 and UTC time is reckoned from 6h 28m 16s UTC on 7 Feb
376(continued): ruary
377: 2036. Note that when calculating the correspondence, 2000
377(continued): is not a
2000 found at line 377: 375: January 1900. If bit 0 is not set, the time is in the rang 375(continued): e 2036- 376: 2104 and UTC time is reckoned from 6h 28m 16s UTC on 7 Feb 376(continued): ruary 377: 2036. Note that when calculating the correspondence, 2000 377(continued): is not a 378: leap year. Note also that leap seconds are not counted in 378(continued): the 379: reckoning.
2000在第377行中找到：375:1900年1月。如果未设置位0，则时间在375范围内（续）：e 2036-376:2104，UTC时间从376年2月7日的6h 28m 16s UTC开始计算（续）：ruary 377:2036。请注意，在计算对应关系时，2000 377（续）：不是378：闰年。还请注意，378（续）：379：推算中不计算闰秒。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2048.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 738: 736: 737: To: ietf-types@iana.org 738: Subject: Registration of MIME media type XXX/YYY 739: 740: MIME media type name:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc248.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第738:736:737:To:ietf行中未找到'yyyy'-types@iana.org738:主题：MIME媒体类型XXX/YYY的注册739:740:MIME媒体类型名称：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2050.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 638: 636: [RFC 1814] Gerich, E., "Unique Addresses are Good", June 1995 636(continued): . 637: 638: [RFC 1900] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs 638(continued): Work", 639: February 1996. 640:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc2050.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900，见第638行：636:[RFC 1814]Gerich，E.，“唯一地址是好的”，1995年6月636（续）：。637:638:[RFC 1900]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要638（续）：工作”，639:1996年2月。640:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2052.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 420: 418: Errors", RFC 1912, February 1996. 419: 420: RFC 1900: Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs W 420(continued): ork", 421: RFC 1900, February 1996. 422:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第420行找到的文件rfc2052.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900:RFC1912，1996年2月。419:420:RFC1900:Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要W 420（续）：ork”，421:RFC1900，1996年2月。422:
1900 found at line 421: 419: 420: RFC 1900: Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs W 420(continued): ork", 421: RFC 1900, February 1996. 422: 423: RFC 1920: Postel, J., "INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS", 423(continued):
1900见第421:419:420:RFC 1900:Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要W 420（续）：ork”，421:RFC 1900，1996年2月。422:423:RFC 1920:Postel，J.，“互联网官方协议标准”，423（续）：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2060.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3782:
3780: date ::= date_text / <"> date_text <">
3781:
3782: date_day ::= 1*2digit
3783: ;; Day of month
3784:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2060.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3782:
3780: date ::= date_text / <"> date_text <">
3781:
3782: date_day ::= 1*2digit
3783: ;; Day of month
3784:
2digit found at line 3785: 3783: ;; Day of month 3784:
2第3785行的数字：3783:；；3784月日：
3785: date_day_fixed ::= (SPACE digit) / 2digit
3786: ;; Fixed-format version of date_day
3787:
3785: date_day_fixed ::= (SPACE digit) / 2digit
3786: ;; Fixed-format version of date_day
3787:
2digit found at line 4101:
4099: TEXT_CHAR ::= <any CHAR except CR and LF>
4100:
4101: time ::= 2digit ":" 2digit ":" 2digit
4102: ;; Hours minutes seconds
4103:
2digit found at line 4101:
4099: TEXT_CHAR ::= <any CHAR except CR and LF>
4100:
4101: time ::= 2digit ":" 2digit ":" 2digit
4102: ;; Hours minutes seconds
4103:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2062.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 330:
328: ::= partial
329:
330: date_year_old ::= 2digit
331: ;; (year - 1900)
332:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2062.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 330:
328: ::= partial
329:
330: date_year_old ::= 2digit
331: ;; (year - 1900)
332:
1900 found at line 331:
329:
330: date_year_old ::= 2digit
331: ;; (year - 1900)
332:
333: date_time_old ::= <"> date_day_fixed "-" date_month "-" dat
333(continued): e_year
1900 found at line 331:
329:
330: date_year_old ::= 2digit
331: ;; (year - 1900)
332:
333: date_time_old ::= <"> date_day_fixed "-" date_month "-" dat
333(continued): e_year
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2063.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 716:
714:
715: start time = 1 start time =
715(continued): 1
716: Usage record N: flow count = 2000 flow count = 200
716(continued): 0 (done)
717:
718: start time = 1 start time =
718(continued): 5
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2063.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 716:
714:
715: start time = 1 start time =
715(continued): 1
716: Usage record N: flow count = 2000 flow count = 200
716(continued): 0 (done)
717:
718: start time = 1 start time =
718(continued): 5
2000 found at line 725: 723: 724: In the continuing flow case, the same flow was reported when 724(continued): its 725: count was 2000, and again at 3000: the total count to date i 725(continued): s 3000. 726: In the OLD/NEW case, the old flow had a count of 2000. Its r 726(continued): ecord 727:
2000在第725:723:724行发现：在持续流的情况下，当724（续）的725:count为2000时报告相同的流，并且再次在3000:total count到目前为止i 725（续）：s 3000时报告相同的流。726:在旧/新情况下，旧流的计数为2000。其r 726（续）：ecord 727：
2000 found at line 726: 724: In the continuing flow case, the same flow was reported when 724(continued): its 725: count was 2000, and again at 3000: the total count to date i 725(continued): s 3000. 726: In the OLD/NEW case, the old flow had a count of 2000. Its r 726(continued): ecord 727: 728:
2000在第726:724行发现：在持续流的情况下，当724（续）：其725:计数为2000时报告相同的流，并且再次在3000：到目前为止的总计数i 725（续）：s 3000时报告相同的流。726:在旧/新情况下，旧流的计数为2000。其r 726（续）：ecord 727:728：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2068.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2-digit found at line 772: 770: Specific repetition: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to 771: "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is, exactly <n> occurrences of (el 771(continued): ement). 772: Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of 772(continued): three 773: alphabetic characters. 774:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc2068.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=第772行找到的2位数字：770：特定重复：“<n>（元素）”相当于771:“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是说，正好<n>出现了（el 771（续）：ement）。772:因此2DIGIT是一个2位数字，3ALPHA是一个772字符串（续）：三个773:字母字符。774:
2digit found at line 772: 770: Specific repetition: "<n>(element)" is equivalent to 771: "<n>*<n>(element)"; that is, exactly <n> occurrences of (el 771(continued): ement). 772: Thus 2DIGIT is a 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of 772(continued): three 773: alphabetic characters. 774:
2第772行的数字：770：特定重复：“<n>（元素）”相当于771:“<n>*<n>（元素）”；也就是说，正好<n>出现了（el 771（续）：ement）。772:因此2DIGIT是一个2位数字，3ALPHA是一个772字符串（续）：三个773:字母字符。774:
2digit found at line 1163:
1161: asctime-date = wkday SP date3 SP time SP 4DIGIT
1162:
1163: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
1164: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
1165: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
2digit found at line 1163:
1161: asctime-date = wkday SP date3 SP time SP 4DIGIT
1162:
1163: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
1164: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
1165: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
2digit found at line 1165:
1163: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
1164: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
1165: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
1166: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82)
1167: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT ))
2digit found at line 1165:
1163: date1 = 2DIGIT SP month SP 4DIGIT
1164: ; day month year (e.g., 02 Jun 1982)
1165: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT
1166: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82)
1167: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT ))
2digit found at line 1167: 1165: date2 = 2DIGIT "-" month "-" 2DIGIT 1166: ; day-month-year (e.g., 02-Jun-82) 1167: date3 = month SP ( 2DIGIT | ( SP 1DIGIT )) 1168: ; month day (e.g., Jun 2) 1169:
第1167行：1165:date2=2digit“-”月“-”2digit 1166:；日-月-年（例如，1982年6月2日）1167:date3=月SP（2DIGIT |（SP1Digit））1168:；月日（如6月2日）1169：
2digit found at line 1170: 1168: ; month day (e.g., Jun 2) 1169: 1170: time = 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT 1171: ; 00:00:00 - 23:59:59 1172:
2在第1170行：1168:处发现的数字；月日（如6月2日）1169:1170:time=2DIGIT:“2DIGIT:”2DIGIT:“2DIGIT 1171:；00:00:00 - 23:59:59 1172:
2digit found at line 7652:
7650:
7651: warning-value = warn-code SP warn-agent SP warn-text
7652: warn-code = 2DIGIT
7653: warn-agent = ( host [ ":" port ] ) | pseudonym
7654: ; the name or pseudonym of the server
7654(continued): adding
2digit found at line 7652:
7650:
7651: warning-value = warn-code SP warn-agent SP warn-text
7652: warn-code = 2DIGIT
7653: warn-agent = ( host [ ":" port ] ) | pseudonym
7654: ; the name or pseudonym of the server
7654(continued): adding
1900 found at line 1083: 1081: for TCP connections on that port of that host, and the Reques 1081(continued): t-URI 1082: for the resource is abs_path. The use of IP addresses in URL' 1082(continued): s SHOULD 1083: be avoided whenever possible (see RFC 1900 [24]). If the abs_ 1083(continued): path is 1084: not present in the URL, it MUST be given as "/" when used as 1084(continued): a 1085: Request-URI for a resource (section 5.1.2).
1900在第1083行找到：1081:对于该主机端口上的TCP连接，资源的请求1081（续）：t-URI 1082:是abs_路径。应尽可能避免在URL'1082（续）：1083:中使用IP地址（见RFC 1900[24]）。如果abs_1083（续）：路径为1084:不存在于URL中，则在用作1084（续）：资源的1085:请求URI（第5.1.2节）时，必须将其指定为“/”。
1900 found at line 8249:
8247:
8248: [24] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Work",
8248(continued): RFC
8249: 1900, IAB, February 1996.
8250:
8251: [25] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version 4.3
8251(continued): ." RFC
1900 found at line 8249:
8247:
8248: [24] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Work",
8248(continued): RFC
8249: 1900, IAB, February 1996.
8250:
8251: [25] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version 4.3
8251(continued): ." RFC
2000 found at line 8453:
8451: o HTTP/1.1 clients and caches should assume that an RFC-850 d
8451(continued): ate
8452: which appears to be more than 50 years in the future is in
8452(continued): fact
2000 found at line 8453:
8451: o HTTP/1.1 clients and caches should assume that an RFC-850 d
8451(continued): ate
8452: which appears to be more than 50 years in the future is in
8452(continued): fact
8453: in the past (this helps solve the "year 2000" problem). 8454: 8455:
8453:过去（这有助于解决“2000年”问题）。8454: 8455:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2071.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 738: 736: December 1995. 737: 738: [16] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Work", R 738(continued): FC 1900, 739: February 1996. 740:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2071.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第738行：736:1995年12月找到。737:738:[16]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要工作”，R738（续）：FC 1900，739:1996年2月。740:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2072.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 206: 204: Many discussions of renumbering emphasize interactions among 205: organizations' numbering plans and those of the global Intern 205(continued): et 206: [RFC1900]. There can be equally strong motivations for renum 206(continued): bering 207: in organizations that never connect to the global Internet. 208:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2072.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900可在第206行找到：204：关于重新编号的许多讨论强调205：组织的编号计划与全球实习生205的编号计划之间的相互作用（续）：et 206:[RFC1900]。雷纳姆206（续）：白令207：在从未连接到全球互联网的组织中，也可能有同样强烈的动机。208:
1900 found at line 209:
207: in organizations that never connect to the global Internet.
208:
209: According to RFC1900, "Unless and until viable alternatives a
209(continued): re
210: developed, extended deployment of Classless Inter-Domain Rout
210(continued): ing
211: (CIDR) is vital to keep the Internet routing system alive and
211(continued): to
1900 found at line 209:
207: in organizations that never connect to the global Internet.
208:
209: According to RFC1900, "Unless and until viable alternatives a
209(continued): re
210: developed, extended deployment of Classless Inter-Domain Rout
210(continued): ing
211: (CIDR) is vital to keep the Internet routing system alive and
211(continued): to
1900 found at line 2606: 2604: February 1996. 2605: 2606: [RFC1900] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Wo 2606(continued): rk", RFC 2607: 1900, February 1996. 2608:
1900位于第2606行：2604:1996年2月。2605:2606:[RFC1900]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要Wo 2606（续）：rk”，RFC 2607:1900，1996年2月。2608:
1900 found at line 2607: 2605: 2606: [RFC1900] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs Wo 2606(continued): rk", RFC 2607: 1900, February 1996.
1900见第2607:2605:2606行：[RFC1900]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要Wo 2606（续）：rk”，RFC 2607:1900，1996年2月。
2608: 2609: [RPS] Alaettinoglu, C., Bates, T., Gerich, E., Terpstra, M., a 2609(continued): nd C.
2608:2609:[RPS]Alaettinoglu，C.，Bates，T.，Gerich，E.，Terpstra，M.，a 2609（续）：nd C。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2074.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 2041: 2039: From [RFC1831]: 2040: 2041: Program numbers are given out in groups of hexadecimal 20 2041(continued): 000000 2042: (decimal 536870912) according to the following chart: 2043:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第2041:2039行找到的文件rfc2074.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:From[RFC1831]：2040:2041:程序编号按十六进制20 2041（续）：000000 2042：（十进制536870912）分组给出，如下图表所示：2043:
2000 found at line 2045:
2043:
2044: 0 - 1fffffff defined by rpc@sun.com
2045: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
2046: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
2047: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
2000 found at line 2045:
2043:
2044: 0 - 1fffffff defined by rpc@sun.com
2045: 20000000 - 3fffffff defined by user
2046: 40000000 - 5fffffff transient
2047: 60000000 - 7fffffff reserved
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2077.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 315: 313: Subject: model data file 314: 315: I1ZSTUwgVjEuMCBhc2NpaQojIFRoaXMgZmlsZSB3YXMgIGdlbmVyY.. 315(continued): . 316: byBDb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucwojIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2hhY28uY29tC.. 316(continued): . 317: IyB1c2VkIGluIHJvb20gMTkyICh0ZXN0IHJvb20pCiAgIAojIFRvc.. 317(continued): .
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2077.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第315行：313:主题：模型数据文件314:315:I1zstuwgvjeumcbhc2npaqojifroaxmgzmlszsb3yxmgdlbmvyy。。315（续）：。316：通过BDB21TDW5Py2F0AW9UCWOJIGH0DHA6LY93D3CUY2HY28UY29TC。。316（续）：。317:IyB1c2VkIGluIHJvb20gMTkyICh0ZXN0IHJvb20pCiAgIAojIFRvc。。317（续）：。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2095.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 131: 129: C: A0001 AUTHENTICATE CRAM-MD5 130: S: + PDE4OTYuNjk3MTcwOTUyQHBvc3RvZmZpY2UucmVzdG9uLm1jaS5uZX 130(continued): Q+ 131: C: dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 132: S: A0001 OK CRAM authentication successful 133:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=''yy'在第131行未找到'yyyy'的行上：129:C:A0001验证CRAM-MD5 130:S:+PDE4OTYunjk3MTCWOTUYQHBVC3RVZMZMZPY2UUCMVZDG9ULM1JAS5UZX 130（续）：Q+131:C:DGLTIGI5MTNHNJAYYZDLZE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZNZMZNZNZNZNZGZZZZZZZZLZOW 132:S:A0001确定CRAM验证成功133:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 161: 159: AUTHENTICATE command (or the similar POP3 AUTH command), y 159(continued): ielding 160: 161: dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 162: 163:
第161:159行：AUTHENTICATE命令（或类似的POP3 AUTH命令），第159行（续）：ielding 160:161:dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 162:163:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2096.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 134:
132:
133: ipForward MODULE-IDENTITY
134: LAST-UPDATED "9609190000Z" -- Thu Sep 26 16:34:47 PDT 19
134(continued): 96
135: ORGANIZATION "IETF OSPF Working Group"
136: CONTACT-INFO
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2096.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 134:
132:
133: ipForward MODULE-IDENTITY
134: LAST-UPDATED "9609190000Z" -- Thu Sep 26 16:34:47 PDT 19
134(continued): 96
135: ORGANIZATION "IETF OSPF Working Group"
136: CONTACT-INFO
1900 found at line 147: 145: DESCRIPTION 146: "The MIB module for the display of CIDR multipath IP 146(continued): Routes." 147: REVISION "9609190000Z" 148: DESCRIPTION 149: "Revisions made by the OSPF WG."
1900位于第147行：145：说明146：“用于显示CIDR多路径IP 146的MIB模块（续）：路由。”147：修订版“9609190000Z”148：说明149：“OSPF工作组进行的修订。”
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2099.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 14:
12: Request for Comments Summary
13:
14: RFC Numbers 2000-2099
15:
16: Status of This Memo
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2099.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 14:
12: Request for Comments Summary
13:
14: RFC Numbers 2000-2099
15:
16: Status of This Memo
2000 found at line 18:
16: Status of This Memo
17:
18: This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RF
18(continued): C 2000
19: through RFCs 2099. This is a status report on these RFCs. T
19(continued): his memo
20: provides information for the Internet community. It does not
20(continued): specify
2000 found at line 18:
16: Status of This Memo
17:
18: This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RF
18(continued): C 2000
19: through RFCs 2099. This is a status report on these RFCs. T
19(continued): his memo
20: provides information for the Internet community. It does not
20(continued): specify
2000 found at line 60: 58: Elliott Informational
2000在第60行找到：58:Elliott
60: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 60(continued): rch 1997 61: 62:
60:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 60摘要（续）：rch 1997 61:62：
2000 found at line 116: 114: Elliott Informational
2000在第116行找到：114:Elliott
116: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 116(continued): rch 1997 117: 118:
116:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 116摘要（续）：rch 1997 117:118：
2000 found at line 172: 170: Elliott Informational
2000在第172:170行找到：Elliott
172: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 172(continued): rch 1997 173: 174:
172:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma汇总172（续）：rch 1997 173:174：
2000 found at line 228: 226: Elliott Informational
2000在第228行找到：226:Elliott
228: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 228(continued): rch 1997 229: 230:
228:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma摘要228（续）：rch 1997 229:230：
2000 found at line 284: 282: Elliott Informational
2000在第284行找到：282:Elliott
284: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 284(continued): rch 1997 285: 286:
284:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma摘要284（续）：rch 1997 285:286：
2000 found at line 340: 338: Elliott Informational
2000在第340行找到：338:Elliott
340: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 340(continued): rch 1997 341: 342:
340:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 340摘要（续）：rch 1997 341:342：
2000 found at line 396: 394: Elliott Informational
2000在第396行找到：394:Elliott
396: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma
396:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma汇总
396(continued): rch 1997 397: 398:
396（续）：rch 1997 397:398：
2000 found at line 452: 450: Elliott Informational
2000在第452行找到：450:Elliott
452: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 452(continued): rch 1997 453: 454:
452:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 452摘要（续）：rch 1997 453:454：
2000 found at line 508: 506: Elliott Informational
2000在第508行找到：506:Elliott
508: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 508(continued): rch 1997 509: 510:
508:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 508摘要（续）：rch 1997 509:510：
2000 found at line 564: 562: Elliott Informational [ 562(continued): Page 10] 563: 564: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 564(continued): rch 1997 565: 566:
2000年第564行：562:Elliott信息[562（续）：第10页]563:564:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 564摘要（续）：rch 1997 565:566：
2000 found at line 620: 618: Elliott Informational [ 618(continued): Page 11] 619: 620: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 620(continued): rch 1997 621: 622:
2000年见第620:618行：Elliott信息[618（续）：第11页]619:620:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 620摘要（续）：rch 1997 621:622：
2000 found at line 676: 674: Elliott Informational [ 674(continued): Page 12] 675: 676: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 676(continued): rch 1997 677: 678:
2000年见第676行：674:Elliott信息[674（续）：第12页]675:676:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 676摘要（续）：rch 1997 677:678：
2000 found at line 732: 730: Elliott Informational [ 730(continued): Page 13] 731: 732: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 732(continued): rch 1997 733: 734:
2000年见第732行：730:Elliott信息[730（续）：第13页]731:732:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 732摘要（续）：rch 1997 733:734：
2000 found at line 788: 786: Elliott Informational [ 786(continued): Page 14] 787: 788: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 788(continued): rch 1997 789: 790:
2000年见第788:786行：Elliott信息[786（续）：第14页]787:788:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 788摘要（续）：rch 1997 789:790：
2000 found at line 844: 842: Elliott Informational [ 842(continued): Page 15] 843: 844: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 844(continued): rch 1997 845: 846:
2000年第844行：842:Elliott信息[842（续）：第15页]843:844:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 844摘要（续）：rch 1997 845:846:
2000 found at line 900: 898: Elliott Informational [ 898(continued): Page 16] 899: 900: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 900(continued): rch 1997 901: 902:
2000年，见第900:898行：Elliott信息[898（续）：第16页]899:900:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 900的摘要（续）：rch 1997 901:902：
2000 found at line 956: 954: Elliott Informational [ 954(continued): Page 17] 955: 956: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 956(continued): rch 1997 957: 958:
2000年见第956行：954:Elliott信息[954（续）：第17页]955:956:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 956摘要（续）：rch 1997 957:958：
2000 found at line 1012: 1010: Elliott Informational [ 1010(continued): Page 18]
2000第1012行：1010:Elliott信息[1010（续）：第18页]
1011: 1012: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 1012(continued): rch 1997 1013: 1014:
1011:1012:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 1012摘要（续）：rch 1997 1013:1014：
2000 found at line 1068: 1066: Elliott Informational [ 1066(continued): Page 19] 1067: 1068: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 1068(continued): rch 1997 1069: 1070:
2000年第1068行：1066:Elliott信息[1066（续）：第19页]1067:1068:RFC 2099 2000-2099 Ma 1068摘要（续）：rch 1997 1069:1070：
2000 found at line 1124: 1122: Elliott Informational [ 1122(continued): Page 20] 1123: 1124: RFC 2099 Summary of 2000-2099 Ma 1124(continued): rch 1997 1125: 1126:
2000年第1124行：1122:Elliott信息[1122（续）：第20页]1123:1124:RFC 2099 2000-2099年Ma 1124摘要（续）：rch 1997 1125:1126:
2000 found at line 1144:
1142:
1143:
1144: 2000 I.A.B. Feb 97 INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDAR
1144(continued): DS
1145:
1146: This memo describes the state of standardization of protocols us
1146(continued): ed in
2000 found at line 1144:
1142:
1143:
1144: 2000 I.A.B. Feb 97 INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDAR
1144(continued): DS
1145:
1146: This memo describes the state of standardization of protocols us
1146(continued): ed in
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2101.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 353: 351: 352: Changing providers is just one possible reason for renumbe 352(continued): ring. 353: The informational document [RFC 1900] shows why renumberin 353(continued): g is an 354: increasingly frequent event. Both DHCP [RFC 1541] and PPP 354(continued): [RFC 355: 1661] promote the use of dynamic address allocation.
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第353:351:352行找到的文件rfc2101.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=1900:更改提供程序只是renumbe 352（续）：ring的一个可能原因。353：信息性文件[RFC 1900]说明了为什么将353重新编号（续）：g是一个354：日益频繁的事件。DHCP[RFC 1541]和PPP 354（续）：[RFC 355:1661]都提倡使用动态地址分配。
1900 found at line 534: 532: solutions for renumbering sites. The need to contain the ov 532(continued): erhead 533: in a rapidly growing Internet routing system is likely to mak
1900可在第534行找到：532：重新编号站点的解决方案。控制ov 532的需要（续）：erhead 533：在快速增长的互联网路由系统中，很可能
533(continued): e
534: renumbering more and more common [RFC 1900].
535:
536: The need to scale the Internet routing system, and the use of
536(continued): CIDR as
533(continued): e
534: renumbering more and more common [RFC 1900].
535:
536: The need to scale the Internet routing system, and the use of
536(continued): CIDR as
1900 found at line 632: 630: Protocol", RFC 1825, September 1995. 631: 632: [RFC 1900] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs 632(continued): Work", 633: RFC 1900, February 1996. 634:
1900发现于第632:630：协议行，RFC 18251995年9月。631:632:[RFC 1900]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要632（续）：工作”，633:RFC 1900，1996年2月。634：
1900 found at line 633: 631: 632: [RFC 1900] Carpenter, B., and Y. Rekhter, "Renumbering Needs 632(continued): Work", 633: RFC 1900, February 1996. 634: 635: [RFC 1918] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, B., Karrenberg, D., de Gr 635(continued): oot, G.
1900见第633:631:632行：[RFC 1900]Carpenter，B.和Y.Rekhter，“重新编号需要632（续）：工作”，633:RFC 1900，1996年2月。634:635:[RFC 1918]雷克特，Y.，莫斯科维茨，B.，卡伦伯格，D.，德格635（续）：奥特，G。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2109.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1054:
1052: date value in a fixed-length variant format in place of Max-A
1052(continued): ge:
1053:
1054: Wdy, DD-Mon-YY HH:MM:SS GMT
1055:
1056: Note that the Expires date format contains embedded spaces, a
1056(continued): nd that
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2109.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1054:
1052: date value in a fixed-length variant format in place of Max-A
1052(continued): ge:
1053:
1054: Wdy, DD-Mon-YY HH:MM:SS GMT
1055:
1056: Note that the Expires date format contains embedded spaces, a
1056(continued): nd that
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2116.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 4132:
4130: * MAIL.X-OD V2.3
4131:
4132: * MAIL.2000 V1.2, AKOM
4133:
4134: * MS-Mail
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2116.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 4132:
4130: * MAIL.X-OD V2.3
4131:
4132: * MAIL.2000 V1.2, AKOM
4133:
4134: * MS-Mail
2000 found at line 5393:
5391: 1-800-257-OPEN (U.S. and Canada)
5392: 1-612-482-6736 (worldwide)
5393: FAX: 1-612-482-2000 (worldwide)
5394: EMAIL: info@cdc.com
5395: or
2000 found at line 5393:
5391: 1-800-257-OPEN (U.S. and Canada)
5392: 1-612-482-6736 (worldwide)
5393: FAX: 1-612-482-2000 (worldwide)
5394: EMAIL: info@cdc.com
5395: or
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2134.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 30:
28:
29: To: Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs
30: Washington, D.C. 20001
31:
32: We, the undersigned natural persons of the age of eightee
32(continued): n years
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2134.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 30:
28:
29: To: Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs
30: Washington, D.C. 20001
31:
32: We, the undersigned natural persons of the age of eightee
32(continued): n years
2000 found at line 140: 138: 8. The address, including street and number, of the initial 139: registered office of the corporation is c/o C T Corporatio 139(continued): n 140: System, 1030 15th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005, an 140(continued): d the 141: name of its initial registered agent at such address is C 141(continued): T 142: Corporation System.
2000在第140:138:8行找到。首字母139：公司注册办事处的地址（包括街道和编号）为c/o c T Corporatio 139（续）：n 140:System，1030 15th street，n.W.，Washington D.c.20005，an 140（续）：D该地址的首字母注册代理人的姓名为c 141（续）：T 142:Corporate System。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2150.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 2197:
2195: scholarly music resources. http://rism.harvard.edu/RISM/
2196:
2197: Crescendo is used in the web pages at http://mcentury.citi.do
2197(continued): c.ca
2198: along with a growing number of others. One very interesting
2198(continued): use of
2199: Crescendo occurs on the Music Theory Online publication, a se
2199(continued): rious
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2150.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 2197:
2195: scholarly music resources. http://rism.harvard.edu/RISM/
2196:
2197: Crescendo is used in the web pages at http://mcentury.citi.do
2197(continued): c.ca
2198: along with a growing number of others. One very interesting
2198(continued): use of
2199: Crescendo occurs on the Music Theory Online publication, a se
2199(continued): rious
century found at line 3150: 3148: Joseph Aiuto 3149: Sepideh Boroumand 3150: Michael Century 3151: Kelly Cooper 3152: Lile Elam
第3150行发现世纪号：3148:Joseph Aiuto 3149:Sepideh Boroumand 3150:Michael century 3151:Kelly Cooper 3152:Lile Elam
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2151.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1805:
1803: * About Hill Associates
1804: * HAI Products and Services Catalog
1805: * Datacomm/2000-ED Series
1806: * Contacting Hill Associates
1807: * Employment Opportunities
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2151.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1805:
1803: * About Hill Associates
1804: * HAI Products and Services Catalog
1805: * Datacomm/2000-ED Series
1806: * Contacting Hill Associates
1807: * Employment Opportunities
2000 found at line 2808:
2806:
2807: [23] _____, Editor, "Internet Official Protocol Standards,"
2000 found at line 2808:
2806:
2807: [23] _____, Editor, "Internet Official Protocol Standards,"
2808: STD 1/RFC 2000, Internet Architecture Board, February 1997.
2808(continued):
2809:
2810: [24] _____, "Introduction to the STD Notes," RFC 1311, USC/Infor
2810(continued): mation
2808: STD 1/RFC 2000, Internet Architecture Board, February 1997.
2808(continued):
2809:
2810: [24] _____, "Introduction to the STD Notes," RFC 1311, USC/Infor
2810(continued): mation
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2156.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3210: 3208: the prefix, all attributes remaining in the OR address s 3208(continued): hall be 3209: encoded on the LHS. This is to ensure a reversible mapp 3209(continued): ing. For 3210: example, if there is an address /S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/ 3210(continued): and a 3211: mapping for /ADMD=A/C=NN/ is used, then /S=XX/O=YY/ is e 3211(continued): ncoded 3212: on the LHS.
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc2156.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第3210行中未找到'yyyy'。3208：前缀，或地址s 3208中剩余的所有属性（续）：将在LHS上进行3209:编码。这是为了确保可逆的mapp 3209（续）：ing。对于3210:例如，如果存在地址/S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/3210（续）：并且使用了/ADMD=A/C=NN/的3211:映射，则/S=XX/O=YY/是e 3211（续）：在LHS上编码3212:。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3211: 3209: encoded on the LHS. This is to ensure a reversible mapp 3209(continued): ing. For 3210: example, if there is an address /S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/ 3210(continued): and a 3211: mapping for /ADMD=A/C=NN/ is used, then /S=XX/O=YY/ is e 3211(continued): ncoded 3212: on the LHS. 3213:
第3211行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：3209:在LHS上编码。这是为了确保可逆的mapp 3209（续）：ing。对于3210:例如，如果存在地址/S=XX/O=YY/ADMD=A/C=NN/3210（续）：并且使用了/ADMD=A/C=NN/的3211:映射，则/S=XX/O=YY/是e 3211（续）：在LHS上编码3212:。3213:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3317:
3315:
3316: C = "XX"
3317: ADMD = "YY"
3318: O = "ZZ"
3319: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3317:
3315:
3316: C = "XX"
3317: ADMD = "YY"
3318: O = "ZZ"
3319: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3319:
3317: ADMD = "YY"
3318: O = "ZZ"
3319: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
3320:
3321: This is mapped first to an RFC 822 address, and then back to
3321(continued): the
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3319:
3317: ADMD = "YY"
3318: O = "ZZ"
3319: "RFC-822" = "Smith(a)ZZ.YY.XX"
3320:
3321: This is mapped first to an RFC 822 address, and then back to
3321(continued): the
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3325:
3323:
3324: C = "XX"
3325: ADMD = "YY"
3326: O = "ZZ"
3327: Surname = "Smith"
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 3325:
3323:
3324: C = "XX"
3325: ADMD = "YY"
3326: O = "ZZ"
3327: Surname = "Smith"
UTCTime found at line 1705: 1703: "yen*{165}" 1704: 1705: 3.3.5. UTCTime 1706: 1707: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Ye 1707(continued): ar,
UTCTime位于第1705:1703行：“yen*{165}”1704:1705:3.3.5。UTCTime 1706:1707:UTCTime和RFC 822 822.date-time语法包含：Ye 1707（续）：ar，
UTCTime found at line 1707:
1705: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1706:
1707: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Ye
1707(continued): ar,
1708: Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, second (optional), and Tim
1708(continued): ezone
1709: (technically a time differential in UTCTime). 822.date-time
1709(continued): also
UTCTime found at line 1707:
1705: 3.3.5. UTCTime
1706:
1707: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Ye
1707(continued): ar,
1708: Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, second (optional), and Tim
1708(continued): ezone
1709: (technically a time differential in UTCTime). 822.date-time
1709(continued): also
UTCTime found at line 1709:
1707: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Ye
1707(continued): ar,
1708: Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, second (optional), and Tim
1708(continued): ezone
1709: (technically a time differential in UTCTime). 822.date-time
1709(continued): also
1710: contains an optional day of the week, but this is redundant.
1710(continued): With
1711: the exception of Year, a symmetrical mapping can be made betw
1711(continued): een
UTCTime found at line 1709:
1707: Both UTCTime and the RFC 822 822.date-time syntax contain: Ye
1707(continued): ar,
1708: Month, Day of Month, hour, minute, second (optional), and Tim
1708(continued): ezone
1709: (technically a time differential in UTCTime). 822.date-time
1709(continued): also
1710: contains an optional day of the week, but this is redundant.
1710(continued): With
1711: the exception of Year, a symmetrical mapping can be made betw
1711(continued): een
UTCTime found at line 1717: 1715: In practice, a gateway will need to parse various illegal 1715(continued): variants 1716: on 822.date-time. In cases where 822.date-time cannot be 1716(continued): parsed, 1717: it is recommended that the derived UTCTime is set to the v 1717(continued): alue at 1718: the time of translation. Such errors may be noted in an R 1718(continued): FC 822 1719: comment, to aid detection and correction.
UTCTime位于第1717:1715行：实际上，网关需要解析各种非法1715（续）：变体1716:on 822.date-time。在822.date-time不能被1716（续）：解析的情况下，1717：建议将派生的UTCTime设置为1718：翻译时间处的v 1717（续）：值。此类错误可在R 1718（续）：FC 822 1719：注释中注明，以帮助检测和纠正。
UTCTime found at line 1721: 1719: comment, to aid detection and correction. 1720: 1721: When mapping to X.400, the UTCTime format which specifies the 1721(continued): 1722: timezone offset shall be used. 1723:
UTCTime位于第1721行：1719：注释，以帮助检测和更正。1720:1721:映射到X.400时，应使用指定1721（续）：1722:时区偏移的UTCTime格式。1723:
UTCTime found at line 1745:
1743: RFC 822, as modified by RFC 1123, requires use of a four digi
1743(continued): t year.
1744: Note that the original RFC 822 uses a two digit date, which i
1744(continued): s no
1745: longer legal. UTCTime uses a two digit date. To map a year
1745(continued): from RFC
1746: 822 to X.400, simply use the last two digits. To map a year
1746(continued): from
1747: X.400 to RFC 822, assume that the two digit year refers to a
1747(continued): year in
UTCTime found at line 1745:
1743: RFC 822, as modified by RFC 1123, requires use of a four digi
1743(continued): t year.
1744: Note that the original RFC 822 uses a two digit date, which i
1744(continued): s no
1745: longer legal. UTCTime uses a two digit date. To map a year
1745(continued): from RFC
1746: 822 to X.400, simply use the last two digits. To map a year
1746(continued): from
1747: X.400 to RFC 822, assume that the two digit year refers to a
1747(continued): year in
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2162.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 797:
795: maps into
796:
797: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
798: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
799:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2162.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 797:
795: maps into
796:
797: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
798: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
799:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 806:
804: maps into
805:
806: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
807: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
808:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 806:
804: maps into
805:
806: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
807: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
808:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 812:
810:
811: xx = country code of the gateway performing the convers
811(continued): ion
812: yyy = Admd of the gateway performing the conversion
813: zzz = Prmd of the gateway performing the conversion
814: ooo = Organisation of the gateway performing the convers
814(continued): ion
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 812:
810:
811: xx = country code of the gateway performing the convers
811(continued): ion
812: yyy = Admd of the gateway performing the conversion
813: zzz = Prmd of the gateway performing the conversion
814: ooo = Organisation of the gateway performing the convers
814(continued): ion
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 915:
913: it is connected to. In this case the mapping is trivial:
914:
915: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 915:
913: it is connected to. In this case the mapping is trivial:
914:
915: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
916: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart; 917:
916:DD.Mail-11=路由：：节点：：本地部分；917:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 918:
916: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
917:
918: (see sect. 5.2 for explication of 'xx','yyy','zzz','ooo','uuu
918(continued): ','net')
919:
920: maps into
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 918:
916: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
917:
918: (see sect. 5.2 for explication of 'xx','yyy','zzz','ooo','uuu
918(continued): ','net')
919:
920: maps into
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 926:
924: and for DECnet/OSI addresses
925:
926: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
927: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
928:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 926:
924: and for DECnet/OSI addresses
925:
926: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=zzz; O=ooo; OU=uuu; DD.Dnet=net;
927: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
928:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 937:
935: described into section 5.4 apply:
936:
937: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
938: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
939:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 937:
935: described into section 5.4 apply:
936:
937: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
938: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;
939:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 942: 940: maps into 941: 942: gwnode::gw%"C=xx;ADMD=yyy;PRMD=www;DD.Dnet=net; 943: DD.Mail-11=route::node::localpart;" 944:
第942:940行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：映射到941:942:gwnode:：gw%“C=xx；ADMD=yyy；PRMD=www；DD.Dnet=net；943:DD.Mail-11=route:：node:：localpart；”944:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 961:
959: Again for DECnet/OSI addresses:
960:
961: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
962: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
963:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 961:
959: Again for DECnet/OSI addresses:
960:
961: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; PRMD=www; DD.Dnet=net;
962: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;
963:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 966: 964: maps into 965: 966: gwnode::gw%"C=xx;ADMD=yyy;PRMD=www;DD.Dnet=net; 967: DD.Mail-11=node-clns::localpart;" 968:
第966:964行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：映射到965:966:gwnode:：gw%“C=xx；ADMD=yyy；PRMD=www；DD.Dnet=net；967:DD.Mail-11=node clns:：localpart；”968:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1095: 1093: maps into
第1095:1093行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：映射到
1094:
1095: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
1096: DD.Mail-11=route::gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
1097:
1094:
1095: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
1096: DD.Mail-11=route::gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
1097:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1104:
1102: maps into
1103:
1104: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
1105: DD.Mail-11=gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
1106:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1104:
1102: maps into
1103:
1104: C=xx; ADMD=yyy; DD.Dnet=net;
1105: DD.Mail-11=gwnode::gw(p)(q)x400-text-address(q);
1106:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2167.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1026:
1024:
1025: year = 4digit
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2167.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1026:
1024:
1025: year = 4digit
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
2digit found at line 1027:
1025: year = 4digit
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
2digit found at line 1027:
1025: year = 4digit
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
2digit found at line 1028:
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
2digit found at line 1028:
1026: month = 2digit
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
2digit found at line 1029:
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
1031: milli-second = 3digit
2digit found at line 1029:
1027: day = 2digit
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
1031: milli-second = 3digit
2digit found at line 1030:
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
1031: milli-second = 3digit
1032: host-name = dns-char *(dns-char / ".")
2digit found at line 1030:
1028: hour = 2digit
1029: minute = 2digit
1030: second = 2digit
1031: milli-second = 3digit
1032: host-name = dns-char *(dns-char / ".")
2digit found at line 3186:
3184:
3185: year = 4digit
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
2digit found at line 3186:
3184:
3185: year = 4digit
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
2digit found at line 3187:
3185: year = 4digit
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
3189: minute = 2digit
2digit found at line 3187:
3185: year = 4digit
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
3189: minute = 2digit
2digit found at line 3188:
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
3189: minute = 2digit
3190: second = 2digit
2digit found at line 3188:
3186: month = 2digit
3187: day = 2digit
3188: hour = 2digit
3189: minute = 2digit
3190: second = 2digit
2digit found at line 3189: 3187: day = 2digit 3188: hour = 2digit 3189: minute = 2digit 3190: second = 2digit 3191:
2第3189行：3187:day=2数字3188:hour=2数字3189:minute=2数字3190:second=2数字3191:
2digit found at line 3190: 3188: hour = 2digit 3189: minute = 2digit 3190: second = 2digit 3191: 3192:
2第3190行的数字：3188:hour=2数字3189:minute=2数字3190:second=2数字3191:3192:
2000 found at line 1229: 1227: C -class rwhois.net domain host 1228: S %class domain:description:Domain information 1229: S %class domain:version:19970103101232000 1230: S %class 1231:
2000位于第1229:1227:C行-class rwhois.net域主机1228:S%class域：说明：域信息1229:S%class域：版本：19970103101232000 1230:S%class 1231:
2000 found at line 3626: 3624: soa 000800h 3625: status 001000h 3626: xfer 002000h 3627: X 004000h 3628:
2000位于第3626行：3624:soa 000800h 3625:status 001000h 3626:xfer 00200H 3627:X 004000h 3628:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2170.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 427: 425: Server: MyAgent/1.0 426: ATM-Service: CBR 427: ATM-QoS-PCR: 2000 428: Content-type: video/mpeg 428(continued): 429:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第427行找到的文件rfc2170.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:425:服务器：MyAgent/1.0 426:ATM服务：CBR 427:ATM QoS PCR:2000 428:内容类型：视频/mpeg 428（续）：429:
2000 found at line 464: 462: Server: MyAgent/1.0 ATM. 462(continued): address 463: ATM-Service: CBR 464: ATM-QoS-PCR: 2000 465: Content-type: video/mpeg 465(continued): 466:
2000可在第464行找到：462:Server:MyAgent/1.0atm。462（续）：地址463:ATM服务：CBR 464:ATM QoS PCR:2000 465：内容类型：视频/mpeg 465（续）：466:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2179.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 292: 290: a setuid file anywhere in the system, including those on NF 290(continued): S 291: mounted partitions. 292: * "find / -group kmem -perm -2000 -print" will do the same fo 292(continued): r kmem 293: group permissions. 294:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2179.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第292行找到：290：系统中任何位置的setuid文件，包括NF 290上的文件（续）：S 291：已装入的分区。292:“find/-groupkmem-perm-2000-print”将执行与fo292相同的操作（续）：r kmem 293：组权限。294:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2182.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 495: 493: 494: Instead, for this example, set the primary's serial number to 494(continued): 495: 2000000000, and wait for the secondary servers to update to t 495(continued): hat 496: zone. The value 2000000000 is chosen as a value a lot bigger 496(continued): than 497: the current value, but less that 2^31 bigger (2^31 is 2147483 497(continued): 648).
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=在第495:493:494行找到的文件rfc2182.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=2000:相反，在本例中，将主服务器的序列号设置为494（续）：495:2000000，并等待辅助服务器更新为t 495（续）：hat 496:zone。选择2000000000作为一个比496大得多的值（续）：比497：当前值大，但小于2^31（2^31是2147483 497（续）：648）。
2000 found at line 496:
494: Instead, for this example, set the primary's serial number to
494(continued):
495: 2000000000, and wait for the secondary servers to update to t
495(continued): hat
496: zone. The value 2000000000 is chosen as a value a lot bigger
496(continued): than
497: the current value, but less that 2^31 bigger (2^31 is 2147483
2000 found at line 496:
494: Instead, for this example, set the primary's serial number to
494(continued):
495: 2000000000, and wait for the secondary servers to update to t
495(continued): hat
496: zone. The value 2000000000 is chosen as a value a lot bigger
496(continued): than
497: the current value, but less that 2^31 bigger (2^31 is 2147483
497(continued): 648). 498: This is then an increment of the serial number [RFC1982].
497（续）：648）。498:这是序列号[RFC1982]的增量。
2000 found at line 502: 500: Next, after all servers needing updating have the zone with t 500(continued): hat 501: serial number, the serial number can be set to 4000000000. 502: 4000000000 is 2000000000 more than 2000000000 (fairly clearly 502(continued): ), and 503: 504:
2000在第502行找到：500:下一步，在所有需要更新的服务器都具有带t 500的区域（续）：hat 501:序列号之后，序列号可以设置为4000000000。502:4000000000比20000000000多20000000000（相当清楚502（续）：），503:504：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2183.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group R
7(continued): . Troost
8: Request for Comments: 2183 New Century
8(continued): Systems
9: Updates: 1806 S
9(continued): . Dorner
10: Category: Standards Track QUALCOMM Inco
10(continued): rporated
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2183.txt +=+=+=+=+=
century found at line 8:
6:
7: Network Working Group R
7(continued): . Troost
8: Request for Comments: 2183 New Century
8(continued): Systems
9: Updates: 1806 S
9(continued): . Dorner
10: Category: Standards Track QUALCOMM Inco
10(continued): rporated
century found at line 587: 585: 586: Rens Troost 587: New Century Systems 588: 324 East 41st Street #804 589: New York, NY, 10017 USA
century位于第587:585:586行：Rens Troost 587:New century Systems 588:324 East 41 Street#804 589：纽约州纽约市，美国
century found at line 593: 591: Phone: +1 (212) 557-2050 592: Fax: +1 (212) 557-2049 593: EMail: rens@century.com 594: 595:
century位于第593行：591:电话：+1（212）557-2050 592:传真：+1（212）557-2049 593:电子邮件：rens@century.com 594: 595:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2195.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 131: 129: C: A0001 AUTHENTICATE CRAM-MD5 130: S: + PDE4OTYuNjk3MTcwOTUyQHBvc3RvZmZpY2UucmVzdG9uLm1jaS5uZX 130(continued): Q+ 131: C: dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 132: S: A0001 OK CRAM authentication successful 133:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'在第131行未找到'yyyy'的行上：129:C:A0001验证CRAM-MD5 130:S:+PDE4OTYunjk3MTCWOTUYQHBVC3RVZMZMZPY2UUCMVZDG9ULM1JAS5UZX 130（续）：Q+131:C:DGLTIGI5MTNHNJAZDLZE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZMZNZNZNZNZNZGQZOZW 132:S:A0001验证成功133:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 161:
第161行未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：
159: AUTHENTICATE command (or the similar POP3 AUTH command), y 159(continued): ielding 160: 161: dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 162: 163:
159:AUTHENTICATE命令（或类似的POP3 AUTH命令），y 159（续）：ielding 160:161:dGltIGI5MTNhNjAyYzdlZGE3YTQ5NWI0ZTZlNzMzNGQzODkw 162:163:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2200.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2118: 2116: The text version is sent. 2116(continued): 2117: 2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n 2118(continued): umber. 2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps 2119(continued): '. 2120:
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc2200.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第2118行中未找到'yyyy'：2116:发送文本版本。2116（续）：2117:2118:file/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy，其中“nnnn”是rfc n 2118（续）：编号。2119:而'yyy'是'txt'或'ps 2119（续）：'。2120:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2119:
2117:
2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2118(continued): umber.
2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2119(continued): '.
2120:
2121: help to get information on how
2121(continued): to use
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2119:
2117:
2118: file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC n
2118(continued): umber.
2119: and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps
2119(continued): '.
2120:
2121: help to get information on how
2121(continued): to use
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2200 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
9: Obsoletes: 2000, 1920, 1880, 1800, 1780, J
9(continued): une 1997
10: 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410, 1360,
11: 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2200 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
9: Obsoletes: 2000, 1920, 1880, 1800, 1780, J
9(continued): une 1997
10: 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410, 1360,
11: 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083
2000 found at line 921:
919: level of standard.
920:
921: 2099 - Request for Comments Summary - RFC Numbers 2000-209
921(continued): 9
922:
923: This is an information document and does not specif
923(continued): y any
2000 found at line 921:
919: level of standard.
920:
921: 2099 - Request for Comments Summary - RFC Numbers 2000-209
921(continued): 9
922:
923: This is an information document and does not specif
923(continued): y any
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2203.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1096:
1094: GSS_S_GAP_TOKEN 0x00000010
1095: GSS_S_BAD_MECH 0x00010000
1096: GSS_S_BAD_NAME 0x00020000
1097: GSS_S_BAD_NAMETYPE 0x00030000
1098: GSS_S_BAD_BINDINGS 0x00040000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2203.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1096:
1094: GSS_S_GAP_TOKEN 0x00000010
1095: GSS_S_BAD_MECH 0x00010000
1096: GSS_S_BAD_NAME 0x00020000
1097: GSS_S_BAD_NAMETYPE 0x00030000
1098: GSS_S_BAD_BINDINGS 0x00040000
2000 found at line 1113: 1111: GSS_S_UNAVAILABLE 0x00100000 1112: GSS_S_DUPLICATE_ELEMENT 0x00110000 1113: GSS_S_NAME_NOT_MN 0x00120000 1114: GSS_S_CALL_INACCESSIBLE_READ 0x01000000 1115: GSS_S_CALL_INACCESSIBLE_WRITE 0x02000000
2000在第1113行找到：1111:GSS_S_不可用0x001000001112:GSS_S_重复元素0x00110000 1113:GSS_S_名称不可用0x00120000 1114:GSS_S_调用不可访问0x010000001115:GSS_调用不可访问0x02000000
2000 found at line 1115: 1113: GSS_S_NAME_NOT_MN 0x00120000 1114: GSS_S_CALL_INACCESSIBLE_READ 0x01000000 1115: GSS_S_CALL_INACCESSIBLE_WRITE 0x02000000 1116: GSS_S_CALL_BAD_STRUCTURE 0x03000000 1117:
2000在第1115行找到：1113:GSS_S_NAME_NOT_MN 0x00120000 1114:GSS_S_CALL_unabled_READ 0x010000001115:GSS_S_CALL_unabled_WRITE 0x02000000 1116:GSS_S_CALL_BAD_STRUCTURE 0x030000001117:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2204.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 292:
290: available for transmission.
291:
292: Date stamp (YYMMDD)
293:
294: A file qualifier indicating the date the Virtual File was
294(continued): made
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2204.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 292:
290: available for transmission.
291:
292: Date stamp (YYMMDD)
293:
294: A file qualifier indicating the date the Virtual File was
294(continued): made
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1866:
1864: | 1 | SFIDDSN | Virtual File Dataset Name | V
1864(continued): X(26) |
1865: | 27 | SFIDRSV1 | Reserved | F
1865(continued): X(9) |
1866: | 36 | SFIDDATE | Virtual File Date stamp, (YYMMDD) | V
1866(continued): X(6) |
1867: | 42 | SFIDTIME | Virtual File Time stamp, (HHMMSS) | V
1867(continued): X(6) |
1868: | 48 | SFIDUSER | User Data | V
1868(continued): X(8) |
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1866:
1864: | 1 | SFIDDSN | Virtual File Dataset Name | V
1864(continued): X(26) |
1865: | 27 | SFIDRSV1 | Reserved | F
1865(continued): X(9) |
1866: | 36 | SFIDDATE | Virtual File Date stamp, (YYMMDD) | V
1866(continued): X(6) |
1867: | 42 | SFIDTIME | Virtual File Time stamp, (HHMMSS) | V
1867(continued): X(6) |
1868: | 48 | SFIDUSER | User Data | V
1868(continued): X(8) |
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1895:
1893: SFIDDATE Virtual File Date stamp S
1893(continued): tring(6)
1894:
1895: Format: 'YYMMDD' 6 decimal digits representing the year, m
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1895:
1893: SFIDDATE Virtual File Date stamp S
1893(continued): tring(6)
1894:
1895: Format: 'YYMMDD' 6 decimal digits representing the year, m
1895(continued): onth 1896: and day respectively [ISO-8601]. 1897:
1895年（续）：1896年的第1天和第2天[ISO-8601]。1897:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2394:
2392: | 1 | EERPDSN | Virtual File Dataset Name | V
2392(continued): X(26) |
2393: | 27 | EERPRSV1 | Reserved | F
2393(continued): X(9) |
2394: | 36 | EERPDATE | Virtual File Date stamp, (YYMMDD) | V
2394(continued): X(6) |
2395: | 42 | EERPTIME | Virtual File Time stamp, (HHMMSS) | V
2395(continued): X(6) |
2396: | 48 | EERPUSER | User Data | V
2396(continued): X(8) |
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2394:
2392: | 1 | EERPDSN | Virtual File Dataset Name | V
2392(continued): X(26) |
2393: | 27 | EERPRSV1 | Reserved | F
2393(continued): X(9) |
2394: | 36 | EERPDATE | Virtual File Date stamp, (YYMMDD) | V
2394(continued): X(6) |
2395: | 42 | EERPTIME | Virtual File Time stamp, (HHMMSS) | V
2395(continued): X(6) |
2396: | 48 | EERPUSER | User Data | V
2396(continued): X(8) |
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2429: 2427: EERPDATE Virtual File Date stamp S 2427(continued): tring(6) 2428: 2429: Format: 'YYMMDD' 6 decimal digits representing the year, m 2429(continued): onth 2430: and day respectively [ISO-8601]. 2431:
第2429行中没有“yyy”的行上的“yy”：2427:e更新虚拟文件日期戳S 2427（续）：tring（6）2428:2429:Format:“YYMMDD”表示年份的6位十进制数字，m 2429（续）：分别为2430:和天[ISO-8601]。2431:
2000 found at line 304:
302: field. Since the ODETTE-FTP only uses this information to id
302(continued): entify a
303: particular Virtual File it will continue to operate correctly
303(continued): in the
304: year 2000 and beyond.
305:
306: The User Monitor may use the Virtual File Date attribute in l
306(continued): ocal
2000 found at line 304:
302: field. Since the ODETTE-FTP only uses this information to id
302(continued): entify a
303: particular Virtual File it will continue to operate correctly
303(continued): in the
304: year 2000 and beyond.
305:
306: The User Monitor may use the Virtual File Date attribute in l
306(continued): ocal
2000 found at line 308: 306: The User Monitor may use the Virtual File Date attribute in l 306(continued): ocal 307: processes involving date comparisons and calculations. Any s 307(continued): uch use 308: falls outside the scope of this protocol and year 2000 handli 308(continued): ng is a 309: local implementation issue. 310:
2000第308行：306：用户监视器可以使用L306中的虚拟文件日期属性（续）：ocal 307：涉及日期比较和计算的过程。任何s 307（续）：uch使用308:不在本协议范围内，2000年handli 308（续）：ng属于309:本地实施问题。310:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2227.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1949:
1947: Toward the Development of Web Measurement Standards. Thi
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2227.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1949:
1947: Toward the Development of Web Measurement Standards. Thi
1947(continued): s is a 1948: draft paper, currently available at http:// 1949: www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/novak/web.standards/webstand. 1949(continued): html. 1950: Cited by permission of the author; do not quote or cite w 1950(continued): ithout 1951: permission.
1947年（续）：s是一份1948年的草稿，目前可在http://1949:www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/novak/web.standards/webstand上查阅。1949年（续）：html。1950年：经作者许可引用；请勿引用或引用w 1950（续）：未经1951年：许可。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2234.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2-digit found at line 424: 422: 423: That is, exactly <N> occurrences of <element>. Thus 2DIGIT 423(continued): is a 424: 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic 425: characters. 426:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2234.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第424:422:423行找到2位：也就是说，<element>的出现次数正好是<N>。因此，2DIGIT 423（续）：是一个424:2位数的数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母425:字符组成的字符串。426:
2digit found at line 423: 421: <n>*<n>element 422: 423: That is, exactly <N> occurrences of <element>. Thus 2DIGIT 423(continued): is a 424: 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic 425: characters.
2在第423:421:<n>*<n>行元素422:423处发现的数字：也就是说，<element>的出现次数正好是<n>。因此，2DIGIT 423（续）：是一个424:2位数的数字，3ALPHA是一个由三个字母425:字符组成的字符串。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2235.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 862:
860:
861: 1997
862: 2000th RFC: "Internet Official Protocol Standards"
863:
864: 71,618 mailing lists registered at Liszt, a mailing list di
864(continued): rectory
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2235.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 862:
860:
861: 1997
862: 2000th RFC: "Internet Official Protocol Standards"
863:
864: 71,618 mailing lists registered at Liszt, a mailing list di
864(continued): rectory
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2244.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3555:
3553: ;; Timestamp in UTC
3554:
3555: time-day = 2DIGIT ;; 01-31
3556:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2244.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 3555:
3553: ;; Timestamp in UTC
3554:
3555: time-day = 2DIGIT ;; 01-31
3556:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
2digit found at line 3557:
3555: time-day = 2DIGIT ;; 01-31
3556:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
3558:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
2digit found at line 3557:
3555: time-day = 2DIGIT ;; 01-31
3556:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
3558:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
2digit found at line 3559:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
3558:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
3560:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
2digit found at line 3559:
3557: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
3558:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
3560:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
2digit found at line 3561:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
3560:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
3562:
3563: time-second = 2DIGIT ;; 00-60
2digit found at line 3561:
3559: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
3560:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
3562:
3563: time-second = 2DIGIT ;; 00-60
2digit found at line 3563:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
3562:
3563: time-second = 2DIGIT ;; 00-60
3564:
3565: time-subsecond = *DIGIT
2digit found at line 3563:
3561: time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
3562:
3563: time-second = 2DIGIT ;; 00-60
3564:
3565: time-subsecond = *DIGIT
2000 found at line 2217: 2215: criteria): 2216: AND COMPARE "modtime" "+i;octet" "19951206103400" 2217: COMPARE "modtime" "-i;octet" "19960112000000" 2218: refers to all entries modified between 10:34 December 6 19 2218(continued): 95 and 2219: midnight January 12, 1996 UTC.
2000在第2217行找到：2215:标准）：2216:并比较“modtime”+i；八位组“19951206103400”2217:比较“modtime”-i；八位组“19960112000000”2218:指在1996年12月6日10:34至2218（续）：95和2219:UTC 1996年1月12日午夜之间修改的所有条目。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2252.txt +=+=+=+=+= UTCTime found at line 1300: 1298: 1299: Values in this syntax are encoded as if they were printable s 1299(continued): trings 1300: with the strings containing a UTCTime value. This is histori 1300(continued): cal; new 1301: attribute definitions SHOULD use GeneralizedTime instead. 1302:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2252.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第1300行找到的UTCTime:1298:1299:此语法中的值被编码为可打印的s 1299（续）：字符串1300:，字符串包含UTCTime值。这是历史1300（续）：卡尔；新1301:属性定义应改为使用GeneratedTime。1302:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2261.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1923:
1921:
1922: snmpFrameworkMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1923: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 1997
1923(continued):
1924: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1925: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2261.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1923:
1921:
1922: snmpFrameworkMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1923: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 1997
1923(continued):
1924: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1925: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2262.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 818:
816:
817: snmpMPDMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
818: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 19
818(continued): 97
819: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
820: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2262.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 818:
816:
817: snmpMPDMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
818: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 19
818(continued): 97
819: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
820: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2264.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1715:
1713:
1714: snmpUsmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1715: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
1715(continued): ht
1716: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1717: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2264.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1715:
1713:
1714: snmpUsmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1715: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
1715(continued): ht
1716: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1717: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2265.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 554:
552:
553: snmpVacmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
554: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
554(continued): ht
555: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
556: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2265.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 554:
552:
553: snmpVacmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
554: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
554(continued): ht
555: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
556: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2271.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1923:
1921:
1922: snmpFrameworkMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1923: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 1997
1923(continued):
1924: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1925: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2271.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1923:
1921:
1922: snmpFrameworkMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1923: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 1997
1923(continued):
1924: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1925: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2272.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 818:
816:
817: snmpMPDMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
818: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 19
818(continued): 97
819: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
820: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2272.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 818:
816:
817: snmpMPDMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
818: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 November 19
818(continued): 97
819: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
820: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2274.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 1715: 1713:
+=+=+=+=+=+=rfc2274.txt文件+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第1715:1713行找到：
1714: snmpUsmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1715: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
1715(continued): ht
1716: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1717: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
1714: snmpUsmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
1715: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
1715(continued): ht
1716: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
1717: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2275.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 554:
552:
553: snmpVacmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
554: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
554(continued): ht
555: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
556: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2275.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 554:
552:
553: snmpVacmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
554: LAST-UPDATED "9711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnig
554(continued): ht
555: ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
556: CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@tis.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2280.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2119:
2117: missing, they default to:
2118:
2119: flap_damp(1000, 2000, 750, 900, 900, 20000)
2120:
2121: That is, a penalty of 1000 is assigned at each route flap, th
2121(continued): e route
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2280.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 2119:
2117: missing, they default to:
2118:
2119: flap_damp(1000, 2000, 750, 900, 900, 20000)
2120:
2121: That is, a penalty of 1000 is assigned at each route flap, th
2121(continued): e route
2000 found at line 2122:
2120:
2121: That is, a penalty of 1000 is assigned at each route flap, th
2121(continued): e route
2122: is suppressed when penalty reaches 2000. The penalty is redu
2122(continued): ced in
2123: half after 15 minutes (900 seconds) of stability regardless o
2123(continued): f
2124: whether the route is up or down. A supressed route is reused
2124(continued): when
2000 found at line 2122:
2120:
2121: That is, a penalty of 1000 is assigned at each route flap, th
2121(continued): e route
2122: is suppressed when penalty reaches 2000. The penalty is redu
2122(continued): ced in
2123: half after 15 minutes (900 seconds) of stability regardless o
2123(continued): f
2124: whether the route is up or down. A supressed route is reused
2124(continued): when
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2281.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 854: 852: Santa Clara, CA 95054 853: 854: Phone: (408) 327-1900 855: EMail: tli@juniper.net 856:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2281.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第854行找到：852:加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉95054 853:854:电话：（408）327-1900 855:电子邮件：tli@juniper.net 856:
1900 found at line 863: 861: Santa Clara, CA 95054 862: 863: Phone: (408) 327-1900 864: EMail: cole@juniper.net 865:
1900在第863:861:Santa Clara行找到，加利福尼亚州95054 862:863:电话：（408）327-1900 864:电子邮件：cole@juniper.net 865:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2287.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1439:
1437: DESCRIPTION
1438: "The full path and filename of the process.
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2287.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1439:
1437: DESCRIPTION
1438: "The full path and filename of the process.
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1440:
1438: "The full path and filename of the process.
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1442: ::= { sysApplElmtRunEntry 7 }
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1440:
1438: "The full path and filename of the process.
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1442: ::= { sysApplElmtRunEntry 7 }
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1441:
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1442: ::= { sysApplElmtRunEntry 7 }
1443:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1441:
1439: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1440: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1441: path is '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1442: ::= { sysApplElmtRunEntry 7 }
1443:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1706:
1704: DESCRIPTION
1705: "The full path and filename of the process.
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1706:
1704: DESCRIPTION
1705: "The full path and filename of the process.
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1707:
1705: "The full path and filename of the process.
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1709: ::= { sysApplElmtPastRunEntry 6 }
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1707:
1705: "The full path and filename of the process.
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1709: ::= { sysApplElmtPastRunEntry 6 }
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1708:
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1709: ::= { sysApplElmtPastRunEntry 6 }
1710:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1708:
1706: For example, '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc' would
1707: be returned for process 'myyproc' whose execution
1708: path was '/opt/MYYpkg/bin/myyproc'."
1709: ::= { sysApplElmtPastRunEntry 6 }
1710:
2000 found at line 402: 400: 401: sysApplMIB MODULE-IDENTITY 402: LAST-UPDATED "9710200000Z" 403: ORGANIZATION "IETF Applications MIB Working Group" 404: CONTACT-INFO
2000第402行：400:401:sysApplMIB模块-标识402:LAST-Update“9710200000Z”403:ORGANIZATION“IETF应用程序MIB工作组”404:CONTACT-INFO
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2292.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 547:
545: #define ND_NA_FLAG_ROUTER 0x80000000
546: #define ND_NA_FLAG_SOLICITED 0x40000000
547: #define ND_NA_FLAG_OVERRIDE 0x20000000
548: #else /* BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN */
549: #define ND_NA_FLAG_ROUTER 0x00000080
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2292.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 547:
545: #define ND_NA_FLAG_ROUTER 0x80000000
546: #define ND_NA_FLAG_SOLICITED 0x40000000
547: #define ND_NA_FLAG_OVERRIDE 0x20000000
548: #else /* BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN */
549: #define ND_NA_FLAG_ROUTER 0x00000080
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2298.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1310:
1308: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 00:19:00 (EDT) -0400
1309: From: Joe Recipient <Joe_Recipient@mega.edu>
1310: Message-Id: <199509200019.12345@mega.edu>
1311: Subject: Disposition notification
1312: To: Jane Sender <Jane_Sender@huge.com>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2298.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1310:
1308: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 00:19:00 (EDT) -0400
1309: From: Joe Recipient <Joe_Recipient@mega.edu>
1310: Message-Id: <199509200019.12345@mega.edu>
1311: Subject: Disposition notification
1312: To: Jane Sender <Jane_Sender@huge.com>
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2300.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2300 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
9: Obsoletes: 2200, 2000, 1920, 1880, 1800,
9(continued): May 1998
10: 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410,
11: 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2300.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2300 J. Postel
8(continued): , Editor
9: Obsoletes: 2200, 2000, 1920, 1880, 1800,
9(continued): May 1998
10: 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410,
11: 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2308.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 873: 871: NS2.XX.EXAMPLE. 600 IN NXT XX.EXAMPLE. NXT A NXT 871(continued): SIG 872: NS2.XX.EXAMPLE. 600 IN SIG NXT ... XX.EXAMPLE. .. 872(continued): . 873: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS1.YY.EXAMPLE.
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2308.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第873行：871:NS2.XX.EXAMPLE中未找到'yyyy'。NXT XX.EXAMPLE中的600。NXT A NXT 871（续）：SIG 872:NS2.XX.EXAMPLE。600英寸SIG NXT。。。二十、 例如。。872（续）：。873：例如。NS NS1.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。
874: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS2.YY.EXAMPLE. 875: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG NS ... XX.EXAMPLE. ... 875(continued):
874：例如。NS NS2.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。875:例如。65799英寸SIG NS。。。二十、 例如。。。875（续）：
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 874:
872: NS2.XX.EXAMPLE. 600 IN SIG NXT ... XX.EXAMPLE. ..
872(continued): .
873: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS1.YY.EXAMPLE.
874: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS2.YY.EXAMPLE.
875: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG NS ... XX.EXAMPLE. ...
875(continued):
876: Additional
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 874:
872: NS2.XX.EXAMPLE. 600 IN SIG NXT ... XX.EXAMPLE. ..
872(continued): .
873: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS1.YY.EXAMPLE.
874: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN NS NS2.YY.EXAMPLE.
875: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG NS ... XX.EXAMPLE. ...
875(continued):
876: Additional
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 879: 877: XX.EXAMPLE. 65800 IN KEY 0x4100 1 1 ... 878: XX.EXAMPLE. 65800 IN SIG KEY ... EXAMPLE. ... 879: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.1 880: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 881: NS2.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.2
第879:877:XX行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。例如。键0x4100 1中的65800。。。878:XX.例如。65800英寸信号键。。。实例879:NS1.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.1880:NS1.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例881:NS2.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.2中的65799
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 880: 878: XX.EXAMPLE. 65800 IN SIG KEY ... EXAMPLE. ... 879: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.1 880: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 881: NS2.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.2 882: NS3.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ...
第880:878:XX行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。例如。65800英寸信号键。。。实例879:NS1.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.1880:NS1.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例881:NS2.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.2882:NS3.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 881: 879: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.1 880: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 881: NS2.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.2 882: NS3.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 883: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN KEY 0x4100 1 1 ...
第881:879:NS1.yy.EXAMPLE行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。10.100.0.1880:NS1.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例881:NS2.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.2882:NS3.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例883:例如。键0x4100 1中的65799。。。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 882: 880: NS1.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 881: NS2.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN A 10.100.0.2 882: NS3.YY.EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG A ... EXAMPLE. ... 883: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN KEY 0x4100 1 1 ... 884: EXAMPLE. 65799 IN SIG KEY ... . ...
第882:880:NS1.yy.EXAMPLE行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。信号A中的65799。。。实例881:NS2.YY.EXAMPLE。10.100.0.2882:NS3.YY.EXAMPLE中的65799。信号A中的65799。。。实例883:例如。键0x4100 1中的65799。。。884:例如。SIG键中的65799。。。
2000 found at line 805:
803: $ORIGIN XX.EXAMPLE.
804: @ IN SOA NS1.XX.EXAMPLE. HOSTMATER.XX.EXA
804(continued): MPLE. (
805: 1997102000 ; serial
806: 1800 ; refresh (30 mins)
807: 900 ; retry (15 mins)
2000 found at line 805:
803: $ORIGIN XX.EXAMPLE.
804: @ IN SOA NS1.XX.EXAMPLE. HOSTMATER.XX.EXA
804(continued): MPLE. (
805: 1997102000 ; serial
806: 1800 ; refresh (30 mins)
807: 900 ; retry (15 mins)
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2311.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 269:
267: Sending agents MUST encode signing time through the year 2049
267(continued): as
268: UTCTime; signing times in 2050 or later MUST be encoded as
269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as
269(continued):
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter
271(continued): preted
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2311.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 269:
267: Sending agents MUST encode signing time through the year 2049
267(continued): as
268: UTCTime; signing times in 2050 or later MUST be encoded as
269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as
269(continued):
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter
271(continued): preted
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 270: 268: UTCTime; signing times in 2050 or later MUST be encoded as 269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as 269(continued): 270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is 271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter 271(continued): preted 272: as 20YY.
第270行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：268:UTCTime；2050年或以后的签名时间必须编码为269:GeneralizedTime。代理人必须将年份字段（YY）解释为269（续）：270：如下：如果YY大于或等于50，则年份为271：解释为19YY；如果YY小于50，则年份为INTER271（续）：预测272:as 20YY。
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 271: 269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as 269(continued): 270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is 271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter 271(continued): preted 272: as 20YY. 273:
第271:269:GeneralizedTime行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”。代理人必须将年份字段（YY）解释为269（续）：270：如下：如果YY大于或等于50，则年份为271：解释为19YY；如果YY小于50，则年份为INTER271（续）：预测272:as 20YY。273:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 272:
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter
271(continued): preted
272: as 20YY.
273:
274: 2.5.2 S/MIME Capabilities Attribute
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 272:
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
271: interpreted as 19YY; if YY is less than 50, the year is inter
271(continued): preted
272: as 20YY.
273:
274: 2.5.2 S/MIME Capabilities Attribute
UTCTime found at line 268:
266:
267: Sending agents MUST encode signing time through the year 2049
267(continued): as
268: UTCTime; signing times in 2050 or later MUST be encoded as
269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as
269(continued):
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
UTCTime found at line 268:
266:
267: Sending agents MUST encode signing time through the year 2049
267(continued): as
268: UTCTime; signing times in 2050 or later MUST be encoded as
269: GeneralizedTime. Agents MUST interpret the year field (YY) as
269(continued):
270: follows: if YY is greater than or equal to 50, the year is
1900 found at line 1972: 1970: Mountain View, CA 94043
1900发现于1972:1970线：加利福尼亚州山景城94043
1971: 1972: Phone: (415) 254-1900 1973: EMail: repka@netscape.com 1974:
1971:1972:电话：（415）254-1900 1973:电子邮件：repka@netscape.com 1974:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2312.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 1049: 1047: Mountain View, CA 94043 1048: 1049: Phone: (415) 254-1900 1050: EMail: jsw@netscape.com 1051:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2312.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900在第1049:1047行：加利福尼亚州山景城94043 1048:1049:电话：（415）254-1900 1050:电子邮件：jsw@netscape.com 1051:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2326.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 906:
904: smpte-type = "smpte" | "smpte-30-drop" | "smpte-25"
905: ; other timecodes may be adde
905(continued): d
906: smpte-time = 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT [ ":" 1*2
906(continued): DIGIT ]
907: [ "." 1*2DIGIT ]
908:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2326.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 906:
904: smpte-type = "smpte" | "smpte-30-drop" | "smpte-25"
905: ; other timecodes may be adde
905(continued): d
906: smpte-time = 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT [ ":" 1*2
906(continued): DIGIT ]
907: [ "." 1*2DIGIT ]
908:
2digit found at line 907: 905: ; other timecodes may be adde 905(continued): d 906: smpte-time = 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT [ ":" 1*2 906(continued): DIGIT ] 907: [ "." 1*2DIGIT ] 908: 909: Examples:
2在第907行找到的数字：905:；其他时间码可以是加法905（续）：d 906:smpte time=1*2DIGIT:“1*2DIGIT:“1*2DIGIT[”：“1*2906（续）：DIGIT]907:[”“1*2DIGIT]908:909:示例：
2digit found at line 940: 938: npt-hhmmss = npt-hh ":" npt-mm ":" npt-ss [ "." *DIGIT ] 939: npt-hh = 1*DIGIT ; any positive number 940: npt-mm = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 941: npt-ss = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 942:
2在第940行发现的数字：938:npt hhmmss=npt hh:“npt mm:“npt ss[”*“数字]939:npt hh=1*数字；任意正数940:npt mm=1*2数字；0-59 941:npt ss=1*2数字；0-59 942:
2digit found at line 941: 939: npt-hh = 1*DIGIT ; any positive number 940: npt-mm = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 941: npt-ss = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 942: 943: Examples:
2第941行的数字：939:npt hh=1*位；任意正数940:npt mm=1*2数字；0-59 941:npt ss=1*2数字；0-59 942:943:示例：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2332.txt +=+=+=+=+= 1900 found at line 2839: 2837: 1620 Tuckerstown Road 3260 Jay St. 2838: Dresher, PA 19025 USA Santa Clara, CA 95054 2839: Phone: +1 215 830 0692 Phone: +1 408 327 1900 2840: EMail: dave@corecom.com EMail: bcole@jnx.com 2841:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2332.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=1900位于第2839行：2837:1620塔克斯敦路3260杰伊街2838:Dresher，宾夕法尼亚州19025美国加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉市95054 2839：电话：+1218300692电话：+1408327 1900 2840：电子邮件：dave@corecom.com电邮：bcole@jnx.com 2841:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2353.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 211: 209: native IP DLC, this field is not used to convey a port number 209(continued): for 210: replies; moreover, the zero setting is not used. IANA has re 210(continued): gistered 211: port numbers 12000 through 12004 for use in these two fields 211(continued): by the 212: native IP DLC; use of these port numbers allows prioritizatio 212(continued): n in the 213: IP network. For more details of the use of these fields, see 213(continued): 2.6.1,
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2353.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第211行找到：209：本机IP DLC，此字段不用于传输端口号209（续）：对于210：应答；此外，不使用零位设置。IANA已经注册了RE210（续）：注册了211：端口号12000到12004，用于这两个字段211（续）：由212：本机IP DLC注册；使用这些端口号可以在213:IP网络中设置优先级212（续）：n。有关这些字段使用的更多详细信息，请参见213（续）：2.6.1，
2000 found at line 1694: 1692: 1693: At an intermediate HPR node, link activation failure can be r 1693(continued): eported 1694: with sense data X'08010000' or X'80020000'. At a node with r 1694(continued): oute-1695: selection responsibility, such failure can be reported with s 1695(continued): ense 1696: data X'80140001'.
在第1694:1692:1693行找到的2000：在中间HPR节点上，链路激活故障可能是r 1693（续）：报告1694：具有检测数据X'08010000'或X'80020000'。在具有r 1694（续）：oute-1695：选择责任的节点上，可使用s 1695（续）：ense 1696：数据X'8014001'报告此类故障。
2000 found at line 1841:
1839: | the same connection network. |
1839(continued): |
1840: +--------------------------------------------------------+------
1840(continued): -------+
1841: | Link failure | X'800
1841(continued): 20000' |
1842: +--------------------------------------------------------+------
1842(continued): -------+
1843: | Route selection services has determined that no path | X'801
1843(continued): 40001' |
2000 found at line 1841:
1839: | the same connection network. |
1839(continued): |
1840: +--------------------------------------------------------+------
1840(continued): -------+
1841: | Link failure | X'800
1841(continued): 20000' |
1842: +--------------------------------------------------------+------
1842(continued): -------+
1843: | Route selection services has determined that no path | X'801
1843(continued): 40001' |
2000 found at line 1868: 1866: will be able to exploit routers that provide priority functio 1866(continued): n. 1867: 1868: The 5 UDP port numbers, 12000-12004 (decimal), have been assi
在第1868:1866行找到的2000将能够利用提供优先级功能的路由器1866（续）：n。1867:1868:5个UDP端口号12000-12004（十进制）已被assi
1868(continued): gned by
1869: the Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA). Four of these
1869(continued): port
1870: numbers are used for ANR-routed network layer packets (NLPs)
1870(continued): and
1868(continued): gned by
1869: the Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA). Four of these
1869(continued): port
1870: numbers are used for ANR-routed network layer packets (NLPs)
1870(continued): and
2000 found at line 1872:
1870: numbers are used for ANR-routed network layer packets (NLPs)
1870(continued): and
1871: correspond to the APPN transmission priorities (network, 1200
1871(continued): 1; high,
1872: 12002; medium, 12003; and low, 12004), and one port number (1
1872(continued): 2000) is
1873: used for a set of LLC commands (i.e., XID, TEST, DISC, and DM
1873(continued): ) and
1874: function-routed NLPs (i.e., XID_DONE_RQ and XID_DONE_RSP). T
1874(continued): hese
2000 found at line 1872:
1870: numbers are used for ANR-routed network layer packets (NLPs)
1870(continued): and
1871: correspond to the APPN transmission priorities (network, 1200
1871(continued): 1; high,
1872: 12002; medium, 12003; and low, 12004), and one port number (1
1872(continued): 2000) is
1873: used for a set of LLC commands (i.e., XID, TEST, DISC, and DM
1873(continued): ) and
1874: function-routed NLPs (i.e., XID_DONE_RQ and XID_DONE_RSP). T
1874(continued): hese
2000 found at line 2417:
2415: the source port number is not relevant. That is, the firewal
2415(continued): l should
2416: accept traffic with the IP addresses of the HPR/IP nodes and
2416(continued): with
2417: destination port numbers in the range 12000 to 12004. Second
2417(continued): , the
2418: possibility exists for an attack using forged UDP datagrams;
2418(continued): such
2419: attacks could cause the RTP connection to fail or even introd
2419(continued): uce
2000 found at line 2417:
2415: the source port number is not relevant. That is, the firewal
2415(continued): l should
2416: accept traffic with the IP addresses of the HPR/IP nodes and
2416(continued): with
2417: destination port numbers in the range 12000 to 12004. Second
2417(continued): , the
2418: possibility exists for an attack using forged UDP datagrams;
2418(continued): such
2419: attacks could cause the RTP connection to fail or even introd
2419(continued): uce
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2355.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1488:
1486: 0x00 Command Reject 0x10030000
1487:
1488: 0x01 Intervention Required 0x08020000
1489:
1490: 0x02 Operation Check 0x10050000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2355.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1488:
1486: 0x00 Command Reject 0x10030000
1487:
1488: 0x01 Intervention Required 0x08020000
1489:
1490: 0x02 Operation Check 0x10050000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2361.txt +=+=+=+=+= 'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 30: 28: * video/vnd.avi; codec=XXX identifies a specific video codec 28(continued): (i.e., 29: XXX) within the AVI Registry. 30: * audio/vnd.wave; codec=YYY identifies a specific audio codec 30(continued): 31: (i.e., YYY) within the WAVE Registry. 32:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2361.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+='yy'位于第30行：28:*video/vnd.avi；codec=XXX标识AVI注册表中的特定视频编解码器28（续）：（即29:XXX）。30:*音频/vnd.wave；codec=YYY标识WAVE注册表中的特定音频编解码器30（续）：31：（即YYY）。32:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 31:
29: XXX) within the AVI Registry.
30: * audio/vnd.wave; codec=YYY identifies a specific audio codec
30(continued):
31: (i.e., YYY) within the WAVE Registry.
32:
33: Appendix A and Appendix B provides an authoritative reference
33(continued): for the
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 31:
29: XXX) within the AVI Registry.
30: * audio/vnd.wave; codec=YYY identifies a specific audio codec
30(continued):
31: (i.e., YYY) within the WAVE Registry.
32:
33: Appendix A and Appendix B provides an authoritative reference
33(continued): for the
2000 found at line 354: 352: Compaq Computer Corporation 353: 20555 SH 249 354: Houston, TX 77269-2000 USA 355: 356: A.6 IBM CVSD
2000可在第354:352行找到：康柏计算机公司353:20555 SH 249 354:德克萨斯州休斯顿77269-2000美国355:356:A.6 IBM CVSD
2000 found at line 1474: 1472: PO Box 582 1473: Stellenbosch Stellenbosch South Africa 1474: 27 21 888 2000 1475: 1476: A.75 DF GSM610
2000发现于第1474行：1472：邮政信箱582 1473:Stellenbosch南非Stellenbosch 1474:27 21 888 2000 1475:1476:A.75 DF GSM610
2000 found at line 1487: 1485: PO Box 582 1486: Stellenbosch 7600 South Africa 1487: 27 21 888 2000 1488: 1489: A.76 ISIAudio
2000发现于第1487:1485行：邮政信箱582 1486:Stellenbosch 7600南非1487:27 21 888 2000 1488:1489:A.76
2000 found at line 1545: 1543: 4900 Old Ironsides Drive 1544: Santa Clara, California 95054 USA 1545: (408) 492-2000 1546: 1547: A.79 Dolby AC3 SPDIF
2000发现于第1545:1543:4900行加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉市旧Ironsides Drive 1544:Santa Clara 95054美国1545:（408）492-2000 1546:1547:A.79杜比AC3 SPDIF
2000 found at line 1993:
1991: A.104 DVM
1992:
1993: WAVE form Registration Number (hex): 0x2000
1994: Codec ID in the IANA Namespace: audio/vnd.wave;codec=2
1994(continued): 000
1995: WAVE form wFormatTag ID: WAVE_FORMAT_DVM
2000 found at line 1993:
1991: A.104 DVM
1992:
1993: WAVE form Registration Number (hex): 0x2000
1994: Codec ID in the IANA Namespace: audio/vnd.wave;codec=2
1994(continued): 000
1995: WAVE form wFormatTag ID: WAVE_FORMAT_DVM
2000 found at line 1994: 1992: 1993: WAVE form Registration Number (hex): 0x2000
2000发现于第1994:1992:1993行：波形注册号（十六进制）：0x2000
1994: Codec ID in the IANA Namespace: audio/vnd.wave;codec=2 1994(continued): 000 1995: WAVE form wFormatTag ID: WAVE_FORMAT_DVM 1996: Contact:
1994:IANA名称空间中的编解码器ID:audio/vnd.wave；编解码器=2 1994（续）：000 1995：波形wFormatTag ID:WAVE_FORMAT_DVM 1996：联系人：
2000 found at line 3180: 3178: 707 California Street 3179: Mountain View, California 94041 USA 3180: 650-526-2000 3181: 3182:
2000位于第3180行：3178:707加利福尼亚街3179：美国加利福尼亚州山景城94041 3180:650-526-2000 3181:3182：
2000 found at line 3211: 3209: 707 California Street 3210: Mountain View, California 94041 USA 3211: 650-526-2000 3212: 3213: B.83 TrueMotion 2.0
2000位于第3211:3209:707行加利福尼亚街3210:Mountain View，California 94041 USA 3211:650-526-2000 3212:3213:B.83 TrueMotion 2.0
2000 found at line 3239: 3237: 707 California Street 3238: Mountain View, California 94041 USA 3239: 650-526-2000 3240: 3241:
2000位于第3239:3237:707行加利福尼亚街3238:Mountain View，California 94041 USA 3239:650-526-2000 3240:3241：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2368.txt +=+=+=+=+= two-digit found at line 240: 238: scheme is not a problem: those characters may appear in mailt 238(continued): o URLs, 239: they just may not appear in unencoded form. The standard URL 239(continued): encoding 240: mechanisms ("%" followed by a two-digit hex number) must be u 240(continued): sed in 241: certain cases. 242:
+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2368.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=在第240行找到的两位数字：238:方案不是问题：这些字符可能出现在邮件238中（续）：o URL，239:它们可能不会以未编码的形式出现。标准URL 239（续）：编码240:Mechanism（“%”后接两位十六进制数）在241：某些情况下必须为u 240（续）：sed。242:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2373.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1192:
1190: IPv4address = 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DI
1190(continued): GIT
1191:
1192: IPv6prefix = hexpart "/" 1*2DIGIT
1193:
1194: hexpart = hexseq | hexseq "::" [ hexseq ] | "::" [ hexseq
1194(continued): ]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2373.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1192:
1190: IPv4address = 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DI
1190(continued): GIT
1191:
1192: IPv6prefix = hexpart "/" 1*2DIGIT
1193:
1194: hexpart = hexseq | hexseq "::" [ hexseq ] | "::" [ hexseq
1194(continued): ]
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2378.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1078:
1076: response = code [index] [field] text CRLF
1077:
1078: code = [-] LDIG 2DIGIT ":"
1079: index = number ":"
1080: field = 1*SPACE attribute ":" 1*SPACE
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2378.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 1078:
1076: response = code [index] [field] text CRLF
1077:
1078: code = [-] LDIG 2DIGIT ":"
1079: index = number ":"
1080: field = 1*SPACE attribute ":" 1*SPACE
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2389.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 133:
131:
132: error-response = error-code SP *TCHAR CRLF
133: error-code = ("4" / "5") 2DIGIT
134:
135: Note that in ABNF, strings literals are case insensitive. Th
135(continued): at
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2389.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2digit found at line 133:
131:
132: error-response = error-code SP *TCHAR CRLF
133: error-code = ("4" / "5") 2DIGIT
134:
135: Note that in ABNF, strings literals are case insensitive. Th
135(continued): at
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2397.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 107:
105: a/TPg7JpJHxyendzWTBfX0cxOnKPjgBzi4diinWGdkF8kjdfnycQZXZeYGejm
105(continued): Jl
106: ZeGl9i2icVqaNVailT6F5iJ90m6mvuTS4OK05M0vDk0Q4XUtwvKOzrcd3iq9u
106(continued): is
107: F81M1OIcR7lEewwcLp7tuNNkM3uNna3F2JQFo97Vriy/Xl4/f1cf5VWzXyym7
107(continued): PH
108: hhx4dbgYKAAA7"
109: ALT="Larry">
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2397.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 107:
105: a/TPg7JpJHxyendzWTBfX0cxOnKPjgBzi4diinWGdkF8kjdfnycQZXZeYGejm
105(continued): Jl
106: ZeGl9i2icVqaNVailT6F5iJ90m6mvuTS4OK05M0vDk0Q4XUtwvKOzrcd3iq9u
106(continued): is
107: F81M1OIcR7lEewwcLp7tuNNkM3uNna3F2JQFo97Vriy/Xl4/f1cf5VWzXyym7
107(continued): PH
108: hhx4dbgYKAAA7"
109: ALT="Larry">
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2400.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2400 J
8(continued): . Postel
9: Obsoletes: 2300, 2200, 2000, 1920, 1880, J.
9(continued): Reynolds
10: 1800, 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410,
10(continued): Editors
11: 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083 Septem
11(continued): ber 1998
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2400.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 9:
7: Network Working Group Internet Architectu
7(continued): re Board
8: Request for Comments: 2400 J
8(continued): . Postel
9: Obsoletes: 2300, 2200, 2000, 1920, 1880, J.
9(continued): Reynolds
10: 1800, 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, 1540, 1500, 1410,
10(continued): Editors
11: 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083 Septem
11(continued): ber 1998
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2407.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 832: 830: 831: Attribute #2:
+=+=+=+=+=+=在第832:830:831:Attribute#2:
832: 0x00020004 (AF = 0, type = SA Duration, length = 4 bytes 832(continued): ) 833: 0x00015180 (value = 0x15180 = 86400 seconds = 24 hours) 834:
832:0x00020004（AF=0，类型=SA持续时间，长度=4字节832（续）：）833:0x00015180（值=0x15180=86400秒=24小时）834:
2000 found at line 848: 846: 847: Attribute #4: 848: 0x00020004 (AF = 0, type = SA Duration, length = 4 bytes 848(continued): ) 849: 0x000186A0 (value = 0x186A0 = 100000KB = 100MB) 850:
2000位于第848:846:847行：属性#4:848:0x00020004（AF=0，type=SA Duration，length=4字节848（续）：849:0x000186A0（value=0x186A0=10000KB=100MB）850:
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2409.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1257:
1255: Field Size: 185
1256: Group Prime/Irreducible Polynomial:
1257: 0x020000000000000000000000000000200000000000
1257(continued): 000001
1258: Group Generator One: 0x18
1259: Group Curve A: 0x0
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2409.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1257:
1255: Field Size: 185
1256: Group Prime/Irreducible Polynomial:
1257: 0x020000000000000000000000000000200000000000
1257(continued): 000001
1258: Group Generator One: 0x18
1259: Group Curve A: 0x0
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2412.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1689:
1687: As of early 1996, it appears that for 90 bits of cryptographi
1687(continued): c
1688: strength, one should use a modular exponentiation group modul
1688(continued): us of
1689: 2000 bits. For 128 bits of strength, a 3000 bit modulus is r
1689(continued): equired.
1690:
1691: 3. Specifying and Deriving Security Associations
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2412.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 1689:
1687: As of early 1996, it appears that for 90 bits of cryptographi
1687(continued): c
1688: strength, one should use a modular exponentiation group modul
1688(continued): us of
1689: 2000 bits. For 128 bits of strength, a 3000 bit modulus is r
1689(continued): equired.
1690:
1691: 3. Specifying and Deriving Security Associations
2000 found at line 2761:
2759: Length (32 bit words): 6
2760: Data (hex):
2761: 02000000 00000000 00000000 00000020 00000000 0000000
2761(continued): 1
2762: Generator:
2763: X coordinate: 22 (decimal)
2000 found at line 2761:
2759: Length (32 bit words): 6
2760: Data (hex):
2761: 02000000 00000000 00000000 00000020 00000000 0000000
2761(continued): 1
2762: Generator:
2763: X coordinate: 22 (decimal)
2000 found at line 2976: 2974: 2975: [Stinson] Stinson, Douglas, Cryptography Theory and Practi 2975(continued): ce. CRC
2000第2976:2974:2975行：[Stinson]Stinson，Douglas，《密码学理论与实践》2975（续）：ce。华润
2976: Press, Inc., 2000, Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, 2976(continued): FL, 2977: 33431-9868, ISBN 0-8493-8521-0, 1995 2978:
2976:Press，Inc.，2000，博卡拉顿公司大道，2976（续）：佛罗里达州，2977:33431-9868，ISBN 0-8493-8521-012995 2978：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2425.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1106:
1104: 9ucyBDb3JwLjEYMBYGA1UEAxMPVGltb3RoeSBBIEhvd2VzMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNA
1104(continued): QkBF
1105: hJob3dlc0BuZXRzY2FwZS5jb20xFTATBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEBEwVob3dlczBcMA0G
1105(continued): CSqG
1106: SIb3DQEBAQUAA0sAMEgCQQC0JZf6wkg8pLMXHHCUvMfL5H6zjSk4vTTXZpYyrdN
1106(continued): 2dXc
1107: oX49LKiOmgeJSzoiFKHtLOIboyludF90CgqcxtwKnAgMBAAGjNjA0MBEGCWCGSA
1107(continued): GG+E
1108: IBAQQEAwIAoDAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBT84FToB/GV3jr3mcau+hUMbsQukjANBgkqh
1108(continued): kiG9
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2425.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1106:
1104: 9ucyBDb3JwLjEYMBYGA1UEAxMPVGltb3RoeSBBIEhvd2VzMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNA
1104(continued): QkBF
1105: hJob3dlc0BuZXRzY2FwZS5jb20xFTATBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEBEwVob3dlczBcMA0G
1105(continued): CSqG
1106: SIb3DQEBAQUAA0sAMEgCQQC0JZf6wkg8pLMXHHCUvMfL5H6zjSk4vTTXZpYyrdN
1106(continued): 2dXc
1107: oX49LKiOmgeJSzoiFKHtLOIboyludF90CgqcxtwKnAgMBAAGjNjA0MBEGCWCGSA
1107(continued): GG+E
1108: IBAQQEAwIAoDAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBT84FToB/GV3jr3mcau+hUMbsQukjANBgkqh
1108(continued): kiG9
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2426.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1479:
1477: MPVGltb3RoeSBBIEhvd2VzMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJob3dlc0BuZ
1477(continued): XRz
1478: Y2FwZS5jb20xFTATBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEBEwVob3dlczBcMA0GCSqGSIb
1478(continued): 3DQ
1479: EBAQUAA0sAMEgCQQC0JZf6wkg8pLMXHHCUvMfL5H6zjSk4vTTXZpYyr
1479(continued): dN2
1480: dXcoX49LKiOmgeJSzoiFKHtLOIboyludF90CgqcxtwKnAgMBAAGjNjA
1480(continued): 0MB
1481: EGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAoDAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBT84FToB/GV3jr3m
1481(continued): cau
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2426.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 1479:
1477: MPVGltb3RoeSBBIEhvd2VzMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJob3dlc0BuZ
1477(continued): XRz
1478: Y2FwZS5jb20xFTATBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEBEwVob3dlczBcMA0GCSqGSIb
1478(continued): 3DQ
1479: EBAQUAA0sAMEgCQQC0JZf6wkg8pLMXHHCUvMfL5H6zjSk4vTTXZpYyr
1479(continued): dN2
1480: dXcoX49LKiOmgeJSzoiFKHtLOIboyludF90CgqcxtwKnAgMBAAGjNjA
1480(continued): 0MB
1481: EGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAoDAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBT84FToB/GV3jr3m
1481(continued): cau
2-digit found at line 372:
370: and minutes (e.g., +hh:mm). The time is specified as a 24-hou
370(continued): r clock.
371: Hour values are from 00 to 23, and minute values are from 00
371(continued): to 59.
372: Hour and minutes are 2-digits with high order zeroes required
372(continued): to
373: maintain digit count. The extended format for ISO 8601 UTC of
373(continued): fsets
374: MUST be used. The extended format makes use of a colon charac
374(continued): ter as a
2-digit found at line 372:
370: and minutes (e.g., +hh:mm). The time is specified as a 24-hou
370(continued): r clock.
371: Hour values are from 00 to 23, and minute values are from 00
371(continued): to 59.
372: Hour and minutes are 2-digits with high order zeroes required
372(continued): to
373: maintain digit count. The extended format for ISO 8601 UTC of
373(continued): fsets
374: MUST be used. The extended format makes use of a colon charac
374(continued): ter as a
2digit found at line 379:
377: The value is defined by the following notation:
378:
379: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
380: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
381: utc-offset = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2digit found at line 379:
377: The value is defined by the following notation:
378:
379: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
380: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
381: utc-offset = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2digit found at line 380:
378:
379: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
380: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
381: utc-offset = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
382:
2digit found at line 380:
378:
379: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
380: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
381: utc-offset = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
382:
2digit found at line 2051:
2049:
2050: utc-offset-value = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2051: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2052: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2053:
2digit found at line 2051:
2049:
2050: utc-offset-value = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2051: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2052: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2053:
2digit found at line 2052:
2050: utc-offset-value = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2051: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2052: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2053:
2054: 5. Differences From vCard v2.1
2digit found at line 2052:
2050: utc-offset-value = ("+" / "-") time-hour ":" time-minute
2051: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2052: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2053:
2054: 5. Differences From vCard v2.1
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2440.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 3227:
3225: Encryption Standard. This algorithm will work with (at least)
3225(continued): 128,
3226: 192, and 256-bit keys. We expect that this algorithm will be
3226(continued): selected
3227: from the candidate algorithms in the year 2000.
3228:
3229: 12.8. OpenPGP CFB mode
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2440.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 3227:
3225: Encryption Standard. This algorithm will work with (at least)
3225(continued): 128,
3226: 192, and 256-bit keys. We expect that this algorithm will be
3226(continued): selected
3227: from the candidate algorithms in the year 2000.
3228:
3229: 12.8. OpenPGP CFB mode
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2445.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2234:
2232: ( ";" "BYDAY" "=" bywdaylist ) /
2233: ( ";" "BYMONTHDAY" "=" bymodaylist ) /
2234: ( ";" "BYYEARDAY" "=" byyrdaylist ) /
2235: ( ";" "BYWEEKNO" "=" bywknolist ) /
2236: ( ";" "BYMONTH" "=" bymolist ) /
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2445.txt +=+=+=+=+=
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2234:
2232: ( ";" "BYDAY" "=" bywdaylist ) /
2233: ( ";" "BYMONTHDAY" "=" bymodaylist ) /
2234: ( ";" "BYYEARDAY" "=" byyrdaylist ) /
2235: ( ";" "BYWEEKNO" "=" bywknolist ) /
2236: ( ";" "BYMONTH" "=" bymolist ) /
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2288:
2286: ordmoday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 31
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2288:
2286: ordmoday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 31
2287:
2288: byyrdaylist = yeardaynum / ( yeardaynum *("," yeardaynum) )
2288(continued):
2289:
2290: yeardaynum = ([plus] ordyrday) / (minus ordyrday)
2287:
2288: byyrdaylist = yeardaynum / ( yeardaynum *("," yeardaynum) )
2288(continued):
2289:
2290: yeardaynum = ([plus] ordyrday) / (minus ordyrday)
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2388:
2386: the month.
2387:
2388: The BYYEARDAY rule part specifies a COMMA character (US-ASCII
2388(continued): decimal
2389: 44) separated list of days of the year. Valid values are 1 to
2389(continued): 366 or
2390: -366 to -1. For example, -1 represents the last day of the ye
2390(continued): ar
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2388:
2386: the month.
2387:
2388: The BYYEARDAY rule part specifies a COMMA character (US-ASCII
2388(continued): decimal
2389: 44) separated list of days of the year. Valid values are 1 to
2389(continued): 366 or
2390: -366 to -1. For example, -1 represents the last day of the ye
2390(continued): ar
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 2461: 2459: specified FREQ and INTERVAL rule parts, the BYxxx rule parts 2459(continued): are 2460: applied to the current set of evaluated occurrences in the fo 2460(continued): llowing 2461: order: BYMONTH, BYWEEKNO, BYYEARDAY, BYMONTHDAY, BYDAY, BYHOU 2461(continued): R, 2462: BYMINUTE, BYSECOND and BYSETPOS; then COUNT and UNTIL are eva 2462(continued): luated. 2463:
在第2461行中未找到“yyy”的行上的“yy”：2459：指定的频率和间隔规则部分，BYxxx规则部分2459（续）：是2460：应用于fo 2460中的当前评估事件集（续）：以下2461：顺序：BYMONTH、BYWEEKNO、BYYEARDAY、BYMONTHDAY、BYDAY、BYHOU 2461（续）：R，2462:BYMINUTE，BYSECOND和BYSETPOS；然后计数，直到eva 2462（续）：luated。2463:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 6804: 6802: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10 6803: (2001 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10 6804: Note: Since none of the BYDAY, BYMONTHDAY or BYYEARDAY comp 6804(continued): onents 6805: are specified, the day is gotten from DTSTART 6806:
在6804:6802（2000年美国东部夏令时上午9:00）6月10日的第6804行中找到了不带“yyy”的行上的“yy”；6803年7月10日：（2001年美国东部时间上午9:00）6月10日；6804年7月10日：注意：由于未指定BYDAY、BYMONTHDAY或BYYEARDAY组件6804（续）：组件6805:，因此日期从DTSTART 6806:
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 6820:
6818:
6819: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19970101T090000
6820: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=3;COUNT=10;BYYEARDAY=1,100,200
6821:
6822: ==> (1997 9:00 AM EST)January 1
'yy' on a line without 'yyyy' found at line 6820:
6818:
6819: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19970101T090000
6820: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=3;COUNT=10;BYYEARDAY=1,100,200
6821:
6822: ==> (1997 9:00 AM EST)January 1
two-digit found at line 1919: 1917: of values. The format for the value type is expressed as the 1917(continued): [ISO 1918: 8601] complete representation, basic format for a calendar da 1918(continued): te. The 1919: textual format specifies a four-digit year, two-digit month,
在第1919:1917行找到两位数字：的值。值类型的格式表示为1917（续）：[ISO 1918:8601]完整表示，日历da 1918的基本格式（续）：te。1919：文本格式指定了四位数的年、两位数的月、，
1919(continued): and 1920: two-digit day of the month. There are no separator characters 1920(continued): between 1921: the year, month and day component text.
1919年（续）：和1920年：每月两位数的日期。没有分隔符1920（续）：1921之间：年、月和日组成文本。
two-digit found at line 1920: 1918: 8601] complete representation, basic format for a calendar da 1918(continued): te. The 1919: textual format specifies a four-digit year, two-digit month, 1919(continued): and 1920: two-digit day of the month. There are no separator characters 1920(continued): between 1921: the year, month and day component text. 1922:
第1920:1918:8601行的两位数字]完整表示，日历da 1918的基本格式（续）：te。1919：文本格式指定四位数的年份、两位数的月份、1919（续）：和1920：两位数的月份日期。没有分隔符1920（续）：1921之间：年、月和日组成文本。1922:
two-digit found at line 2610:
2608: of day. The format is based on the [ISO 8601] complete
2609: representation, basic format for a time of day. The text form
2609(continued): at
2610: consists of a two-digit 24-hour of the day (i.e., values 0-23
2610(continued): ), two-
2611: digit minute in the hour (i.e., values 0-59), and two-digit s
2611(continued): econds
2612: in the minute (i.e., values 0-60). The seconds value of 60 MU
2612(continued): ST only
two-digit found at line 2610:
2608: of day. The format is based on the [ISO 8601] complete
2609: representation, basic format for a time of day. The text form
2609(continued): at
2610: consists of a two-digit 24-hour of the day (i.e., values 0-23
2610(continued): ), two-
2611: digit minute in the hour (i.e., values 0-59), and two-digit s
2611(continued): econds
2612: in the minute (i.e., values 0-60). The seconds value of 60 MU
2612(continued): ST only
two-digit found at line 2611:
2609: representation, basic format for a time of day. The text form
2609(continued): at
2610: consists of a two-digit 24-hour of the day (i.e., values 0-23
2610(continued): ), two-
2611: digit minute in the hour (i.e., values 0-59), and two-digit s
2611(continued): econds
2612: in the minute (i.e., values 0-60). The seconds value of 60 MU
2612(continued): ST only
2613: to be used to account for "leap" seconds. Fractions of a seco
2613(continued): nd are
two-digit found at line 2611:
2609: representation, basic format for a time of day. The text form
2609(continued): at
2610: consists of a two-digit 24-hour of the day (i.e., values 0-23
2610(continued): ), two-
2611: digit minute in the hour (i.e., values 0-59), and two-digit s
2611(continued): econds
2612: in the minute (i.e., values 0-60). The seconds value of 60 MU
2612(continued): ST only
2613: to be used to account for "leap" seconds. Fractions of a seco
2613(continued): nd are
two-digit found at line 4583:
4581: Values for latitude and longitude shall be expressed as decim
4581(continued): al
4582: fractions of degrees. Whole degrees of latitude shall be repr
4582(continued): esented
two-digit found at line 4583:
4581: Values for latitude and longitude shall be expressed as decim
4581(continued): al
4582: fractions of degrees. Whole degrees of latitude shall be repr
4582(continued): esented
4583: by a two-digit decimal number ranging from 0 through 90. Whol 4583(continued): e 4584: degrees of longitude shall be represented by a decimal number 4584(continued): ranging 4585: from 0 through 180. When a decimal fraction of a degree is sp 4585(continued): ecified,
4583:由一个从0到90的两位十进制数字组成。Whol 4583（续）：e 4584：经度应由十进制数字4584表示（续）：范围4585：从0到180。当度的小数点为sp 4585时（续）：指定，
2digit found at line 1911:
1909:
1910:
1911: date-month = 2DIGIT ;01-12
1912: date-mday = 2DIGIT ;01-28, 01-29, 01-30, 01
1912(continued): -31
1913: ;based on month/year
2digit found at line 1911:
1909:
1910:
1911: date-month = 2DIGIT ;01-12
1912: date-mday = 2DIGIT ;01-28, 01-29, 01-30, 01
1912(continued): -31
1913: ;based on month/year
2digit found at line 1912: 1910: 1911: date-month = 2DIGIT ;01-12 1912: date-mday = 2DIGIT ;01-28, 01-29, 01-30, 01 1912(continued): -31 1913: ;based on month/year 1914:
2在第1912:1910:1911行找到的数字：日期月=2数字；01-12 1912：日期mday=2数字；01-28、01-29、01-30、01-1912（续）：-31 1913:；基于1914年/月：
2digit found at line 2258:
2256: byseclist = seconds / ( seconds *("," seconds) )
2257:
2258: seconds = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 59
2259:
2260: byminlist = minutes / ( minutes *("," minutes) )
2digit found at line 2258:
2256: byseclist = seconds / ( seconds *("," seconds) )
2257:
2258: seconds = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 59
2259:
2260: byminlist = minutes / ( minutes *("," minutes) )
2digit found at line 2262:
2260: byminlist = minutes / ( minutes *("," minutes) )
2261:
2262: minutes = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 59
2263:
2264: byhrlist = hour / ( hour *("," hour) )
2digit found at line 2262:
2260: byminlist = minutes / ( minutes *("," minutes) )
2261:
2262: minutes = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 59
2263:
2264: byhrlist = hour / ( hour *("," hour) )
2digit found at line 2266:
2264: byhrlist = hour / ( hour *("," hour) )
2265:
2266: hour = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 23
2267:
2268: bywdaylist = weekdaynum / ( weekdaynum *("," weekdaynum) )
2digit found at line 2266:
2264: byhrlist = hour / ( hour *("," hour) )
2265:
2266: hour = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;0 to 23
2267:
2268: bywdaylist = weekdaynum / ( weekdaynum *("," weekdaynum) )
2digit found at line 2276:
2274: minus = "-"
2275:
2276: ordwk = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 53
2digit found at line 2276:
2274: minus = "-"
2275:
2276: ordwk = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 53
2277:
2278: weekday = "SU" / "MO" / "TU" / "WE" / "TH" / "FR" / "SA"
2278(continued):
2277:
2278: weekday = "SU" / "MO" / "TU" / "WE" / "TH" / "FR" / "SA"
2278(continued):
2digit found at line 2286:
2284: monthdaynum = ([plus] ordmoday) / (minus ordmoday)
2285:
2286: ordmoday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 31
2287:
2288: byyrdaylist = yeardaynum / ( yeardaynum *("," yeardaynum) )
2288(continued):
2digit found at line 2286:
2284: monthdaynum = ([plus] ordmoday) / (minus ordmoday)
2285:
2286: ordmoday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 31
2287:
2288: byyrdaylist = yeardaynum / ( yeardaynum *("," yeardaynum) )
2288(continued):
2digit found at line 2292:
2290: yeardaynum = ([plus] ordyrday) / (minus ordyrday)
2291:
2292: ordyrday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT / 3DIGIT ;1 to 366
2293:
2294: bywknolist = weeknum / ( weeknum *("," weeknum) )
2digit found at line 2292:
2290: yeardaynum = ([plus] ordyrday) / (minus ordyrday)
2291:
2292: ordyrday = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT / 3DIGIT ;1 to 366
2293:
2294: bywknolist = weeknum / ( weeknum *("," weeknum) )
2digit found at line 2307:
2305: bymolist = monthnum / ( monthnum *("," monthnum) )
2306:
2307: monthnum = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 12
2308:
2309: bysplist = setposday / ( setposday *("," setposday) )
2digit found at line 2307:
2305: bymolist = monthnum / ( monthnum *("," monthnum) )
2306:
2307: monthnum = 1DIGIT / 2DIGIT ;1 to 12
2308:
2309: bysplist = setposday / ( setposday *("," setposday) )
2digit found at line 2595:
2593: time = time-hour time-minute time-second [tim
2593(continued): e-utc]
2594:
2595: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2596: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2597: time-second = 2DIGIT ;00-60
2digit found at line 2595:
2593: time = time-hour time-minute time-second [tim
2593(continued): e-utc]
2594:
2595: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23
2596: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59
2597: time-second = 2DIGIT ;00-60
2digit found at line 2596: 2594: 2595: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23 2596: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59 2597: time-second = 2DIGIT ;00-60 2598: ;The "60" value is used to account for "leap" seconds.
2在第2596:2594:2595行找到的数字：时间小时=2数字；00-23 2596：时间分钟=2位数；00-59 2597：时间秒=2位数；00-60 2598: ;“60”值用于说明“闰秒”。
2digit found at line 2597: 2595: time-hour = 2DIGIT ;00-23 2596: time-minute = 2DIGIT ;00-59 2597: time-second = 2DIGIT ;00-60 2598: ;The "60" value is used to account for "leap" seconds. 2599:
2在第2597行找到的数字：2595:time hour=2数字；00-23 2596：时间分钟=2位数；00-59 2597：时间秒=2位数；00-60 2598: ;“60”值用于说明“闰秒”。2599:
1900 found at line 2988:
2986: DTSTAMP:19970901T1300Z
2987: DTSTART:19970903T163000Z
2988: DTEND:19970903T190000Z
2989: SUMMARY:Annual Employee Review
2990: CLASS:PRIVATE
1900 found at line 2988:
2986: DTSTAMP:19970901T1300Z
2987: DTSTART:19970903T163000Z
2988: DTEND:19970903T190000Z
2989: SUMMARY:Annual Employee Review
2990: CLASS:PRIVATE
2000 found at line 1716:
1714: The following are examples of this property parameter:
1715:
1716: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T020000
1717:
1718: DTEND;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T030000
2000 found at line 1716:
1714: The following are examples of this property parameter:
1715:
1716: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T020000
1717:
1718: DTEND;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T030000
2000 found at line 2029:
2027: New York on Janurary 19, 1998:
2028:
2029: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T020000
2030:
2031: Example: The following represents July 14, 1997, at 1:30 PM i
2031(continued): n New
2000 found at line 2029:
2027: New York on Janurary 19, 1998:
2028:
2029: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980119T020000
2030:
2031: Example: The following represents July 14, 1997, at 1:30 PM i
2031(continued): n New
2000 found at line 2822: 2820: Property names, parameter names and enumerated parameter valu 2820(continued): es are 2821: case insensitive. For example, the property name "DUE" is the 2821(continued): same as 2822: "due" and "Due", DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000 is t 2822(continued): he same 2823: as DtStart;TzID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000. 2824:
2000位于第2822行：2820:属性名称、参数名称和枚举参数值2820（续）：es为2821:不区分大小写。例如，属性名称“DUE”是2821（续）：与2822相同：“DUE”和“DUE”，DTSTART；TZID=美国东部：19980714T120000是t 2822（续）：他与DtStart相同的2823:；TzID=美国东部：19980714T120000。2824:
2000 found at line 2823:
2821: case insensitive. For example, the property name "DUE" is the
2821(continued): same as
2822: "due" and "Due", DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000 is t
2822(continued): he same
2823: as DtStart;TzID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000.
2824:
2825: 4.6 Calendar Components
2000 found at line 2823:
2821: case insensitive. For example, the property name "DUE" is the
2821(continued): same as
2822: "due" and "Due", DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000 is t
2822(continued): he same
2823: as DtStart;TzID=US-Eastern:19980714T120000.
2824:
2825: 4.6 Calendar Components
2000 found at line 3566:
3564: Time took effect in Fall 1967 for New York City:
3565:
3566: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3567:
3568: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3566:
3564: Time took effect in Fall 1967 for New York City:
3565:
3566: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3567:
3568: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3631:
3629: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3630: BEGIN:STANDARD
3631: DTSTART:19971026T020000
3632: RDATE:19971026T020000
3633: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3631:
3629: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3630: BEGIN:STANDARD
3631: DTSTART:19971026T020000
3632: RDATE:19971026T020000
3633: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3632:
3630: BEGIN:STANDARD
3631: DTSTART:19971026T020000
3632: RDATE:19971026T020000
3633: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
3634: TZOFFSETTO:-0500
2000 found at line 3632:
3630: BEGIN:STANDARD
3631: DTSTART:19971026T020000
3632: RDATE:19971026T020000
3633: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
3634: TZOFFSETTO:-0500
2000 found at line 3638: 3636: END:STANDARD 3637: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT 3638: DTSTART:19971026T020000 3639: 3640:
2000位于第3638行：3636:END:STANDARD 3637:BEGIN:DAYLIGHT 3638:DTSTART:19971026T020000 3639:3640:
2000 found at line 3647:
3645:
3646:
3647: RDATE:19970406T020000
3648: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
3649: TZOFFSETTO:-0400
2000 found at line 3647:
3645:
3646:
3647: RDATE:19970406T020000
3648: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
3649: TZOFFSETTO:-0400
2000 found at line 3665:
3663: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/US-Eastern
3664: BEGIN:STANDARD
3665: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3666: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3667: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3665:
3663: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/US-Eastern
3664: BEGIN:STANDARD
3665: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3666: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3667: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3672:
3670: END:STANDARD
3671: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3672: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3673: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
3674: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3672:
3670: END:STANDARD
3671: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3672: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3673: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
3674: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3688:
3686: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3687: BEGIN:STANDARD
3688: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3689: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3690: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3688:
3686: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3687: BEGIN:STANDARD
3688: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3689: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3690: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3704:
3702:
3703: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3704: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3705: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=19980404T070000
3705(continued): Z
3706: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3704:
3702:
3703: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3704: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3705: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=19980404T070000
3705(continued): Z
3706: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3721:
3719: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3720: BEGIN:STANDARD
3721: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3722: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3723: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3721:
3719: LAST-MODIFIED:19870101T000000Z
3720: BEGIN:STANDARD
3721: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3722: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3723: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 3728:
3726: END:STANDARD
3727: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3728: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3729: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=19980404T070000
3729(continued): Z
3730: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3728:
3726: END:STANDARD
3727: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3728: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3729: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=19980404T070000
3729(continued): Z
3730: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3735:
3733: END:DAYLIGHT
3734: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3735: DTSTART:19990424T020000
3736: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=4
3737: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3735:
3733: END:DAYLIGHT
3734: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3735: DTSTART:19990424T020000
3736: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=4
3737: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 5352: 5350: FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-UNAVAILABLE:19970308T160000Z/PT8H30M 5351: 5352: FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H,19970308T200000Z 5352(continued): /PT1H 5353: 5354: FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H,19970308T200000Z 5354(continued): /PT1H,
2000在第5352行找到：5350:FREEBUSY；FBTYPE=忙-不可用：19970308T160000Z/PT8H30M 5351:5352:忙-闲；FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H，19970308T200000Z 5352（续）：/PT1H 5353:5354:FREEBUSY；FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H，19970308T200000Z 5354（续）：/PT1H，
2000 found at line 5354: 5352: FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H,19970308T200000Z 5352(continued): /PT1H 5353: 5354: FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H,19970308T200000Z 5354(continued): /PT1H, 5355: 19970308T230000Z/19970309T000000Z 5356:
2000在第5354行找到：5352:FREEBUSY；FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H，19970308T200000Z 5352（续）：/PT1H 5353:5354:FREEBUSY；FBTYPE=FREE:19970308T160000Z/PT3H，19970308T200000Z 5354（续）：/PT1H，5355:19970308T230000Z/19970309T000000Z 5356：
2000 found at line 6069:
6067: RECURRENCE-ID;VALUE=DATE:19960401
6068:
6069: RECURRENCE-ID;RANGE=THISANDFUTURE:19960120T120000Z
6070:
6071: 4.8.4.5 Related To
2000 found at line 6069:
6067: RECURRENCE-ID;VALUE=DATE:19960401
6068:
6069: RECURRENCE-ID;RANGE=THISANDFUTURE:19960120T120000Z
6070:
6071: 4.8.4.5 Related To
2000 found at line 6507: 6505: RDATE;TZID=US-EASTERN:19970714T083000 6506: 6507: RDATE;VALUE=PERIOD:19960403T020000Z/19960403T040000Z, 6508: 19960404T010000Z/PT3H 6509:
2000发现于第6507行：6505:RDATE；TZID=美国东部：19970714T083006506:6507:RDATE；值=周期：19960403T020000Z/19960403T040000Z，6508:19960404T010000Z/PT3H 6509:
2000 found at line 6623:
6621:
6622: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980101T090000
6623: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;UNTIL=20000131T090000Z;
6624: BYMONTH=1;BYDAY=SU,MO,TU,WE,TH,FR,SA
6625: or
2000 found at line 6623:
6621:
6622: DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:19980101T090000
6623: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;UNTIL=20000131T090000Z;
6624: BYMONTH=1;BYDAY=SU,MO,TU,WE,TH,FR,SA
6625: or
2000 found at line 6626:
6624: BYMONTH=1;BYDAY=SU,MO,TU,WE,TH,FR,SA
6625: or
6626: RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;UNTIL=20000131T090000Z;BYMONTH=1
6627:
6628: ==> (1998 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
2000 found at line 6626:
6624: BYMONTH=1;BYDAY=SU,MO,TU,WE,TH,FR,SA
6625: or
6626: RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;UNTIL=20000131T090000Z;BYMONTH=1
6627:
6628: ==> (1998 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
2000 found at line 6630:
6628: ==> (1998 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6629: (1999 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6630: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6631:
6632: Weekly for 10 occurrences
2000 found at line 6630:
6628: ==> (1998 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6629: (1999 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6630: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)January 1-31
6631:
6632: Weekly for 10 occurrences
2000 found at line 6802:
6800: (1998 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6801: (1999 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6802: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6803: (2001 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6804: Note: Since none of the BYDAY, BYMONTHDAY or BYYEARDAY comp
6804(continued): onents
2000 found at line 6802:
6800: (1998 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6801: (1999 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6802: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6803: (2001 9:00 AM EDT)June 10;July 10
6804: Note: Since none of the BYDAY, BYMONTHDAY or BYYEARDAY comp
6804(continued): onents
2000 found at line 6824:
6822: ==> (1997 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6823: (1997 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
2000 found at line 6824:
6822: ==> (1997 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6823: (1997 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
6824: (2000 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6825: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)April 9;July 18
6826: (2003 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6824: (2000 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6825: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)April 9;July 18
6826: (2003 9:00 AM EST)January 1
2000 found at line 6825:
6823: (1997 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
6824: (2000 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6825: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)April 9;July 18
6826: (2003 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6827: (2003 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
2000 found at line 6825:
6823: (1997 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
6824: (2000 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6825: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)April 9;July 18
6826: (2003 9:00 AM EST)January 1
6827: (2003 9:00 AM EDT)April 10;July 19
2000 found at line 6897: 6895: ==> (1998 9:00 AM EST)February 13;March 13;November 13 6896: (1999 9:00 AM EDT)August 13 6897: (2000 9:00 AM EDT)October 13 6898: ... 6899:
2000年2月13日第6897行：6895:==>（1998年美国东部时间上午9:00）；3月13日；1996年11月13日：（1999年美国东部时间上午9:00）1997年8月13日：（2000年美国东部时间上午9:00）1998年10月13日：。。。6899:
2000 found at line 6920: 6918: 6919: ==> (1996 9:00 AM EST)November 5 6920: (2000 9:00 AM EST)November 7 6921: (2004 9:00 AM EST)November 2 6922: ...
2000发现于第6920行：6918:6919:==>（1996年东部时间上午9:00）11月5日6920:（2000年东部时间上午9:00）11月7日6921:（2004年东部时间上午9:00）11月2日6922:。。。
2000 found at line 7612:
7610:
7611: BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//xyz Corp//NONSGML PDA Calendar Ve
7611(continued): rson
7612: 1.0//EN VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:19960704T120000Z
7613: UID:uid1@host.com ORGANIZER:MAILTO:jsmith@host.com
7614: DTSTART:19960918T143000Z DTEND:19960920T220000Z STATUS:CONF
7614(continued): IRMED
2000 found at line 7612:
7610:
7611: BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//xyz Corp//NONSGML PDA Calendar Ve
7611(continued): rson
7612: 1.0//EN VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:19960704T120000Z
7613: UID:uid1@host.com ORGANIZER:MAILTO:jsmith@host.com
7614: DTSTART:19960918T143000Z DTEND:19960920T220000Z STATUS:CONF
7614(continued): IRMED
2000 found at line 7614: 7612: 1.0//EN VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:19960704T120000Z 7613: UID:uid1@host.com ORGANIZER:MAILTO:jsmith@host.com 7614: DTSTART:19960918T143000Z DTEND:19960920T220000Z STATUS:CONF 7614(continued): IRMED 7615: 7616:
2000位于第7614:7612:1.0//EN版本：2.0开始：VEVENT DTSTAMP:19960704T1200000Z 7613:UID:uid1@host.com组织者：邮寄至：jsmith@host.com7614:DTSTART:19960918T143000Z DTEND:19960920T220000Z状态：CONF 7614（续）：IRMED 7615:7616：
2000 found at line 7640:
7638: TZID:US-Eastern
7639: BEGIN:STANDARD
7640: DTSTART:19981025T020000
7641: RDATE:19981025T020000
7642: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 7640:
7638: TZID:US-Eastern
7639: BEGIN:STANDARD
7640: DTSTART:19981025T020000
7641: RDATE:19981025T020000
7642: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
2000 found at line 7641:
7639: BEGIN:STANDARD
7640: DTSTART:19981025T020000
7641: RDATE:19981025T020000
7642: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
7643: TZOFFSETTO:-0500
2000 found at line 7641:
7639: BEGIN:STANDARD
7640: DTSTART:19981025T020000
7641: RDATE:19981025T020000
7642: TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
7643: TZOFFSETTO:-0500
2000 found at line 7647:
7645: END:STANDARD
7646: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
7647: DTSTART:19990404T020000
7648: RDATE:19990404T020000
7649: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 7647:
7645: END:STANDARD
7646: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
7647: DTSTART:19990404T020000
7648: RDATE:19990404T020000
7649: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 7648:
7646: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
7647: DTSTART:19990404T020000
7648: RDATE:19990404T020000
7649: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
7650: TZOFFSETTO:-0400
2000 found at line 7648:
7646: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
7647: DTSTART:19990404T020000
7648: RDATE:19990404T020000
7649: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
7650: TZOFFSETTO:-0400
2000 found at line 7740:
7738: BEGIN:VALARM
7739: ACTION:AUDIO
7740: TRIGGER:19980403T120000
7741: ATTACH;FMTTYPE=audio/basic:http://host.com/pub/audio-
7742: files/ssbanner.aud
2000 found at line 7740:
7738: BEGIN:VALARM
7739: ACTION:AUDIO
7740: TRIGGER:19980403T120000
7741: ATTACH;FMTTYPE=audio/basic:http://host.com/pub/audio-
7742: files/ssbanner.aud
2000 found at line 7755:
7753: PRODID:-//ABC Corporation//NONSGML My Product//EN
7754: BEGIN:VJOURNAL
7755: DTSTAMP:19970324T120000Z
7756: UID:uid5@host1.com
7757: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:jsmith@host.com
2000 found at line 7755:
7753: PRODID:-//ABC Corporation//NONSGML My Product//EN
7754: BEGIN:VJOURNAL
7755: DTSTAMP:19970324T120000Z
7756: UID:uid5@host1.com
7757: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:jsmith@host.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2446.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 3347:
3345: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3346: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3347: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3348: SUMMARY:ST. PAUL SAINTS -VS- DULUTH-SUPERIOR DUKES
3349: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2446.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 3347:
3345: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3346: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3347: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3348: SUMMARY:ST. PAUL SAINTS -VS- DULUTH-SUPERIOR DUKES
3349: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
1900 found at line 3373:
3371: BEGIN:VEVENT
3372: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3373: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
1900 found at line 3373:
3371: BEGIN:VEVENT
3372: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3373: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3374: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
3375: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
3374: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
3375: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
1900 found at line 3410:
3408: SEQUENCE:2
3409: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
3410: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3411: END:VEVENT
3412: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3410:
3408: SEQUENCE:2
3409: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
3410: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3411: END:VEVENT
3412: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3461:
3459: DTEND;TZID=America-Chicago:19970701T180000
3460: DTSTART;TZID=America-Chicago:19970702T160000
3461: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3462: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3463: LOCATION;VALUE=URI:http://www.midwaystadium.com/
1900 found at line 3461:
3459: DTEND;TZID=America-Chicago:19970701T180000
3460: DTSTART;TZID=America-Chicago:19970702T160000
3461: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3462: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3463: LOCATION;VALUE=URI:http://www.midwaystadium.com/
1900 found at line 3505:
3503: BEGIN:VEVENT
3504: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3505: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3506: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
3507: DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:19970714
1900 found at line 3505:
3503: BEGIN:VEVENT
3504: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3505: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3506: UID:0981234-1234234-23@example.com
3507: DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:19970714
1900 found at line 3594:
3592: ATTENDEE;RSVP=FALSE;TYPE=ROOM:conf_Big@example.com
3593: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
3593(continued):
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
1900 found at line 3594:
3592: ATTENDEE;RSVP=FALSE;TYPE=ROOM:conf_Big@example.com
3593: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
3593(continued):
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
1900 found at line 3618:
3616: SEQUENCE:0
3617: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3618: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3619: END:VEVENT
3620: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3618:
3616: SEQUENCE:0
3617: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3618: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3619: END:VEVENT
3620: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3655:
3653: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
3653(continued):
3654: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3655: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3656: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3657: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
1900 found at line 3655:
3653: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
3653(continued):
3654: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3655: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3656: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3657: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
1900 found at line 3659:
3657: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
3658: SEQUENCE:1
3659: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3660: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3661: END:VEVENT
1900 found at line 3659:
3657: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
3658: SEQUENCE:1
3659: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3660: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3661: END:VEVENT
1900 found at line 3680:
3678: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:B@example.com
3679: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3680: DTSTART:19970701T190000Z
3681: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3682: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
1900 found at line 3680:
3678: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:B@example.com
3679: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3680: DTSTART:19970701T190000Z
3681: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3682: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
1900 found at line 3686:
3684: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777a@example.com
3685: SEQUENCE:0
3686: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3687: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3688: END:VEVENT
1900 found at line 3686:
3684: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777a@example.com
3685: SEQUENCE:0
3686: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3687: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3688: END:VEVENT
1900 found at line 3713:
3711: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3712: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3713: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3714: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3715: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
1900 found at line 3713:
3711: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3712: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3713: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3714: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3715: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
1900 found at line 3714:
3712: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3713: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3714: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3715: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
3716: LOCATION:Green Conference Room
1900 found at line 3714:
3712: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3713: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3714: DTSTAMP:19970612T190000Z
3715: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
3716: LOCATION:Green Conference Room
1900 found at line 3721:
3719: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777a@example.com
3720: SEQUENCE:0
3721: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3722: END:VEVENT
3723: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3721:
3719: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777a@example.com
3720: SEQUENCE:0
3721: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3722: END:VEVENT
3723: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3738:
3736: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:B@example.com
3737: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3738: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3739: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3740: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
1900 found at line 3738:
3736: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:B@example.com
3737: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3738: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3739: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3740: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
1900 found at line 3740:
3738: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3739: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3740: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3741: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results - changed
3741(continued): to
3742: meet B's schedule
1900 found at line 3740:
3738: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
3739: DTSTART:19970701T160000Z
3740: DTEND:19970701T190000Z
3741: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results - changed
3741(continued): to
3742: meet B's schedule
1900 found at line 3769:
3767: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
3768: SEQUENCE:0
3769: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3770: END:VEVENT
3771: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3769:
3767: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
3768: SEQUENCE:0
3769: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3770: END:VEVENT
3771: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3884:
3882: SEQUENCE:0
3883: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3884: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3885: END:VEVENT
3886: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3884:
3882: SEQUENCE:0
3883: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3884: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3885: END:VEVENT
3886: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3906:
3904: SEQUENCE:0
3905: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3906: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3907: END:VEVENT
3908: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3906:
3904: SEQUENCE:0
3905: STATUS:CONFIRMED
3906: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3907: END:VEVENT
3908: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3936:
3934: SEQUENCE:0
3935: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3936: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3937: END:VEVENT
3938: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3936:
3934: SEQUENCE:0
3935: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3936: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3937: END:VEVENT
3938: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3967:
3965: SEQUENCE:0
3966: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3967: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3968: END:VEVENT
3969: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 3967:
3965: SEQUENCE:0
3966: REQUEST-STATUS:2.0;Success
3967: DTSTAMP:19970614T190000Z
3968: END:VEVENT
3969: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 4072:
4070: SEQUENCE:1
4071: STATUS:CANCELLED
4072: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4073: END:VEVENT
1900 found at line 4072:
4070: SEQUENCE:1
4071: STATUS:CANCELLED
4072: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4073: END:VEVENT
4074: END:VCALENDAR
4074:完：VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 4157:
4155: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;
4156: RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
4157: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4158: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4159: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
1900 found at line 4157:
4155: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;
4156: RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
4157: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4158: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4159: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
1900 found at line 4193:
4191: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
4192: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:D@example.com
4193: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4194: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4195: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
1900 found at line 4193:
4191: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
4192: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:D@example.com
4193: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4194: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4195: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
1900 found at line 4232:
4230: DTSTART:19980101T124200Z
4231: DTEND:19980107T124200Z
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
1900 found at line 4232:
4230: DTSTART:19980101T124200Z
4231: DTEND:19980107T124200Z
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
1900 found at line 4236:
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
1900 found at line 4236:
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
1900 found at line 4288:
4286: ATTENDEE:Mailto:B@example.com
4287: ATTENDEE:Mailto:C@example.com
4288: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4289: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4290: DTEND:19970701T200000
1900 found at line 4288:
4286: ATTENDEE:Mailto:B@example.com
4287: ATTENDEE:Mailto:C@example.com
4288: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4289: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4290: DTEND:19970701T200000
1900 found at line 4319:
4317:
4318:
4319: DTSTAMP:19970613T190030Z
4320: END:VFREEBUSY
4321: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 4319:
4317:
4318:
4319: DTSTAMP:19970613T190030Z
4320: END:VFREEBUSY
4321: END:VCALENDAR
1900 found at line 4359:
4357: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:B@example.fr
4358: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:c@example.jp
4359: DTSTAMP:19970613T190030Z
1900 found at line 4359:
4357: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:B@example.fr
4358: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:c@example.jp
4359: DTSTAMP:19970613T190030Z
4360: DTSTART;TZID=America-SanJose:19970701T140000
4361: DTEND;TZID=America-SanJose:19970701T150000
4360: DTSTART;TZID=America-SanJose:19970701T140000
4361: DTEND;TZID=America-SanJose:19970701T150000
1900 found at line 5193:
5191: to each of the start of each recurring instance. Hence, if th
5191(continued): e
5192: initial "VTODO" calendar component specifies a "DTSTART" prop
5192(continued): erty
5193: value of "19970701T190000Z" and a "DUE" property value of
5194: "19970801T190000Z" the interval of one day which is applied t
5194(continued): o each
5195: recurring instance of the "VTODO" calendar component to deter
5195(continued): mine the
1900 found at line 5193:
5191: to each of the start of each recurring instance. Hence, if th
5191(continued): e
5192: initial "VTODO" calendar component specifies a "DTSTART" prop
5192(continued): erty
5193: value of "19970701T190000Z" and a "DUE" property value of
5194: "19970801T190000Z" the interval of one day which is applied t
5194(continued): o each
5195: recurring instance of the "VTODO" calendar component to deter
5195(continued): mine the
1900 found at line 5194: 5192: initial "VTODO" calendar component specifies a "DTSTART" prop 5192(continued): erty 5193: value of "19970701T190000Z" and a "DUE" property value of 5194: "19970801T190000Z" the interval of one day which is applied t 5194(continued): o each 5195: recurring instance of the "VTODO" calendar component to deter 5195(continued): mine the 5196: "DUE" date of the instance.
第5194行中的1900:5192：初始“VTODO”日历组件指定了“DTSTART”prop 5192（续）：erty 5193：值“19970701T190000Z”和“到期”属性值5194:“19970801190000Z”应用于t 5194的一天间隔（续）：o每个5195：用于确定5195的“VTODO”日历组件的重复实例（续）：在5196：“到期”日期对该实例进行挖掘。
2000 found at line 3346:
3344: BEGIN:VEVENT
3345: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3346: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3347: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3348: SUMMARY:ST. PAUL SAINTS -VS- DULUTH-SUPERIOR DUKES
2000 found at line 3346:
3344: BEGIN:VEVENT
3345: ORGANIZER:mailto:a@example.com
3346: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3347: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3348: SUMMARY:ST. PAUL SAINTS -VS- DULUTH-SUPERIOR DUKES
2000 found at line 3437:
3435: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/America-Chicago
3436: BEGIN:STANDARD
3437: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3438: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3439: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3437:
3435: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/America-Chicago
3436: BEGIN:STANDARD
3437: DTSTART:19671029T020000
3438: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
3439: TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
2000 found at line 3444:
3442: END:STANDARD
3443: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3444: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3445: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
3446: TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
2000 found at line 3444:
3442: END:STANDARD
3443: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
3444: DTSTART:19870405T020000
3445: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
3446: TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
2000 found at line 3595: 3593: ATTENDEE;ROLE=NON-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com 3593(continued):
2000第3595行：3593：与会者；角色=非参与者；RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com3593（续）：
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
3597: SUMMARY:Conference
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
3597: SUMMARY:Conference
2000 found at line 3596:
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
3597: SUMMARY:Conference
3598: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
2000 found at line 3596:
3594: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
3595: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
3596: DTEND:19970701T2000000Z
3597: SUMMARY:Conference
3598: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
2000 found at line 3681:
3679: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3680: DTSTART:19970701T190000Z
3681: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3682: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
3683: LOCATION:Green Conference Room
2000 found at line 3681:
3679: ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:C@example.com
3680: DTSTART:19970701T190000Z
3681: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3682: SUMMARY:Discuss the Merits of the election results
3683: LOCATION:Green Conference Room
2000 found at line 3901:
3899: DELEGATED-FROM="Mailto:C@example.com":Mailto:E@example.com
3900: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3901: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3902: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3903: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
2000 found at line 3901:
3899: DELEGATED-FROM="Mailto:C@example.com":Mailto:E@example.com
3900: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3901: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3902: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3903: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
2000 found at line 3996:
3994: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3995: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3996: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3997: DTSTAMP:19970614T200000Z
3998: COMMENT:DELEGATE (ATTENDEE Mailto:E@example.com) DECLINED YOU
3998(continued): R
2000 found at line 3996:
3994: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
3995: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3996: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3997: DTSTAMP:19970614T200000Z
3998: COMMENT:DELEGATE (ATTENDEE Mailto:E@example.com) DECLINED YOU
3998(continued): R
2000 found at line 3997:
3995: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3996: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3997: DTSTAMP:19970614T200000Z
3998: COMMENT:DELEGATE (ATTENDEE Mailto:E@example.com) DECLINED YOU
3998(continued): R
3999: INVITATION
2000 found at line 3997:
3995: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
3996: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
3997: DTSTAMP:19970614T200000Z
3998: COMMENT:DELEGATE (ATTENDEE Mailto:E@example.com) DECLINED YOU
3998(continued): R
3999: INVITATION
2000 found at line 4158:
4156: RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
4157: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4158: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4159: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
4160: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
2000 found at line 4158:
4156: RSVP=FALSE:Mailto:E@example.com
4157: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4158: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4159: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
4160: SUMMARY:Phone Conference
2000 found at line 4194:
4192: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:D@example.com
4193: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4194: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4195: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
4196: RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY
2000 found at line 4194:
4192: ATTENDEE;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:Mailto:D@example.com
4193: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
4194: DTSTART:19970701T200000Z
4195: DTEND:19970701T203000Z
4196: RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY
2000 found at line 4233:
4231: DTEND:19980107T124200Z
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
2000 found at line 4233:
4231: DTEND:19980107T124200Z
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
2000 found at line 4234:
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
2000 found at line 4234:
4232: FREEBUSY:19980101T180000Z/19980101T190000Z
4233: FREEBUSY:19980103T020000Z/19980103T050000Z
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
2000 found at line 4236:
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
2000 found at line 4236:
4234: FREEBUSY:19980107T020000Z/19980107T050000Z
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
2000 found at line 4237:
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
4239: END:VFREEBUSY
2000 found at line 4237:
4235: FREEBUSY:19980113T000000Z/19980113T010000Z
4236: FREEBUSY:19980115T190000Z/19980115T200000Z
4237: FREEBUSY:19980115T220000Z/19980115T230000Z
4238: FREEBUSY:19980116T013000Z/19980116T043000Z
4239: END:VFREEBUSY
2000 found at line 4290:
4288: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4289: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4290: DTEND:19970701T200000
4291: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
4292: END:VFREEBUSY
2000 found at line 4290:
4288: DTSTAMP:19970613T190000Z
4289: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4290: DTEND:19970701T200000
4291: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
4292: END:VFREEBUSY
2000 found at line 4308:
4306: ATTENDEE:Mailto:B@example.com
4307: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4308: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
4309: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
4310: FREEBUSY:19970701T090000Z/PT1H,19970701T140000Z/PT30M
2000 found at line 4308:
4306: ATTENDEE:Mailto:B@example.com
4307: DTSTART:19970701T080000Z
4308: DTEND:19970701T200000Z
4309: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777@example.com
4310: FREEBUSY:19970701T090000Z/PT1H,19970701T140000Z/PT30M
2000 found at line 4340:
4338: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/America-SanJose
4339: BEGIN:STANDARD
4340: DTSTART:19671029T020000
4341: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
4342: TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
2000 found at line 4340:
4338: TZURL:http://zones.stds_r_us.net/tz/America-SanJose
4339: BEGIN:STANDARD
4340: DTSTART:19671029T020000
4341: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
4342: TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
2000 found at line 4347:
4345: END:STANDARD
4346: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
4347: DTSTART:19870405T020000
4348: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
4349: TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
2000 found at line 4347:
4345: END:STANDARD
4346: BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
4347: DTSTART:19870405T020000
4348: RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4
4349: TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
2000 found at line 4446:
4444: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4445: DTSTART:19970601T210000Z
4446: DTEND:19970601T220000Z
4447: LOCATION:Conference Call
4448: DTSTAMP:19970526T083000Z
2000 found at line 4446:
4444: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4445: DTSTART:19970601T210000Z
4446: DTEND:19970601T220000Z
4447: LOCATION:Conference Call
4448: DTSTAMP:19970526T083000Z
2000 found at line 4473:
4471: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4472: DTSTART:19970703T210000Z
4473: DTEND:19970703T220000Z
4474: LOCATION:Conference Call
4475: DTSTAMP:19970626T093000Z
2000 found at line 4473:
4471: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4472: DTSTART:19970703T210000Z
4473: DTEND:19970703T220000Z
4474: LOCATION:Conference Call
4475: DTSTAMP:19970626T093000Z
2000 found at line 4565:
4563: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4564: DTSTART:19970901T210000Z
4565: DTEND:19970901T220000Z
4566: LOCATION:Building 32, Microsoft, Seattle, WA
4567: DTSTAMP:19970526T083000Z
2000 found at line 4565:
4563: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4564: DTSTART:19970901T210000Z
4565: DTEND:19970901T220000Z
4566: LOCATION:Building 32, Microsoft, Seattle, WA
4567: DTSTAMP:19970526T083000Z
2000 found at line 4601:
4599: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4600: DTSTART:19970715T210000Z
4601: DTEND:19970715T220000Z
4602: LOCATION:Conference Call
4603: DTSTAMP:19970629T093000Z
2000 found at line 4601:
4599: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4600: DTSTART:19970715T210000Z
4601: DTEND:19970715T220000Z
4602: LOCATION:Conference Call
4603: DTSTAMP:19970629T093000Z
2000 found at line 4631:
4629: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4630: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4631: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4632: LOCATION:The White Room
4633: DTSTAMP:19980301T093000Z
2000 found at line 4631:
4629: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4630: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4631: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4632: LOCATION:The White Room
4633: DTSTAMP:19980301T093000Z
2000 found at line 4664:
4662: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4663: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4664: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4665: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4666: LOCATION:The Usual conference room
2000 found at line 4664:
4662: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4663: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4664: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4665: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4666: LOCATION:The Usual conference room
2000 found at line 4690:
4688: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4689: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4690: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4691: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4692: LOCATION:The White Room
2000 found at line 4690:
4688: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4689: DTSTART:19980303T210000Z
4690: DTEND:19980303T220000Z
4691: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4692: LOCATION:The White Room
2000 found at line 4730:
4728: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4729: DTSTART:19980304T180000Z
4730: DTEND:19980304T200000Z
4731: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4732: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4730:
4728: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4729: DTSTART:19980304T180000Z
4730: DTEND:19980304T200000Z
4731: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4732: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4781:
4779: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4780: DTSTART:19980315T180000Z
4781: DTEND:19980315T200000Z
4782: DTSTAMP:19980307T193000Z
4783: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4781:
4779: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4780: DTSTART:19980315T180000Z
4781: DTEND:19980315T200000Z
4782: DTSTAMP:19980307T193000Z
4783: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4811:
4809: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4810: DTSTART:19980304T180000Z
4811: DTEND:19980304T200000Z
4812: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4813: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4811:
4809: SUMMARY:Review Accounts
4810: DTSTART:19980304T180000Z
4811: DTEND:19980304T200000Z
4812: DTSTAMP:19980303T193000Z
4813: LOCATION:Conference Room A
2000 found at line 4863:
4861: CLASS:PUBLIC
4862: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4863: DTSTART:19970715T220000Z
4864: DTEND:19970715T230000Z
4865: LOCATION:Conference Call
2000 found at line 4863:
4861: CLASS:PUBLIC
4862: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4863: DTSTART:19970715T220000Z
4864: DTEND:19970715T230000Z
4865: LOCATION:Conference Call
2000 found at line 4903:
4901: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4902: DTSTART:19970601T210000Z
4903: DTEND:19970601T220000Z
4904: DTSTAMP:19970602T094000Z
4905: LOCATION:Conference Call
2000 found at line 4903:
4901: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
4902: DTSTART:19970601T210000Z
4903: DTEND:19970601T220000Z
4904: DTSTAMP:19970602T094000Z
4905: LOCATION:Conference Call
2000 found at line 5018:
5016: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777-00@example.com
5017: SEQUENCE:0
5018: DTSTAMP:19970717T200000Z
5019: STATUS:Needs Action
5020: END:VTODO
2000 found at line 5018:
5016: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777-00@example.com
5017: SEQUENCE:0
5018: DTSTAMP:19970717T200000Z
5019: STATUS:Needs Action
5020: END:VTODO
2000 found at line 5179:
5177: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777-00@example.com
5178: SEQUENCE:0
5179: DTSTAMP:19970717T200000Z
5180: STATUS:NEEDS ACTION
5181: PRIORITY:1
2000 found at line 5179:
5177: UID:calsrv.example.com-873970198738777-00@example.com
5178: SEQUENCE:0
5179: DTSTAMP:19970717T200000Z
5180: STATUS:NEEDS ACTION
5181: PRIORITY:1
2000 found at line 5236:
5234: VERSION:2.0
5235: BEGIN:VJOURNAL
5236: DTSTART:19971002T200000Z
5237: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:A@Example.com
5238: SUMMARY:Phone conference minutes
2000 found at line 5236:
5234: VERSION:2.0
5235: BEGIN:VJOURNAL
5236: DTSTART:19971002T200000Z
5237: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:A@Example.com
5238: SUMMARY:Phone conference minutes
2000 found at line 5358:
5356: SEQUENCE:3
5357: RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY
5358: RDATE;VALUE=PERIOD:19970819T210000Z/199700819T220000Z
5359: ORGANIZER:Mailto:A@example.com
5360: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED:Mailto:A@example.com
2000 found at line 5358:
5356: SEQUENCE:3
5357: RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY
5358: RDATE;VALUE=PERIOD:19970819T210000Z/199700819T220000Z
5359: ORGANIZER:Mailto:A@example.com
5360: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED:Mailto:A@example.com
2000 found at line 5365:
5363: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
5364: DTSTART:19970801T210000Z
5365: DTEND:19970801T220000Z
5366: RECURRENCE-ID:19970809T210000Z
5367: DTSTAMP:19970726T083000
2000 found at line 5365:
5363: SUMMARY:IETF Calendaring Working Group Meeting
5364: DTSTART:19970801T210000Z
5365: DTEND:19970801T220000Z
5366: RECURRENCE-ID:19970809T210000Z
5367: DTSTAMP:19970726T083000
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2447.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 421:
419: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:sman@netscape.com
419(continued):
420: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES:mailto:stevesil@microsoft.com
421: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
422: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
423: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2447.txt +=+=+=+=+=
1900 found at line 421:
419: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:sman@netscape.com
419(continued):
420: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES:mailto:stevesil@microsoft.com
421: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
422: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
423: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
1900 found at line 475:
473: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
474: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
475: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
476: DTSTART:19970701T170000Z
477: DTEND:19970701T173000Z
1900 found at line 475:
473: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
474: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
475: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
476: DTSTART:19970701T170000Z
477: DTEND:19970701T173000Z
1900 found at line 523:
521: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
522: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
523: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
524: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
525: DTEND:19970701T183000Z
1900 found at line 523:
521: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
522: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
523: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
524: DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
525: DTEND:19970701T183000Z
1900 found at line 584:
582: BEGIN:VEVENT
583: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:FOO1@EXAMPLE.COM
584: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
585: DTSTART:19970715T150000Z
586: DTEND:19970715T230000Z
1900 found at line 584:
582: BEGIN:VEVENT
583: ORGANIZER:MAILTO:FOO1@EXAMPLE.COM
584: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
585: DTSTART:19970715T150000Z
586: DTEND:19970715T230000Z
1900 found at line 631:
629: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
630: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
631: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
632: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
633: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
1900 found at line 631:
629: ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
630: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
631: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
632: DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
633: DTEND:19970701T230000Z
1900 found at line 722:
720: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
721: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo3@example.com
722: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
723: DTSTART:19970621T170000Z
724: DTEND:199706211T173000Z
1900 found at line 722:
720: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
721: ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo3@example.com
722: DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
723: DTSTART:19970621T170000Z
724: DTEND:199706211T173000Z
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2455.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2-digit found at line 7166: 7164: 7165: Since this object incorporates the Year 2000-unfriendl 7165(continued): y 7166: 2-digit year specified in SMI for the LAST-UPDATED fie 7166(continued): ld, and 7167: 7168:
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=文件rfc2455.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=+=第7166行找到的2位数字：因为此对象包含SMI中为上次更新的fie 7166指定的2000年unfriendl 7165（续）：y 7166:2位数字年份（续）：ld和7167:7168:
2000 found at line 7165: 7163: determining the level of the MIB supported by an agent 7163(continued): .
2000第7165行：7163：确定代理7163支持的MIB级别（续）：。
7164: 7165: Since this object incorporates the Year 2000-unfriendl 7165(continued): y 7166: 2-digit year specified in SMI for the LAST-UPDATED fie 7166(continued): ld, and 7167:
7164:7165:由于此对象包含2000年unfriendl 7165（续）：y 7166:SMI中为最后更新的fie 7166（续）指定的两位数年份：ld和7167：
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2461.txt +=+=+=+=+= 2000 found at line 2347: 2345: consecutive advertisements. 2346: 2347: Default: 2592000 seconds (30 days), 2347(continued): fixed 2348: (i.e., stays the same in consecutiv 2348(continued): e 2349: advertisements).
+=+=+=+=+=+==文件rfc2461.txt+=+=+=+=+=+=2000在第2347行：2345:连续广告中找到。2346:2347:默认值：2592000秒（30天），2347（续）：固定2348:（即，在连续2348中保持不变（续）：e 2349:广告）。
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2470.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 65:
63: rely on manual configuration or router advertisements [DISC]
63(continued): to
64: determine actual MTU sizes. Common default values include
65: approximately 2000, 4000, and 8000 octets.
66:
67: In the absence of any other information, an implementation sh
67(continued): ould use
+=+=+=+=+= File rfc2470.txt +=+=+=+=+=
2000 found at line 65:
63: rely on manual configuration or router advertisements [DISC]
63(continued): to
64: determine actual MTU sizes. Common default values include
65: approximately 2000, 4000, and 8000 octets.
66:
67: In the absence of any other information, an implementation sh
67(continued): ould use
Appendix D: Discussion of HTTP 1.0 Issues
附录D：HTTP 1.0问题的讨论
HTTP:
HTTP:
The main IETF standards-track document on the HTTP protocol is RFC2068 on HTTP 1.1. It notes that historically three different date formats have been used, and that one of them uses a two-digit year field. In section 3.3.1 it requires HTTP 1.1 implementations to generate this RFC1123 format:
HTTP协议上的主要IETF标准跟踪文档是HTTP 1.1上的RFC2068。它指出，历史上使用过三种不同的日期格式，其中一种使用两位数的年份字段。在第3.3.1节中，需要HTTP 1.1实现来生成此RFC1123格式：
Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
instead of this RFC850 format:
代替此RFC850格式：
Sunday, 06-Nov-94 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 850, obsoleted by RFC 1036
1994年11月6日星期日08:49:37 GMT；RFC 850，被RFC 1036淘汰
Unfortunately, many existing servers, serving on the order of one fifth of the current HTTP traffic, send dates in the ambiguous RFC850 format.
不幸的是，许多现有服务器，服务于当前HTTP流量的五分之一，以不明确的RFC850格式发送日期。
Section 19.3 of the RFC2068 says this:
RFC2068第19.3节规定：
o HTTP/1.1 clients and caches should assume that an RFC-850 date which appears to be more than 50 years in the future is in fact in the past (this helps solve the "year 2000" problem).
o HTTP/1.1客户端和缓存应假定RFC-850日期（看起来在未来超过50年）实际上已经过去（这有助于解决“2000年”问题）。
This avoids a "stale cache" problem, which would cause the user to see out-of-date data.
这避免了“过时缓存”问题，这将导致用户看到过期数据。
But to avoid unnecessary delays and bandwidth indicated in Scenario 2 below, this should be extended to say that a date which appears to be more than 50 years in the past may be assumed to be in the future, if a future date is legal for that field.
但是，为了避免下文场景2中所述的不必要的延迟和带宽，应将其延长，以表示如果未来日期对该领域是合法的，则可以假设过去似乎超过50年的日期是在未来。
Scenario 3 indicates that servers may also want to follow these rules.
场景3表明服务器可能也希望遵循这些规则。
Here is some more background and justification for these arguments.
下面是这些论点的更多背景和理由。
The following headers use full dates:
以下标题使用完整日期：
HTTP/1.0:
Date:
Expires: # can be in the future
If-Modified-Since: # required to be in the past
Last-Modified: # required to be in the past
Retry-After: # can be in the future, also takes
# relative time - number of seconds
HTTP/1.0:
Date:
Expires: # can be in the future
If-Modified-Since: # required to be in the past
Last-Modified: # required to be in the past
Retry-After: # can be in the future, also takes
# relative time - number of seconds
HTTP/1.1:
If-Range:
If-Unmodified-Since: # required to be in the past
HTTP/1.1:
If-Range:
If-Unmodified-Since: # required to be in the past
Note that clock skew between hosts can lead to confusion here - see the RFC for details.
请注意，主机之间的时钟偏差可能会导致此处的混乱-有关详细信息，请参阅RFC。
Here are some scenarios of the implications of RFC850 dates, which include stale caches, unnecessary requests for things, which are validly cached, delays for the user, extra bandwidth, and presenting incorrect information to the user.
以下是RFC850日期含义的一些场景，其中包括过时的缓存、对有效缓存的事物的不必要请求、用户延迟、额外带宽以及向用户呈现错误信息。
Some cases involve comparisons with the current time, and others may involve comparisons between dates from different sources. The abbreviation "/99" is used to imply an RFC850 date with the value "99" for the year.
有些情况涉及与当前时间的比较，另一些情况可能涉及来自不同来源的日期之间的比较。缩写“/99”用于表示RFC850日期，该日期的值为“99”。
RFC850 date from server
来自服务器的RFC850日期
Scenario 1: If a client gets an Expires /99 date after the year 2000, it should interpret it as 1999, to avoid ending up with a stale cache entry.
场景1：如果客户机在2000年之后获得Expires/99日期，则应将其解释为1999年，以避免以过时的缓存条目结束。
This is as already specified in RFC2068.
这已在RFC2068中规定。
Scenario 2: If a client gets an Expires /00 date before the year 2000, and subsequently is faced with a choice to either retrieve the document from its cache or look for an updated copy, it may interpret it as the year 2000, to avoid the unnecessary delay and bandwidth of an extra request.
场景2：如果客户机在2000年之前获得Expires/00日期，并且随后面临从其缓存检索文档或查找更新副本的选择，则它可能会将其解释为2000年，以避免额外请求的不必要延迟和带宽。
RFC850 date from client
来自客户的RFC850日期
Scenario 3: If a server gets an If-Modified-Since /99 date from a client after the year 2000, it should interpret it as 1999 when comparing with the local modification date, in order to possibly avoid sending a full GET response rather than a HEAD response.
场景3：如果服务器从2000年之后的客户机获得一个If-Modified-Since/99日期，那么与本地修改日期相比，它应该将其解释为1999年，以避免发送完整的GET响应而不是HEAD响应。
Note that an If-Modified-Since header must never be in the future.
请注意，If-Modified-Since标头以后绝对不能出现。
Full Copyright Statement
完整版权声明
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
版权所有（C）互联网协会（1999年）。版权所有。
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
本文件及其译本可复制并提供给他人，对其进行评论或解释或协助其实施的衍生作品可全部或部分编制、复制、出版和分发，不受任何限制，前提是上述版权声明和本段包含在所有此类副本和衍生作品中。但是，不得以任何方式修改本文件本身，例如删除版权通知或对互联网协会或其他互联网组织的引用，除非出于制定互联网标准的需要，在这种情况下，必须遵循互联网标准过程中定义的版权程序，或根据需要将其翻译成英语以外的其他语言。
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
上述授予的有限许可是永久性的，互联网协会或其继承人或受让人不会撤销。
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
本文件和其中包含的信息是按“原样”提供的，互联网协会和互联网工程任务组否认所有明示或暗示的保证，包括但不限于任何保证，即使用本文中的信息不会侵犯任何权利，或对适销性或特定用途适用性的任何默示保证。
Acknowledgement
确认
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.
RFC编辑功能的资金目前由互联网协会提供。